· Private foundation
The Cleveland-Cliffs Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k58 grants · $208k
- $10k–50k80 grants · $1.4M
- $50k–250k13 grants · $941k
- $250k+3 grants · $1.3M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| COLLEGE NOW GREATER CLEVELAND | $490,000 |
| NATIONAL FISH AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION | $400,000 |
| American Online Giving Foundation | $369,388 |
| DUNELAND YMCA INC | $125,000 |
| GREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK | $100,500 |
| CLEVELAND CLINIC FDN PHILANTHROP | $100,000 |
| ASM MATERIALS EDUCATION FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
| YMCA OF MARQUETTE COUNTY | $75,000 |
| ATRIUM MEDICAL CTR FOUNDATION | $75,000 |
| GREAT LAKES HISTORICAL SOCIETY | $62,500 |
| FOOD BANK OF NORTHWEST INDIANA | $52,500 |
| DEARBORN EDUCATION FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS | $50,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF NORTHWEST INDIANA | $50,000 |
| INDIANA DUNES ENVIRONMENTAL LEARNING CENTER INC | $50,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $1.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 49% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +15% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.
189 repeat relationships — 106 still active in FY2025, 83 since wound down; 39 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $438k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NFNATIONAL FISH AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION4× · 2021–2025 · $2.7M · revenue +35%
- CNCOLLEGE NOW GREATER CLEVELAND INC5× · 2021–2025 · $1.5M · revenue +109%
- FBFOOD BANK OF NORTHWEST INDIANA INC5× · 2021–2025 · $718k · revenue +4%
Funded once
- NFNATIONAL FISH AND WILDLIFEone grant, 2024 · $800k
- BMBenevity - MGAmerican Online Giving Foundationone grant, 2022 · $366k
- UWUnited Way of Greater Cincinnatione grant, 2021 · $194k · revenue +3%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
United way of central ohio is the local organization that harnesses the power of communities working together - people, nonprofits, businesses and government - to create a stronger, more equitable central ohio. see schedule o.we do this…
Greater cleveland volunteers enriches the community and indivuduals through volunteer service. volunteers age 18 and older are recruited and placed in the agency's programs or referred to local nonprofit or public organizations to help…
Advancing a thriving central ohio commmunity by serving as a catalyst for all businesses to grow and flourish. our mission pillars are connections, government relations, strategic business solutions and talent/workforce.
To strengthen the capacity of United Ways across Ohio and to advance the common good for Ohioans.
Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…
The mission of great lakes community action partnership is to create partnerships and opportunites to help individuals, families and communities thrive.
Global cleveland is dedicated to growing northeast ohio's economy by welcoming and connecting international people to opportunities and fostering a more inviting community for those seeking a place to call home.
United way of bucks county creates opportunities for quality education, financial stability, and good health to ensure real, lasting change for individuals and our communities.
At united way of north central ohio, we bring people, organizations, and resources together to create solutions that improve the lives of every person in every community in our region.
To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.
To lead and equip ohio philanthropy to be effective partners for change in our communities.
Uniting our community to empower individuals and families to thrive.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Greater Cleveland and the most unlike its peers is Jim Gillach Memorial Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.5% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
339 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 339 of the 560 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NATIONAL FISH AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF BREAKTHROUGH SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds COLLEGE NOW GREATER CLEVELAND INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MIDDLETOWN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FOOD BANK OF NORTHWEST INDIANA INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF NORTHWEST INDIANA INC ↗
- Who funds GREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds DUNELAND YMCA INC ↗
- Who funds GOLDEN BEAR FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER CLEVELAND ↗
- Who funds USS CLEVELAND LEGACY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MAUMEE VALLEY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
- Who funds MANUFACTURING ADVOCACY & GROWTH NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds THE GREAT LAKES HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds INDIANA DUNES ENVIRONMENTAL LEARNING CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ASM MATERIALS EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Second Harvest Northland ↗
- Who funds DEARBORN EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Playhouse Square Foundation ↗
- Who funds United Way of Greater Cincinnati ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF TOLEDO AND THE TOLEDO NEWSBOYS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds ATRIUM MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ROCK RIDGE YOUTH HOCKEY ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds SCIENCE OLYMPIAD INC ↗
- Who funds THE LIGHTHOUSE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF NORTHEAST OHIO ↗
- Who funds CHALLENGER LEARNING CENTER OF NORTHWEST INDIANA INC ↗
- Who funds FIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY ↗
- Who funds THE UNITED WAY OF SOUTHWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA ↗
- Who funds METROPARKS TOLEDO FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: John W Anderson Foundation · Nisource Charitable Foundation · Porter County Community Foundation Inc · Duluth-Superior Area Community Foundation · Legacy Foundation Inc · Minnesota Power Foundation · The Cleveland Foundation · The Westfield Insurance Foundation · First Financial Foundation · The Reinberger Foundation · The Char and Chuck Fowler Family Foundation · The George Gund Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Cleveland-Cliffs Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- City Year Inc — 11% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Cleveland-Cliffs Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Cleveland-Cliffs Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.