· Private foundation
Eugene M Lang Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k131 grants · $266k
- $10k–50k47 grants · $994k
- $50k–250k24 grants · $1.7M
- $250k+4 grants · $1.9M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| EUGENE LANG COLLEGE THE NEW SCHOOL | $1,125,000 |
| ATLAS PERFORMING ARTS CENTER | $304,750 |
| CONCERTS IN MOTION | $251,750 |
| DEMOCRACY FORWARD FOUNDATION | $250,000 |
| EXPLORING THE ARTS | $150,000 |
| IONA SENIOR SERVICES | $127,000 |
| PROJECT PERICLES | $103,250 |
| BILLION OYSTER PROJECT | $101,000 |
| NEW YORK PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL | $100,000 |
| CENTRR FOR JUSTICE AT COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY | $100,000 |
| COMMUNITY SERVINGS | $75,000 |
| FUTURES IGNITE INC | $75,000 |
| 42 ANALYTICS EDUCATION INC | $75,000 |
| I HAVE A DREAM FOUNDATION | $72,000 |
| MOSAIC THEATRE | $65,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $2.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +22% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.
247 repeat relationships — 129 still active in FY2025, 118 since wound down; 74 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $603k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- IHI HAVE A DREAM FOUNDATION6× · 2020–2025 · $1.2M · revenue +242% · 29% of their budget
- CICONCERTS IN MOTION INC6× · 2020–2025 · $1.2M · revenue +36%
- RIRESIST INC5× · 2020–2024 · $587k · revenue +242%
Funded once
- LILUTHERAN IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE SERVICEone grant, 2021 · $200k
- CFCENTER FOR JUSTICE AT COLUMBIA UNIVERSITYone grant, 2022 · $100k
- GLGOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $71k · revenue +66%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of new york city center is to be new york city's leading center for dance and musical theater. dedicated to making the arts accessible to the broadest possible audience, city center seeks to create a welcoming environment and…
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…
The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.
Established in 1971, the mission of the new york foundation for the arts (nyfa) is to empower artists in all disciplines, as well as cultural workers, to achieve success on their own terms by providing critical support, resources, and…
At sarah lawrence college, our mission is to graduate citizens of the world who are diverse in every definition of the word, who take intellectual and creative risks, and who are able to focus exceptional intellectual discipline (continued…
To bring quality public television programs and resources to communities throughout new jersey and its tri-state neighbors. its content, both on-air and online, aims to reflect the diverse
The manhattan institute is a community of scholars, journalists, activists, and civic leaders dedicated to advancing opportunity, individual liberty, and the rule of law in america and its great cities.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Fordham university, the jesuit university of new york, is committed to the discovery of wisdom and the transmission of learning, through research and through education of the highest quality. for more information, see schedule o.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Access Inc and the most unlike its peers is Re-Entry Rocks Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.5% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
359 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 359 of the 531 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ATLAS PERFORMING ARTS CENTER ↗
- Who funds I HAVE A DREAM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CONCERTS IN MOTION INC ↗
- Who funds EXPLORING THE ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds AIM HIGH FOR HIGH SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds RESIST INC ↗
- Who funds GIVETHX INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY SERVINGS INC ↗
- Who funds PROJECT PERICLES INC ↗
- Who funds FUTURES IGNITE INC ↗
- Who funds JOHN JAY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE OSBORNE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds MIRIAM'S KITCHEN ↗
- Who funds The Children's Law Center ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ACCESS INC ↗
- Who funds BILLION OYSTER PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds Iona Senior Services ↗
- Who funds YOUTH REPRESENT INC ↗
- Who funds DEMOCRACY FORWARD FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SOCIAL GOOD FUND INC ↗
- Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds PINE STREET INN INC ↗
- Who funds THE BARUCH COLLEGE FUND ↗
- Who funds HER JUSTICE INC ↗
- Who funds GIDEONS PROMISE INC ↗
- Who funds OPEN CITY ADVOCATES ↗
- Who funds FENWAY COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds NEWYORK-PRESBYTERIANQUEENS ↗
- Who funds ROSIE'S PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds JERICHO PROJECT ↗
- Who funds WOMEN'S HOUSING & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL SUMMER LEARNING ASSOCIATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation · Greater Washington Community Foundation · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Hrbt Foundation · The New York Community Trust · Bank of Greene County Charitable Foundation · Lily Auchincloss Foundation Inc · Dimick Foundation John M Lynham Jr Trustee · Brooklyn Community Foundation · Pinkerton Foundation · T Backer Fund Inc · Nora Roberts Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Eugene M Lang Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Boston Area Rape Crisis Center Inc — 82% of income from government
- Center for Medicare Advocacy Inc — 63% of income from government
- Fenway Community Health Center Inc — 27% of income from government
- More Than Words Inc — 24% of income from government
- Greater Boston Food Bank Inc — 22% of income from government
- Saint Francis House Inc — 18% of income from government
- Community Servings Inc — 12% of income from government
- Pine Street Inn Inc — 11% of income from government
- Watkinson School — 2% of income from government
- Berkshire Taconic Community Foundation Inc — 2% of income from government
- Bikes Not Bombs Inc — 2% of income from government
- Resist Inc — 2% of income from government
- Rosie's Place Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Eugene M Lang Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Eugene M Lang Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.