Skip to content
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants: funding profile →

California · Public charity

Women in California Leadership Inc

Promote and support the development of women in science technology engineering and mathematics and address the disparities in california and the persons filling these key positions.

$437k
Granted FY2023
10
Itemized grants FY2023
9
Organizations funded FY2023
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2023
$51k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2023
$5,000
Largest grant, FY2023
$6,000
States reached, FY2023
1
Total assets, FY2023
$1.4M

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2023 to FY2023, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
YWCA of San Gabriel Valley$6,00010%
Highly Favored a Blessing to Others$5,000119%
Casa Familiar Inc$5,00010%
Mary's Shelter$5,00010%
For the People Taskforce$5,000123%
Tri-Valley Haven For Women$5,00010%
Afghan Coalition$5,00011%
League of Women Voters North County San Diego$5,0001n/a
Special Spirit Inc$5,00013%

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Women in California Leadership Inc supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYWCA of San Gabriel Valley: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHighly Favored a Blessing to Others: $5,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetCasa Familiar Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMary's Shelter: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFor the People Taskforce: $5,000 over 1y, 23% of budgetTri-Valley Haven For Women: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAfghan Coalition: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSpecial Spirit Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 8.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America C…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC7.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Women in California Leadership Inc with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Women in California Leadership Inc?

Find your warmest path to Women in California Leadership Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Women in California Leadership Inc

How much does Women in California Leadership Inc give?
Women in California Leadership Inc reported 10 itemized grants totaling $51,000, out of $437,273 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2023 IRS filing.
What does Women in California Leadership Inc fund?
By grant dollars over FY2023 to FY2023, its largest causes are Human Services (51%), Health (10%), Food & Nutrition (10%).
Who are Women in California Leadership Inc's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2023 to FY2023: YWCA of San Gabriel Valley ($6k), Highly Favored a Blessing to Others ($5k), Casa Familiar Inc ($5k).
Which funders back the same organizations as Women in California Leadership Inc?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc, American Online Giving Foundation Inc, Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc.
Where is Women in California Leadership Inc based?
Women in California Leadership Inc is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $553k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Women in California Leadership’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home