· Private foundation
Bank of Greene County Charitable Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 64% of BANK OF GREENE COUNTY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k444 grants · $381k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $75k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CATSKILL MOUNTAIN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION | $50,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $50,000 |
| COLUMBIA MEMORIAL HEALTH FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| CATSKILL MOUNTAIN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION | $20,000 |
| COLUMBIA COUNTY OFFICE FOR THE AGING | $10,000 |
| COLUMBIA MEMORIAL HEALTH FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| ALBANY COUNTY RURAL HOUSING ALLIANCE | $10,000 |
| CULTIVATE CATSKILL | $5,500 |
| COLUMBIA COUNTY COMMUNITY HEALTHCARE CONSORTIUM INC | $5,000 |
| RENSSELAER COUNTY HOUSING RESOURCES | $5,000 |
| COMMUNITY ACTION OF GREENE COUNTY INC | $5,000 |
| CAPITAL REGION CHAMBER FOUNDATION | $4,000 |
| COMMUNITY HOSPICE OF COLUMBIA-GREENE | $3,000 |
| COLUMBIA MEMORIAL HEALTH FOUNDATION | $2,500 |
| O POSITIVE FESTIVAL | $2,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $77k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
281 repeat relationships — 237 still active in FY2025, 44 since wound down; 181 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $185k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CMCATSKILL MOUNTAIN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION3× · 2023–2025 · $95k · revenue +1%
- ACALBANY COUNTY RURAL HOUSING ALLIANCE2× · 2024–2025 · $20k · revenue +20%
- HAHUDSON ATHENS LIGHTHOUSE PRESERVATION SOCIETY2× · 2023–2024 · $11k · revenue +114%
Funded once
- BOBANK OF GREENE COUNTY CFone grant, 2022 · $216k
- BOBANK OF GREENE COUNTY CF PAID OUT 196 GRANTS TOTALING 213325one grant, 2021 · $213k
- UCULSTER COUNTY OFFICE FOR THE AGINGone grant, 2024 · $25k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To hold and manage open space property for the public's benefit and assist in the preservation and stewardship of the scenic beauty, natural communities and recreational amenities in greene county, ny and surrounding areas.
The Historical Society of Rockland County is a museum and educational organization dedicated to engaging diverse audiences in a dynamic dialogue about the rich historical heritage of the county.
The Catskill Center for Conservation and Development, Inc. (the Catskill Center) is a not-for-profit organization under the non-profit laws of the State of New York. The mission of the Catskill Center is to preserve and enrich the…
To foster and perpetuate appreciation of the visual arts
Provide various educational, cultural, and museum programs and services to area residents and tourists in order to promote an appreciation of ontario county, ny.
To provide fire protection services for the residents in the towns of caroga, bleecker, and piseco in upstate new york.
Economic development and promotion of the hudson valley region in new york.
Adk is the only non-profit organization in new york state dedicated to the conservation, preservation, and responsible recreational use of the new york state forest preserve and other parks, wild lands, and waters vital to our members and…
The organization was formed to safeguard and share existing and future collections related to the social, cultural, and economic history of the high peaks adirondack region in and around the township of newcomb in essex county, new york.
Preserve, enhance and restore natural and cultural resources and encourage compatible economic development within the greenway region of the hudson river valley.
The History Center in Tompkins County, Inc. is a non-profit organization whose purpose is to preserve and encourage access to its unique collections, while designing learning experiences and services that create opportunities for people to…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Ulster County Inc and the most unlike its peers is Planet Arts Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 21 years old; the field is 23. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 11% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
290 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 290 of the 600 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CATSKILL MOUNTAIN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds COLUMBIA-GREENE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CULTIVATE CATSKILL INC ↗
- Who funds ALBANY COUNTY RURAL HOUSING ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds COLUMBIA COUNTY COMMUNITY HEALTHCARE CONSORTIUM INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION OF GREENE COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds CAPITAL REGION CHAMBER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds HUDSON ATHENS LIGHTHOUSE PRESERVATION SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds RENSSELAER COUNTY HOUSING RESOURCES ↗
- Who funds FORTNIGHTLY CLUB OF CATSKILL ↗
- Who funds COLUMBIA-GREENE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CAIRO DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds COLUMBIA-GREENE HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds THE COMMUNITY HOSPICE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Good Work Institute Inc ↗
- Who funds THE HUNTER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION OF COLUMBIA & GREENE COUNTIES INC ↗
- Who funds BENEDICTINE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds IN FLIGHT INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF HUDSON YOUTH INC ↗
- Who funds COLUMBIA COUNTY RECOVERY KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds HAWTHORNE VALLEY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds RUPCO INC ↗
- Who funds COLUMBIA-GREENE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
- Who funds CAMPHILL GHENT INC ↗
- Who funds CAMPHILL HUDSON INC ↗
- Who funds SECOND CHANCE OPPORTUNITIES INC ↗
- Who funds ANIMALKIND INC ↗
- Who funds ZADOCK PRATT MUSEUM INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Hrbt Foundation · Ulster Savings Charitable Foundation · The Alexander and Marjorie Hover Foundation · The Dyson Foundation · Community Foundations of the Hudson Valley Inc · Berkshire Taconic Community Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation for the Greater Capital Region Inc · Price Chopper's Golub Foundation · Hudson Valley Foundation for Youth Health · Rheinstrom Hill Community Foundation · T Backer Fund Inc · Kvistad Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Bank of Greene County Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Bank of Greene County Charitable Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Bank of Greene County Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.