Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Snider Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$163M
Granted FY2025still arriving
92
Grants FY2025still arriving
14
States reached
$28M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.

Philanthropy$134MHealth$36MEducation$12MCivil Rights$11MArts & Culture$9.3MInternational$9.3MCrime & Legal$7.3MPublic Benefit$3.0MOther$0
02FY2025 · 92 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k28 grants · $87k
  • $10k–50k36 grants · $674k
  • $50k–250k14 grants · $1.3M
  • $250k+14 grants · $161M
$18,000
Median grant
14
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE JAY AND TERRY SNIDER FOUNDATION$27,686,688
THE LINDY SNIDER FOUNDATION$27,686,688
THE CRAIG SNIDER FOUNDATION$27,686,688
THE SARENA SNIDER FOUNDATION$27,686,688
THE TINA SNIDER FOUNDATION$22,720,040
THE TINA SNIDER FOUNDATION$9,274,331
THE SARENA SNIDER FOUNDATION$3,100,000
THE CRAIG SNIDER FOUNDATION$3,100,000
THE LINDY SNIDER FOUNDATION$3,100,000
THE JAY AND TERRY SNIDER FOUNDATION$3,100,000
THE CRAIG SNIDER FOUNDATION$1,421,595
THE LINDY SNIDER FOUNDATION$1,421,595
THE SARENA SNIDER FOUNDATION$1,421,595
THE JAY AND TERRY SNIDER FOUNDATION$1,421,595
BEYOND CELIAC (NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR CELIAC AWARENESS)$216,280
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $1.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 66% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%WELLSPRING HOUSE INC: $11k → 10%SPECIAL OPERATIONS SOLUTIONS FUND: $65k → 11%DELIVER FUND: $21k → 14%SPECIAL OPERATIONS WOUNDED WARRIORS (SOWW): $5k → 13%ONE VET AT A TIME INC: $10k → 10%KAVOD-ENSURING DIGNITY FOR HOLOCAUST SURVIVORS: $30k → 17%HEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION: $25k → 17%LAZARUS HOUSE MINISTRIES INC: $5k → 10%NATIONAL PROGRESS ALLIANCE: $10k → 5%PALS PROGRAMS: $300k → 6%LAZARUS HOUSE MINISTRIES INC: $5k → 10%ACTION INC: $10k → 10%PALS PROGRAMS: $40k → 6%PALS PROGRAM: $30k → 6%PALS PROGRAMS: $25k → 6%THE PEOPLE CONCERN: $25k → 14%BETTER TOGETHER: $10k → 10%PALS PROGRAMS: $16k → 6%PALS PROGRAMS: $10k → 6%NEXT STEP FUND INC: $25k → 8%TURNING POINTS FOR CHILDREN: $25k → 22%KAVOD SURVIVORS OF THE HOLOCAUST EMERGENCY FUND: $25k → 12%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $12k → 22%FAMILIES AGAINST MANDATORY MINIMUMS FOUNDATION (FAMM): $55k → 14%FAMILIES AGAINST MANDATORY MINIMUMS FOUNDATION (FAMM): $50k → 14%FAMILIES AGAINST MANDATORY MINIMUMS FOUNDATION (FAMM): $50k → 14%SOUTH BOSTON NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $5k → 16%JEWISH RELIEF AGENCY: $50k → 7%JEWISH RELIEF AGENCY: $30k → 7%JEWISH RELIEF AGENCY: $25k → 7%JEWISH RELIEF AGENCY: $20k → 7%LUBAVITCH HOUSE AT PENN INC: $6k → 22%BRAVER ANGELS: $25k → 17%BRAVER ANGELS: $25k → 17%RXART: $5k → 17%COMMUNITY SECURITY SERVICE: $25k → 17%ORPHANED STARFISH FOUNDATION: $20k → 17%ORPHANED STARFISH FOUNDATION: $15k → 17%ORPHANED STARFISH FOUNDATION: $15k → 17%PROJECT HOME: $120k → 22%PROJECT HOME: $35k → 22%FIRST STAR: $30k → 14%FIRST STAR INC: $25k → 14%COMMUNITY SECURITY SERVICE: $150k → 17%PHILADELPHIA FREEDOM VALLEY YMCA: $10k → 7%COMMUNITY SECURITY SERVICE: $100k → 17%COMMUNITY SECURITY SERVICE: $50k → 17%PUBLIC CITIZENS FOR CHILDREN AND YOUTH: $16k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
WA
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
WY
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
DE
AZ
KS
TN
NC
SC
DC
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

41%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$97M · 283 repeat orgs$139M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +36% since the first grant, against +23% for the ones you funded once.

283 repeat relationships — 43 still active in FY2025, 240 since wound down; 25 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

283
354

Total granted

$97M
$10M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+23%

Still filing today

85%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 21% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $129M went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureHealthHuman ServicesInternationalAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $4.2M · revenue +72%
  • SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC
    4× · 2018–2024 · $3.3M · revenue +49%
  • IF
    INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE
    7× · 2018–2024 · $2.8M · revenue +57%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF AUSTIN
    one grant, 2022 · $1.0M
  • CF
    COMMONWEALTH FOUNDATION FOR PUBLIC POLICY ALT
    one grant, 2018 · $400k
  • HOMEBOY INDUSTRIES
    one grant, 2022 · $300k · revenue +1%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
2
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
3
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
4
Foreign Policy Research Institute

The foreign policy research institute (frpi) is dedicated to producing the highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on crucial foreign policy and national security challenges facing the united states. we educate…

International
5
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
6
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
7
Public Media Nj Inc

To bring quality public television programs and resources to communities throughout new jersey and its tri-state neighbors. its content, both on-air and online, aims to reflect the diverse

Arts & Culture
8
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
9
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
10
Peter G Peterson Institute for International Economics

The peterson institute for international economics (piie) is an independent nonprofit, nonpartisan research organization dedicated to strengthening prosperity and human welfare in the global economy through expert analysis and practical…

Social Science
11
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
12
The Rand Corporation

Help improve policy and decision making through research and analysis.

Public Benefit

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Center for the Rights of Abused Children and the most unlike its peers is NORTH10 Philadelphia. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyDance Arts OrganizationsHealth Access Advocacy and …Local Food System Organizat…Community Food PantriesChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Affordable Housing Construc…School District FoundationsPublic Library OperationsFood Banks and PantriesLgbtq+ Community SupportOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Affordable Housing Developm…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Military Veterans SupportAddiction Recovery ServicesImmigrant Worker SupportVolunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Youth Development CentersCommunity Arts CentersLocal History MuseumsAnimal Rescue and ShelterCommunity FoundationsIndependent K-12 SchoolsCancer Support ServicesYouth Sports ProgramsEnvironmental Conservation …Community FoundationsJewish Community Organizati…Policy Research and AdvocacyCommunity College Foundatio…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%5%<5yr13%8%5–10yr19%21%10–20yr17%25%20–35yr15%21%35–55yr17%20%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%70%<5yr13%2%5–10yr19%6%10–20yr17%12%20–35yr15%8%35–55yr17%2%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 70% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.9% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.9%5/553
the rest of the field
9%
7,128/77,609

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

530 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 530 of the 682 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

13
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
120
Early backer (in before they grew)
517/530
Grantees still filing
353/530
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE JAY AND TERRY SNIDER FOUNDATION — $32,208,283 · PhilanthropyTHE JAY AND TERRY SNIDER FOUNDATIONANOTHER LIGHT FOUNDATION — $32,208,283 · PhilanthropyANOTHER LIGHT FOUNDATIONTHE LINDY SNIDER FOUNDATION — $32,208,283 · PhilanthropyTHE LINDY SNIDER FOUNDATIONTHE CRAIG SNIDER FOUNDATION — $32,208,283 · PhilanthropyTHE CRAIG SNIDER FOUNDATION+7 more — $2,377,149 · PhilanthropyTHE TINA SNIDER FOUNDATION — $34,136,406 · OtherTHE TINA SNIDER FOUNDATIONUSC SHOAH FOUNDATION - THE INSTITUTE FOR VISUAL HISTORY AND EDUCATION — $2,569,000 · Other+100 more — $23,693,429 · Other+100 moreSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC — $3,255,000 · Arts & CultureWEITZMAN NATIONAL MUSEUM OF AMERICAN JEWISH HISTORY — $920,250 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN CONTEMPORARY BALLET INC — $705,000 · Arts & CultureTHE AYN RAND INSTITUTE THE CENTER FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF OBJECTIVISM — $703,520 · Arts & CultureTHE PHILOS PROJECT INC — $675,000 · Arts & CulturePHILADELPHIA HOLOCAUST REMEMBRANCE FOUNDATION INC — $525,001 · Arts & CultureThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum — $422,000 · Arts & CultureNew Civil Liberties Alliance — $395,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL CONSTITUTION CENTER — $370,000 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION — $351,750 · Arts & Culture+12 more — $1,832,018 · Arts & CultureUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION INC — $4,195,794 · EducationISRAEL ON CAMPUS COALITION INC — $893,412 · Education+31 more — $4,767,567 · EducationFoundation for the Defense of Democracies Inc — $2,380,000 · InternationalTHE LAWFARE PROJECT INC — $2,208,000 · InternationalSCHOLARS FOR PEACE IN THE MIDDLE EAST — $590,000 · InternationalITREK INC — $526,250 · InternationalFuente Latina Inc — $505,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAHAD - IN UNUM INC — $405,000 · InternationalCENTER FOR SECURITY POLICY INC — $360,000 · InternationalMIDDLE EAST MEDIA AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC — $323,000 · International+7 more — $1,084,500 · InternationalINSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE — $2,830,000 · Civil RightsFOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND EXPRESSION INC — $1,695,750 · Civil RightsLETTER OF THE LAW INC — $625,000 · Civil RightsUNITED NATIONS WATCH - USA — $488,750 · Civil Rights+4 more — $385,662 · Civil RightsTHE FAIRNESS CENTER INC — $2,200,000 · Crime & LegalPacific Legal Foundation — $763,500 · Crime & LegalNATIONAL RIGHT TO WORK LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $680,000 · Crime & LegalThe Louis D Brandeis Center Inc — $302,500 · Crime & Legal+5 more — $572,100 · Crime & Legal
Philanthropy$131,210,281Other$60,398,835Arts & Culture$10,154,539Education$9,856,773International$8,381,750Civil Rights$6,025,162Crime & Legal$4,518,100

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION INC — $4,195,794 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC — $3,255,000 over 4y, 8.6% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE — $2,830,000 over 7y, 1.6% of budgetFoundation for the Defense of Democracies Inc — $2,380,000 over 7y, 2.4% of budgetTHE LAWFARE PROJECT INC — $2,208,000 over 7y, 18% of budgetTHE FAIRNESS CENTER INC — $2,200,000 over 7y, 32% of budgetTHE COMMONWEALTH FOUNDATION FOR PUBLIC POLICY ALTERNATIVES — $1,942,500 over 5y, 6.5% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND EXPRESSION INC — $1,695,750 over 7y, 2.3% of budgetDAVID HOROWITZ FREEDOM CENTER — $1,126,148 over 7y, 2.9% of budgetTHE PHILANTHROPY ROUNDTABLE — $923,650 over 7y, 5.2% of budgetWEITZMAN NATIONAL MUSEUM OF AMERICAN JEWISH HISTORY — $920,250 over 7y, 6.1% of budgetISRAEL ON CAMPUS COALITION INC — $893,412 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetPacific Legal Foundation — $763,500 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetSECURE COMMUNITY NETWORK INC — $725,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetAMERICAN CONTEMPORARY BALLET INC — $705,000 over 3y, 35% of budgetTHE AYN RAND INSTITUTE THE CENTER FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF OBJECTIVISM — $703,520 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetNATIONAL RIGHT TO WORK LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $680,000 over 7y, 1.8% of budgetTHE PHILOS PROJECT INC — $675,000 over 6y, 9.2% of budgetLETTER OF THE LAW INC — $625,000 over 2y, 24% of budgetSCHOLARS FOR PEACE IN THE MIDDLE EAST — $590,000 over 6y, 12% of budgetJEWISH FUNDERS NETWORK — $578,999 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE COBBOSSEE WATERSHED — $537,590 over 5y, 25% of budgetITREK INC — $526,250 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetPHILADELPHIA HOLOCAUST REMEMBRANCE FOUNDATION INC — $525,001 over 4y, 34% of budgetFuente Latina Inc — $505,000 over 6y, 4.9% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS COUNCIL OF SAN FRANCISCO MARIN & PENINSULA — $495,000 over 5y, 2.9% of budgetUNITED NATIONS WATCH - USA — $488,750 over 7y, 8.2% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum — $422,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetPALS Programs — $421,000 over 6y, 40% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAHAD - IN UNUM INC — $405,000 over 6y, 11% of budgetFoundation for Economic Education Inc — $400,000 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetNew Civil Liberties Alliance — $395,000 over 6y, 1.9% of budgetNATIONAL CONSTITUTION CENTER — $370,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetCENTER FOR SECURITY POLICY INC — $360,000 over 3y, 6.4% of budgetMUSEUM OF THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION — $351,750 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetED SNIDER YOUTH HOCKEY & EDUCATION — $326,810 over 7y, 2.6% of budgetCommunity Security Service — $325,000 over 4y, 44% of budgetHOLOCAUST MUSEUM LA — $325,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetBEYOND CELIAC — $323,500 over 6y, 6.4% of budgetMIDDLE EAST MEDIA AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC — $323,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetHETERODOX ACADEMY — $322,500 over 6y, 2.6% of budgetPHILADELPHIA MURAL ARTS ADVOCATES INC — $318,768 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR FREE SPEECH — $310,000 over 6y, 1.9% of budgetTHE FEDERALIST SOCIETY FOR LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY STUDIES — $302,500 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetThe Louis D Brandeis Center Inc — $302,500 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetHOMEBOY INDUSTRIES — $300,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetBill of Rights Institute — $300,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetWILLIAMSON COLLEGE OF THE TRADES — $267,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE JAY AND TERRY SNIDER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ANOTHER LIGHT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE LINDY SNIDER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE CRAIG SNIDER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds Foundation for the Defense of Democracies Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE LAWFARE PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FAIRNESS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE COMMONWEALTH FOUNDATION FOR PUBLIC POLICY ALTERNATIVES ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND EXPRESSION INC ↗
  • Who funds DAVID HOROWITZ FREEDOM CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE PHILANTHROPY ROUNDTABLE ↗
  • Who funds WEITZMAN NATIONAL MUSEUM OF AMERICAN JEWISH HISTORY ↗
  • Who funds ISRAEL ON CAMPUS COALITION INC ↗
  • Who funds Pacific Legal Foundation ↗
  • Who funds SECURE COMMUNITY NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CONTEMPORARY BALLET INC ↗
  • Who funds THE AYN RAND INSTITUTE THE CENTER FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF OBJECTIVISM ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL RIGHT TO WORK LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE PHILOS PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds LETTER OF THE LAW INC ↗
  • Who funds SCHOLARS FOR PEACE IN THE MIDDLE EAST ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FUNDERS NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE COBBOSSEE WATERSHED ↗
  • Who funds ITREK INC ↗
  • Who funds PHILADELPHIA HOLOCAUST REMEMBRANCE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Fuente Latina Inc ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS COUNCIL OF SAN FRANCISCO MARIN & PENINSULA ↗
  • Who funds UNITED NATIONS WATCH - USA ↗
  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The William Penn Foun…The Saramar Charitabl…The Lindy Snider Foun…Donors Trust IncHenry Dolfinger 2 Tru…The Philadelphia Foun…The Tina Snider Found…The Craig Snider Foun…Another Light Foundat…Erlbaum Family Founda…The Daniel B and Flor…The Jay and Terry Sni…
The William Penn FoundationPA62.2× affinity48 shared granteesties to 8 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The William Penn Foundation · The Saramar Charitable Fund · The Lindy Snider Foundation · Donors Trust Inc · Henry Dolfinger 2 Trust Uw · The Philadelphia Foundation · The Tina Snider Foundation · The Craig Snider Foundation · Another Light Foundation · Erlbaum Family Foundation · The Daniel B and Florence E Green Foundation · The Jay and Terry Snider Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Snider Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 140%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Samaritans Inc — 31% of income from government
  • Police Assisted Addiction and Recovery Initiative Inc — 16% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University — 12% of income from government
  • Northeastern University — 7% of income from government
  • Ballet Theatre of Boston Inc D/B/a Jose Mateo Ballet Theatre — 1% of income from government
  • Year Up Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
14get no government money at all
35report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 682 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home