Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Futures Without Violence

To pioneer new strategies to end violence against women and children at home and abroad.

$1.9M
Granted FY2024still arriving
27
Grants FY2024still arriving
13
States reached
$506k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Human Services$7.5MEducation$2.5MScience & Tech$1.5MCrime & Legal$1.4MPublic Benefit$987kEmployment$887kInternational$710kHealth$707kOther$0
02FY2024 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $10k
  • $10k–50k17 grants · $376k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $744k
  • $250k+2 grants · $794k
$30,911
Median grant
13
States reached
$91M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WESTED$506,374
ORGANIZACION EN CALIFORNIA DE LIDERES CAMPESINAS INC$287,608
NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JUVENILE & FAMILY COURT JUDGES$160,835
ALIANZA NACIONAL DE CAMPESINAS$150,000
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH$142,805
CIA SIAB INC$85,949
FORGE INC$78,249
FISCAL SPONSORSHIP ALLIES (FBO THE FLOURISH FUND REVIVING ROOTS)$70,113
VOCES UNIDAS FOR JUSTICE$55,558
MICHIGAN ORGANIZATION ON ADOLESCENT SEXUAL HEALTH$45,743
EAST LOS ANGELES WOMEN'S CENTER$43,598
IN THE STREETS$41,791
CENTER FOR EMPOWERED POLITICS EDUCATION FUND$37,907
KAN-WIN$30,911
THE LATINA CENTER$29,914
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $3.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 73% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ASIAN WOMEN UNITED OF MINNESOTA: $10k → 11%THE LATINA CENTER: $30k → 9%LA LUZ CENTER: $600k → 9%SAFE HORIZON INC: $5k → 17%IOWA COALITION AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $75k → 10%CIA SIAB INC: $86k → 12%LATINA SAFEHOUSE INITIATIVE: $31k → 12%OHIO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE NETWORK: $57k → 15%MI CENTRO: $194k → 9%YOU ARE MORE THAN INC: $12k → 7%TURNAROUND INC: $31k → 11%LA LUZ CENTER: $10k → 9%ALIANZA NACIONAL DE CAMPESINAS: $214k → 10%JENESSE CENTER INC: $8k → 14%COLORADO COALTION AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $75k → 12%OHIO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE NETWORK: $18k → 15%HEARTLAND HUMAN CARE SERVICES: $31k → 14%CASA DE ESPERANZA: $41k → 14%NEXT DOOR SOLUTIONS TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $31k → 8%ALIANZA NACIONAL DE CAMPESINAS: $150k → 10%CHILDREN NOW: $600k → 10%JEANNE GEIGER CRISIS CENTER INC: $62k → 10%CASA DE ESPERANZA: $34k → 14%ALIANZA NACIONAL DE CAMPESINAS INC: $15k → 10%KAN-WIN: $31k → 14%JEANNE GEIGER CRISIS CENTER INC: $51k → 10%JEANNE GEIGER CRISIS CENTER INC: $49k → 10%CENTER FOR YOUNG WOMEN'S DEVELOPMENT: $600k → 10%JEANNE GEIGER CRISIS CENTER INC: $19k → 10%CHILDREN NOW: $10k → 10%WOMEN'S CENTER & SHELTER OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $31k → 11%YOUNG WOMEN'S FREEDOM CENTER: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
ME
WA
ID
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
NV
IA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
WV
VA
MD
KS
NC
DC
HI
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$14M · 45 repeat orgs$2.9M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +43% since the first grant, against +28% for the ones you funded once.

45 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2024, 26 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

45
54

Total granted

$14M
$2.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+28%

Still filing today

76%
85%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $324k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthEducationCrime & LegalEmploymentCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    University of Kansas Center for Research Inc
    6× · 2017–2022 · $1.5M · revenue +44%
  • CL
    CAMINAR LATINO INC
    6× · 2018–2023 · $914k · revenue +402%
  • NC
    NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JUVENILE & FAMILY COURT JUDGES
    8× · 2017–2024 · $721k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • TP
    THE PRIMARY SCHOOL
    one grant, 2021 · $600k · revenue +14%
  • NF
    NATIONAL FUND FOR WORKFORCE SOLUTIONS
    one grant, 2023 · $200k · revenue -88%
  • MC
    MI CENTRO
    one grant, 2023 · $194k · revenue -25%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Domestic Violence & Sexual Assault Services of Whatcom County

The mission of domestic violence and sexual assault services is to support individuals affected by domestic violence, sexual assault, and sexual exploitation, and to lead the community toward ending these abuses of power.

Health
2
Family Violence Law Center

FVLC helps diverse communities in Alameda County heal from domestic violence and sexual assault, advocating for justice and healthy relationships. We provide survivor-centered legal and crisis intervention services, offer prevention for…

Crime & Legal
3
The Network Advocating Against Domestic Violence

The Network is a group of 40+ member organizations dedicated to improving the lives of those impacted by gender-based violence through education, public policy and advocacy, and connecting community members with direct service providers.…

Human Services
4
Michigan Coalition to End Domestic and Sexual Violence

Dedicated to the empowerment of all the state's survivors of domestic and sexual violence. our mission is to develop and promote efforts aimed at the elimination of all domestic and sexual violence in michigan.

—
5
Alliance Against Domestic Abuse

To eliminate domestic violence and sexual assault and to empower victims through education, service, and social change.

Crime & Legal
6
Woman Inc

W.O.M.A.N., Inc. supports survivors of domestic violence and their loved ones along their healing journeys, bridging value rich networks designed to address intersections of violence. In all our work, we strive to continually increase our…

Health
7
California Partnership to End Domestic Violence

The organization's mission is to promote the collective voice of a diverse coalition of organizations and individuals working to eliminate all forms of domestic violence. as an advocate for sociate change, we advance our mission by…

Civil Rights
8
Su Casa - Ending Domestic Violence

Su casa's mission is to empower individuals and families to live free from domestic abuse and build partnerships with communities to end domestic violence. the organization helps transform victims into survivors, helping them escape the…

—
9
Crisis Intervention & Advocacy Center

Crisis intervention & advocacy center is an advocacy program designed to respond to victims of domestic abuse, sexual assualt, stalking, dating violence, and homelessness in adair, adams, clarke, dallas, decatur, guthrie, madison,…

Human Services
10
The Center for Violence-Free Relationships

The Center for Violence-Free Relationships is dedicated to building healthy relationships, families, and communities free from sexual assault and domestic violence through education, advocacy, and services in western El Dorado County.

—
11
National Resource Center On Domestic Violence Inc

The mission of the nrcdv is to strengthen and transform efforts to end domestic violence.

Crime & Legal
12
Enlace Comunitario

To work to eliminate domestic violence in the latino immigrant community and to promote healthy families through comprehensive domestic violence intervention services in spanish, preventative community education policy advocacy and…

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Center for the Study of Social Policy and the most unlike its peers is Hawaii Family Law Clinic. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyImmigrant Worker SupportDomestic Violence ServicesLgbtq+ Community SupportHealth Access Advocacy and …Policy Research and AdvocacyWomen & Girls Leadership De…Community Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%1%<5yr14%9%5–10yr19%20%10–20yr16%19%20–35yr13%41%35–55yr16%10%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%11%5–10yr19%14%10–20yr16%20%20–35yr13%39%35–55yr16%15%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%2/106
the rest of the field
13%
240,394/1,819,459

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

92 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 92 of the 107 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
22
Early backer (in before they grew)
88/92
Grantees still filing
61/92
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WESTED — $1,346,128 · OtherWESTEDSAFE & SOUND — $610,000 · OtherSAFE & SOUNDMISSION ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGENCY — $610,000 · OtherMISSION ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGENCYMONTEREY COUNTY CHILDREN & FAMILIES COMMISSION — $610,000 · OtherMONTEREY COUNTY CHILDREN & FAMILIES COMMISSIONALLEGHENY COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES — $588,133 · OtherALLEGHENY COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICESILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES — $322,415 · OtherBREAK THE CYCLE — $282,089 · OtherCARRY THE VISION — $609,996 · OtherCARRY THE VISION+51 more — $2,012,825 · Other+51 moreCAMINAR LATINO INC — $914,294 · Human ServicesCAMINAR LATINO INCYOUNG WOMEN'S FREEDOM CENTER — $610,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG WOMEN'S FREEDOM CENTERLA LUZ CENTER — $610,000 · Human ServicesLA LUZ CENTERCHILDREN NOW — $610,000 · Human ServicesCHILDREN NOWAlianza Nacional de Campesinas Inc — $378,575 · Human ServicesAlianza Nacional de Campesina…MI CENTRO — $194,365 · Human ServicesJEANNE GEIGER CRISIS CENTER INC — $181,904 · Human Services+20 more — $869,563 · Human Services+20 moreUniversity of Kansas Center for Research Inc — $1,482,576 · Science & TechUniversity…THE PRIMARY SCHOOL — $600,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $366,919 · EducationFORGE INC — $91,988 · Education+6 more — $108,378 · EducationCENTER FOR THE STUDY OF SOCIAL POLICY — $986,779 · Public BenefitNATIONAL COUNCIL OF JUVENILE & FAMILY COURT JUDGES — $720,942 · Crime & LegalGUAM COALITION AGAINST SEXUAL ASSAULT AND FAMILY VIOLENCE CORP — $43,917 · Crime & LegalIn The Streets Inc — $41,791 · Crime & LegalEssie Justice Group — $41,057 · Crime & LegalTAPESTRI INC — $30,720 · Crime & Legal+2 more — $37,584 · Crime & LegalOrganizacion en California de Lideres Campesinas Inc — $637,608 · EmploymentNATIONAL FUND FOR WORKFORCE SOLUTIONS — $200,000 · EmploymentWOMEN EMPLOYED — $31,308 · Employment
Other$6,991,586Human Services$4,368,701Science & Tech$1,482,576Education$1,167,285Public Benefit$986,779Crime & Legal$916,011Employment$868,916

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUniversity of Kansas Center for Research Inc — $1,482,576 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetCENTER FOR THE STUDY OF SOCIAL POLICY — $986,779 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetCAMINAR LATINO INC — $914,294 over 6y, 22% of budgetNATIONAL COUNCIL OF JUVENILE & FAMILY COURT JUDGES — $720,942 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetOrganizacion en California de Lideres Campesinas Inc — $637,608 over 3y, 7.3% of budgetSAFE & SOUND — $610,000 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetYOUNG WOMEN'S FREEDOM CENTER — $610,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetLA LUZ CENTER — $610,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetMISSION ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGENCY — $610,000 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetCHILDREN NOW — $610,000 over 2y, 7.9% of budgetCARRY THE VISION — $609,996 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetAlianza Nacional de Campesinas Inc — $378,575 over 3y, 5.6% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $366,919 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBREAK THE CYCLE — $282,089 over 3y, 15% of budgetNATIONAL FUND FOR WORKFORCE SOLUTIONS — $200,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetMI CENTRO — $194,365 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetJEANNE GEIGER CRISIS CENTER INC — $181,904 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetMICHIGAN ORGANIZATION ON ADOLESCENT SEXUAL HEALTH — $129,661 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetCommunity Health Center Assoc of Connecticut Inc — $106,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetFORGE INC — $91,988 over 2y, 10% of budgetCIA SIAB INC — $85,949 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetCENTER FOR EMPOWERED POLITICS EDUCATION FUND — $80,521 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetIDAHO COALITION AGAINST SEXUAL AND DOMESTIC VIOLENCE — $75,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetOHIO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE NETWORK — $75,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetCOLORADO COALITION AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE — $75,000 over 1y, 6.6% of budgetESPERANZA UNITED — $74,865 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetFISCAL SPONSORSHIP ALLIES INC — $70,113 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetOMNI FAMILY HEALTH — $70,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPublic Health Institute — $65,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetViolence Free Minnesota — $64,469 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetCLINICA SIERRA VISTA — $60,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW ENGLAND ARAB AMERICAN ORGANIZATION — $55,744 over 2y, 4.9% of budgetKING URBAN LIFE CENTER INC — $54,675 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH ON WOMEN — $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetYWCA NORTHEASTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC — $49,748 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetEAST LOS ANGELES WOMEN'S CENTER — $43,598 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetIn The Streets Inc — $41,791 over 1y, 11% of budgetEssie Justice Group — $41,057 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetASIAN HEALTH SERVICES — $40,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCalifornia School-Based Health Alliance — $40,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetSHENANDOAH WOMEN'S CENTER INC — $39,787 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetHEARTLAND HUMAN CARE SERVICES INC — $31,333 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEALTH IMPERATIVES INC — $31,321 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWOMEN EMPLOYED — $31,308 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetKAN-WIN — $30,911 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetWISE WOMEN GATHERING PLACE INC — $30,720 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetDistrict of Columbia Coalition Against Domestic — $30,720 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTURNAROUND INC — $30,720 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Allstate Foundati…California Physicians…Novo FoundationThe California Endowm…Women's Foundation of…Kaiser Foundation Hos…Annie E Casey Foundat…Tides FoundationThe California Wellne…Rockefeller Philanthr…Vera Institute of Jus…Weingart Foundation
The Allstate FoundationIL32.5× affinity23 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Allstate Foundation · California Physicians' Service Fdn Dba Blue Shield of California Fdn · Novo Foundation · The California Endowment · Women's Foundation of California · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Annie E Casey Foundation Inc · Tides Foundation · The California Wellness Foundation · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · Vera Institute of Justice Inc · Weingart Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Futures Without Violence funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 40%
  • Connecticut Coalition Against Domestic Violence Inc — 100% of income from government
  • You Are More Than Inc — 100% of income from government
  • Community Health Center Assoc of Connecticut Inc — 85% of income from government
  • Health Imperatives Inc — 79% of income from government
  • Jeanne Geiger Crisis Center Inc — 40% of income from government
  • Boston Medical Center Corporation — 23% of income from government
  • Turnaround Inc — 18% of income from government
  • Trustees of Tufts College — 13% of income from government
  • Ywca Northeastern Massachusetts Inc — 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
24report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
4rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 107 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines