Skip to content

Washington, D.C. · Nonprofit

FAMILIES AGAINST MANDATORY MINIMUMS FOUNDATION

FAMILIES AGAINST MANDATORY MINIMUMS FOUNDATION (Washington, D.C.) receives grants from 42 organizations whose IRS filings report $18,119,660 to it, the largest being Silicon Valley Community Foundation ($4,781,500). 21 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 61% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2025
$2.0M
Funders on record
42
Grants received
$18M
Net assets
$6.7M
21/42 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 66%
01What it does

What Families Against Mandatory Minimums Foundation does

Mission

Our mission is to create a more fair and effective justice system that respects our american values of individual accountability and dignity while keeping our communities safe.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. State programs: famm's state work has two components: (1) project states, which are the states in which we have aggressive, full-scale campaigns for reform led by in-state project directors, and (2) opportunity states, which are states in which we see an opportunity for reform, we seek to bring a unique or additional voice to the discussion, or are invited to testify or weigh in on a proposed reform. Family outreach and storytelling: famm's greatest asset has always been the stories of our members. Famm maintains a large network of families and formerly incarcerated people across the country to aid us in our fight for reform. We provide intensive training in storytelling and advocacy, and in turn highlight member stories and connect members to direct advocacy. Such opportunities include testifying before legislators, meeting with lawmakers and other officials, and speaking with the media.

    $2,256,171 spentof which $66,000 as grants
    68% of program spending
  2. Federal programs: famm is focused on eliminating federal mandatory minimum sentencing laws and improving advisory guidelines so that judges can make individualized assessments of offenders. We also work in prison policy reform, supporting policies that provide incarcerated individuals access to meaningful work and educational opportunities, as well as substance abuse and mental health treatment. We believe that all corrections facilities should be safe and that individuals who are incarcerated should remain close to their homes in order to maintain important family bonds. In our work to educate policymakers on these issues, famm hosts capitol hill lobby days, panels, and briefings; testifies before legislators; and advocates presidential pardons and commutations.

    $1,038,107 spent
    32% of program spending

The 2 programs described on its FY2025 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $3,294,278.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($3.4M) Expenses 100 ($2.3M) Net assets 100 ($3.2M)2018 Revenue 119 ($4.0M) Expenses 140 ($3.2M) Net assets 124 ($3.9M)2019 Revenue 103 ($3.5M) Expenses 173 ($4.0M) Net assets 108 ($3.4M)2020 Revenue 161 ($5.5M) Expenses 156 ($3.6M) Net assets 166 ($5.3M)2021 Revenue 134 ($4.5M) Expenses 170 ($3.9M) Net assets 185 ($5.9M)2022 Revenue 145 ($4.9M) Expenses 162 ($3.8M) Net assets 221 ($7.0M)2023 Revenue 124 ($4.2M) Expenses 189 ($4.4M) Net assets 216 ($6.8M)2024 Revenue 195 ($6.6M) Expenses 191 ($4.4M) Net assets 285 ($9.0M)2025 Revenue 60 ($2.0M) Expenses 186 ($4.3M) Net assets 212 ($6.7M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (60)Expenses (186)Net assets (212)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2019 to 2020, from $3.6M to $6.4M (+79%).

$3.3M
$4.1M
$3.6M
$6.4M
$6.8M
$7.7M
$7.8M
$9.9M
$7.5M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

95% of FAMILIES AGAINST MANDATORY MINIMUMS FOUNDATION’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (81% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 11,793 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$1.1M
’17
$773k
’18
−$515k
’19
$1.8M
’20
$587k
’21
$1.1M
’22
−$161k
’23
$2.2M
’24
−$2.3M
’25
0.4
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Board chair

Julie Stewart

Board chair & founder

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed910991110131115
Joined·+4+0+0+2+2+3+3+7
No longer listed·31003053
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 9 funders to 14 funders, grant income rose $1.8M → $2.4M.

23 of 42 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 61% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of FAMILIES AGAINST MANDATORY MINIMUMS FOUNDATION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 42 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

FAMILIES AGAINST MANDATORY MINIMUMS FOUNDATION has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 26% of grant income, and it takes 4 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 4 funders to its left

79% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund FAMILIES AGAINST MANDATORY MINIMUMS FOUNDATION.

26%
largest funder
50%
top three
~8
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 87% · 2018 73% · 2019 61% · 2020 34% · 2021 50% · 2022 32% · 2023 44% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

38% of FAMILIES AGAINST MANDATORY MINIMUMS FOUNDATION's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 50% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

61% of FAMILIES AGAINST MANDATORY MINIMUMS FOUNDATION's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $7.1M that is directly attributable, 88% of it comes from funders outside Washington, D.C., across 8 states.

IL
NY
PA
CA
DE
NC
DC
TX

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Washington, D.C. out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $11M arriving through sponsors registered in 13 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

FAMILIES AGAINST MANDATORY MINIMUMS FOUNDATION's revenue fell 40% between 2017 and 2025.

Operating margin−114% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve0.4mo · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)−6% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 6,891 human services nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025

Organizations like FAMILIES AGAINST MANDATORY MINIMUMS FOUNDATION

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Washington, D.C.

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

77% of spending goes to programs.

Program 77%Management 20%Fundraising 3%

Governance

7
board members
86%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

64%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 46 states

AK
ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
MA
OR
NV
WY
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
AZ
NM
KS
AR
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
FL

Part of a family of 1 related entity

  • Families Against Mandatory Minimums · exempt

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for FAMILIES AGAINST MANDATORY MINIMUMS FOUNDATION: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds FAMILIES AGAINST MANDATORY MINIMUMS FOUNDATION?
FAMILIES AGAINST MANDATORY MINIMUMS FOUNDATION (Washington, D.C.) receives grants from 42 organizations whose IRS filings report $18,119,660 to it, the largest being Silicon Valley Community Foundation ($4,781,500). 21 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 61% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does FAMILIES AGAINST MANDATORY MINIMUMS FOUNDATION have?
IRS filings report 42 organizations giving $18,119,660 in grants to FAMILIES AGAINST MANDATORY MINIMUMS FOUNDATION, 21 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of FAMILIES AGAINST MANDATORY MINIMUMS FOUNDATION?
Silicon Valley Community Foundation is the largest funder on record, with $4,781,500 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like FAMILIES AGAINST MANDATORY MINIMUMS FOUNDATION find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington, D.C.. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 42 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing