Loading…
Loading…
Washington · Nonprofit
The Pride Foundation (Washington) is funded by 70 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $19,099,411 in grants to it, the largest being INATAI FOUNDATION ($3,289,885). 40 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
The Pride Foundation holds deeper cash reserves than three-quarters of the 13 civil rights nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 13 civil rights nonprofits $10M–$100M, FY2025
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
The funding model — what share of revenue comes from contributions, programs, investments and other sources — and whether it's shifting.
72% of The Pride Foundation’s revenue is contributions — more earned-revenue than three-quarters of its peers (96% for the typical peer).
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.
$96k from 1 funders in 2025, up from $499k and 12 in 2017.
17 of 70 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 27% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of The Pride Foundation’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 70 funders by total. Association, not causation.
The Pride Foundation has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 17% of grant income, and it takes 4 funders to reach half.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 4 funders to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 52% · 2018 31% · 2019 39% · 2020 19% · 2021 60% · 2022 26% · 2023 31% · 2024 35% · 2025 100% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
41% of The Pride Foundation's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 57% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year.
The Pride Foundation draws 65% of its grant income from funders outside Washington — its reputation reaches beyond the state, across 20 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 70 funders put you typical among the 400 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
89% of spending goes to programs.
76%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Operates in 2 states
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2018–2025), and the filings of 70funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing