· Private foundation
Nisource Charitable Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k525 grants · $1.4M
- $10k–50k137 grants · $2.5M
- $50k–250k19 grants · $1.1M
- $250k+2 grants · $2.4M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ESSEX COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $2,100,000 |
| INDIANA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION | $340,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL OHIO | $100,000 |
| 2 HYPE FOUNDATION | $78,000 |
| URBAN LEAGUE OF NORTHWEST INDIANA INC | $74,000 |
| AMERICAN RED CROSS | $66,440 |
| STAR HOUSE FOUNDATION | $60,000 |
| NATIONAL MERIT SCHOLARSHIP CORP | $58,960 |
| LIFECARE ALLIANCE | $57,500 |
| AMERICAN RED CROSS | $55,420 |
| CHILDREN'S HUNGER ALLIANCE | $55,000 |
| RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE | $51,200 |
| THE TRUSTEES OF PURDUE UNIVERSITY | $50,000 |
| SERVING OUR NEIGHBORS MINISTRIES INC | $50,000 |
| MID OHIO FOOD BANK | $50,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $2.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 79% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.
956 repeat relationships — 465 still active in FY2024, 491 since wound down; 152 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $935k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NMNational Merit Scholarship Corporation7× · 2017–2024 · $479k · revenue +10%
- ULURBAN LEAGUE OF NW INDIANA INC6× · 2018–2024 · $332k · revenue +137%
- ANAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches4× · 2017–2024 · $311k · revenue +46%
Funded once
- ARAMERICAN RED CROSS - INDIANAPOLISone grant, 2020 · $400k
- IEINDIANA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FOUNDAITONone grant, 2022 · $190k
- UWUNITED WAY - COLUMBUSone grant, 2020 · $151k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
United way of bucks county creates opportunities for quality education, financial stability, and good health to ensure real, lasting change for individuals and our communities.
The mission of the united way of indiana county is to meet critical needs and improve the quality of life throughout indiana county by inspiring and uniting its residents.
Advancing a thriving central ohio commmunity by serving as a catalyst for all businesses to grow and flourish. our mission pillars are connections, government relations, strategic business solutions and talent/workforce.
Greater cleveland volunteers enriches the community and indivuduals through volunteer service. volunteers age 18 and older are recruited and placed in the agency's programs or referred to local nonprofit or public organizations to help…
Connect resources to important community needs. the organization focuses on the most important human service needs facing the community and uses a variety of methods to communicate with community members in order to priortize the issues…
To positively impact the lives of those in our community by assessing needs, uniting partner organizations, agencies, and volunteers, and devoting our financial resources and efforts to the most critical needs.
To strengthen the capacity of United Ways across Ohio and to advance the common good for Ohioans.
To reduce the conditions of poverty by providing comprehensive services to improve lives.to accomplish the mission, hhwp cac will collect and analyze data on the nature of poverty and the existing resources in the area. hhwp cac will…
We focus on three primary needs in our community: investing in children and youth, promoting health and independence, and helping families in crisis.
In order to mobilize community resources to help people measurably improve their lives - we work collaboratively with our community to identify priorities, and then decide which strategies, dollars, and partnerships should be used to bring…
To maximize the development and utilization of the human and economic resources of the wayne county georgraphical area in order to create or preserve jobs and employment opportunities and improve the welfare of people of the area.
To coordinate and promote economic development on a county wide basis among all of the political subdivisions of portage county, ohio.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Stephen Community Services Inc and the most unlike its peers is Abbot Home. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
1187 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1187 of the 2,000 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ESSEX COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds INDIANA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL OHIO INC ↗
- Who funds National Merit Scholarship Corporation ↗
- Who funds URBAN LEAGUE OF NW INDIANA INC ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST INDIANA FORUM INC ↗
- Who funds COLUMBUS BLUE JACKETS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Mid-Ohio Foodbank ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HUNGER ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds LOCAL MATTERS ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER NORTHWEST INDIANA INC ↗
- Who funds ONE COLUMBUS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LIFECARE ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds BESA COMMUNITY INC ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF NORTHERN IN INC ↗
- Who funds Junior Achievement of Central Ohio Inc ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY SHELTER BOARD ↗
- Who funds PRESBYTERIAN HOMES & FAMILY SVCS ↗
- Who funds THE BREATHING ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF NORTHWEST INDIANA INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC ↗
- Who funds STAR HOUSE ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds OPPORTUNITY ENTERPRISES INC ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF NORTHEAST INDIANA INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF NORTHEAST IND ↗
- Who funds CHALLENGER LEARNING CENTER OF NORTHWEST INDIANA INC ↗
- Who funds MOUNT CARMEL HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a loosely connected circle, clustered around a few shared anchors.
Open a dossier: John W Anderson Foundation · Porter County Community Foundation Inc · Legacy Foundation Inc · Encova Foundation of Ohio · Harry C Moores Foundation · English-Bonter-Mitchell Fdn · 1st Source Bank Foundation Inc Xxx-Xx-Xxxx · L Brands Foundation · Edward M Wilson Foundation · Siemer Family Foundation · United Way of Central Ohio Inc · Ingram-White Castle Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Nisource Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Clinical & Support Options Inc — 32% of income from government
- Father Bill's & Mainspring Inc — 24% of income from government
- Nectar Community Investments Inc — 12% of income from government
- The Maryland Food Bank Inc — 11% of income from government
- Essex County Community Foundation Inc — 2% of income from government
- Lazarus House Inc — 1% of income from government
- Shriners Hospitals for Children — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.