· Private foundation
Majestic Realty Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k98 grants · $300k
- $10k–50k24 grants · $369k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| YMCA of Southern Nevada | $25,000 |
| Moody Family YMCA | $25,000 |
| Spread the Word Nevada | $25,000 |
| Mercy Street | $25,000 |
| Camp John Marc | $20,000 |
| Semones Family YMCA | $20,000 |
| East Valley Community Health Center Inc | $18,753 |
| Mt San Antonio College Foundation | $18,753 |
| Think Together | $17,953 |
| Goodwill of Southern California | $15,000 |
| Boys & Girls Club of Greater Redlands | $15,000 |
| Texas Scottish Rite Hospital For Crippled Children | $15,000 |
| Swim with Mike Foundation | $13,145 |
| Cal Poly Pomona Foundation | $12,500 |
| Mt San Antonio College Foundation | $12,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $486k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +42% since the first grant, against +28% for the ones you funded once.
149 repeat relationships — 67 still active in FY2024, 82 since wound down; 33 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $136k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CHChildren's Hospital Colorado Foundation6× · 2017–2023 · $1.1M · revenue +42%
- MSMT SAN ANTONIO COLLEGE FOUNDATION8× · 2017–2024 · $311k · revenue +69%
- TTTHINK TOGETHER8× · 2017–2024 · $242k · revenue +387%
Funded once
- TGTHE GRADY HEALTH FOUNDATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $50k · revenue +108%
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2020 · $30k
- OHOPEN HAND ATLANTA INCone grant, 2019 · $20k · revenue +6%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To improve the quality of life for the diverse communities we serve providing affordable and comprehensive healthcare and education in a welcoming multi-cultural environment.
To eliminate disparities in health care access and outcomes by providing superior quality health and human services through an integrated world-class delivery system for latino, multi-ethnic underserved communities in southern california.
The primary exempt purpose of children's healthcare of california includes without limitation the receipt of distributions and grants for the making of distributions and grants to children's hospital of orange county (choc) and to…
Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service
The california dental association is committed to the success of our members in service to their patients and the public.
The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…
The organization provides primary medical, behavior health, and dental care to the population of san joaquin, and solano counties without regard to patients' ability to pay.
Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.
The foundation's mission is to improve the oral health of all californians by supporting the dental profession and its efforts to meet community needs.
To provide compassionate, coordinated, family-centered care for children with a dedicated commitment to excellent patient outcomes, inclusive leadership and innovative pediatric research and education.
La clinica provides primary and preventive medical, dental, behavioral health, and other health promotion services to underserved and low-income patients.
The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Saint John's Health Center Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Redlands Bicycle Classic Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 44 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.4% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
238 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 238 of the 348 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Children's Hospital Colorado Foundation ↗
- Who funds MT SAN ANTONIO COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THINK TOGETHER ↗
- Who funds EAST VALLEY COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds SPREAD THE WORD NEVADA ↗
- Who funds YMCA OF SOUTHERN NEVADA ↗
- Who funds MERCY STREET ↗
- Who funds CAL POLY POMONA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF REDLANDS ↗
- Who funds GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds Family Service Association of Redlands ↗
- Who funds SHEPHERD CENTER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THREE SQUARE ↗
- Who funds GEORGE WEST MENTAL HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Fernbank Inc ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds EAST LAKE FOUNDATIONINC ↗
- Who funds THE GRADY HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ATLANTA POLICE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds COLORADO UPLIFT INC ↗
- Who funds GOLD CROWN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SHOES THAT FIT ↗
- Who funds FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES ↗
- Who funds SAINT JOHN'S HEALTH CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AURORA COMPREHENSIVE COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO DENVER INC ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds FEEDING AMERICA RIVERSIDE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTIES ↗
- Who funds NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds Five Acres The Boys and Girls' Aid Society of Los Angeles County ↗
- Who funds ATLANTA RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds COVENANT HOUSE GEORGIA INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Ahmanson Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · The Rose Hills Foundation · Weingart Foundation · California Community Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Sempra Foundation · Mufg Union Bank Foundation Ag · Pasadena Community Foundation · Inland Empire Community Foundation · Johnny Carson Foundation · The Green Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Majestic Realty Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Abilities at Work — 95% of income from government
- Urban League of Portland Inc — 33% of income from government
- Chadd Inc Children and Adults With Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder — 31% of income from government
- Epilepsy Foundation of America — 22% of income from government
- Oregon Food Bank — 21% of income from government
- Raphael House of Portland — 10% of income from government
- The Shriners' Hospital for Children — 6% of income from government
- Young Men's Christian Association of Columbia-Willamette — 1% of income from government
- Food for the Poor Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.