· Private foundation
Elmina B Sewall Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k18 grants · $102k
- $10k–50k173 grants · $4.0M
- $50k–250k101 grants · $8.9M
- $250k+4 grants · $1.4M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Sunrise County Economic Council | $580,000 |
| Maine Environmental Education Association | $267,000 |
| United Somali Women of Maine | $261,200 |
| Maine Audubon | $260,000 |
| New Learning Journey | $225,000 |
| Center for An Ecology-Based Economy | $200,000 |
| Outdoor Sports Institute Inc | $200,000 |
| Maine Development Foundation | $185,000 |
| Cooperative Development Institute | $185,000 |
| Passamaquoddy Tribe at Pleasant Point | $180,000 |
| Our Katahdin | $175,000 |
| Sunrise Opportunities | $172,500 |
| Maine Immigrant & Refugee Services | $172,500 |
| Maine Initiatives Inc | $157,100 |
| Four Directions Development Corporation | $150,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $4.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 49% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +38% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.
342 repeat relationships — 258 still active in FY2024, 84 since wound down; 34 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $517k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
SUNRISE COUNTY ECONOMIC COUNCIL5× · 2020–2024 · $2.3M · revenue +57%- MAMaine Audubon Society5× · 2020–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +3%
- OKOur Katahdin5× · 2020–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +257%
Funded once
- NTNATIONAL TRUST FOR LOCAL NEWSone grant, 2023 · $250k · revenue +15%
- CACENTRAL AROOSTOOK HUMANE SOCIETYgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $200k · revenue +48% · 94% of their budget
- PHPUBLIC HEALTH RESEARCH INSTITUTEone grant, 2020 · $173k · revenue -91% · 36% of their budget
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide access to outdoor gear and know-how through a collaborative, equity-centered approach.
The Eastern Maine Conservation Initiative (EMCI) is a non-profit organization with broad conservation interests that seeks to: 1) Foster environmentally sustainable communities of the eastern Maine coast; 2) Encourage an appreciation of…
Maine & Company is a private, non-profit business development sales organization. Its purpose is to improve Maine's success in attracting new business and expanding and retaining existing business by providing a focused, statewide sales…
Maine Rivers is a statewide advocacy organization. Our mission is to protect, restore and enhance the ecological health of Maine's river systems. We support and direct efforts to conserve and improve the health of Maine's rivers and…
The mission of Islesboro Islands Trust is to enhance the quality of residents' lives through the preservation of open space, educate all residents as to the value of the island's natural ecosystems, and act as an environmental advocate on…
To conserve lands with significant ecological or cultural resources and manage them in a sustainable way for public benefit.
Maine Media Workshops & College educates and inspires visual artists and storytellers to achieve their creative potential. We provide lifelong learning opportunities for those pursuing the fine arts and media-related professions. We are…
The mission of the mount desert land & garden preserve is to conserve and share the beauty of our historic lands and gardens.
The mission of the 30 Mile River Watershed Association (30 Mile) is to work as a community for clean and healthy lakes, ponds and streams in our watershed. Since 2008, 30 Mile has led efforts to protect these waters from the growing…
To preserve and protect land surrounding the appalachian trail in maine for public benefit.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Center for Grieving Children and the most unlike its peers is Nomadic and Pastoralist Development. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
406 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 406 of the 475 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SUNRISE COUNTY ECONOMIC COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds Maine Audubon Society ↗
- Who funds Our Katahdin ↗
- Who funds COOPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds MAINE ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds Sunrise Opportunities ↗
- Who funds MAINE INITIATIVESINC ↗
- Who funds Maine Development Foundation ↗
- Who funds NEW LEARNING JOURNEY INC ↗
- Who funds WABANAKI HEALTH & WELLNESS NPC ↗
- Who funds Millinocket Regional Hospital ↗
- Who funds OUTDOOR SPORT INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds Chewonki Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds Maine Farmland Trust ↗
- Who funds Hand in Hand Mano en Mano ↗
- Who funds Four Directions Development Corporation ↗
- Who funds KENNEBEC VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds St Mary's Regional Medical Center ↗
- Who funds Rural Aspirations Project ↗
- Who funds MILLINOCKET MEMORIAL LIBRARY ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR AN ECOLOGY BASED ECONOMY ↗
- Who funds MAINE COMMUNITY INTEGRATION ↗
- Who funds Resources for Organizing and Social Change ↗
- Who funds MAINE IMMIGRANTS' RIGHTS COALITION ↗
- Who funds DOWNEAST COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC ↗
- Who funds Bangor Humane Society ↗
- Who funds Maine Coast Heritage Trust ↗
- Who funds MAINE ORGANIC FARMERS AND GARDENERS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds MAINE PEOPLE'S RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds PREBLE STREET ↗
- Who funds Paws Brave Hearts ↗
- Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds MAINE IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE SERVICES ↗
- Who funds MIDCOAST HUMANE ↗
- Who funds HALFWAY HOME PET RESCUE INC ↗
- Who funds MAINE ASSOCIATION FOR THE EDUCATION OF YOUNG CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds Somali Bantu Community Association of Maine ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Maine Community Foundation Inc · Onion Foundation · John T Gorman Foundation · Maine Health Access Foundation Inc · Bangor Savings Bank Foundation · Sam L Cohen Foundation · Quimby Family Foundation · Fisher Charitable Foundation · Good Shepherd Food Bank · Maine Initiativesinc · Stephen & Tabitha King Foundation Inc · Simmons Foundation - PerkinsThompson
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Elmina B Sewall Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Cooperative Development Institute Inc — 58% of income from government
- Third Sector Capital Partners Inc — 16% of income from government
- Trustees of Tufts College — 13% of income from government
- Third Sector New England Inc — 3% of income from government
- Sponsor Inc — 2% of income from government
- Resist Inc — 2% of income from government
- Appalachian Mountain Club — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Elmina B Sewall Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Elmina B Sewall Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.