Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Lumpkin Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$4.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
209
Grants FY2024still arriving
21
States reached
$630k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Environment$4.5MEducation$3.4MPhilanthropy$3.3MFood & Nutrition$1.8MRecreation & Sports$817kCommunity Improvement$755kHealth$679kReligion$646kOther$0
02FY2024 · 209 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k112 grants · $263k
  • $10k–50k78 grants · $1.6M
  • $50k–250k17 grants · $1.2M
  • $250k+2 grants · $963k
$6,000
Median grant
21
States reached
$40M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FOREFRONT$630,000
MATTOON SPORTS COMPLEX INC$333,333
EASTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY$138,940
COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF CHICAGO$125,000
THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY$85,000
FAITH IN PLACE$82,500
AFTER SCHOOL MATTERS$70,000
PRAIRIE RIVERS NETWORK$65,000
THE LAND CONNECTION$65,000
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL EDUCATION FUND$60,000
SAVANNA INSTITUTE$55,000
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS URBANA-CHAMPAIGN$52,902
HEALTHY SCHOOLS CAMPAIGN$52,500
HEART OF ILLINOIS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$52,500
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY$50,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $329k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%LYMELIGHT FOUNDATION: $500 → 7%CROSSROADS CHRISTIAN COUNSELING: $500 → 11%THINK REGENERATION NFP: $25k → 9%MERCY CHEFS: $6k → 20%INTERNET ARCHIVE: $500 → 10%CROSSROADS CHRISTIAN COUNSELING: $500 → 11%MERCY CHEFS: $1k → 20%MERCY CHEFS: $1k → 20%JOES PLACE CORPORATION: $1k → 11%JUVENILE PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION: $15k → 14%JOES PLACE CORPORATION: $1k → 11%CHARITY WATER: $10k → 17%HOPE OF EAST CENTRAL ILLINOIS: $500 → 18%LARKIN STREET YOUTH SERVICES: $500 → 10%WHY NOT CARE INC: $1k → 17%CENTER FOR DOMESTIC PEACE: $2k → 8%MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION GREATER BAY AREA: $3k → 10%CENTER FOR DOMESTIC PEACE: $2k → 8%CENTER FOR DOMESTIC PEACE: $2k → 8%CENTER FOR DOMESTIC PEACE: $1k → 8%HEARTLAND HUMAN CARE SERVICES INC: $10k → 14%MATTOON AREA FAMILY YMCA: $20k → 18%TRINITY UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST CHILD CARE CENTERS INC: $10k → 14%MATTOON AREA FAMILY YMCA: $20k → 18%MATTOON AREA FAMILY YMCA: $20k → 18%MATTOON AREA FAMILY YMCA: $20k → 18%MATTOON AREA FAMILY YMCA: $20k → 18%GADS HILL CENTER: $1k → 14%BRAVE SPACE ALLIANCE: $10k → 14%ONE FAMILY ILLINOIS: $18k → 14%SOS CHILDREN'S VILLAGES ILLINOIS: $10k → 14%HEARTLAND HUMAN CARE SERVICES: $24k → 14%HEARTLAND HUMAN CARE SERVICES: $20k → 14%HEARTLAND HUMAN CARE SERVICES: $13k → 14%HEARTLAND HUMAN CARE SERVICES: $10k → 14%REFUGEE EDUCATION AND ADVENTURE CHALLENGE: $15k → 14%REFUGEE EDUCATION AND ADVENTURE CHALLENGE: $10k → 14%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $500 → 14%NEW MOMS INC: $3k → 14%NEW MOMS INC: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
OR
WY
IA
IN
OH
PA
CT
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
VA
MD
DE
NM
KS
DC
HI
MS
AL
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$15M · 204 repeat orgs$2.8M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +27% since the first grant, against +23% for the ones you funded once.

204 repeat relationships — 151 still active in FY2024, 53 since wound down; 51 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

204
184

Total granted

$15M
$2.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+23%

Still filing today

91%
61%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $679k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentEducationFood & NutritionArts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • F
    FOREFRONT
    5× · 2020–2024 · $2.4M · revenue +67%
  • EI
    Eastern Illinois University Foundation
    3× · 2020–2023 · $1.7M · revenue +53%
  • FI
    FAITH IN PLACE
    5× · 2020–2024 · $452k · revenue +67%

Funded once

  • MC
    MATTOON COMMUNITY UNIT SCHOOL DISTRICT #2
    one grant, 2022 · $493k
  • WH
    WESTSIDE HEALTH AUTHORITYgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $160k · revenue +44%
  • THE CONSERVATION FUND A NONPROFIT CORPORATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $150k · revenue +42%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Common Future

Common future is a network of pioneering leaders across the u.s. and canada who work deeply within their communities to create alternative approaches to business, philanthropy, and investing. we envision an economy that has transitioned…

Community Improvement
2
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
3
Climate Foundation

To research and develop healthy climate solutions comprising global food security, ecosystem regeneration and carbon balance in seas and soils.

Science & Tech
4
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
5
American Flood Coalition Inc

To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.

Environment
6
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
7
Foundation for Food and Agriculture Research

Foundation for food and agriculture research connects funders, researchers and farmers through public-private partnerships to support audacious research addressing the biggest food and agriculture challenges.

Food & Nutrition
8
Center for International Environmental Law Inc

To investigate, research, write, publish, present conferences and teach with respect to global, regional, transboundary, and comparative environmental issues and to make the findings from such activities available to the general public; to…

International
9
Environment Next Inc

Environment next supports individuals, nonprofits and businesses around the world on solutions to complex climate issues. we provide leadership, outreach and communication support, grants, and investments to empower leaders and their ideas…

Environment
10
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
11
New Roots Institute

New Roots Institute is a nonprofit empowering the next generation with knowledge and training to end factory farming.

Food & Nutrition
12
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Land Connection Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Center for Responsible Science. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyHealth Access Advocacy and …Immigrant Worker SupportPolicy Research and AdvocacyCommunity Arts CentersChristian Missionary Organi…Christian Youth CampsYouth Sports ProgramsPregnancy Support ServicesAddiction Recovery ServicesPublic Library OperationsDomestic Violence ServicesCancer Support ServicesOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Child Abuse Advocacy Servic…Local History MuseumsLgbtq+ Community SupportYouth Development ServicesLocal Food System Organizat…Animal Rescue and ShelterIndependent K-12 SchoolsSchool District FoundationsAffordable Housing Developm…Food Banks and PantriesUnited Way AffiliatesCommunity FoundationsCommunity FoundationsEnvironmental Conservation …Community College Foundatio…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%5%<5yr13%7%5–10yr18%21%10–20yr15%25%20–35yr14%28%35–55yr22%16%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%5%<5yr13%7%5–10yr18%14%10–20yr15%21%20–35yr14%32%35–55yr22%21%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.5% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.5%2/383
the rest of the field
12%
8,890/71,976

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

361 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 361 of the 458 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
82
Early backer (in before they grew)
355/361
Grantees still filing
244/361
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MATTOON COMMUNITY UNIT SCHOOL DISTRICT #2 — $492,974 · OtherMATTOON COMMUNITY UNIT SCHOOL DISTR…EASTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY — $310,664 · OtherEASTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITYIndividual grant recipient — $210,750 · Other+103 more — $4,445,480 · Other+103 morePRAIRIE RIVERS NETWORK — $387,250 · EnvironmentPRAIRIE RIVERS NETWOR…GRAND PRAIRIE FRIENDS — $359,529 · EnvironmentGRAND PRAIRIE FRIENDSSAVANNA INSTITUTE — $355,000 · EnvironmentSAVANNA INSTITUTEHealthy Schools Campaign — $282,500 · EnvironmentHealthy Schools Campa…ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL EDUCATION — $225,000 · EnvironmentILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTA…EVERGREEN CLIMATE INNOVATIONS — $200,000 · EnvironmentEVERGREEN CLIMATE INN…AMERICAN RIVERS INC — $170,000 · EnvironmentTHE CONSERVATION FUND A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $150,000 · EnvironmentSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION — $135,000 · EnvironmentSEVEN GENERATIONS AHEAD — $120,000 · Environment+31 more — $880,625 · Environment+31 moreFOREFRONT — $2,417,849 · PhilanthropyFOREFRONTSOUTHEASTERN ILLINOIS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $179,478 · PhilanthropySOUTHEASTERN ILLINOI…+11 more — $526,250 · Philanthropy+11 moreEastern Illinois University Foundation — $1,742,500 · EducationEastern Illinois…THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $185,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRU…GARDENEERS — $180,000 · EducationGARDENEERSAFTER SCHOOL MATTERS INC — $140,000 · EducationAFTER SCHOOL MAT…OPEN MARKETS INSTITUTE — $102,000 · Education+5 more — $174,250 · Education+5 moreMATTOON SPORTS COMPLEX INC — $666,667 · Community ImprovementMOVEMENT STRATEGY CENTER — $130,000 · Community ImprovementTHE DELTA INSTITUTE — $110,000 · Community ImprovementRural Coalition — $100,000 · Community ImprovementNEIGHBORSPACE — $90,100 · Community ImprovementNORTH LAKE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INC — $84,000 · Community ImprovementGarfield Park Community Council — $60,000 · Community ImprovementTRAIL RECREATION EFFINGHAM COUNTY — $50,000 · Community Improvement+3 more — $50,000 · Community ImprovementTHE LAND CONNECTION FOUNDATION INC — $252,052 · Food & NutritionILLINOIS STEWARDSHIP ALLIANCE — $199,602 · Food & NutritionSOLA GRATIA FARM — $183,000 · Food & NutritionSUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE AND FOOD SYSTEMS FUNDERS — $170,000 · Food & NutritionREGENERATIVE AGRICULTURE FOUNDATION — $140,000 · Food & NutritionAMERICAN FARMLAND TRUST — $114,991 · Food & NutritionFOOD AND ENVIRONMENT REPORTING NETWORK INC — $50,000 · Food & NutritionJUST ROOTS JUST ROOTS CHICAGO — $47,500 · Food & Nutrition+7 more — $159,500 · Food & NutritionFAITH IN PLACE — $451,695 · ReligionFit-2-Serve Inc — $94,200 · ReligionCANAL ALLIANCE — $22,500 · Religion+1 more — $15,000 · Religion
Other$5,459,868Environment$3,264,904Philanthropy$3,123,577Education$2,523,750Community Improvement$1,340,767Food & Nutrition$1,316,645Religion$583,395

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFOREFRONT — $2,417,849 over 5y, 6.9% of budgetEastern Illinois University Foundation — $1,742,500 over 3y, 18% of budgetMATTOON SPORTS COMPLEX INC — $666,667 over 2y, 6.4% of budgetFAITH IN PLACE — $451,695 over 5y, 4.0% of budgetPRAIRIE RIVERS NETWORK — $387,250 over 5y, 7.9% of budgetGRAND PRAIRIE FRIENDS — $359,529 over 4y, 32% of budgetSAVANNA INSTITUTE — $355,000 over 5y, 4.5% of budgetHealthy Schools Campaign — $282,500 over 5y, 3.2% of budgetTHE LAND CONNECTION FOUNDATION INC — $252,052 over 5y, 7.6% of budgetILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL EDUCATION — $225,000 over 5y, 4.3% of budgetEVERGREEN CLIMATE INNOVATIONS — $200,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetILLINOIS STEWARDSHIP ALLIANCE — $199,602 over 5y, 5.3% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $185,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOLA GRATIA FARM — $183,000 over 5y, 9.0% of budgetTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC — $180,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetGARDENEERS — $180,000 over 5y, 6.0% of budgetSOUTHEASTERN ILLINOIS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $179,478 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetDOUGLAS-HART FOUNDATION — $172,550 over 4y, 16% of budgetSUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE AND FOOD SYSTEMS FUNDERS — $170,000 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetAMERICAN RIVERS INC — $170,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $165,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMIDWEST CENTER FOR INVESTIGATIVE REPORTING INC — $160,050 over 5y, 9.0% of budgetWESTSIDE HEALTH AUTHORITY — $159,903 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetTHE CONSERVATION FUND A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $150,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetREGENERATIVE AGRICULTURE FOUNDATION — $140,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetCENTER FOR RURAL AFFAIRS — $140,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetAFTER SCHOOL MATTERS INC — $140,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetThe Land Institute — $136,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION — $135,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMOVEMENT STRATEGY CENTER — $130,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF CHICAGO — $125,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetSARAH BUSH LINCOLN HEALTH FOUNDATION — $121,500 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetSEVEN GENERATIONS AHEAD — $120,000 over 5y, 4.1% of budgetSTATE INNOVATION EXCHANGE — $115,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN FARMLAND TRUST — $114,991 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE DELTA INSTITUTE — $110,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetOPENLANDS — $103,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetOPEN MARKETS INSTITUTE — $102,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetRural Coalition — $100,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetLINCOLN LOG CABIN FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 2y, 30% of budgetMATTOON AREA FAMILY YMCA CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION — $100,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetNational Save The Family Farm Coalition — $100,000 over 5y, 5.0% of budgetTHE CHICAGO INNOVATION FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 3y, 4.5% of budgetSTAR FARM CHICAGO — $97,000 over 5y, 5.8% of budgetURBAN FOREST CARBON REGISTRY — $95,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetOAK PARK-RIVER FOREST COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $95,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetFit-2-Serve Inc — $94,200 over 5y, 25% of budgetNEIGHBORSPACE — $90,100 over 4y, 1.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Builders Vision FoundationIL67.6× affinity36 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Builders Vision Foundation · Forefront · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Southeastern Illinois Community Foundation · Walter S Mander Foundation · Grand Victoria Foundation · United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · Robert R McCormick Foundation · Patagoniaorg · Clif Family Foundation · Marin Community Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Lumpkin Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 80%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 7%
  • Community Action Inc52% of income from government
  • Sea Education Association Inc12% of income from government
  • Center for Ecotechnology Inc9% of income from government
  • Friends of Ambler Farm Inc7% of income from government
  • Double Edge Theatre Productions Inc2% of income from government
  • Wilton Historical Society Inc1% of income from government
  • Wellesley College1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
59report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Lumpkin Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Lumpkin Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 458 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph