Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Private foundation

Weyerhaeuser Family Foundationinc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.3M
Granted FY2024still arriving
50
Grants FY2024still arriving
22
States reached
$214k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.

Environment$2.3MInternational$1.6MHuman Services$1.3MHealth$438kCrime & Legal$330kPhilanthropy$307kEducation$257kCommunity Improvement$133kOther$0
02FY2024 · 50 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k42 grants · $985k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $264k
$25,000
Median grant
22
States reached
$27M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MINNEAPOLIS FOUNDATION$213,952
CORNERHOUSE$50,000
MARTIN LUTHER KING MULTI-SERVICE CENTER INDIANAPOLIS INCORPORATED$30,000
PROJECT ZAWADI INC$30,000
WORLD NEIGHBORS$30,000
READYKIDS$30,000
NATUN GUATEMALA$30,000
OMID FOUNDATION USA$30,000
NEW FRIENDS NEW LIFE$30,000
ANISHINAABE AGRICULTURE INSTITUTE$30,000
WE CARE SOLAR$30,000
FAMILY CONNECTIONS INC$30,000
HEALTH EQUITY INTERNATIONAL (ST BONIFACE HAITI FOUNDATION)$30,000
MAYA ANGELOU SCHOOLS$30,000
WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME$30,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $963k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 64% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%YMCA TRI-COUNTY AREA: $30k → 7%FORESTDALE INC: $30k → 13%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF WESTERN NEW YORK: $30k → 13%SAFE HORIZON: $25k → 17%ONE HEART WORLDWIDE: $20k → 16%WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME: $30k → 16%MARTIN LUTHER KING MULTI-SERVICE CENTER INDIANAPOLIS INCORPORATED: $30k → 16%COVENANT HOUSE ALASKA: $30k → 10%READYKIDS: $30k → 8%CREAMOS NORTE: $34k → 7%HEALTH EQUITY INTERNATIONAL: $30k → 8%FORESTDALE INC: $30k → 13%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF WESTERN NEW YORK: $30k → 13%SAFE HORIZON: $25k → 17%WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME: $30k → 16%MARTIN LUTHER KING MULTI-SERVICE CENTER INDIANAPOLIS INCORPORATED: $30k → 16%COVENANT HOUSE ALASKA: $30k → 10%READYKIDS: $30k → 8%CREAMOS NORTE: $32k → 7%HEALTH EQUITY INTERNATIONAL (ST BONIFACE HAITI FOUNDATION): $30k → 8%ONE HEART WORLDWIDE: $35k → 11%FORESTDALE INC: $30k → 13%SAFE HORIZON: $25k → 17%WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME: $30k → 16%COVENNANT HOUSE ALASKA: $30k → 10%READYKIDS: $30k → 8%CREAMOS NORTE: $15k → 7%HEALTH EQUITY INTERNATIONAL: $30k → 8%ASIA INITIATIVES: $39k → 17%HEALTH EQUITY INTERNATIONAL: $30k → 8%ASIA INITIATIVES: $25k → 17%HEALTH EQUITY INTERNATIONAL (ST BONIFACE HAITI FOUNDATION): $30k → 8%FAMILY PARTNERSHIP: $25k → 11%FAMILY PARTNERSHIP: $3k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
ME
WA
ID
MT
MN
WI
NY
MA
OR
IN
PA
NJ
CA
UT
CO
NE
VA
MD
AZ
KS
NC
SC
DC
OK
AL
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 25% of Weyerhaeuser Family Foundationinc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Weyerhaeuser Family Foundationinclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 28% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$6.1M · 79 repeat orgs$494k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +46% since the first grant, against +29% for the ones you funded once.

79 repeat relationships — 42 still active in FY2024, 37 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

79
20

Total granted

$6.1M
$483k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+29%

Still filing today

87%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentHuman ServicesInternationalEducationHealthCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ST BONIFACE HAITI FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2019–2024 · $150k · revenue +126%
  • THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND
    5× · 2019–2023 · $150k · revenue +112%
  • C
    CORNERHOUSE
    4× · 2021–2024 · $140k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • FH
    FOREST HISTORY SOCIETY INC
    one grant, 2019 · $50k · revenue -47%
  • NC
    NATURE CONSERVANCY - FLORIDA
    one grant, 2020 · $50k
  • LR
    LOMAKATSI RESTORATION PROJECTgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $35k · revenue +236%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
2
Rainforest Foundation Inc

The purpose of rainforest foundation us is to support indigenous peoples and forest communities in their efforts to secure their lands, protect their environment, and uphold their rights.

Environment
3
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
4
African Wildlife Foundation Inc

Awf's mission is to ensure wildlife and wild lands thrive in modern africa. we work to equip african governments, institutions, business, and communities with the tools, insights, and support they need to define, own, and realize a…

Animals
5
Nature and Culture International

Nature and culture international conserves biologically diverse landscapes in latin america, in concert with local cultures, for the well-being of the planet.

Environment
6
Tuolumne River Preservation Trust dba Yosemite Rivers Alliance

At Yosemite Rivers Alliance, we unite conservation and community to protect and restore the three rivers that ?ow through the Yosemite Regionthe Tuolumne, Stanislaus, and Merced.

—
7
Dian Fossey Gorilla Fund International Inc

The Fossey Fund is dedicated to the conservation and study of gorillas in Africa through a successful, people-centered approach: 1) Providing daily protection to gorillas, 2) Scientific research providing critical data on gorillas and…

—
8
Eden Peopleplanet

To offer the dignity of fair employment to people living in impoverished communities, who become transformational agents of global forest restoration.

International
9
Wildlife Conservation Network Inc

Connect conservationists and supporters, deploy resources to the field, provide conservationists with tools and support they need to succeed.

Animals
10
Amazon Watch Inc

To protect the rainforest and advance the rights of Indigenous peoples in the Amazon Basin. We partner with Indigenous communities in campaigns for human rights, corporate accountability, and the preservation of the Amazon Basin's…

Environment
11
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
12
Fsc I&P

Fsc i&p promotes environmentally appropriate, socially beneficial, and economically viable management of the world's forests. this mission aligns with the forest stewardship council (fsc), its network of offices, and other organizations.…

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sanctuary for Families Inc and the most unlike its peers is High Desert Partnership. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Environmental Conservation …Jewish Community Organizati…Youth Development ServicesCommunity FoundationsChristian Missionary Organi…Domestic Violence Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%3%<5yr14%3%5–10yr19%21%10–20yr16%38%20–35yr13%20%35–55yr16%16%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%2%<5yr14%3%5–10yr19%19%10–20yr16%36%20–35yr13%20%35–55yr16%20%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/86
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,479

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

84 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 84 of the 102 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
28
Early backer (in before they grew)
84/84
Grantees still filing
61/84
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND — $150,000 · EnvironmentTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAN…MT ADAMS RESOURCE STEWARDS — $117,290 · EnvironmentMT ADAMS RESOURCE STEWAR…United States Endowment for Forestry — $100,000 · EnvironmentUnited States Endowment …NORTHWEST NATURAL RESOURCE GROUP — $100,000 · EnvironmentNORTHWEST NATURAL RESOUR…WILD RIVERS CONSERVANCY OF THE ST CROIX & NAMEKAGON — $90,000 · EnvironmentWILD RIVERS CONSERVANCY …MISSISSIPPI PARK CONNECTION — $85,000 · EnvironmentMISSISSIPPI PARK CONNECT…JEFFERSON LAND TRUST — $75,000 · EnvironmentCHELAN-DOUGLAS LAND TRUST — $75,000 · EnvironmentCALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF RESOURCE CONSERVATION DISTRICTS — $75,000 · EnvironmentWHATCOM LAND TRUST — $75,000 · EnvironmentREDWOOD FOREST FOUNDATION INC — $72,000 · EnvironmentCASCADE FOREST CONSERVANCY — $70,500 · EnvironmentWESTERN RIVERS CONSERVANCY — $60,000 · EnvironmentNEW ENGLAND FORESTRY FOUNDATION INC — $60,000 · EnvironmentMINNESOTA LAND TRUST — $60,000 · EnvironmentKaniksu Land Trust Inc — $51,781 · EnvironmentFOREST HISTORY SOCIETY INC — $50,000 · EnvironmentHIGH DESERT PARTNERSHIP — $50,000 · Environment+4 more — $62,000 · EnvironmentNATURE CONSERVANCY - MINNESOTA — $146,000 · OtherNATURE CONSERVANCY - MINNESOTATHOMPSON CHILD & FAMILY FOCUS INC — $90,000 · OtherMAYA ANGELOU SCHOOLS — $90,000 · OtherTransformations By Atlanta Angels — $90,000 · OtherFosterHope Sacramento — $88,400 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL — $87,815 · OtherThe Pacific Forest Trust Incorporated — $75,000 · OtherTHE BRIDGE INC — $75,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $75,000 · OtherECOTRUST — $75,000 · OtherCORNERHOUSE — $140,000 · OtherCORNERHOUSESUSTAINABLE NORTHWEST — $92,500 · OtherSIERRA INSTITUTE FOR COMMUNITY & ENVIRONMENT — $110,500 · Other+23 more — $904,725 · Other+23 moreWORLD NEIGHBORS INC — $140,000 · InternationalWORLD NEIGHBORS I…SEED PROGRAMS INC — $102,000 · InternationalSEED PROGRAMS INCLIFENET INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION — $95,000 · InternationalLIFENET INTERNATI…ASSOCIATION OF VOLUNTEERS IN INTERNATIONAL SERVICE USA INC — $92,000 · InternationalASSOCIATION OF VO…NATUN GUATEMALA — $90,000 · InternationalNATUN GUATEMALAOMID FOUNDATION USA — $90,000 · InternationalOMID FOUNDATION U…NEPAL YOUTH FOUNDATION — $88,131 · InternationalNEPAL YOUTH FOUND…Asante Africa Foundation Inc — $75,000 · InternationalAsante Africa Fou…VILLAGE ENTERPRISE FUND — $75,000 · InternationalVILLAGE ENTERPRIS…THE CENTER FOR VICTIMS OF TORTURE — $74,980 · InternationalTHE CENTER FOR VI…FLYING KITES INC — $60,000 · InternationalFLYING KITES INC+3 more — $83,559 · International+3 moreST BONIFACE HAITI FOUNDATION INC — $150,000 · Human ServicesST BONIFACE HAITI…COVENANT HOUSE ALASKA — $90,000 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSE AL…THE WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME — $90,000 · Human ServicesTHE WICHITA CHILD…SANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES INC — $90,000 · Human ServicesSANCTUARY FOR FAM…FORESTDALE INC — $90,000 · Human ServicesFORESTDALE INCREADYKIDS INC — $90,000 · Human ServicesREADYKIDS INCCreamos Norte — $80,500 · Human ServicesCreamos NorteSAFE HORIZON INC — $75,000 · Human ServicesSAFE HORIZON INCAsia Initiatives — $64,400 · Human ServicesAsia InitiativesJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF WESTERN NEW YORK — $60,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY SER…MARTIN LUTHER KING MULTI-SERVICE CENTER INDIANAPOLIS INC — $60,000 · Human ServicesMARTIN LUTHER KIN…ONE HEART WORLDWIDE — $55,000 · Human Services+2 more — $58,000 · Human Services+2 moreTeam Up Mentoring Inc — $83,835 · EducationFriends of Forman Christian College Inc — $75,000 · EducationTHE WATERSHED RESEARCH & TRAINING CENTER — $75,000 · EducationDARING GIRLS — $75,000 · EducationPROJECT ZAWADI INC — $60,000 · EducationWASHINGTON ASSOCIATION OF LAND TRUSTS — $20,000 · EducationMALI RISING FOUNDATION — $15,000 · Education+1 more — $10,000 · EducationFAMILY CONNECTIONS INC — $90,000 · HealthYAKIMA NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH SERVICES — $90,000 · HealthIntegrate Health Inc — $80,000 · HealthWE CARE SOLAR — $60,000 · HealthFOUNDATION FOR HOPE AND HEALTH IN HAITI — $50,000 · HealthTUBMAN — $25,500 · HealthTHE MINNEAPOLIS FOUNDATION — $231,952 · PhilanthropyALLIANCE FOR HOPE INTERNATIONAL — $75,000 · Philanthropy
Environment$1,478,571Other$2,139,940International$1,065,670Human Services$1,052,900Education$413,835Health$395,500Philanthropy$306,952

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE MINNEAPOLIS FOUNDATION — $231,952 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetST BONIFACE HAITI FOUNDATION INC — $150,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND — $150,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCORNERHOUSE — $140,000 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetWORLD NEIGHBORS INC — $140,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetMT ADAMS RESOURCE STEWARDS — $117,290 over 4y, 7.0% of budgetSIERRA INSTITUTE FOR COMMUNITY & ENVIRONMENT — $110,500 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetSEED PROGRAMS INC — $102,000 over 4y, 8.3% of budgetUnited States Endowment for Forestry — $100,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetNORTHWEST NATURAL RESOURCE GROUP — $100,000 over 4y, 4.4% of budgetLIFENET INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION — $95,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetSUSTAINABLE NORTHWEST — $92,500 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetASSOCIATION OF VOLUNTEERS IN INTERNATIONAL SERVICE USA INC — $92,000 over 4y, 3.6% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE ALASKA — $90,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTHOMPSON CHILD & FAMILY FOCUS INC — $90,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME — $90,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTransformations By Atlanta Angels — $90,000 over 3y, 4.9% of budgetNATUN GUATEMALA — $90,000 over 3y, 14% of budgetSANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES INC — $90,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetOMID FOUNDATION USA — $90,000 over 3y, 9.1% of budgetFORESTDALE INC — $90,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY CONNECTIONS INC — $90,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetWILD RIVERS CONSERVANCY OF THE ST CROIX & NAMEKAGON — $90,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetREADYKIDS INC — $90,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetYAKIMA NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH SERVICES — $90,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFosterHope Sacramento — $88,400 over 3y, 4.2% of budgetNEPAL YOUTH FOUNDATION — $88,131 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetMISSISSIPPI PARK CONNECTION — $85,000 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetTeam Up Mentoring Inc — $83,835 over 3y, 4.1% of budgetCreamos Norte — $80,500 over 3y, 9.6% of budgetIntegrate Health Inc — $80,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetThe Pacific Forest Trust Incorporated — $75,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetJEFFERSON LAND TRUST — $75,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetSAFE HORIZON INC — $75,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFriends of Forman Christian College Inc — $75,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetTHE BRIDGE INC — $75,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetTHE WATERSHED RESEARCH & TRAINING CENTER — $75,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetDARING GIRLS — $75,000 over 3y, 9.1% of budgetCHELAN-DOUGLAS LAND TRUST — $75,000 over 3y, 5.7% of budgetAsante Africa Foundation Inc — $75,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetCALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF RESOURCE CONSERVATION DISTRICTS — $75,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetALLIANCE FOR HOPE INTERNATIONAL — $75,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetVILLAGE ENTERPRISE FUND — $75,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetWHATCOM LAND TRUST — $75,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetECOTRUST — $75,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR VICTIMS OF TORTURE — $74,980 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetREDWOOD FOREST FOUNDATION INC — $72,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetCASCADE FOREST CONSERVANCY — $70,500 over 3y, 4.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Together Women RiseNational Fish and Wil…National Forest Found…Millsdavis FoundationRonald W Naito Md Fou…Land Trust Alliance I…Resources Legacy FundM J Murdock Charitabl…The Nature ConservancyCircle of Sisterhood …The Oregon Community …The Burning Foundation
Together Women RiseSC25.9× affinity10 shared granteesties to 5 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Together Women Rise · National Fish and Wildlife Foundation · National Forest Foundation · Millsdavis Foundation · Ronald W Naito Md Foundation · Land Trust Alliance Inc · Resources Legacy Fund · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · The Nature Conservancy · Circle of Sisterhood Foundation Inc · The Oregon Community Foundation · The Burning Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Weyerhaeuser Family Foundationinc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 83%
  • Lomakatsi Restoration Project — 100% of income from government
  • High Desert Partnership — 100% of income from government
  • Wallowa Resources Inc — 100% of income from government
  • New England Forestry Foundation Inc — 88% of income from government
  • Family Connections Inc — 83% of income from government
  • Womanspace Inc — 47% of income from government
  • World Neighbors Inc — 46% of income from government
  • Ecotrust — 14% of income from government
  • Sustainable Northwest — 5% of income from government
  • Western Rivers Conservancy — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
21report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
5rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Weyerhaeuser Family Foundationinc?

Find your warmest path to Weyerhaeuser Family Foundationinc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 102 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines