· Private foundation
The Si Redd & Tamara Redd Charitable Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ANIMAL FOUNDATION | $2,000 |
| PARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA NEVADA CHAPTER | $2,000 |
| FEEDING PETS OF THE HOMELESS | $2,000 |
| NEVADA SPCA | $2,000 |
| PAW WARRIORS | $2,000 |
| GOODIE TWO SHOES FOUNDATION | $1,500 |
| LV VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY | $1,000 |
| SAFE HOUSE | $1,000 |
| ZIONS YOUTH SYMPHONY AND CHORUS | $1,000 |
| ANIMAL RESCUE | $1,000 |
| RUNAWAYS ANIMAL RESCUE | $1,000 |
| CANINE PARTNERS FOR LIFE | $1,000 |
| CHILDREN OF THE NIGHT | $1,000 |
| PILOTS TO THE RESCUE | $1,000 |
| FREEDOM SERVICE DOGS OF AMERICA | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $61k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 82% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
42 repeat relationships — 29 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FPFEEDING PETS OF THE HOMELESS AKA PETS OF THE HOMELESS8× · 2017–2024 · $16k · revenue +413%
- PWPAW WARRIORS INC8× · 2017–2024 · $16k · revenue +22%
- PNPet Network Humane Society8× · 2017–2024 · $15k · revenue +69%
Funded once
- MFMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF UTAH INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue +97%
- HAHEARTS ALIVE VILLAGE INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue ×12
- SNSIERRA NEVADA TRANSPORTATION COALITIONone grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue -63%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To remove the "no pets allowed" sign on the doors of domestic violence shelters. women should not have to choose between leaving their abuser and leaving their pets behind to be abused.
To care for pets, find them homes and save lives.
To compassionately serve pets and the people who love them.
Animal Welfare
Valley Humane Society (VHS) creates a brighter future for cats and dogs by encouraging and strengthening the bond between people and pets. VHS rescues and rehabilitates companion animals, champions responsible caretaking, shares pets'…
A champion for animals since 1967, PAWS is a nationally recognized leader - rehabilitating injured and orphaned wildlife, sheltering and adopting homeless cats and dogs, and educating people to make a better world for animals and people.
Idaho Animal Rescue Network is a 501(c)(3) non-profit based in Idaho that works in Idaho and Eastern Washington to educate, advocate, and network with other rescues and law enforcement in Idaho regarding animal cruelty and neglect. We are…
Animal shelter for the protection and care of abused and neglected animals.
Our mission is to be an innovative regional leader in responsible treatment of homeless dogs and cats, primarily through their rescue and placement in forever loving homes and by promoting spaying and neutering to control pet…
Animal rescue organization dedicated to finding homes for animals at the animal shelter. we also provde vet care foster homes, and assistance with homing for special needs animals.
All about animals rescue's mission is no more homeless pets.
Animal Care and Adoption - ARR's mission is to save the lives of homeless and abandoned dogs and cats. Our goal is reaching a no-kill society in the United States.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feeding Pets of the Homeless Aka Pets of the Homeless and the most unlike its peers is Runaways Animal Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 9. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 35% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 20% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
39 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 39 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE ANIMAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FEEDING PETS OF THE HOMELESS AKA PETS OF THE HOMELESS ↗
- Who funds PAW WARRIORS INC ↗
- Who funds Pet Network Humane Society ↗
- Who funds Children of the Night ↗
- Who funds Operation Blankets Of Love ↗
- Who funds GOODIE TWO SHOES FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SAFE HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds NEVADA SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
- Who funds ZION'S YOUTH SYMPHONY & CHORUS INC ↗
- Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF SOUTH MISSISSIPPI ↗
- Who funds NEVADA PARTNERSHIP FOR HOMELESS YOUTH ↗
- Who funds LAS VEGAS RESCUE MISSION ↗
- Who funds CANINE PARTNERS FOR LIFE ↗
- Who funds HUMANE FARMING ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds SHOES THAT FIT ↗
- Who funds ANIMAL RESCUE INC ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL WILDERNESS LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds DAYS END FARM HORSE RESCUE INC ↗
- Who funds Last Chance for Animals ↗
- Who funds FOSTER KINSHIP ↗
- Who funds SPREAD THE WORD NEVADA ↗
- Who funds PERFORMING ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds Runaways Animal Rescue ↗
- Who funds ANGEL FLIGHT WEST INC ↗
- Who funds FREEDOM SERVICE DOGS INC ↗
- Who funds ST JUDES RANCH FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds HELP OF SOUTHERN NEVADA ↗
- Who funds WILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds POLARIS PROJECT ↗
- Who funds ORGANIZATION FOR AUTISM RESEARCH ↗
- Who funds CYSTIC FIBROSIS RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: America's Charities · Mgm Resorts Foundation · Wynn Resorts Foundation · United Way of Southern Nevada · Nevada Community Foundation Inc · NV Energy Charitable Foundation · The Mel & Ruth Wolzinger Foundation · Engelstad Family Foundation · Greater Good Charities · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Dermody Properties Foundation · Speedway Children's Charities
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Si Redd & Tamara Redd Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Si Redd & Tamara Redd Charitable Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Si Redd & Tamara Redd Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.