· Private foundation
John T Gorman Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k17 grants · $78k
- $10k–50k101 grants · $2.0M
- $50k–250k29 grants · $3.4M
- $250k+7 grants · $2.1M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Lewiston Public Schools | $345,000 |
| Boys and Girls Club of Bangor | $316,000 |
| MaineHealth | $310,000 |
| Bangor Housing Development Corporation | $297,000 |
| The Root Cellar | $275,000 |
| Mercy Hospital | $263,000 |
| Maine Cancer Foundation | $250,000 |
| Lurie Childrens Hospital of Chicago | $240,000 |
| Sanford Public Schools | $235,000 |
| Trekkers Inc | $215,000 |
| Educate Maine | $196,000 |
| Healthy Acadia | $165,000 |
| University System of New Hampshire | $159,000 |
| Coastal Enterprises Inc | $150,000 |
| United Way of Southern Maine | $145,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $6.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 52% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.
181 repeat relationships — 120 still active in FY2024, 61 since wound down; 33 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.4M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MMaineHealth5× · 2020–2024 · $1.9M · revenue +64%
- MHMercy Hospital Northern Light Mercy Hospital5× · 2020–2024 · $1.5M · revenue +49%
- PSPREBLE STREET5× · 2020–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +50%
Funded once
- M(MaineHealth (dba Maine Behavioral Healthcare)one grant, 2023 · $292k
- SOState of Maineone grant, 2020 · $220k
- HHHEALTHY HOMEWORKSone grant, 2023 · $150k · revenue -66% · 36% of their budget
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To recognize the resiliency of people who use drugs and to work in collaboration to create access points for overdose prevention and harm reduction services in Maine.
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Maine creates, finds and supports programs that directly improve the health and well being of children statewide; provides affordable home away from home lodging which increases access to medical care for…
Provide low-income defendants assistance in obtaining pretrial release and supervision.
The organization advocates for the creation and preservation of affordable housing so all people in maine have a place to call home.
To enrich the quality of life of all people on Mount Desert Island through recreational, educational and social programs.
MAIN serves as a bridge and cultural broker for multilingual access to health and social services for immigrants, refugees, and asylees in our community.
To build a permanent and powerful progressive movement in Maine. We will promote a healthy, just, equitable democracy through research, engagement, and education of Maine's citizens. We will engage in democracy expansion, voter engagement,…
Maine Behavioral Healthcare provides a seamless and compassionate continuum of care through a community of providers collaborating to promote recovery and the overall mental and physical well-being of those we are privileged to serve.
To provide access to outdoor gear and know-how through a collaborative, equity-centered approach.
To provide quality affordable housing
Partnering with economically disadvantaged individuals and families. Hancock County Habitat For Humanity seeks to eliminate poverty housing and to make decent, affordable shelter a matter of conscience and action.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Maine Community Action Association Dba Maine Community Action Partnership and the most unlike its peers is St Vincent DePaul Soup Kitchen. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
265 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 265 of the 340 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MaineHealth ↗
- Who funds Mercy Hospital Northern Light Mercy Hospital ↗
- Who funds PREBLE STREET ↗
- Who funds BANGOR HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Senator George J Mitchell Scholarship Research Institute ↗
- Who funds SUNRISE COUNTY ECONOMIC COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds Maine Cancer Foundation ↗
- Who funds PINE TREE LEGAL ASSISTANCE INC ↗
- Who funds LEWISTON AUBURN METROPOLITAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COASTAL ENTERPRISES INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF BANGOR ↗
- Who funds Good Shepherd Food Bank ↗
- Who funds HEALTHY ACADIA ↗
- Who funds MAINE COMMUNITY ACTION ASSOCIATION DBA MAINE COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP ↗
- Who funds MAINE COALITION TO END DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ↗
- Who funds Maine Community Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds THE ROOT CELLAR ↗
- Who funds PROSPERITYME ↗
- Who funds AVESTA HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds YORK COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Lewiston-Auburn Area Housing Development Corporation ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MAINE SCHOOL OF LAW FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Community Concepts Inc ↗
- Who funds Maine Equal Justice Partners ↗
- Who funds MAINE CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds Boys & Girls Clubs of Southern Maine ↗
- Who funds Sunrise Opportunities ↗
- Who funds MAINE IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE SERVICES ↗
- Who funds TREKKERS INC ↗
- Who funds MAINE COMMUNITY INTEGRATION ↗
- Who funds LEGAL SERVICES FOR MAINE ELDERS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Maine Community Foundation Inc · Elmina B Sewall Foundation · Maine Health Access Foundation Inc · Sam L Cohen Foundation · Bangor Savings Bank Foundation · United Way Inc · Good Shepherd Food Bank · Simmons Foundation - PerkinsThompson · Fisher Charitable Foundation · Stephen & Tabitha King Foundation Inc · Machias Savings Bank Community Development Foundation · Onion Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization John T Gorman Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Green & Healthy Homes Initiative Inc — 100% of income from government
- Veterans Inc — 58% of income from government
- Bluehub Capital Inc — 32% of income from government
- Jobs for the Future Inc — 11% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to John T Gorman Foundation?
Find your warmest path to John T Gorman Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.