Skip to content

Washington · Nonprofit

FEMINIST WOMEN'S HEALTH CENTER

FEMINIST WOMEN'S HEALTH CENTER (Washington) receives grants from 22 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,470,954 to it, the largest being HOPEWELL FUND ($398,860). 14 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 51% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2025
$6.8M
Funders on record
22
Grants received
$1.5M
Net assets
$3.0M
14/22 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 7%
01What it does

What Feminist Women's Health Center does

Mission

To achieve reproductive freedom, Feminist Women's Health Center - cedar river clinics provides abortion and reproductive health services and information, so women may determine their own destiny. We are a social change organization that combines direct services (abortion, birth control, reproductive healthcare), with activism (to preserve and expand access to services and information) and community education (to demystify health information and empower women's health choices).

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Since 1979, the Feminist Women's Health Center, cedar river clinics in renton, tacoma, and yakima, has provided reproductive health care including abortion, birth control, sti testing and treatment, cancer and infection screenings, and lgbtq wellness services to our local communities and patients from across the northwest, united states, and other countries.

    $6,232,474 spent$3,933,323 earned by the program
    100% of program spending
  2. The greatest achievement of cedar river clinics is to provide consistent high-quality health care in a manner that is respectful to the patients and their families. Proud of its feminist foundation, cedar river clinics demystifies medical procedures and promotes patient participation in medical decision making. Additionally, cedar river clinics is active in our communities as a social justice organization that combines direct services with advocacy and community education.

The 2 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $6,232,474.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($4.1M) Expenses 100 ($4.1M) Net assets 100 ($769k)2018 Revenue 99 ($4.1M) Expenses 99 ($4.0M) Net assets 103 ($788k)2019 Revenue 98 ($4.0M) Expenses 100 ($4.1M) Net assets 94 ($721k)2020 Revenue 86 ($3.5M) Expenses 94 ($3.8M) Net assets 51 ($388k)2021 Revenue 105 ($4.3M) Expenses 94 ($3.9M) Net assets 109 ($834k)2022 Revenue 139 ($5.7M) Expenses 114 ($4.7M) Net assets 239 ($1.8M)2023 Revenue 150 ($6.2M) Expenses 130 ($5.3M) Net assets 348 ($2.7M)2024 Revenue 180 ($7.3M) Expenses 165 ($6.8M) Net assets 422 ($3.2M)2025 Revenue 167 ($6.8M) Expenses 173 ($7.1M) Net assets 390 ($3.0M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (167)Expenses (173)Net assets (390)

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2022 to 2023, from $3.0M to $8.3M (+178%).

$1.6M
$1.6M
$1.5M
$1.6M
$1.6M
$3.0M
$8.3M
$9.5M
$9.1M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 9% · 2018 16% · 2019 18% · 2020 18% · 2021 32% · 2022 13% · 2023 20% · 2024 37% · 2025 29%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

−$9k
’17
$20k
’18
−$67k
’19
−$333k
’20
$446k
’21
$1.0M
’22
$842k
’23
$567k
’24
−$245k
’25
2.8
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Mercedes Sanchez

Executive director

Board chair

Shauna Heckert

Chair

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed16121110911111414
Joined·+0+2+0+0+2+1+3+1
No longer listed·43110101
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 2 funders to 11 funders, grant income rose $137k → $194k.

10 of 22 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 51% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of FEMINIST WOMEN'S HEALTH CENTER’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

FEMINIST WOMEN'S HEALTH CENTER has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 27% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left

98% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund FEMINIST WOMEN'S HEALTH CENTER.

27%
largest funder
56%
top three
~7
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 60% · 2018 47% · 2019 92% · 2020 69% · 2021 49% · 2022 29% · 2023 35% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

67% of FEMINIST WOMEN'S HEALTH CENTER's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 64% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

51% of FEMINIST WOMEN'S HEALTH CENTER's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $717k that is directly attributable, 98% of it comes from funders outside Washington, across 9 states.

WA
MN
NY
MA
OR
NJ
CA
DC
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Washington out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $754k arriving through sponsors registered in 8 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Organizations like FEMINIST WOMEN'S HEALTH CENTER

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Washington

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

88% of spending goes to programs.

Program 88%Management 11%Fundraising 1%

Governance

8
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

99%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

WA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for FEMINIST WOMEN'S HEALTH CENTER: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds FEMINIST WOMEN'S HEALTH CENTER?
FEMINIST WOMEN'S HEALTH CENTER (Washington) receives grants from 22 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,470,954 to it, the largest being HOPEWELL FUND ($398,860). 14 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 51% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does FEMINIST WOMEN'S HEALTH CENTER have?
IRS filings report 22 organizations giving $1,470,954 in grants to FEMINIST WOMEN'S HEALTH CENTER, 14 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of FEMINIST WOMEN'S HEALTH CENTER?
HOPEWELL FUND is the largest funder on record, with $398,860 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like FEMINIST WOMEN'S HEALTH CENTER find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Feminist Women's Health Center →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 22 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing