Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Angell Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$6.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
118
Grants FY2025still arriving
15
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.

Education$12MFood & Nutrition$7.9MCommunity Improvement$5.4MPhilanthropy$5.0MYouth Development$3.7MHuman Services$3.2MReligion$1.2MCrime & Legal$1.1MOther$0
02FY2025 · 118 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k58 grants · $244k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $260k
  • $50k–250k43 grants · $5.0M
  • $250k+3 grants · $750k
$10,000
Median grant
15
States reached
$127M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEO PHILANTHROPY$250,000
LEADERS UP$250,000
ROCKWOOD LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE$250,000
Individual grant recipient$225,000
CAMPAIGN FOR COLLEGE OPPORTUNITY$200,000
ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN'S RIGHT$200,000
HEART OF LOS ANGELES$200,000
UNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO$200,000
COLLEGE ACCESS PLAN$150,000
READY TO SUCCEED$150,000
RHODE ISLAND FOOD POLICY COUNCIL$150,000
Individual grant recipient$150,000
Individual grant recipient$150,000
URBAN FARMING INSTITUTE$150,000
EARTH ISLAND INSTITUTE$150,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $4.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 87% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%INSTITUTE FOR NONPROFIT PRACTICE: $5k → 7%THE FAMILY PANTRY-DAMIEN'S PLACE: $5k → 8%KRIPALU CENTER FOR YOGA AND HEALTH: $75k → 12%IMMERSE NYC INC: $5k → 20%BOULDER CREST RETREAT FOUNDATION: $125k → 7%SPECTRUM YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES: $125k → 10%ST GIANNA'S PLACE: $18k → 5%KRIPALU CENTER FOR YOGA AND HEALTH: $75k → 12%INSTITUTE FOR NONPROFIT PRACTICE: $225k → 16%BOULDER CREST RETREAT FOUNDATION: $75k → 7%ST GIANNA'S PLACE: $15k → 5%INSTITUTE FOR NONPROFIT PRACTICE: $225k → 16%BOULDER CREST RETREAT FOUNDATION: $75k → 7%ST GIANNA'S PLACE: $10k → 5%ST ANTOINE RESIDENCE: $100k → 14%ST GIANNA'S PLACE: $10k → 5%INSTITUTE FOR NONPROFIT PRACTICE: $125k → 16%ST GIANNA'S PLACE: $8k → 5%INSTITUTE FOR NONPROFIT PRACTICE: $100k → 7%INSTITUTE FOR NONPROFIT PRACTICE: $75k → 7%COVENANT HOUSE: $6k → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $6k → 17%MIND BODY AWARENESS PROJECT: $10k → 10%SHAREFEST COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INC: $75k → 14%SHAREFEST COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INC: $50k → 14%FIRST STAR INC: $105k → 14%FIRST STAR INC: $100k → 14%FIRST STAR INC: $75k → 14%FIRST STAR INC: $75k → 14%FIRST STAR INC: $50k → 14%FIRST STAR INC: $50k → 14%FIRST STAR INC: $50k → 14%HILLSIDES: $650k → 14%HILLSIDES: $100k → 14%HILLSIDES: $100k → 14%HILLSIDES: $100k → 14%FIRST PLACE FOR YOUTH: $150k → 14%FIRST PLACE FOR YOUTH: $150k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF LOS ANGELES: $125k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF LOS ANGELES: $20k → 14%MEET EACH NEED WITH DIGNITY: $75k → 14%MEET EACH NEED WITH DIGNITY: $25k → 14%MEET EACH NEED WITH DIGNITY: $10k → 14%THE CHILDREN'S COLLECTIVE INC: $10k → 14%ONE VOICE: $100k → 14%ONE VOICE: $50k → 14%UNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $150k → 14%FULFILLMENT FUND: $25k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
NH
MN
IL
NY
MA
OR
WY
PA
CT
RI
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
TN
NC
DC
LA
AL
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$36M · 182 repeat orgs$6.6M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +47% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.

182 repeat relationships — 66 still active in FY2025, 116 since wound down; 46 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

182
119

Total granted

$36M
$4.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+12%

Still filing today

75%
49%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.8M went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
Human ServicesEducationFood & NutritionArts & CulturePhilanthropyEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NEO Philanthropy Inc
    4× · 2021–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +17%
  • PROVIDENCE COLLEGE
    3× · 2019–2021 · $1.0M · revenue +34%
  • H
    HILLSIDES
    4× · 2018–2022 · $960k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • LA
    LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF
    one grant, 2021 · $250k
  • LA
    LOS ANGELES COUNTY REGISTRAR-RECORDERCOUNTY CLERK
    one grant, 2019 · $250k
  • CS
    CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY LONG BEACH RESEARCH FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $200k · revenue +32%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Forward

Ca fwd drives action to identify solutions that can be taken to scale to meet the challenges the state is facing. the organization is driven by the belief that regional solutions across the state will help ensure economic, environmental,…

Public Benefit
2
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
3
Cangress Dba Los Angeles Community Action Network

Community organizing, education, advocacy, leadership development, direct services and organizational development for communities faced with immense poverty.

Community Improvement
4
Coop Careers Inc

Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.

Education
5
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
6
Fresh Approach

The mission of fresh approach is to create long-term change in local food systems by connecting california communities with healthy food from california farmers and expanding knowledge about food and nutrition.

Food & Nutrition
7
Common Future

Common future is a network of pioneering leaders across the u.s. and canada who work deeply within their communities to create alternative approaches to business, philanthropy, and investing. we envision an economy that has transitioned…

Community Improvement
8
California Institute of Integral Studies

Ciis is an institution of higher education that encourages an interdisciplinary approach to learning. over 1,700 students are enrolled in masters, doctoral, bachelor of arts completion programs, and certifications. ours is a mosaic of…

Education
9
Golden Gate University

Golden gate university prepares individuals to lead and serve by providing high quality, practice-based educational programs in law, taxation, business and related professions - as a nonprofit institution - in an innovative and challenging…

Education
10
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
11
California Agricultural Leadership Found

To enhance the long-term viability of california agriculture through leadership development, which in turn benefits the people and communities that agriculture serves. we grow leaders who make a difference.

Food & Nutrition
12
Cooperation L a

The L.A. Co-op Lab is a collective that builds capacity for worker ownership in Los Angeles as a pathway toward a more equitable and democratic economy.

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Leadersup and the most unlike its peers is Polos Pantry. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyPolicy Research and AdvocacyYouth Mentoring ProgramsLocal Food System Organizat…Community FoundationsWomen & Girls Leadership De…Child Abuse Advocacy Servic…Youth Development CentersEnvironmental Conservation …Pregnancy Support ServicesPublic Library OperationsLgbtq+ Community SupportCancer Support ServicesCommunity Arts CentersMilitary Veterans SupportAnimal Rescue and ShelterYouth Development ServicesAffordable Housing Developm…Domestic Violence ServicesSchool Parent OrganizationsIndependent K-12 SchoolsChristian Missionary Organi…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Jewish Community Organizati…Community College Foundatio…Food Banks and Pantries
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%3%<5yr15%9%5–10yr20%25%10–20yr17%24%20–35yr11%23%35–55yr13%17%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%1%<5yr15%3%5–10yr20%28%10–20yr17%27%20–35yr11%24%35–55yr13%18%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%4/240
the rest of the field
14%
26,001/186,738

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

226 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 226 of the 356 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
60
Early backer (in before they grew)
220/226
Grantees still filing
154/226
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SHARE OUR STRENGTH — $800,000 · OtherLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK — $705,000 · OtherLEADERSUP — $850,000 · Other+117 more — $17,347,500 · Other+117 morePROVIDENCE COLLEGE — $1,000,000 · EducationPROVIDENCE COLLEGENATIONAL COLLEGE ADVISING CORPS INC — $625,000 · EducationNATIONAL COLLEGE ADVI…CAMPAIGN FOR COLLEGE OPPORTUNITY — $600,000 · EducationCAMPAIGN FOR COLLEGE …UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE FOUNDATION INCORPORATED — $435,000 · EducationAUBURN THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY — $405,000 · EducationTeach for America Inc — $400,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $400,000 · EducationCOLLEGE ACCESS PLAN — $375,000 · EducationREADY TO SUCCEED — $370,000 · EducationLA COMPOST — $340,250 · EducationONWARD WE LEARN — $335,000 · EducationCOPPER BEECH INSTITUTE INC — $330,000 · EducationCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY DOMINGUEZ HILLS PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATION — $300,000 · Education+18 more — $2,351,500 · Education+18 moreFeeding America — $550,000 · Food & NutritionFeeding Am…San Diego Food System Alliance — $475,000 · Food & NutritionSan Diego …ALMA BACKYARD FARM — $420,000 · Food & NutritionALMA BACKY…ABOUT FRESH INC — $400,000 · Food & NutritionABOUT FRES…THE URBAN FOOD INITIATIVE INC — $400,000 · Food & NutritionTHE URBAN …RHODE ISLAND COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ASSOCIATION — $355,000 · Food & NutritionRHODE ISLA…FARM FRESH RHODE ISLAND INC — $305,000 · Food & NutritionFARM FRESH…Nourish California — $300,000 · Food & NutritionNourish Ca…RHODE ISLAND FOOD POLICY COUNCIL — $300,000 · Food & NutritionRHODE ISLA…WESTSIDE FOOD BANK — $280,000 · Food & NutritionWESTSIDE F…FOOD FORWARD INC — $245,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD FORWA…VERMONT FOODBANK — $225,000 · Food & NutritionHILLSIDES — $960,000 · Human ServicesHILLSIDESINSTITUTE FOR NONPROFIT PRACTICE INC — $755,000 · Human ServicesINSTITUTE …FIRST STAR INC — $505,000 · Human ServicesFIRST STAR…FIRST PLACE FOR YOUTH — $307,500 · Human ServicesFIRST PLAC…BOULDER CREST FOUNDATION — $275,000 · Human ServicesBOULDER CR…One Voice — $162,500 · Human ServicesHATHAWAY-SYCAMORES CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES — $150,000 · Human ServicesUNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN — $150,000 · Human ServicesKRIPALU CENTER FOR YOGA & HEALTH — $150,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES — $145,000 · Human Services+5 more — $552,000 · Human Services+5 moreRockwood Leadership Institute — $880,000 · PhilanthropyRockwood L…SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GRANTMAKERS — $710,522 · PhilanthropySOUTHERN C…Boston Foundation Inc — $572,500 · PhilanthropyBoston Fou…Greater Horizons — $450,000 · PhilanthropyGreater Ho…LIBERTY HILL FOUNDATION — $375,000 · PhilanthropyLIBERTY HI…CAL STATE FULLERTON PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATION — $225,000 · PhilanthropyCAL STATE …BOSTON WOMEN'S FUND INC — $200,000 · PhilanthropyTHE MAYOR'S FUND FOR LOS ANGELES — $160,000 · PhilanthropyCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $145,000 · Philanthropy+3 more — $200,000 · PhilanthropyNEO Philanthropy Inc — $1,125,000 · Public BenefitCORO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INC — $372,500 · Public BenefitON BEING PROJECT — $275,000 · Public BenefitTHE FAITH MATTERS NETWORK COLLABORATIVE — $70,000 · Public BenefitThe Rightway Foundation — $587,500 · EmploymentAdvancement Through Opportunity & Knowledge Inc — $432,500 · EmploymentVERMONT SUSTAINABLE JOBS FUND INC — $350,000 · EmploymentBOSTON PRIVATE INDUSTRY COUNCIL INC THE — $225,000 · EmploymentSTREETLIGHTS — $125,000 · EmploymentResilient Coders Inc — $100,000 · Employment
Other$19,702,500Education$8,266,750Food & Nutrition$4,255,000Human Services$4,112,000Philanthropy$3,918,022Public Benefit$1,842,500Employment$1,820,000

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNEO Philanthropy Inc — $1,125,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetPROVIDENCE COLLEGE — $1,000,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetHILLSIDES — $960,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetRockwood Leadership Institute — $880,000 over 7y, 1.7% of budgetLEADERSUP — $850,000 over 5y, 6.1% of budgetSHARE OUR STRENGTH — $800,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR NONPROFIT PRACTICE INC — $755,000 over 6y, 3.4% of budgetSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GRANTMAKERS — $710,522 over 7y, 2.9% of budgetLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK — $705,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL COLLEGE ADVISING CORPS INC — $625,000 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetCAMPAIGN FOR COLLEGE OPPORTUNITY — $600,000 over 4y, 6.9% of budgetThe Rightway Foundation — $587,500 over 6y, 30% of budgetBoston Foundation Inc — $572,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFeeding America — $550,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHEART OF LOS ANGELES YOUTH INC — $525,000 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO — $525,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFIRST STAR INC — $505,000 over 7y, 7.9% of budgetSan Diego Food System Alliance — $475,000 over 5y, 8.2% of budgetGreater Horizons — $450,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN'S RIGHTS — $445,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE FOUNDATION INCORPORATED — $435,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetAdvancement Through Opportunity & Knowledge Inc — $432,500 over 4y, 11% of budgetALMA BACKYARD FARM — $420,000 over 5y, 13% of budgetAUBURN THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY — $405,000 over 4y, 4.9% of budgetFlourish Agenda — $405,000 over 6y, 3.2% of budgetABOUT FRESH INC — $400,000 over 4y, 4.1% of budgetTeach for America Inc — $400,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE URBAN FOOD INITIATIVE INC — $400,000 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $400,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERS — $392,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE URBAN FARMING INSTITUTE OF BOSTONINC — $375,000 over 4y, 4.0% of budgetLeading from Within — $375,000 over 4y, 22% of budgetCOLLEGE ACCESS PLAN — $375,000 over 3y, 14% of budgetLIBERTY HILL FOUNDATION — $375,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetCORO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INC — $372,500 over 6y, 4.1% of budgetREADY TO SUCCEED — $370,000 over 5y, 11% of budgetRHODE ISLAND COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ASSOCIATION — $355,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetVERMONT SUSTAINABLE JOBS FUND INC — $350,000 over 5y, 6.7% of budgetLA COMPOST — $340,250 over 6y, 46% of budgetTHIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC — $335,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSOCIAL JUSTICE LEARNING INSTITUTE — $335,000 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetONWARD WE LEARN — $335,000 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetCOPPER BEECH INSTITUTE INC — $330,000 over 6y, 13% of budgetFIRST PLACE FOR YOUTH — $307,500 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetFARM FRESH RHODE ISLAND INC — $305,000 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY DOMINGUEZ HILLS PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATION — $300,000 over 2y, 5.3% of budgetNourish California — $300,000 over 3y, 6.7% of budgetRHODE ISLAND FOOD POLICY COUNCIL — $300,000 over 3y, 10% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NEO Philanthropy Inc ↗
  • Who funds PROVIDENCE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds HILLSIDES ↗
  • Who funds Rockwood Leadership Institute ↗
  • Who funds LEADERSUP ↗
  • Who funds SHARE OUR STRENGTH ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR NONPROFIT PRACTICE INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GRANTMAKERS ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL COLLEGE ADVISING CORPS INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMPAIGN FOR COLLEGE OPPORTUNITY ↗
  • Who funds The Rightway Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Boston Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds HEART OF LOS ANGELES YOUTH INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO ↗
  • Who funds FIRST STAR INC ↗
  • Who funds San Diego Food System Alliance ↗
  • Who funds Greater Horizons ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN'S RIGHTS ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE FOUNDATION INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds Advancement Through Opportunity & Knowledge Inc ↗
  • Who funds ALMA BACKYARD FARM ↗
  • Who funds AUBURN THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY ↗
  • Who funds Flourish Agenda ↗
  • Who funds ABOUT FRESH INC ↗
  • Who funds Teach for America Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE URBAN FOOD INITIATIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY PARTNERS ↗
  • Who funds THE URBAN FARMING INSTITUTE OF BOSTONINC ↗
  • Who funds Leading from Within ↗
  • Who funds COLLEGE ACCESS PLAN ↗
  • Who funds LIBERTY HILL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CORO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INC ↗
  • Who funds READY TO SUCCEED ↗
  • Who funds RHODE ISLAND COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ASSOCIATION ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Annenberg Foundat…The Ralph M Parsons F…California Community …Weingart FoundationThe Rose Hills Founda…The Deutsch FoundationUnited Way IncS Mark Taper Foundati…Elbridge Stuart Found…The Ahmanson Foundati…Liberty Hill Foundati…The California Wellne…
The Annenberg FoundationPA55.1× affinity35 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Annenberg Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · California Community Foundation · Weingart Foundation · The Rose Hills Foundation · The Deutsch Foundation · United Way Inc · S Mark Taper Foundation · Elbridge Stuart Foundation Dba Stuart Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · Liberty Hill Foundation · The California Wellness Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Angell Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 120%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Hias Inc — 88% of income from government
  • Vermont Sustainable Jobs Fund Inc — 51% of income from government
  • The Home for Little Wanderers Inc — 38% of income from government
  • The Family Pantry- Damien's Place — 36% of income from government
  • Vermont Foodbank — 13% of income from government
  • Benjamin Franklin Cummings Institute of Technology — 5% of income from government
  • The Urban Farming Institute of Bostoninc — 4% of income from government
  • Third Sector New England Inc — 3% of income from government
  • Food for Free Committee Inc — 3% of income from government
  • The Institute of Contemporary Art Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Pear — 1% of income from government
  • Boston Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
12get no government money at all
62report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 356 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home