Skip to content

Washington · Nonprofit

FULL LIFE CARE

FULL LIFE CARE (Washington) receives grants from 24 organizations whose IRS filings report $451,912 to it, the largest being THE SUSAN ELIZABETH FOUNDATION ($175,000). 13 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$22M
Funders on record
24
Grants received
$452k
Net assets
$-5118579
13/24 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 1%
01What it does

What Full Life Care does

Mission

Full Life Care is dedicated to enhancing the quality of life for frail elders with chronic or terminal illnesses and disabilities. Full Life Care respects the dignity of participants and provides for them with care and compassion. Full Life Care is committed, through programs of health and social services, to the independence and well-being of all participants and providing respite for caregivers.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Program

  1. Home care services - Full Life Care provided in-home care services to hundreds of clients with over 350 home care aides. This service allows the client to remain in their home for as long as possible and avoid institutional care or the risk of homelessness.adult day services - Full Life Care provided adult day health care to over 875 frail elders and adults with disabilities at 3 locations in king and snohomish counties. Services included skilled nursing, rehabilitative therapy, and social programs which helped persons with chronic health conditions such as stroke, dementia, acquired brain injury, and development disabilities avoid life in a nursing home or other institutional setting. These adult day health programs provided respite to hundreds of family care givers.housing supports - ongoing supports to help people find and keep stable, independent housing. Services include: housing assessments, identifying housing resources, support obtaining a lease, independent living skills development, landlord relations, and crisis management. Elder friends - volunteer-based program providing companionship and advocacy for isolated older adults. Rooted in life's simple pleasures:…

    $25,041,186 spent$20,896,256 earned by the program
    100% of program spending

The program described on its FY2024 Form 990. Program spending in total: $25,041,186.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($16M) Expenses 100 ($17M) Net assets 100 ($1.3M)2019 Revenue 119 ($19M) Expenses 123 ($21M) Net assets 140 ($1.9M)2020 Revenue 126 ($21M) Expenses 122 ($21M) Net assets 134 ($1.8M)2021 Revenue 130 ($21M) Expenses 127 ($22M) Net assets 102 ($1.4M)2022 Revenue 130 ($21M) Expenses 118 ($20M) Net assets 190 ($2.5M)2023 Revenue 109 ($18M) Expenses 113 ($19M) Net assets 86 ($1.2M)2024 Revenue 122 ($20M) Expenses 132 ($22M) Net assets -103 ($-1383300)2025 Revenue 134 ($22M) Expenses 151 ($26M) Net assets -382 ($-5118579)
'17'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (134)Expenses (151)Net assets (-382)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2021 to 2022, from $11M to $6.9M (−35%).

$6.0M
$9.5M
$10M
$11M
$6.9M
$8.4M
$11M
$10M
'17'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2024 6% · 2025 6%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

6% of FULL LIFE CARE’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (21% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 3,400 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 7 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

−$663k
’17
−$1.3M
’19
−$48k
’20
−$429k
’21
$1.2M
’22
−$1.4M
’23
−$2.5M
’24
−$3.7M
’25
0.6
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Board chair

Jesse Bond

Chair & director

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

'17'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed1415161413131414
Joined··+3+1+1+0+3+0
No longer listed··232020
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 5 funders to 6 funders, grant income rose $16k → $36k.

5 of 24 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 27% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

Left out of every figure on this page: $2.6M from 2 payers (the payer shares this organization's board, largest Presbyterian Retirement Communities Northwest). These are real filings, and they are not money FULL LIFE CARE raised.

From the IRS filings of FULL LIFE CARE’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

FULL LIFE CARE leans on a few funders — its largest provides 39% of grant income and the top three 61%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

27% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund FULL LIFE CARE.

39%
largest funder
61%
top three
~5
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 44% · 2018 62% · 2019 88% · 2020 27% · 2021 32% · 2022 48% · 2023 56% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

44% of FULL LIFE CARE's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 54% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

86% of FULL LIFE CARE's grant income comes from Washington funders.

WA
NV
CA
DE
NC
TX

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Washington out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $122k arriving through sponsors registered in 5 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

FULL LIFE CARE's funding base is broadening — from 5 funders to 6 as grant income climbed.

Operating margin−17% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve0.6mo · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)4% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 2,297 human services nonprofits $10M–$100M, FY2025

Government funding FULL LIFE CARE receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $2.3M on record.

Federal$2.3M
grants $1.9Mcontracts $355k
17
18
19
Top agencies
  • Department of Health and Human Services$1.9M
  • Department of Veterans Affairs$355k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like FULL LIFE CARE

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Washington

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

98% of spending goes to programs.

Program 98%Management 2%Fundraising 0%

Governance

9
board members
89%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

81%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Part of a family of 21 related entities

  • Christian Retirement Homes · exempt
  • Downtown Action to Save Housing · exempt
  • Eastmont Foundation · exempt
  • Elder Care Alliance · exempt
  • Elder Care Alliance of Camarillo · exempt

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for FULL LIFE CARE: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds FULL LIFE CARE?
FULL LIFE CARE (Washington) receives grants from 24 organizations whose IRS filings report $451,912 to it, the largest being THE SUSAN ELIZABETH FOUNDATION ($175,000). 13 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does FULL LIFE CARE have?
IRS filings report 24 organizations giving $451,912 in grants to FULL LIFE CARE, 13 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of FULL LIFE CARE?
THE SUSAN ELIZABETH FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $175,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like FULL LIFE CARE find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Full Life Care →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 24 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing