· Public charity
The Pride Foundation
Pride Foundation connects, inspires and strengthens the Pacific Northwest lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) community in pursuit of equality.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 137 grants below total $4,238,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $5,435,899 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,197,899 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k6 grants · $44k
- $10k–50k112 grants · $2.8M
- $50k–250k19 grants · $1.4M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Allied Media Projects | $142,000 |
| Coalition Against Violence | $97,000 |
| Lavender Rights Project | $90,000 |
| Native Movement | $90,000 |
| Rods House | $82,000 |
| Utopia Washington | $77,000 |
| Powerful Voices | $77,000 |
| Pizza Klatch | $72,000 |
| Matthew Shepard Foundation | $67,500 |
| Stonewall | $66,000 |
| Friendly House | $62,500 |
| Community Roots Housing Found | $62,000 |
| Montana Two Spirit Society | $60,000 |
| Camp Ten Trees | $57,000 |
| Madrona Institute | $55,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 37% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
157 repeat relationships — 93 still active in FY2025, 64 since wound down; 41 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $969k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WMWESTERN MONTANA GAY AND LESBIAN COMMUNITY CENTER5× · 2021–2025 · $379k · revenue +598% · 66% of their budget
Lavender Rights Project6× · 2019–2025 · $341k · revenue +529%- UTUNITED TERRITORIES OF PACIFIC ISLANDERS WASHINGTON-UTOPIA WA8× · 2017–2025 · $242k · revenue ×37
Funded once
- NSNorth Star Community Foundationone grant, 2024 · $100k · revenue -17%
- ADART DESIGN PORTLAND LLCone grant, 2018 · $84k
- MAMOVEMENT ADVANCEMENT PROJECTgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $60k · revenue +111%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The Northwest Network of Bisexual Trans Lesbians and Gay Survivors of Abuse supports queer and trans survivors in reconnecting to their self-determination through advocacy-based counseling and community education.
Pride Foundation connects, inspires and strengthens the Pacific Northwest lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) community in pursuit of equality. They accomplish this in rural and urban areas by awarding grants and scholarships and…
Forward Together is a national reproductive justice organization that centers people, families, and communities who experience reproductive oppression. They prioritize queer, trans, Black, Indigenous, and other peoples of color and utilize…
Next up amplifies the voice of diverse youth to achieve a more just oregon
To combine business development, leadership and social action to expand economic opportunities for the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer community and those who support equality for all.
To coordinate and promote lesbian gay bisexual and transgender pride events in Seattle and the Pacific Northwest which celebrate the present envision the future and honor the past.
Oregon Justice Network is an alliance built and staffed by criminal legal system impacted people advocating for the well-being of people affected or at-risk of being affected by carceral systems. Our work centers around restorative…
Our mission is to ameliorate disparities faced by transgender, gender non-binary and intersex people as well as help reduce similar disparities among our lesbian, gay and bisexual communities.
Basic rights oregon will ensure that all lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender oregonians experience equality by building a broad and inclusive politically powerful movement, shifting public opinion, and achieving policy victories.
Washington Ethnic Studies Now WAESN is a multigenerational majority POC-led nonprofit advancing Ethnic Studies and racial justice in Washington. We center people of color build youth-centered leadership and learning and organize…
Transgender Law Center TLC changes law, policy and attitudes so that all people can live safely, authentically, and free from discrimination regardless of their gender identity or expression.
Sexual Violence Law Center (SVLC) is a nonprofit law firm that protects the safety, privacy, and civil rights of survivors of sexual and gender-based violence in Washington through holistic and trauma-informed practices rooted in race and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Peer Washington and the most unlike its peers is Seattle University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 9% of your grantees by number, and just 6% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 5% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
240 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 240 of the 279 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ALLIED MEDIA PROJECTS INC ↗
- Who funds WESTERN MONTANA GAY AND LESBIAN COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds IDAHO COALITION AGAINST SEXUAL AND DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ↗
- Who funds Lavender Rights Project ↗
- Who funds UNITED TERRITORIES OF PACIFIC ISLANDERS WASHINGTON-UTOPIA WA ↗
- Who funds SOUTHEAST UPLIFT NEIGHBORHOOD PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds STONEWALL YOUTH ↗
- Who funds PIZZA KLATCH ↗
- Who funds SEATTLE CHILDREN'S THEATRE ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds ODYSSEY YOUTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds NATIVE MOVEMENT ↗
- Who funds CASCADE AIDS PROJECT ↗
- Who funds Pierce County Aids Foundation ↗
- Who funds A Cure in Sight ↗
- Who funds FRIENDLY HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds RVC SEATTLE ↗
- Who funds GAY CITY HEALTH PROJECT ↗
- Who funds Transponder ↗
- Who funds Choosing Our Roots ↗
- Who funds ROD'S HOUSE ↗
- Who funds ENTRE HERMANOS ↗
- Who funds API CHAYA ↗
- Who funds CATALYST MONTANA ↗
- Who funds ROGUE ACTION CENTER ↗
- Who funds Powerful Voices ↗
- Who funds LAMBDA LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
- Who funds CAMP TEN TREES ↗
- Who funds Blue Mountain Heart to Heart ↗
- Who funds PATH ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL PARTNERSHIPS ↗
- Who funds FISCAL SPONSORSHIP ALLIES INC ↗
- Who funds MATTHEW SHEPARD FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Food Empowerment Education Sustainability Team ↗
- Who funds FREEDOM FOR ALL AMERICANS EDUCATION FUND ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF MISSOULA COUNTY ↗
- Who funds HIV ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds THE COMMUNITY CENTER RESOURCES FOR GAY AND LESBIAN PEOPLE INC ↗
- Who funds SPOKANE AIDS NETWORK ↗
- Who funds LGBTQ COMMUNITY CENTER FUND ↗
- Who funds North Star Community Foundation ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Social Justice Fund Northwest · Inatai Foundation · The Collins Foundation · Seeding Justice · Meyer Memorial Trust · Seattle Foundation · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · The Satterberg Foundation Inc · Raikes Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · School's Out Washington · The Oregon Community Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Pride Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Fortaleza Atravez Barreras — 100% of income from government
- Safe Harbors — 64% of income from government
- Call to Safety — 61% of income from government
- Transponder — 58% of income from government
- Hiv Alliance — 54% of income from government
- Educate Ya Inc — 38% of income from government
- Rogue Action Center — 29% of income from government
- Warm Springs Community Action Team — 28% of income from government
- Immigration Counseling Service Inc — 20% of income from government
- Latino Network — 15% of income from government
- Ywca of Greater Portland — 15% of income from government
- Cascade Aids Project — 13% of income from government
- Centerlink Inc — 12% of income from government
- United Way of Southwestern Oregon — 12% of income from government
- Bradley Angle — 10% of income from government
- Josephy Center for Arts and Culture — 7% of income from government
- Friendly House Inc — 3% of income from government
- Portland Gay Men's Chorus — 1% of income from government
- Pride Northwest Inc — 0% of income from government
- Basic Rights Education Fund — 0% of income from government
- Keshet Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.