Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Cencora Impact Foundation

The specific and primary purpose of this corporation is to engage in charitable, educational, and scientific purposes within the meaning of section 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code of 1986, as amended, and the treasury regulations promulgated thereunder, per the corresponding provision of any future united states internal revenue…

$8.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
100
Grants FY2025still arriving
28
States reached
$658k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Health$19MInternational$13MYouth Development$2.7MCommunity Improvement$2.4MPublic Safety & Disaster$2.3MEducation$2.2MHuman Services$2.0MPhilanthropy$1.8MOther$0
02FY2025 · 100 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 100 grants below total $7,420,228 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $8,200,356 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $780,128 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k31 grants · $219k
  • $10k–50k30 grants · $452k
  • $50k–250k31 grants · $3.2M
  • $250k+8 grants · $3.5M
$14,251
Median grant
28
States reached
$15M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DIRECT RELIEF$658,478
PROJECT HOPE THE PEOPLE TO PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC$628,966
AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC$618,633
INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE INC$497,021
ELUNA$353,347
FAMILY REACH FOUNDATION$277,507
UNITED STATES ASSOCIATION FOR UNHCR$250,077
SOSTENTO INC$250,000
PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION$232,800
ALEXS LEMONADE STAND FOUNDATION$226,999
SCHOLARSHIP AMERICA INC$164,205
NURSE FAMILY PARTNERSHIP$151,500
BOYS GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA$151,149
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY-PENNSYLVANIA$150,000
CHILDRENS INN AT NIH INC$150,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $4.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 85% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MATFORCE THE YAVAPAI COUNTY SUBSTANCE ABUSE COALITION: $62k → 14%AMISTADES INC: $86k → 15%UP VALLEY FAMILY CENTERS: $65k → 9%SUNRISE DAY CAMPS ASSOCIATION INC: $50k → 6%SOUTHEASTERN GUIDE DOGS INC: $101k → 10%K9 PARTNERS FOR PATRIOTS INC: $90k → 12%UNITED WAYS OF TENNESSEE: $105k → 4%UNITED WAYS OF TENNESSEE: $50k → 9%POWER OF PUTNAM INC: $64k → 19%YOUNG PEOPLE IN RECOVERY: $75k → 12%HUMAN SERVICE CENTER OF SOUTHERN METRO-EAST: $100k → 6%MATFORCE THE YAVAPAI COUNTY SUBSTANCE ABUSE COALITION: $62k → 14%AMISTADES INC: $75k → 15%SOUTHEASTERN GUIDE DOGS INC: $101k → 10%K9 PARTNERS FOR PATRIOTS INC: $75k → 12%UNITED WAYS OF TENNESSEE: $75k → 4%POWER OF PUTNAM INC: $60k → 19%DAVIS DIRECTION FOUNDATION INC: $70k → 8%YOUNG PEOPLE IN RECOVERY: $75k → 12%AMISTADES INC: $75k → 15%SOUTHEASTERN GUIDE DOGS INC: $100k → 10%K9 PARTNERS FOR PATRIOTS INC: $70k → 12%POWER OF PUTNAM INC: $56k → 19%YOUNG PEOPLE IN RECOVERY: $50k → 12%PROJECT HOME: $92k → 22%SOUTHEASTERN GUIDE DOGS INC: $100k → 10%K9 PARTNERS FOR PATRIOTS INC: $70k → 12%POWER OF PUTNAM INC: $56k → 19%MEDASSIST OF MECKLENBURG: $60k → 10%PROJECT HOME: $82k → 22%SOUTHEASTERN GUIDE DOGS INC: $53k → 10%K9 PARTNERS FOR PATRIOTS INC: $60k → 12%MEDASSIST OF MECKLENBURG: $52k → 10%PROJECT HOME: $75k → 22%SOUTHEASTERN GUIDE DOGS INC: $50k → 10%K9 PARTNERS FOR PATRIOTS INC: $50k → 12%NC MEDASSIST: $50k → 10%PROJECT HOME: $75k → 22%SOUTHEASTERN GUIDE DOGS INC: $50k → 10%PROJECT HOME: $75k → 22%PROJECT HOME: $75k → 22%PROJECT HOME: $75k → 22%PROJECT HOME: $75k → 22%AMERICAN RED CROSS - SOUTHEASTERN PA CHAPTER: $187k → 22%AMERICAN RED CROSS - SOUTHEASTERN PA CHAPTER: $175k → 22%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS - SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA: $127k → 22%AMERICAN RED CROSS OF SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA: $73k → 22%PHMC 1500: $105k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
ME
WA
ID
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$43M · 130 repeat orgs$7.4M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +17% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.

130 repeat relationships — 60 still active in FY2025, 70 since wound down; 34 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

130
188

Total granted

$43M
$6.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+9%

Still filing today

91%
88%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $779k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationPhilanthropyInternationalAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EF
    ELUNA FORMERLY THE MOYER FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $2.8M · revenue +143% · 27% of their budget
  • DIRECT RELIEF
    7× · 2018–2025 · $2.6M · revenue +94%
  • FR
    FAMILY REACH FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $2.3M · revenue +98%

Funded once

  • UU
    UNICEF USA Impact Fund for Children Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $500k · revenue -28%
  • ID
    IMMUNE DEFICIENCY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $167k · revenue +23%
  • DP
    DRUG PREVENTION RESOURCES INC
    one grant, 2019 · $165k · revenue +13%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University Health Inc

Primary functions are the coordination and delivery of health care resources and services, health care education for the hospital service area, long range analysis of health care needs and development of programs, and arranging for…

—
2
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
3
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
4
Public Health Institute

Public health institute generates and promotes research, leadership and partnerships to build capacity for strong public health policy, programs, systems and practices.

Health
5
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
6
National Committee for Quality Assurance

Our mission: to improve the quality of health care.our vision: better health care. better choices. better health.

Health
7
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
8
Personal Care Products Council Foundation Inc

The foundation is set up to deliver one program - look good feel better. the mission of this nationwide program is to improve the quality of life of women, men, and teens undergoing cancer treatment by offering advice on how to cope with…

Health
9
National Nurse-Led Care Consortium

The national nurse-led care consortium (nncc) strives to advance nurse-led healthcare through policy, consultation, and programs to reduce health disparities and meet people's primary care and wellness needs.

Health
10
America's Health Insurance Plans Inc

Ahip is the national trade association representing the health insurance industry. ahip's members provide health care coverage, services and solutions to more than 200 million americans. we are committed to market-based solutions and…

Membership Benefit
11
Patient Access Network Foundation

As a leading charitable foundation and healthcare advocacy organization, the pan foundation is dedicated to accelerating access to treatment for those who need it most and empowering patients on their healthcare journeys. we provide…

—
12
Highmark Health

As the parent entity of a blended health organization, highmark health seeks to improve the health and well-being of the people and communities it serves by providing affordable, accessible and high-quality healthcare.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Buffalo and Erie County and the most unlike its peers is Veterinary Sustainability Alliance. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyAnimal Rescue and ShelterYouth Development CentersCommunity FoundationsCancer Support ServicesChristian Missionary Organi…Food Banks and PantriesMilitary Veterans SupportSenior Support ServicesIndependent K-12 SchoolsYouth Sports ProgramsLocal History MuseumsDomestic Violence ServicesAffordable Housing Developm…Women & Girls Leadership De…Developmental Disabilities …Community Arts CentersChristian Youth CampsEquine Therapy ProgramsLgbtq+ Community SupportEnvironmental Conservation …Addiction Recovery ServicesVolunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Child Abuse Advocacy Servic…Public Library OperationsYmca Youth DevelopmentImmigrant Worker SupportFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Policy Research and AdvocacyUnited Way AffiliatesYouth Development ServicesHealth Access Advocacy and …Community Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%4%<5yr14%6%5–10yr19%21%10–20yr16%27%20–35yr13%23%35–55yr16%20%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%2%<5yr14%5%5–10yr19%12%10–20yr16%41%20–35yr13%21%35–55yr16%19%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%12/380
the rest of the field
13%
240,384/1,819,185

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

353 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 353 of the 381 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

10
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
65
Early backer (in before they grew)
339/353
Grantees still filing
202/353
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ELUNA FORMERLY THE MOYER FOUNDATION — $2,786,549 · HealthELUNA FORMERLY THE MOYER FOUNDATIONFAMILY REACH FOUNDATION — $2,331,658 · HealthFAMILY REACH FOUNDATIONPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $1,658,805 · HealthPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORA…Sostento Inc — $1,125,000 · HealthSostento IncNURSE-FAMILY PARTNERSHIP — $820,640 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $731,138 · HealthHealthcare Ready — $572,762 · Health+43 more — $7,042,639 · Health+43 moreAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC — $4,466,191 · InternationalAMERICARES FOUNDATION IN…DIRECT RELIEF — $2,563,811 · InternationalDIRECT RELIEFPROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $863,966 · InternationalPROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPL…International Rescue Committee INC — $765,955 · InternationalInternational Rescue Com…UNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION INC — $720,000 · InternationalUNITED NATIONS FOUNDATIO…UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $458,449 · International+5 more — $1,033,868 · International+5 moreHEALTH CARE IMPROVEMENT FOUNDATION — $612,531 · OtherHEALTH CARE IMPROVEMEN…ALEXS LEMONADE STAND FOUNDATION — $541,222 · OtherALEXS LEMONADE STAND F…FLORIDA COALITION ALLIANCE INC — $375,000 · OtherINITIATIVE FOR A COMPETITIVE INNER CITY INC — $560,000 · OtherINITIATIVE FOR A COMPE…TREVOR PROJECT INC — $595,785 · OtherTREVOR PROJECT INCANGEL FLIGHT EAST — $578,000 · OtherANGEL FLIGHT EAST+69 more — $6,801,711 · Other+69 moreAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $751,580 · Human ServicesAmerican …PROJECT HOME — $623,513 · Human ServicesPROJECT H…Southeastern Guide Dogs Inc — $555,350 · Human ServicesSoutheast…K9 PARTNERS FOR PATRIOTS — $415,000 · Human ServicesK9 PARTNE…AMISTADES INC — $236,166 · Human ServicesAMISTADES…POWER OF PUTNAM INC — $236,123 · Human ServicesPOWER OF …UNITED WAYS OF TENNESSEE — $230,000 · Human ServicesUNITED WA…YOUNG PEOPLE IN RECOVERY — $199,533 · Human ServicesMedAssist of Mecklenburg DBA NC Medassist — $187,551 · Human ServicesNATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC — $150,000 · Human Services+9 more — $626,518 · Human Services+9 moreBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA — $1,758,494 · Youth DevelopmentCADCA — $703,877 · Youth DevelopmentNational FFA Foundation Inc — $301,452 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS IN TENNESSEE — $200,000 · Youth Development+4 more — $213,113 · Youth DevelopmentSCHOLARSHIP AMERICA INC — $878,632 · EducationUS Chamber of Commerce Foundation — $832,000 · EducationNATIONAL COMMUNITY PHARMACISTS ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION INC — $350,774 · EducationRIZE MASSACHUSETTS FOUNDATION INC — $150,000 · EducationLINCOLN UNIVERSITY — $100,000 · EducationDUQUESNE UNIVERSITY OF THE HOLY SPIRIT — $97,500 · Education+7 more — $309,853 · EducationUNICEF USA Impact Fund for Children Inc — $500,203 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA AND SOUTHERN NEW JERSEY — $332,800 · PhilanthropyCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $103,093 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF THE DUTCHESS-ORANGE REGION INC — $100,000 · PhilanthropyVOLUNTEER FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC — $85,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF NORTH CAROLINA — $79,573 · PhilanthropyGREATER GOOD CHARITIES — $77,306 · Philanthropy+17 more — $543,269 · Philanthropy
Health$17,069,191International$10,872,240Other$10,064,249Human Services$4,211,334Youth Development$3,176,936Education$2,718,759Philanthropy$1,821,244

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC — $4,466,191 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetELUNA FORMERLY THE MOYER FOUNDATION — $2,786,549 over 9y, 27% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF — $2,563,811 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY REACH FOUNDATION — $2,331,658 over 9y, 5.8% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA — $1,758,494 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $1,658,805 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetSostento Inc — $1,125,000 over 5y, 20% of budgetSCHOLARSHIP AMERICA INC — $878,632 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $863,966 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetUS Chamber of Commerce Foundation — $832,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetNURSE-FAMILY PARTNERSHIP — $820,640 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $765,955 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $751,580 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $731,138 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION INC — $720,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCADCA — $703,877 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetPROJECT HOME — $623,513 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetHEALTH CARE IMPROVEMENT FOUNDATION — $612,531 over 5y, 6.7% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC — $595,785 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetANGEL FLIGHT EAST — $578,000 over 8y, 4.8% of budgetHealthcare Ready — $572,762 over 9y, 70% of budgetINITIATIVE FOR A COMPETITIVE INNER CITY INC — $560,000 over 5y, 3.4% of budgetSoutheastern Guide Dogs Inc — $555,350 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetALEXS LEMONADE STAND FOUNDATION — $541,222 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetNATIONAL DISASTER SEARCH DOG FOUNDATION — $528,747 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetUNICEF USA Impact Fund for Children Inc — $500,203 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetTHE ADDICTION POLICY FORUM — $480,000 over 6y, 8.5% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $458,449 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D — $435,149 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetK9 PARTNERS FOR PATRIOTS — $415,000 over 6y, 12% of budgetLIVING BEYOND BREAST CANCER — $405,423 over 7y, 1.4% of budgetNATIONAL COMMUNITY PHARMACISTS ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION INC — $350,774 over 6y, 30% of budgetPARENTS OF ADDICTED LOVED ONES — $350,714 over 4y, 15% of budgetINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS — $346,074 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA AND SOUTHERN NEW JERSEY — $332,800 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetPHYSICIAN ASSOCIATE FOUNDATION OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PHYSICIAN ASSOCIATES — $322,283 over 4y, 10% of budgetNational FFA Foundation Inc — $301,452 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetTREK MEDICS INTERNATIONAL INC — $301,200 over 2y, 27% of budgetDKMS — $300,046 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetOVERDOSE LIFELINE INC — $298,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetURBAN AFFAIRS COALITION — $296,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPREVENTION ACTION ALLIANCE — $295,825 over 3y, 5.0% of budgetCamden Coalition Inc — $286,843 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetCHARITABLE PHARMACY OF CENTRAL OHIO INC — $262,730 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetNOT ONE MORE VET INC — $261,236 over 4y, 13% of budgetNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION INC — $260,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetThe Children's Health Fund — $253,500 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetNATIONAL RECREATION AND PARK ASSOCIATION — $250,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ELUNA FORMERLY THE MOYER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DIRECT RELIEF ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY REACH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds Sostento Inc ↗
  • Who funds SCHOLARSHIP AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds US Chamber of Commerce Foundation ↗
  • Who funds NURSE-FAMILY PARTNERSHIP ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CADCA ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT HOME ↗
  • Who funds HEALTH CARE IMPROVEMENT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TREVOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds ANGEL FLIGHT EAST ↗
  • Who funds Healthcare Ready ↗
  • Who funds INITIATIVE FOR A COMPETITIVE INNER CITY INC ↗
  • Who funds Southeastern Guide Dogs Inc ↗
  • Who funds ALEXS LEMONADE STAND FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL DISASTER SEARCH DOG FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNICEF USA Impact Fund for Children Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE ADDICTION POLICY FORUM ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
  • Who funds K9 PARTNERS FOR PATRIOTS ↗
  • Who funds LIVING BEYOND BREAST CANCER ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL COMMUNITY PHARMACISTS ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PARENTS OF ADDICTED LOVED ONES ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA AND SOUTHERN NEW JERSEY ↗
  • Who funds PHYSICIAN ASSOCIATE FOUNDATION OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PHYSICIAN ASSOCIATES ↗
  • Who funds National FFA Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds TREK MEDICS INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds DKMS ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Philadelphia Foun…United Way of Greater…The Gordon Charter Fo…Chester County Commun…The Cigna Group Found…America's CharitiesConnelly FoundationThe Blackbaud Giving …Henry Dolfinger 2 Tru…The Leo and Peggy Pie…Lindback Cr & Mf Foun…Independence Blue Cro…
The Philadelphia FoundationPA40× affinity33 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Philadelphia Foundation · United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · The Gordon Charter Foundation · Chester County Community Foundation · The Cigna Group Foundation · America's Charities · Connelly Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Henry Dolfinger 2 Trust Uw · The Leo and Peggy Pierce Family Foundation Inc · Lindback Cr & Mf Foundation Tw Main · Independence Blue Cross Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Cencora Impact Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 100%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • Mhp Salud — 66% of income from government
  • Education Development Center Inc — 65% of income from government
  • Community Action Pioneer Valley — 62% of income from government
  • Clear Path for Veterans New England Inc — 62% of income from government
  • Rize Massachusetts Foundation Inc — 39% of income from government
  • Columbia Health Services — 25% of income from government
  • National Association of School Nurses — 15% of income from government
  • Care Dimensions Inc — 14% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University — 12% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
  • Children's Inn at Nih Inc — 10% of income from government
  • Mid Shore Behavioral Health Inc — 4% of income from government
  • Cradles to Crayons Inc — 2% of income from government
  • The Oregon Community Foundation — 2% of income from government
  • Volunteer Florida Foundation Inc — 2% of income from government
  • United Way Suncoast Inc — 1% of income from government
  • The United Way of Lee County Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Americares Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Southeastern Guide Dogs Inc — 0% of income from government
  • The Addiction Policy Forum — 0% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
10get no government money at all
52report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
4rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 381 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home