· Private foundation
Deacon Charitable Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k118 grants · $273k
- $10k–50k9 grants · $98k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FRIENDSHIP ADVENTURES | $13,000 |
| GROWING VETERANS | $13,000 |
| MONTLEY ZOO ANIMAL RESCUE | $11,000 |
| MARY'S PLACE | $10,500 |
| BRIDGE RECEIVING CENTER | $10,000 |
| CASA FOR CHILDREN INC | $10,000 |
| UPPER ROOM DINING HALL | $10,000 |
| PLYMOUTH HOUSING | $10,000 |
| SKY VALLEY FOOD BANK | $10,000 |
| COMMUNITY TRANSITIONAL SCHOOL | $9,000 |
| ROSE HAVEN | $9,000 |
| BLANCHET HOUSE OF HOSPITALITY | $8,000 |
| VETERANS GOLF PARK FOR DISABLED VETS DBA VETERANS COMMUNITY CENTER | $8,000 |
| WOMEN'S WISDOM ART | $8,000 |
| SNOWLINE HEALTH | $8,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $292k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 53% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +43% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.
151 repeat relationships — 47 still active in FY2024, 104 since wound down; 56 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $167k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FSFosterHope Sacramento7× · 2018–2024 · $46k · revenue +211%
- KAKids & Art Foundation5× · 2020–2024 · $32k · revenue +199%
- RVRETURNING VETERANS PROJECT7× · 2017–2024 · $31k · revenue +48%
Funded once
- CCChildrens Centerone grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +5%
- FLFOOD LIFELINEone grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -1%
- SOSentinels of Freedom Scholarship Foundationone grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue -47%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Impact nw prevents homelessness by supporting people as they navigate their journey to stability and strength. founded in portland in 1966, impact nw now serves 26,944 people a year in the greater portland, oregon metro area, including…
Network services has been serving homeless families in the puget sound area since 1990, with a focus on families with children. network services aims to break the cycle of homelessness by providing assistance to families with children to…
Nourishing our community. the port angeles food bank is the main food bank in clallam county, providing food to 13 other area pantries and meal programs as well as providing food to over 5,000 individuals per month.
To empower survivors to heal and engage all individuals and communities to address and prevent sexual assault and intimate partner violence
In addition to rescue and adoption, pet orphans provides a wide range of services including education, medical/financial, spay/neuter, and training assistance.
Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.
Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.
Sheltercare offers a variety of housing and support services for people who are homeless or those facing homelessness with a committed focus on the community's most vulnerable individuals dealing with psychiatric disabilities, acquired…
Saving grace offers safety, hope, and healing to survivors of intimiate partner violence and sexual assault and engages central oregon to build life free from violence.
Building changes advances equitable responses to homelessness in washington state, with a focus on children, youth, and families. we work at the intersection of housing, education, and health systems, partnering with communities and public…
Shelter Animal Resource Alliance rescues, assists, and advocates for shelter animals in Lane County by developing and implementing programs designed to increase the number of animals adopted into permanent, loving homes and decrease the…
From clinical care and peer support programs to housing, we provide resources so people seeking mental health care can develop the tools to thrive, not just survive.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Families Forward and the most unlike its peers is The Emma Zen Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.8% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
368 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 368 of the 507 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FosterHope Sacramento ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY TRANSITIONAL SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds Kids & Art Foundation ↗
- Who funds RETURNING VETERANS PROJECT ↗
- Who funds HART OF FOLSOM ↗
- Who funds Maris Place ↗
- Who funds REBUILDING TOGETHER SACRAMENTO ↗
- Who funds Constructing Hope Pre-Apprenticeship Program ↗
- Who funds WISEPLACE ↗
- Who funds SOUL RIVER INC ↗
- Who funds GROWING VETERANS ↗
- Who funds Portland YouthBuilders ↗
- Who funds 916 INK ↗
- Who funds BRIDGE RECEIVING CENTER ↗
- Who funds Motley Zoo Animal Rescue ↗
- Who funds SACRAMENTO LOAVES & FISHES ↗
- Who funds Left Behind K9 Rescue ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GARDEN GROVE INC ↗
- Who funds CONSERVATION NW ↗
- Who funds ROSE HAVEN CIC ↗
- Who funds CRACKED POTS INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF LEAPS & BOUNDS PEDIATRIC THERAPY INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDSHIP ADVENTURES ↗
- Who funds REBUILDING TOGETHER SEATTLE ↗
- Who funds AFTER-SCHOOL ALL-STARS ↗
- Who funds PROJECT LIFELONG ↗
- Who funds FROM MADDIS CLOSET ↗
- Who funds EMERGENCY FOOD NETWORK OF TACOMA AND PIERCE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds INTERVAL HOUSE ↗
- Who funds THE EMMA ZEN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SCHOOL ON WHEELS INC ↗
- Who funds UNDERDOG ANIMAL RESCUE ↗
- Who funds GIVING CHILDREN HOPE ↗
- Who funds SUNSHINE DIVISION INC ↗
- Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE INC ↗
- Who funds AGEUP INC ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY PORTLAND METRO EAST ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON KIDS IN TRANSITION ↗
- Who funds All About Equine Animal Rescue Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · Sacramento Region Community Foundation · Juan Young Trust · Meyer Memorial Trust · Wheeler Foundation · The Jackson Foundation · The Collins Foundation · The Autzen Foundation · The Oregon Community Foundation · The Harold & Arlene Schnitzer Care Foundation · Teichert Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Deacon Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Friends of Trees — 100% of income from government
- Lines for Life — 70% of income from government
- Call to Safety — 61% of income from government
- Neighborhood House Inc — 53% of income from government
- Black Parent Initiative — 45% of income from government
- Portland YouthBuilders — 35% of income from government
- Transition Projects Inc — 29% of income from government
- Liberty House — 23% of income from government
- Oregon Food Bank — 21% of income from government
- New Avenues for Youth Inc — 20% of income from government
- Ac Portland — 14% of income from government
- Habitat for Humanity Portland Metro East — 14% of income from government
- My Voice Music Inc — 11% of income from government
- Raphael House of Portland — 10% of income from government
- Bradley Angle — 10% of income from government
- Nami Oregon — 10% of income from government
- Lifeworks Nw — 8% of income from government
- Community Transitional School — 7% of income from government
- Growing Gardens — 6% of income from government
- The Contingent — 5% of income from government
- Friendly House Inc — 3% of income from government
- Constructing Hope Pre-Apprenticeship Program — 2% of income from government
- Casa for Children Inc — 2% of income from government
- Metropolitan Youth Symphony — 1% of income from government
- Cracked Pots Inc — 1% of income from government
- Childrens Center — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Deacon Charitable Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Deacon Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.