Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Private foundation

Raikes Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$11M
Granted FY2024still arriving
269
Grants FY2024still arriving
25
States reached
$800k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Education$43MPhilanthropy$34MHousing & Shelter$8.9MHuman Services$4.4MCivil Rights$4.2MCommunity Improvement$3.8MPublic Benefit$3.6MCrime & Legal$3.2MOther$0
02FY2024 · 269 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k133 grants · $330k
  • $10k–50k83 grants · $1.7M
  • $50k–250k37 grants · $3.4M
  • $250k+16 grants · $5.9M
$10,000
Median grant
25
States reached
$98M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMALGAMATED CHARITABLE FOUNDATION$800,000
NATIONAL EQUITY PROJECT$750,000
AMALGAMATED CHARITABLE FOUNDATION$700,000
TIDES CENTER$400,000
CENTER ON BUDGET AND POLICY PRIORITIES$300,000
LEARNING POLICY INSTITUTE$300,000
EDUCATION TRUST INC$300,000
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM$300,000
ASSOCIATION OF PUBLIC AND LAND-GRANT UNIVERSITIES$280,000
VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$275,000
NEW VENTURE FUND$250,000
NATIONAL GOVERNORS ASSOCIATION CENTER FOR BEST PRACTICES$250,000
SCHOOLHOUSE CONNECTION$250,000
SCHOOL BOARD PARTNERS$250,000
NATIONAL CENTER FOR YOUTH LAW$250,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $8.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 55% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%CHILD WELFARE INNOVATIONS INC: $80k → 16%NORTH CAROLINA JUSTICE CENTER: $97k → 8%WELCOMING AMERICA INC: $30k → 14%INNOVATIONS HUMAN TRAFFICKING COLLABORATIVE: $57k → 9%YOUTH COLLABORATORY INC: $50k → 11%POSSIBILITY LABS: $150k → 10%INNOVATIONS HUMAN TRAFFICKING COLLABORATIVE: $38k → 9%YOUTH COLLABORATORY INC: $50k → 11%POSSIBILITY LABS: $40k → 10%YOUTH COLLABORATORY INC: $50k → 11%CHAPIN HALL CENTER FOR CHILDREN: $200k → 14%FUNDERS TOGETHER TO END HOMELESSNESS INC: $160k → 16%PARTNERSHIP FOR AMERICA'S CHILDREN: $50k → 14%FUNDERS TOGETHER TO END HOMELESSNESS INC: $75k → 16%COVENANT HOUSE INTERNATIONAL: $100k → 17%TIDES CENTER: $550k → 10%TIDES CENTER: $550k → 10%TIDES CENTER: $450k → 10%TIDES CENTER: $450k → 10%TIDES CENTER: $362k → 10%TIDES CENTER: $85k → 10%THINK OF US: $100k → 14%TIDES CENTER: $500k → 10%TIDES CENTER: $400k → 10%OPPORTUNITY INSTITUTE: $200k → 10%MOCKINGBIRD SOCIETY: $338k → 9%MOCKINGBIRD SOCIETY: $227k → 9%MOCKINGBIRD SOCIETY: $220k → 9%MOCKINGBIRD SOCIETY: $210k → 9%MOCKINGBIRD SOCIETY: $200k → 9%MOCKINGBIRD SOCIETY: $123k → 9%MOCKINGBIRD SOCIETY: $113k → 9%MOCKINGBIRD SOCIETY: $108k → 9%MOCKINGBIRD SOCIETY: $95k → 9%MOCKINGBIRD SOCIETY: $92k → 9%SOUTHWEST YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES: $81k → 9%MOCKINGBIRD SOCIETY: $55k → 9%LATINO COMMUNITY FUND OF WASHINGTON STATE: $60k → 9%YMCA OF GREATER SEATTLE: $250k → 9%YMCA OF GREATER SEATTLE: $171k → 9%YMCA OF GREATER SEATTLE: $171k → 9%YMCA OF GREATER SEATTLE: $115k → 9%YMCA OF GREATER SEATTLE: $105k → 9%YMCA OF GREATER SEATTLE: $60k → 9%YMCA OF GREATER SEATTLE: $46k → 9%YMCA OF GREATER SEATTLE: $36k → 9%YOUTHCARE: $225k → 9%YOUTHCARE: $100k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
NH
WA
ID
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
VA
MD
AZ
NM
KS
TN
NC
DC
HI
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 14% of Raikes Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Raikes Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$70M · 224 repeat orgs$13M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.

224 repeat relationships — 109 still active in FY2024, 115 since wound down; 82 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

224
327

Total granted

$70M
$11M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+13%

Still filing today

85%
78%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.9M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesArts & CulturePhilanthropyCivil RightsCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NE
    NATIONAL EQUITY PROJECT
    6× · 2017–2024 · $7.0M · revenue +56%
  • BC
    BUILDING CHANGES
    6× · 2017–2024 · $3.5M · revenue +531%
  • University of Chicago
    5× · 2017–2023 · $2.7M · revenue +56%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA-LINCOLN
    one grant, 2017 · $636k
  • TB
    THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2017 · $600k
  • NATIONAL CENTER FOR CIVIC INNOVATION IN
    one grant, 2022 · $560k · revenue +18%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
2
Association of Washington Cities

The association of washington cities builds connections between our state's diverse cities and towns, while providing our members with the support needed to thrive through delivery of data-driven education, nationally recognized pooling…

—
3
Common Future

Common future is a network of pioneering leaders across the u.s. and canada who work deeply within their communities to create alternative approaches to business, philanthropy, and investing. we envision an economy that has transitioned…

Community Improvement
4
Partnership for Public Service Inc

Making our government work better is a daunting task, and we are a small organization seeking to transform a government that employs millions of civilians and manages trillions of dollars in taxpayer revenue needed to protect public…

Employment
5
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
6
Council for Court Excellence

Council for court excellence's (cce's) mission is to bring people together to conduct research, educate, and advocate to make d.c.'s unique legal systems more just, equitable, and accountable to the community.

—
7
Washington Area Community Investment Fund Inc

The washington area community investment fund (wacif) is a nonprofit community loan fund focused on increasing equity and economic opportunity in the washington, dc area's underserved communities. wacif's mission is driven is driven by…

—
8
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
9
Community Credit Lab

To support equitable access to economic opportunities for immigrants, refugees, low-income, marginalized, and underserved communities in king county and the united states.

Human Services
10
Coop Careers Inc

Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.

Education
11
Partnership On Ai to Benefit People and Society

Bringing diverse voices together across global sectors, disciplines, and demographics so developments in ai advance positive outcomes for people and society.

Science & Tech
12
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Policylink and the most unlike its peers is Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyPolicy Research and AdvocacyHealth Access Advocacy and …Community FoundationsEnvironmental Conservation …Child Abuse Advocacy Servic…Domestic Violence ServicesLocal History MuseumsSchool District FoundationsAnimal Rescue and ShelterCancer Support ServicesSenior Support ServicesYouth Sports ProgramsElementary Literacy TutoringFood Banks and PantriesYouth Development CentersDance Arts OrganizationsPregnancy Support ServicesPublic Library OperationsImmigrant Worker SupportOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Community Arts CentersAddiction Recovery ServicesChristian Missionary Organi…Lgbtq+ Community SupportUnited Way AffiliatesCommunity FoundationsJewish Community Organizati…Women & Girls Leadership De…Affordable Housing Developm…Youth Development ServicesCommunity College Foundatio…Independent K-12 SchoolsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%2%<5yr14%11%5–10yr19%20%10–20yr16%29%20–35yr13%24%35–55yr16%15%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%5%<5yr14%12%5–10yr19%19%10–20yr16%32%20–35yr13%14%35–55yr16%19%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.7% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.7%4/576
the rest of the field
13%
240,392/1,818,989

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

558 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 558 of the 667 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
86
Early backer (in before they grew)
550/558
Grantees still filing
347/558
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NATIONAL EQUITY PROJECT — $6,959,504 · EducationNATIONAL EQUITY PROJECTTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $5,311,926 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND …University of Chicago — $2,701,663 · EducationUniversity of ChicagoASSOCIATION OF PUBLIC AND LAND-GRANT UNIVERSITIES — $2,645,000 · EducationASSOCIATION OF PUBLIC AND LAND-GRANT…Learning Policy Institute — $1,904,836 · EducationLearning Policy InstituteThe Education Trust Inc — $1,753,394 · EducationSCHOOLHOUSE CONNECTION — $1,445,350 · EducationPROTEUS FUND INC — $1,270,000 · EducationEQUAL OPPORTUNITY SCHOOLS — $1,202,950 · Education+39 more — $10,497,813 · Education+39 moreSEATTLE FOUNDATION — $8,575,417 · PhilanthropySEATTLE FOUNDATIONAmalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc — $5,445,000 · PhilanthropyAmalgamated Charitable …Giving Compass Network Inc — $4,410,300 · PhilanthropyGiving Compass Network …SOCIAL VENTURE PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL — $1,030,000 · PhilanthropySolidaire Network Inc — $895,000 · Philanthropy+19 more — $2,654,340 · Philanthropy+19 moreNational Center for Youth Law — $1,250,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $1,061,445 · OtherTURNAROUND FOR CHILDREN INC — $1,005,050 · OtherNEW VENTURE FUND — $3,866,675 · OtherNEW VENTURE FUNDCenter on Budget and Policy Priorities — $1,500,000 · Other+83 more — $19,982,764 · Other+83 moreTIDES CENTER — $3,846,620 · Human ServicesTIDES CEN…THE MOCKINGBIRD SOCIETY — $1,821,442 · Human ServicesTHE MOCKI…THE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER SEATTLE (6871) — $1,062,852 · Human ServicesTHE YOUNG…FUNDERS TOGETHER TO END HOMELESSNES — $393,050 · Human ServicesYOUTHCARE — $384,030 · Human Services+15 more — $1,659,020 · Human Services+15 moreCOLLABORATIVE FOR ACADEMIC SOCIAL AND EMOTIONAL LEARNING — $3,670,000 · Youth DevelopmentSCHOOL'S OUT WASHINGTON — $814,400 · Youth DevelopmentPOINT SOURCE YOUTH INC — $715,000 · Youth Development+3 more — $312,293 · Youth DevelopmentBUILDING CHANGES — $3,519,432 · HealthTUBMAN CENTER FOR HEALTH & FREEDOM — $1,022,707 · HealthTHIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC — $2,517,275 · Community ImprovementNATIONAL CENTER FOR CIVIC INNOVATION IN — $560,000 · Community ImprovementCAMELBACK VENTURES — $325,000 · Community ImprovementCOMMON COUNSEL FOUNDATION — $156,271 · Community ImprovementMOVEMENT STRATEGY CENTER — $150,000 · Community Improvement+7 more — $472,155 · Community Improvement
Education$35,692,436Philanthropy$23,010,057Other$28,665,934Human Services$9,167,014Youth Development$5,511,693Health$4,542,139Community Improvement$4,180,701

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSEATTLE FOUNDATION — $8,575,417 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetNATIONAL EQUITY PROJECT — $6,959,504 over 6y, 20% of budgetAmalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc — $5,445,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $5,311,926 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGiving Compass Network Inc — $4,410,300 over 2y, 67% of budgetNEW VENTURE FUND — $3,866,675 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTIDES CENTER — $3,846,620 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetCOLLABORATIVE FOR ACADEMIC SOCIAL AND EMOTIONAL LEARNING — $3,670,000 over 6y, 15% of budgetBUILDING CHANGES — $3,519,432 over 6y, 16% of budgetUniversity of Chicago — $2,701,663 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetASSOCIATION OF PUBLIC AND LAND-GRANT UNIVERSITIES — $2,645,000 over 6y, 5.0% of budgetTHIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC — $2,517,275 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetLearning Policy Institute — $1,904,836 over 5y, 4.7% of budgetTHE MOCKINGBIRD SOCIETY — $1,821,442 over 6y, 16% of budgetThe Education Trust Inc — $1,753,394 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetCenter on Budget and Policy Priorities — $1,500,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetSCHOOLHOUSE CONNECTION — $1,445,350 over 6y, 21% of budgetPROTEUS FUND INC — $1,270,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetNational Center for Youth Law — $1,250,000 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetEQUAL OPPORTUNITY SCHOOLS — $1,202,950 over 3y, 6.1% of budgetTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER SEATTLE (6871) — $1,062,852 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetSOCIAL VENTURE PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL — $1,030,000 over 5y, 17% of budgetTUBMAN CENTER FOR HEALTH & FREEDOM — $1,022,707 over 4y, 15% of budgetTURNAROUND FOR CHILDREN INC — $1,005,050 over 4y, 3.7% of budgetNATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR RESPONSIVE PHILANTHROPY — $950,000 over 5y, 6.1% of budgetSolidaire Network Inc — $895,000 over 5y, 3.2% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY — $850,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPANORAMA GLOBAL — $840,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION — $821,250 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSCHOOL BOARD PARTNERS — $815,000 over 5y, 28% of budgetSCHOOL'S OUT WASHINGTON — $814,400 over 2y, 13% of budgetLEGAL COUNSEL FOR YOUTH AND CHILDREN — $765,500 over 6y, 7.8% of budgetPOINT SOURCE YOUTH INC — $715,000 over 5y, 5.1% of budgetTRANSCEND INC — $641,600 over 2y, 7.4% of budgetJUSTFUNDUS — $606,060 over 2y, 14% of budgetCOUNCIL OF CHIEF STATE SCHOOL OFFICERS — $562,700 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetNATIONAL CENTER FOR CIVIC INNOVATION IN — $560,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetAlliance for Education — $512,713 over 6y, 3.0% of budgetSOCIAL JUSTICE FUND NORTHWEST — $500,350 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetSpurwink Services Inc — $500,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTHE SCHOTT FOUNDATION FOR PUBLIC EDUCATION — $500,000 over 2y, 6.2% of budgetTHE OAKLAND PUBLIC EDUCATION FUND — $500,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetNeighborhood Funders Group — $497,000 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetNEW SCHOOLS FUND — $430,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetEL EDUCATION INC — $403,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetEDUCATION RESOURCE STRATEGIES INC — $399,500 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetFUNDERS TOGETHER TO END HOMELESSNES — $393,050 over 6y, 6.7% of budgetYOUTHCARE — $384,030 over 5y, 2.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SEATTLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL EQUITY PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Giving Compass Network Inc ↗
  • Who funds NEW VENTURE FUND ↗
  • Who funds TIDES CENTER ↗
  • Who funds COLLABORATIVE FOR ACADEMIC SOCIAL AND EMOTIONAL LEARNING ↗
  • Who funds BUILDING CHANGES ↗
  • Who funds University of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds ASSOCIATION OF PUBLIC AND LAND-GRANT UNIVERSITIES ↗
  • Who funds THIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds Learning Policy Institute ↗
  • Who funds THE MOCKINGBIRD SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds The Education Trust Inc ↗
  • Who funds Center on Budget and Policy Priorities ↗
  • Who funds SCHOOLHOUSE CONNECTION ↗
  • Who funds PROTEUS FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds National Center for Youth Law ↗
  • Who funds EQUAL OPPORTUNITY SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds THE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER SEATTLE (6871) ↗
  • Who funds SOCIAL VENTURE PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds TUBMAN CENTER FOR HEALTH & FREEDOM ↗
  • Who funds TURNAROUND FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR RESPONSIVE PHILANTHROPY ↗
  • Who funds Solidaire Network Inc ↗
  • Who funds GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds PANORAMA GLOBAL ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SCHOOL BOARD PARTNERS ↗
  • Who funds SCHOOL'S OUT WASHINGTON ↗
  • Who funds LEGAL COUNSEL FOR YOUTH AND CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds POINT SOURCE YOUTH INC ↗
  • Who funds TRANSCEND INC ↗
  • Who funds JUSTFUNDUS ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gates FoundationSeattle FoundationMedina FoundationThe Norcliffe Foundat…United Way of King Co…The Satterberg Founda…Puget Sound Energy Fo…Moccasin Lake Foundat…Inatai FoundationCasey Family ProgramsStolte Family Foundat…School's Out Washingt…
Gates FoundationWA114.6× affinity124 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gates Foundation · Seattle Foundation · Medina Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · United Way of King County · The Satterberg Foundation Inc · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Moccasin Lake Foundation · Inatai Foundation · Casey Family Programs · Stolte Family Foundation · School's Out Washington

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Raikes Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 140%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Trustees of Boston University — 12% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
  • Brandeis University — 9% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
  • Reinstitute Inc — 7% of income from government
  • Education Resource Strategies Inc — 4% of income from government
  • Third Sector New England Inc — 3% of income from government
  • Connecticut Public Broadcasting Inc — 3% of income from government
  • The Center for Effective Philanthropy Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
14get no government money at all
46report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Raikes Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Raikes Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 667 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines