Arizona · Nonprofit
Intercollegiate Tennis Association Inc
Intercollegiate Tennis Association Inc (Arizona) receives grants from 13 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,415,921 to it, the largest being UNITED STATES TENNIS ASSOCIATION INCORPORATED ($1,030,000). 7 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- Revenue FY2025
- $2.9M
- Funders on record
- 13
- Grants received
- $1.4M
- Net assets
- $4.6M
What Intercollegiate Tennis Association Inc does
Mission
Administrative, supervision, and sponsorship of college tennis tournaments, college rankings, coaches education, and convention as college tennis rules and regulations.
As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.
Programs
National coaches convention and various tournaments. The ITA hosts an annual convention each December. The convention includes governance meetings by the association's board of directors and tennis operating committees, the presentation of the ITA coaches of the year awards, open forums for coaches, as well as informative and educational clinics (both on-court and in a classroom environment). The ITA also administers a year-round calendar of tournaments. One of the most visible programs administered by the ITA is the ITA regional championships where close to 8,000 men's and women's collegiate tennis players participate each year in over 90 regional events (24 for division I and approximately 60 for small colleges), which are hosted across the country throughout September and October. The ITA also presents a series of national championships for individuals as well as teams.
$1,914,199 spent100% of program spendingOther program income and expenses: Regularly the ITA hosts a series of events, including the ITA Arthur Ashe Leadership weekend in New York City, ITA David A Benjamin award induction ceremony in New York City, and hall of fame induction ceremonies.
Awards program: the ITA administers a comprehensive awards program to honor and recognize men's and women's coaches and players in all divisions. The ITA awards program honors the following: ITA David A Benjamin achievement award, ITA meritorious service award, ITA Men's and women's collegiate halls of fame, ITA Arthur Ashe Jr Leadership & sportsmanship award, the Ann Lebedeff leadership award, Wilson/ITA coaches of the year, ITA national college players of the year, ITA collegiate all-star team, ITA scholar-athlete & all-academic team, Cissie Leary sportsmanship award, Rafael Osuna sportsmanship award, ITA national spring awards program, Wilson/ITA national promoter of the year award, Steve Wilkinson team sportsmanship award.
The 3 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $1,914,199.
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
Balance sheet
Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2019 to 2020, from $3.2M to $3.5M (+12%).
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
Government-grant reliance: 2021 8% · 2022 7%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
16% of Intercollegiate Tennis Association Inc’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (13% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Leadership and staff
The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.
Chief executive
Timothy Russell
President & CEO
Board chair
Jon Vegosen
Chairman
As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.
Who funds it, year by year
2018 → 2023: the base narrowed from 4 funders to 3 funders, grant income rose $33k → $365k.
5 of 13 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 13% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of Intercollegiate Tennis Association Inc’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
Intercollegiate Tennis Association Inc leans on a few funders — its largest provides 73% of grant income and the top three 88%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
89% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund Intercollegiate Tennis Association Inc.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2018 30% · 2019 30% · 2020 48% · 2021 63% · 2022 70% · 2023 90% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How long its funders stay
44% of Intercollegiate Tennis Association Inc's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 54% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.
Where its funders are
Intercollegiate Tennis Association Inc draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside Arizona, across 5 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $186k arriving through sponsors registered in 5 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Against its field
Intercollegiate Tennis Association Inc runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 1,623 recreation & sports nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,623 recreation & sports nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025
Organizations like Intercollegiate Tennis Association Inc
Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Arizona
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
70% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
91%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Intercollegiate Tennis Association Inc: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds Intercollegiate Tennis Association Inc?
- Intercollegiate Tennis Association Inc (Arizona) receives grants from 13 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,415,921 to it, the largest being UNITED STATES TENNIS ASSOCIATION INCORPORATED ($1,030,000). 7 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does Intercollegiate Tennis Association Inc have?
- IRS filings report 13 organizations giving $1,415,921 in grants to Intercollegiate Tennis Association Inc, 7 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of Intercollegiate Tennis Association Inc?
- UNITED STATES TENNIS ASSOCIATION INCORPORATED is the largest funder on record, with $1,030,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like Intercollegiate Tennis Association Inc find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Arizona. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
Play a game about who funds Intercollegiate Tennis Association →
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 13 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing