Skip to content
The Pride Foundation at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

The Pride Foundation

Pride Foundation connects, inspires and strengthens the Pacific Northwest lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) community in pursuit of equality.

$5.4M
Granted FY2025still arriving
137
Grants FY2025still arriving
17
States reached
$142k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Civil Rights$5.9MHealth$2.0MHuman Services$1.6MArts & Culture$1.5MYouth Development$1.1MCrime & Legal$533kCommunity Improvement$394kHousing & Shelter$357kOther$0
02FY2025 · 137 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 137 grants below total $4,238,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $5,435,899 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $1,197,899 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $44k
  • $10k–50k112 grants · $2.8M
  • $50k–250k19 grants · $1.4M
$30,000
Median grant
17
States reached
$53M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Allied Media Projects$142,000
Coalition Against Violence$97,000
Lavender Rights Project$90,000
Native Movement$90,000
Rods House$82,000
Powerful Voices$77,000
Utopia Washington$77,000
Pizza Klatch$72,000
Matthew Shepard Foundation$67,500
Stonewall$66,000
Friendly House$62,500
Community Roots Housing Found$62,000
Montana Two Spirit Society$60,000
Camp Ten Trees$57,000
Madrona Institute$55,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 37% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WESTSIDE QUEER RESOURCE CENTER: $14k → 8%Lower Columbia Queer Center: $21k → 13%FREEDOM CENTER FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE: $15k → 10%PIZZA KLATCH: $25k → 9%Tacoma Seed: $14k → 9%Working Against Violence: $14k → 7%WESTERN MONTANA LGBT COMMUNITY CENTER: $50k → 9%SAFE HARBOR: $14k → 18%LOWER COLUMBIA QUEER CENTER: $14k → 13%PIZZA KLATCH: $20k → 9%Northwest Youth Services: $14k → 12%PIZZA KLATCH: $12k → 9%NORTHWEST YOUTH SERVICES: $14k → 12%W Montana LGBT Community Cent: $30k → 9%WESTERN MONTANA LGBT COMMUNITY CENTER: $25k → 9%Convenant House Alaska: $14k → 10%MONTANA TWO SPIRIT SOCIETY: $35k → 8%COVENANT HOUSE ALASKA: $14k → 10%WESTERN MONTANA LGBT COMMUNITY CENTER: $20k → 9%SPECTRUM: $30k → 12%Empower MT: $21k → 9%EMPOWER MT: $14k → 9%Spectrum: $30k → 12%YWCA Missoula: $14k → 9%Friendly House: $63k → 12%FRIENDLY HOUSE: $35k → 12%Immigration Counseling Serv: $30k → 12%FRIENDLY HOUSE: $21k → 12%IMMIGRATION COUNSELING SERVICE: $14k → 12%WESTERN MONTANA LGBT COMMUNITY CENTER: $20k → 9%STONEWALL YOUTH: $20k → 9%EDUCATE YA: $35k → 12%LATINO NETWORK: $14k → 12%Utopia Washington: $77k → 9%UTOPIA WASHINGTON: $40k → 9%UTOPIA SEATTLE: $40k → 9%UTOPIA WASHINGTON: $32k → 9%BRADLEY ANGLE: $19k → 12%Juntos NW: $30k → 12%DISABILITY RIGHTS WASHINGTON: $14k → 9%YWCA OF GREATER PORTLAND: $14k → 12%UTOPIA SEATTLE: $19k → 9%UTOPIA SEATTLE: $18k → 9%EDUCATE YA: $30k → 9%GenPride: $13k → 9%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $12k → 9%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $12k → 9%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $11k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
WA
ID
MT
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
WY
IN
OH
PA
CA
UT
CO
MD
DE
AZ
TN
NC
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$13M · 157 repeat orgs$2.2M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +26% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

157 repeat relationships: 93 still active in FY2025, 64 since wound down; 41 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

157
77

Total granted

$13M
$1.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
0%

Still filing today

84%
77%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $969k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesCivil RightsHealthArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WM
    WESTERN MONTANA GAY AND LESBIAN COMMUNITY CENTER
    5× · 2021–2025 · $379k · revenue +598% · 66% of their budget
  • Lavender Rights Project
    6× · 2019–2025 · $341k · revenue +529%
  • UT
    UNITED TERRITORIES OF PACIFIC ISLANDERS WASHINGTON-UTOPIA WA
    8× · 2017–2025 · $242k · revenue ×37

Funded once

  • NS
    North Star Community Foundation
    one grant, 2024 · $100k · revenue -17%
  • AD
    ART DESIGN PORTLAND LLC
    one grant, 2018 · $84k
  • MA
    MOVEMENT ADVANCEMENT PROJECTgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $60k · revenue +111%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Northwest Network Btlg Survivors Abuse0

The Northwest Network of Bisexual Trans Lesbians and Gay Survivors of Abuse supports queer and trans survivors in reconnecting to their self-determination through advocacy-based counseling and community education.

Health
2
The Pride Foundation

Pride Foundation connects, inspires and strengthens the Pacific Northwest lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) community in pursuit of equality. They accomplish this in rural and urban areas by awarding grants and scholarships and…

Civil Rights
3
Forward Together

Forward Together is a national reproductive justice organization that centers people, families, and communities who experience reproductive oppression. They prioritize queer, trans, Black, Indigenous, and other peoples of color and utilize…

Health
4
New Progressive Network

Next up amplifies the voice of diverse youth to achieve a more just oregon

Civil Rights
5
Greater Seattle Business Association

To combine business development, leadership and social action to expand economic opportunities for the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer community and those who support equality for all.

Community Improvement
6
Seattle Out and Proud Inc

To coordinate and promote lesbian gay bisexual and transgender pride events in Seattle and the Pacific Northwest which celebrate the present envision the future and honor the past.

Arts & Culture
7
Queer Works

Our mission is to ameliorate disparities faced by transgender, gender non-binary and intersex people as well as help reduce similar disparities among our lesbian, gay and bisexual communities.

Health
8
Oregon Justice Network

Oregon Justice Network is an alliance built and staffed by criminal legal system impacted people advocating for the well-being of people affected or at-risk of being affected by carceral systems. Our work centers around restorative…

Human Services
9
Washington Ethnic Studies Now

Washington Ethnic Studies Now WAESN is a multigenerational majority POC-led nonprofit advancing Ethnic Studies and racial justice in Washington. We center people of color build youth-centered leadership and learning and organize…

Education
10
Basic Rights Oregon

Basic rights oregon will ensure that all lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender oregonians experience equality by building a broad and inclusive politically powerful movement, shifting public opinion, and achieving policy victories.

—
11
Sexual Violence Law Center

Sexual Violence Law Center (SVLC) is a nonprofit law firm that protects the safety, privacy, and civil rights of survivors of sexual and gender-based violence in Washington through holistic and trauma-informed practices rooted in race and…

Human Services
12
Iaf Northwest

In 2024, IAF Pacific continued its work of connecting and strengthening broad-based alliances throughout the Pacific region.Through its Building Partnerships for Collaborative Action initiativethe organization supported Indigenous and…

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Peer Washington; the most unlike its peers is Seattle University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

240 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 240 of the 279 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

8
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
64
Early backer (in before they grew)
225/240
Grantees still filing
131/240
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

IDAHO COALITION AGAINST SEXUAL AND DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $369,500 · OtherIDAHO COALITION AGAINST SEXUAL AND DOMESTIC VI…SEATTLE CHILDREN'S THEATRE ASSOCIATION: $212,537 · OtherODYSSEY YOUTH CENTER: $201,100 · Other+94 more: $4,963,180 · Other+94 moreWESTERN MONTANA GAY AND LESBIAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $378,750 · Human ServicesWESTERN MONTANA GA…UNITED TERRITORIES OF PACIFIC ISLANDERS WASHINGTON-UTOPIA WA: $242,120 · Human ServicesUNITED TERRITORIES…STONEWALL YOUTH: $229,000 · Human ServicesSTONEWALL YOUTHPIZZA KLATCH: $221,500 · Human ServicesPIZZA KLATCHFRIENDLY HOUSE INC: $154,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDLY HOUSE INCPowerful Voices: $132,250 · Human ServicesPowerful VoicesSpectrum: $90,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $87,750 · Human ServicesIMMIGRATION COUNSELING SERVICE INC: $80,750 · Human ServicesEMPOWER MT: $77,350 · Human Services+17 more: $568,450 · Human Services+17 moreTransponder: $145,000 · Civil RightsTransponderChoosing Our Roots: $144,000 · Civil RightsChoosing Our Roo…CATALYST MONTANA: $134,900 · Civil RightsCATALYST MONTANALAMBDA LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATION FUND INC: $131,050 · Civil RightsLAMBDA LEGAL DEF…MATTHEW SHEPARD FOUNDATION: $113,205 · Civil RightsMATTHEW SHEPARD …BASIC RIGHTS EDUCATION FUND: $97,900 · Civil RightsUTOPIA PDX UNITED TERRITORIES OF PACIFIC ISLANDERS: $95,000 · Civil RightsAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $86,750 · Civil RightsGLACIER QUEER ALLIANCE: $85,000 · Civil RightsRainbow Center: $80,350 · Civil RightsPride Northwest Inc: $80,000 · Civil RightsNORTH IDAHO PRIDE ALLIANCE: $75,700 · Civil RightsGLBT Bar Association of Washington Foundation: $71,000 · Civil Rights+18 more: $665,050 · Civil Rights+18 moreCASCADE AIDS PROJECT: $165,400 · HealthCASCADE AI…A Cure in Sight: $158,500 · HealthA Cure in …ENTRE HERMANOS: $136,950 · HealthENTRE HERM…GLOBAL PARTNERSHIPS: $121,500 · HealthGLOBAL PAR…SPOKANE AIDS NETWORK: $102,500 · HealthSPOKANE AI…NORTH IDAHO AIDS COALITION: $95,000 · HealthNORTH IDAH…ALASKAN AIDS ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATION: $77,000 · HealthALASKAN AI…KACHEMAK BAY FAMILY PLANNING CLINIC: $68,000 · HealthBUILDING CHANGES: $65,000 · HealthAHAT Homecare: $52,000 · Health+10 more: $267,000 · Health+10 moreALLIED MEDIA PROJECTS INC: $565,600 · Arts & CultureGAY CITY HEALTH PROJECT: $146,477 · Arts & CultureIngersoll Gender Center: $67,386 · Arts & CultureOri Art Gallery: $65,000 · Arts & CultureSynth Library Portland: $50,000 · Arts & CultureCHILDREN'S DISCOVERY FOUNDATION: $43,500 · Arts & Culture+4 more: $102,500 · Arts & CultureLavender Rights Project: $341,450 · Crime & LegalSOUTHEAST UPLIFT NEIGHBORHOOD PROGRAM INC: $235,000 · Crime & LegalAPI CHAYA: $135,000 · Crime & LegalLEGAL VOICE: $58,250 · Crime & LegalCHILDREN AND YOUTH JUSTICE CENTER: $53,000 · Crime & LegalASPEN-ABUSE SUPPORT & PREVENTION EDUCATION NETWORK: $42,000 · Crime & LegalNATIVE MOVEMENT: $200,000 · Community ImprovementRVC SEATTLE: $151,800 · Community ImprovementROGUE ACTION CENTER: $134,000 · Community ImprovementFISCAL SPONSORSHIP ALLIES INC: $114,000 · Community ImprovementINLAND OASIS INC: $70,550 · Community ImprovementWHITE CENTER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION: $30,000 · Community ImprovementBROWN HOPE: $26,500 · Community Improvement+2 more: $46,000 · Community Improvement
Other$5,746,317Human Services$2,261,920Civil Rights$2,004,905Health$1,308,850Arts & Culture$1,040,463Crime & Legal$864,700Community Improvement$772,850

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetALLIED MEDIA PROJECTS INC: $565,600 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetWESTERN MONTANA GAY AND LESBIAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $378,750 over 5y, 66% of budgetIDAHO COALITION AGAINST SEXUAL AND DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $369,500 over 7y, 6.5% of budgetLavender Rights Project: $341,450 over 6y, 4.8% of budgetUNITED TERRITORIES OF PACIFIC ISLANDERS WASHINGTON-UTOPIA WA: $242,120 over 8y, 6.8% of budgetSOUTHEAST UPLIFT NEIGHBORHOOD PROGRAM INC: $235,000 over 4y, 17% of budgetSTONEWALL YOUTH: $229,000 over 9y, 9.5% of budgetPIZZA KLATCH: $221,500 over 6y, 22% of budgetSEATTLE CHILDREN'S THEATRE ASSOCIATION: $212,537 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetODYSSEY YOUTH CENTER: $201,100 over 8y, 24% of budgetNATIVE MOVEMENT: $200,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetCASCADE AIDS PROJECT: $165,400 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetPierce County Aids Foundation: $163,100 over 7y, 3.8% of budgetA Cure in Sight: $158,500 over 4y, 18% of budgetFRIENDLY HOUSE INC: $154,000 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetRVC SEATTLE: $151,800 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetGAY CITY HEALTH PROJECT: $146,477 over 8y, 2.5% of budgetTransponder: $145,000 over 7y, 14% of budgetChoosing Our Roots: $144,000 over 6y, 5.8% of budgetROD'S HOUSE: $142,000 over 3y, 3.8% of budgetENTRE HERMANOS: $136,950 over 8y, 2.5% of budgetAPI CHAYA: $135,000 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetCATALYST MONTANA: $134,900 over 7y, 3.9% of budgetROGUE ACTION CENTER: $134,000 over 6y, 6.8% of budgetPowerful Voices: $132,250 over 3y, 8.2% of budgetLAMBDA LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATION FUND INC: $131,050 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetCAMP TEN TREES: $124,000 over 5y, 41% of budgetBlue Mountain Heart to Heart: $122,200 over 8y, 4.3% of budgetPATH: $121,602 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL PARTNERSHIPS: $121,500 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetFISCAL SPONSORSHIP ALLIES INC: $114,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetMATTHEW SHEPARD FOUNDATION: $113,205 over 3y, 5.8% of budgetFood Empowerment Education Sustainability Team: $112,000 over 4y, 2.8% of budgetFREEDOM FOR ALL AMERICANS EDUCATION FUND: $108,000 over 2y, 6.5% of budgetUNITED WAY OF MISSOULA COUNTY: $108,000 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetHIV ALLIANCE: $105,500 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY CENTER RESOURCES FOR GAY AND LESBIAN PEOPLE INC: $105,000 over 6y, 21% of budgetSPOKANE AIDS NETWORK: $102,500 over 5y, 37% of budgetLGBTQ COMMUNITY CENTER FUND: $101,500 over 6y, 5.3% of budgetNorth Star Community Foundation: $100,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetBASIC RIGHTS EDUCATION FUND: $97,900 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetNORTH IDAHO AIDS COALITION: $95,000 over 4y, 9.7% of budgetUTOPIA PDX UNITED TERRITORIES OF PACIFIC ISLANDERS: $95,000 over 4y, 3.8% of budgetSpectrum: $90,000 over 4y, 3.3% of budgetThe Living Room: $89,000 over 5y, 7.7% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $87,750 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $86,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGLACIER QUEER ALLIANCE: $85,000 over 4y, 23% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ALLIED MEDIA PROJECTS INC ↗
  • Who funds WESTERN MONTANA GAY AND LESBIAN COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds IDAHO COALITION AGAINST SEXUAL AND DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ↗
  • Who funds Lavender Rights Project ↗
  • Who funds UNITED TERRITORIES OF PACIFIC ISLANDERS WASHINGTON-UTOPIA WA ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHEAST UPLIFT NEIGHBORHOOD PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds STONEWALL YOUTH ↗
  • Who funds PIZZA KLATCH ↗
  • Who funds SEATTLE CHILDREN'S THEATRE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds ODYSSEY YOUTH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds NATIVE MOVEMENT ↗
  • Who funds CASCADE AIDS PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds Pierce County Aids Foundation ↗
  • Who funds A Cure in Sight ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDLY HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds RVC SEATTLE ↗
  • Who funds GAY CITY HEALTH PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds Transponder ↗
  • Who funds Choosing Our Roots ↗
  • Who funds ROD'S HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds ENTRE HERMANOS ↗
  • Who funds API CHAYA ↗
  • Who funds CATALYST MONTANA ↗
  • Who funds ROGUE ACTION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Powerful Voices ↗
  • Who funds LAMBDA LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMP TEN TREES ↗
  • Who funds Blue Mountain Heart to Heart ↗
  • Who funds PATH ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL PARTNERSHIPS ↗
  • Who funds FISCAL SPONSORSHIP ALLIES INC ↗
  • Who funds MATTHEW SHEPARD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Food Empowerment Education Sustainability Team ↗
  • Who funds FREEDOM FOR ALL AMERICANS EDUCATION FUND ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF MISSOULA COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds HIV ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds THE COMMUNITY CENTER RESOURCES FOR GAY AND LESBIAN PEOPLE INC ↗
  • Who funds SPOKANE AIDS NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds LGBTQ COMMUNITY CENTER FUND ↗
  • Who funds North Star Community Foundation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Social Justice Fund N…Inatai FoundationThe Collins FoundationSeeding JusticeMeyer Memorial TrustSeattle FoundationMarie Lamfrom Charita…The Satterberg Founda…Raikes FoundationThe Norcliffe Foundat…School's Out Washingt…The Oregon Community …
Social Justice Fund NorthwestWA77.1× affinity38 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Social Justice Fund Northwest · Inatai Foundation · The Collins Foundation · Seeding Justice · Meyer Memorial Trust · Seattle Foundation · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · The Satterberg Foundation Inc · Raikes Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · School's Out Washington · The Oregon Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Pride Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Pride Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 100%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 15%
  • Fortaleza Atravez Barreras: 100% of income from government
  • Safe Harbors: 64% of income from government
  • Call to Safety: 61% of income from government
  • Transponder: 58% of income from government
  • Hiv Alliance: 54% of income from government
  • Educate Ya Inc: 38% of income from government
  • Rogue Action Center: 29% of income from government
  • Warm Springs Community Action Team: 28% of income from government
  • Immigration Counseling Service Inc: 20% of income from government
  • Latino Network: 15% of income from government
  • Ywca of Greater Portland: 15% of income from government
  • Cascade Aids Project: 13% of income from government
  • Centerlink Inc: 12% of income from government
  • United Way of Southwestern Oregon: 12% of income from government
  • Bradley Angle: 10% of income from government
  • Josephy Center for Arts and Culture: 7% of income from government
  • Friendly House Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Portland Gay Men's Chorus: 1% of income from government
  • Pride Northwest Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Basic Rights Education Fund: 0% of income from government
  • Keshet Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
10get no government money at all
66report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
5rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 279 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Pride’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home