Skip to content

California · Nonprofit

AGEUP INC

AGEUP INC (California) receives grants from 13 organizations whose IRS filings report $796,418 to it, the largest being WOODLAWN FOUNDATION ($490,000). 9 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$1.5M
Funders on record
13
Grants received
$796k
Net assets
$3.0M
9/13 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 10%
01What it does

What Ageup Inc does

Mission

To actively provide advocacy and pursue enhancement of the quality of life for residents of long-term care facilities in the san mateo county.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Complaint investigation and facility monitoring: state certified ombudsmen monitor facilities for quality of care, quality of life and violation of residents' rights. In 2024-2025 fiscal year, the following facilities were included in its jurisdiction: 16 nursing homes,216 residential care facilities for the elderly, 30 intermediate care facilities,24 adult day health care programs,125 adult residential facilities for the developmentally disabled,total of 412 facilities with 9,025 residents. Ombudsmen made a total of 4,321 visits to the facilities and investigated and closed 523 cases encompassing 573 complaints.

    $640,093 spent
    60% of program spending
  2. Recruitment and training: the program provides training to volunteers to obtain and maintain state certification. The training program includes 36 hours of classroom training followed by an internship period of approximately 10 days. During the internship, the student ombudsmen are provided with hands-on guidance on how to monitor facilities; accept, investigate, and document their findings. In addition, we provide 2 hours of on-going training for all ombudsmen each month. During fy 2024-2025 we trained and certified 13 new ombudsmen who actively joined our team in the field, bringing the number up to 31 volunteer field ombudsmen active in the program. (continued on schedule o)during the year, 31 state-certified ombudsmen provided a total of 5,280 volunteer hours over the one-year period, valued at about $184,798. In addition, we provided 12 two-hour training sessions throughout the year to all ombudsmen who must attend 18 hours of ongoing training each year to maintain state certification.

    $213,365 spent
    20% of program spending
  3. Community education and advocacy: ombudsman services contribute to the overall health literacy of residents in san mateo county through its educational outreach. In fy 2024-2025 we accomplished the following:- held 75 community education events educating the general public on long-term care, the role of the ombudsman and other related issues. - provided individual consultation to 1,174 people seeking information on our services or other aging issues - conducted 10 in-service educational events for facility staff and provided 434 consultation hours to staff members.

    $213,365 spent
    20% of program spending

The 3 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $1,066,823.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($1.1M) Expenses 100 ($1.0M) Net assets 100 ($2.4M)2018 Revenue 90 ($976k) Expenses 99 ($1.0M) Net assets 101 ($2.5M)2019 Revenue 90 ($978k) Expenses 102 ($1.1M) Net assets 100 ($2.4M)2020 Revenue 101 ($1.1M) Expenses 96 ($999k) Net assets 104 ($2.5M)2021 Revenue 110 ($1.2M) Expenses 95 ($992k) Net assets 130 ($3.1M)2022 Revenue 109 ($1.2M) Expenses 106 ($1.1M) Net assets 112 ($2.7M)2023 Revenue 115 ($1.2M) Expenses 108 ($1.1M) Net assets 112 ($2.7M)2024 Revenue 98 ($1.1M) Expenses 110 ($1.1M) Net assets 111 ($2.7M)2025 Revenue 140 ($1.5M) Expenses 123 ($1.3M) Net assets 123 ($3.0M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (140)Expenses (123)Net assets (123)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2020 to 2021, from $2.6M to $3.2M (+23%).

$2.5M
$2.5M
$2.5M
$2.6M
$3.2M
$2.8M
$2.7M
$2.8M
$3.2M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 42% · 2018 49% · 2019 53% · 2020 60% · 2021 62% · 2022 70% · 2023 46% · 2024 58% · 2025 54%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

94% of AGEUP INC’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (81% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 11,793 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$48k
’17
−$50k
’18
−$82k
’19
$104k
’20
$202k
’21
$93k
’22
$124k
’23
−$73k
’24
$240k
’25
2.5
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Elyse Brummer

Executive director

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

The chief executive listed changed between the FY2023 and FY2024 filings.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed121111111198911
Joined·+0+4+0+0+0+0+4+4
No longer listed·14002132
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base narrowed from 6 funders to 4 funders, grant income rose $86k → $103k.

2 of 13 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 4% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of AGEUP INC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

AGEUP INC leans on a few funders — its largest provides 62% of grant income and the top three 80%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

70% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund AGEUP INC.

62%
largest funder
80%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 47% · 2018 72% · 2019 72% · 2020 43% · 2021 48% · 2022 66% · 2023 58% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

50% of AGEUP INC's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 69% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

97% of AGEUP INC's grant income comes from California funders.

NJ
CA
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $36k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

AGEUP INC runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 6,891 human services nonprofits its size.

Operating margin16% · top quartile
Months of reserve2.5mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)4% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 6,891 human services nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025

Organizations like AGEUP INC

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

83% of spending goes to programs.

Program 83%Management 14%Fundraising 3%

Governance

10
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

87%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for AGEUP INC: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds AGEUP INC?
AGEUP INC (California) receives grants from 13 organizations whose IRS filings report $796,418 to it, the largest being WOODLAWN FOUNDATION ($490,000). 9 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does AGEUP INC have?
IRS filings report 13 organizations giving $796,418 in grants to AGEUP INC, 9 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of AGEUP INC?
WOODLAWN FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $490,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like AGEUP INC find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Ageup →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 13 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing