Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Daniel B and Florence E Green Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$8.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
118
Grants FY2025still arriving
13
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 51% of THE DANIEL B AND FLORENCE E GREEN FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 118 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $61k
  • $10k–50k50 grants · $845k
  • $50k–250k53 grants · $5.5M
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.6M
$34,500
Median grant
13
States reached
$207M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FEDERATION HOUSING INC$1,000,000
SCHOLARSHIP AMERICA INC$364,930
THE FRANKLIN INSTITUTE$270,000
JEWISH FEDERATION GREATER PHILADELPHIA$235,000
IMPACT SERVICES CORP$225,000
MAKING A CHANGE GROUP$210,000
NEW KENSINGTON COM DEV CORP$200,000
Individual grant recipient$200,000
SHARING EXCESS$175,000
UNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION$175,000
MANNA$150,800
VANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT$150,000
JEWISH NATIONAL FUND USA$141,000
COMMON MARKET PHILADELPHIA INC$125,000
SHARE FOOD PROGRAM INC$125,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $2.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%RIP MEDICAL DEBT: $100k → 13%RIP MEDICAL DEBT: $25k → 13%JEWISH RELIEF AGENCY: $18k → 7%JEWISH RELIEF AGENCY: $10k → 7%JEWISH RELIEF AGENCY: $10k → 7%JEWISH RELIEF AGENCY: $10k → 7%JEWISH RELIEF AGENCY: $10k → 7%DOMESTIC ABUSE PROJECT OF DELAWARE COUNTY INC: $10k → 10%DOMESTIC ABUSE PROJECT OF DELAWARE COUNTY INC: $10k → 10%MITZVAH CIRCLE FOUNDATION: $25k → 7%CHILDREN FIRST: $10k → 22%CHILDREN FIRST: $10k → 22%PROJECT HOME: $25k → 22%PEOPLE FOR PEOPLE INC: $20k → 22%PROJECT HOME: $14k → 22%PROJECT HOME: $10k → 22%PEOPLE FOR PEOPLE INC: $10k → 22%PROJECT HOME: $10k → 22%PEOPLE FOR PEOPLE INC: $10k → 22%PROJECT HOME: $10k → 22%PROJECT HOME: $8k → 22%WOMEN'S WAY: $191k → 22%WOMEN'S WAY: $76k → 22%WOMEN'S WAY: $70k → 22%WOMEN'S WAY: $66k → 22%WOMEN'S WAY: $66k → 22%WOMEN'S WAY: $66k → 22%WOMEN'S WAY: $66k → 22%KITHS INTEGRATED & TARGETED HUMAN SVCS: $10k → 22%KITHS INTEGRATED & TARGETED HUMAN SVCS: $6k → 22%FIRST UP: $25k → 22%FIRST UP: $10k → 22%IT TAKES PHILLY INC: $15k → 22%HOPEPHL: $10k → 22%HOPEPHL: $10k → 22%COMMON MARKET PHILADELPHIA INC: $310k → 22%BROAD STREET MINISTRY: $150k → 22%COMMON MARKET PHILADELPHIA INC: $125k → 22%COMMON MARKET PHILADELPHIA INC: $125k → 22%BROAD STREET LOVE: $110k → 22%COMMON MARKET PHILADELPHIA INC: $100k → 22%BROAD STREET MINISTRY: $75k → 22%BROAD STREET LOVE: $75k → 22%BROAD STREET MINISTRY: $40k → 22%BROAD STREET MINISTRY: $40k → 22%WILLIAM WAY LGBT COMMUNITY CENTER: $35k → 22%WILLIAM WAY LGBT COMMUNITY CENTER: $35k → 22%WILLIAM WAY LGBT COMMUNITY CENTER: $25k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
IL
NY
MA
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
CO
VA
MD
DE
DC
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$43M · 156 repeat orgs$3.5M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +26% since the first grant, against +8% for the ones you funded once.

156 repeat relationships — 89 still active in FY2025, 67 since wound down; 24 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

156
87

Total granted

$43M
$2.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+8%

Still filing today

73%
76%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $959k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesHealthArts & CultureInternationalEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PY
    PHILADELPHIA YOUTH BASKETBALL INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $1.3M · revenue +901%
  • LM
    LANKENAU MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.2M · revenue +103%
  • PG
    PHILADELPHIA GREEN CAPITAL CORP
    4× · 2022–2025 · $1.1M · revenue ×21 · 28% of their budget

Funded once

  • CF
    CATHOLIC FOUNDATION OF PHILA
    one grant, 2018 · $275k
  • PC
    PIDC COMMUNITY CAPITALgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $250k · revenue +105%
  • PN
    PHILANTHROPY NETWORK GREATER PHILADELPHIA
    one grant, 2021 · $180k · revenue -81%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Philadelphia Industrial Development Corporation

Pidc plans and implements economic development initiatives (see schedule o) which enhance the competitive environment, generate jobs and produce higher tax ratables throughout philadelphia.

Community Improvement
2
Pidc Development Management Corporation

Pidc dmc administers and coordinates various development projects for the city and other not-for-profit entities.

Community Improvement
3
The Philadelphia School

The philadelphia school educates children for a future that is impossible to know but not impossible to shape. learn here. go anywhere.

—
4
Philadelphia Works Inc

Philadelphia works, inc. develops and manages smart workforce solutions that respond to business needs and increases economic opportunity for all philadelphia residents.

Employment
5
Greater Philadelphia Tourism Marketing Corporation

Visit philadelphia is our name and our mission. as the region's official tourism marketing agency, we build greater philadelphia's image, drive visitation and boost the economy.

Community Improvement
6
The Philadelphia Education Fund

The mission of the philadelphia education fund (pef) is to create equitable access to opportunities for students by providing resources and expertise that build paths to college and career success. pef focuses on philadelphia public school…

Youth Development
7
Pidc Local Development Corporation

See schedule o.pidc-ldc administers, as a subrecipient of the city of philadelphia, various federally funded grant programs, including community development block grants, housing and urban development loans, and economic development…

Community Improvement
8
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
9
Philabundance

PHILABUNDANCE WAS FOUNDED IN 1984 WITH THE SIMPLE BELIEF THAT NO ONE SHOULD GO HUNGRY WHILE HEALTHY FOOD GOES TO WASTE. OUR MISSION IS TO DRIVE HUNGER FROM OUR COMMUNITIES TODAY AND TO END HUNGER FOR GOOD. We have a commitment to always…

Food & Nutrition
10
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

—
11
Pennsylvania Academic Library Consortium Inc

To support education and research at college, university, and research libraries.

Education
12
National Nurse-Led Care Consortium

The national nurse-led care consortium (nncc) strives to advance nurse-led healthcare through policy, consultation, and programs to reduce health disparities and meet people's primary care and wellness needs.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Graduate Philadelphia and the most unlike its peers is Little Quakers Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFood Banks and PantriesCommunity FoundationsYouth Sports ProgramsEnvironmental Conservation …Local Food System Organizat…Independent K-12 SchoolsPolicy Research and AdvocacySchool District FoundationsLgbtq+ Community SupportElementary Literacy TutoringCancer Support ServicesDomestic Violence ServicesVolunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Equine Therapy ProgramsLocal History MuseumsJewish Community Organizati…Community Arts CentersWomen & Girls Leadership De…Affordable Housing Developm…Christian Youth CampsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Animal Rescue and ShelterHealth Access Advocacy and …
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%4%<5yr13%10%5–10yr19%22%10–20yr17%22%20–35yr15%23%35–55yr17%19%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%5%<5yr13%12%5–10yr19%20%10–20yr17%15%20–35yr15%20%35–55yr17%29%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.9% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.9%2/224
the rest of the field
9%
7,127/77,938

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

214 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 214 of the 278 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

7
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
49
Early backer (in before they grew)
211/214
Grantees still filing
146/214
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

VANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT — $5,257,000 · OtherVANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENTFEDERATION HOUSING INC — $2,751,000 · OtherFEDERATION HOUSING INCJOHN HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $2,025,000 · OtherJOHN HOPKINS UNIVERSITYIndividual grant recipient — $1,585,000 · OtherSCHOLARSHIP AMERICA INC — $1,409,930 · OtherFRIENDS CENTRAL SCHOOL CORPORATION — $1,163,300 · OtherPHILADELPHIA GREEN CAPITAL CORP — $1,142,000 · OtherPHILADELPHIA YOUTH BASKETBALL INC — $1,267,500 · Other+108 more — $13,763,323 · Other+108 moreTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $1,631,100 · EducationTRUSTEES OF T…DREXEL UNIVERSITY — $1,001,500 · EducationDREXEL UNIVER…THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY — $856,000 · EducationTHOMAS JEFFER…The River School — $480,000 · EducationThe River Sch…PHILADELPHIA ACADEMY OF SCHOOL LEADERS INC — $480,000 · EducationPHILADELPHIA …Temple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education — $362,500 · EducationTemple Univer…ST JOHN'S COLLEGE — $210,000 · Education+16 more — $906,494 · Education+16 moreLANKENAU MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $1,225,450 · HealthEAGLES AUTISM CHALLENGE INC — $676,000 · HealthMercy Medical Angels — $526,000 · HealthFOUNDATION FOR DELAWARE COUNTY — $307,500 · HealthVETRI FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN — $215,000 · HealthMINDING YOUR MIND — $175,000 · Health+10 more — $367,000 · HealthJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA — $1,881,500 · PhilanthropyTravis Manion Foundation — $410,000 · PhilanthropyPHILANTHROPY NETWORK GREATER PHILADELPHIA — $180,000 · PhilanthropyTHE FUND FOR THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA — $150,000 · PhilanthropyTHE PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION — $125,000 · Philanthropy+4 more — $200,000 · PhilanthropySHARE FOOD PROGRAM — $650,000 · Food & NutritionMETROPOLITAN AREA NEIGHBORHOOD NUTRITION ALLIANCE — $592,800 · Food & NutritionSHARING EXCESS — $450,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD CONNECT CO — $445,000 · Food & NutritionTHE FOOD TRUST — $225,000 · Food & NutritionANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY FOOD BANK INC — $125,000 · Food & NutritionCARING FOR FRIENDS — $100,000 · Food & Nutrition+1 more — $35,300 · Food & NutritionCOMMON MARKET PHILADELPHIA INC — $660,000 · Human ServicesWOMENS WAY — $601,000 · Human ServicesBROAD STREET MINISTRY — $490,000 · Human ServicesMEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC — $125,000 · Human ServicesLAUREL HOUSE — $116,000 · Human ServicesWILLIAM WAY LGBT COMMUNITY CENTER — $95,000 · Human Services+11 more — $374,000 · Human ServicesTHE PENNSYLVANIA HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY — $375,000 · EnvironmentPENNENVIRONMENT RESEARCH & POLICY CENTER INC — $365,000 · EnvironmentClean Air Council — $355,000 · EnvironmentPENNSYLVANIA ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL INC — $279,000 · EnvironmentGREENER PARTNERS — $215,000 · EnvironmentGREEN BUILDING UNITED — $150,000 · EnvironmentFAIRMOUNT PARK CONSERVANCY — $150,000 · EnvironmentGENERATION180 — $100,000 · EnvironmentINSTITUTE FOR MARKET TRANSFORMATION — $100,000 · Environment+2 more — $75,000 · Environment
Other$30,364,053Education$5,927,594Health$3,491,950Philanthropy$2,946,500Food & Nutrition$2,623,100Human Services$2,461,000Environment$2,164,000

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA — $1,881,500 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $1,631,100 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPHILADELPHIA YOUTH BASKETBALL INC — $1,267,500 over 5y, 7.5% of budgetLANKENAU MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $1,225,450 over 9y, 2.8% of budgetPHILADELPHIA GREEN CAPITAL CORP — $1,142,000 over 4y, 28% of budgetDREXEL UNIVERSITY — $1,001,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY — $856,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FRANKLIN INSTITUTE — $758,300 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetEAGLES AUTISM CHALLENGE INC — $676,000 over 5y, 4.5% of budgetCOMMON MARKET PHILADELPHIA INC — $660,000 over 4y, 6.1% of budgetSHARE FOOD PROGRAM — $650,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetWOMENS WAY — $601,000 over 7y, 14% of budgetMETROPOLITAN AREA NEIGHBORHOOD NUTRITION ALLIANCE — $592,800 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $535,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetMercy Medical Angels — $526,000 over 8y, 4.2% of budgetBROAD STREET MINISTRY — $490,000 over 6y, 5.4% of budgetThe River School — $480,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetPHILADELPHIA ACADEMY OF SCHOOL LEADERS INC — $480,000 over 5y, 8.4% of budgetSHARING EXCESS — $450,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCENTER FOR BLACK EDUCATOR DEVELOPMENT — $445,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetFOOD CONNECT CO — $445,000 over 4y, 7.3% of budgetCOUNCIL FOR RELATIONSHIPS INC — $438,000 over 5y, 2.7% of budgetPATHWAYS TO HOUSING - PA — $410,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetTravis Manion Foundation — $410,000 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND-USA INC — $396,000 over 3y, 82% of budgetWORLD AFFAIRS COUNCIL OF PHILADELPHIA — $391,400 over 7y, 19% of budgetMAKING A CHANGE GROUP — $390,000 over 3y, 14% of budgetTHE PENNSYLVANIA HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY — $375,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetPENNENVIRONMENT RESEARCH & POLICY CENTER INC — $365,000 over 4y, 12% of budgetTemple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education — $362,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetClean Air Council — $355,000 over 5y, 2.7% of budgetIMPACT SERVICES CORPORATION — $350,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetMISSION KIDS CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER — $344,000 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR DELAWARE COUNTY — $307,500 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL INC — $279,000 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetURBAN AFFAIRS COALITION — $253,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetJOYFUL READERS INC — $251,000 over 4y, 42% of budgetPIDC COMMUNITY CAPITAL — $250,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetCEASEFIRE PENNSYLVANIA EDUCATION FUND — $225,000 over 2y, 8.3% of budgetTHE FOOD TRUST — $225,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetCircular Philadelphia — $220,000 over 3y, 58% of budgetVETRI FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN — $215,000 over 4y, 3.1% of budgetGREENER PARTNERS — $215,000 over 4y, 6.1% of budgetST JOHN'S COLLEGE — $210,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetPHILADELPHIA ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY — $205,000 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LIBI INC — $200,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetHAVERFORD SCHOOL — $185,494 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION INC — $182,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds PHILADELPHIA YOUTH BASKETBALL INC ↗
  • Who funds LANKENAU MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PHILADELPHIA GREEN CAPITAL CORP ↗
  • Who funds DREXEL UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE FRANKLIN INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds EAGLES AUTISM CHALLENGE INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMON MARKET PHILADELPHIA INC ↗
  • Who funds SHARE FOOD PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds WOMENS WAY ↗
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN AREA NEIGHBORHOOD NUTRITION ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds Mercy Medical Angels ↗
  • Who funds BROAD STREET MINISTRY ↗
  • Who funds The River School ↗
  • Who funds PHILADELPHIA ACADEMY OF SCHOOL LEADERS INC ↗
  • Who funds SHARING EXCESS ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR BLACK EDUCATOR DEVELOPMENT ↗
  • Who funds FOOD CONNECT CO ↗
  • Who funds COUNCIL FOR RELATIONSHIPS INC ↗
  • Who funds PATHWAYS TO HOUSING - PA ↗
  • Who funds Travis Manion Foundation ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND-USA INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD AFFAIRS COUNCIL OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
  • Who funds MAKING A CHANGE GROUP ↗
  • Who funds THE PENNSYLVANIA HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds PENNENVIRONMENT RESEARCH & POLICY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Temple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education ↗
  • Who funds Clean Air Council ↗
  • Who funds IMPACT SERVICES CORPORATION ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The William Penn Foun…The Philadelphia Foun…The Barra Foundation …The Patricia Kind Fam…Connelly FoundationUnited Way of Greater…Henry Dolfinger 2 Tru…Claneil Foundation IncIndependence Foundati…Future Standard Found…The Snider FoundationThe Gordon Charter Fo…
The William Penn FoundationPA100.8× affinity60 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The William Penn Foundation · The Philadelphia Foundation · The Barra Foundation Inc · The Patricia Kind Family Foundation · Connelly Foundation · United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · Henry Dolfinger 2 Trust Uw · Claneil Foundation Inc · Independence Foundation · Future Standard Foundation · The Snider Foundation · The Gordon Charter Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Daniel B and Florence E Green Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 140%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Trustees of Tufts College — 13% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University — 12% of income from government
  • National Center for Jewish Filminc — 4% of income from government
  • Best Buddies International Inc — 4% of income from government
  • St John's College — 2% of income from government
  • Year Up Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
14get no government money at all
54report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Daniel B and Florence E Green Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Daniel B and Florence E Green Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 278 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines