Alaska · Nonprofit
Tundra Womens Coalition
Tundra Womens Coalition (Alaska) receives grants from 15 organizations whose IRS filings report $2,312,524 to it, the largest being BETHEL COMMUNITY SERVICES FOUNDATION ($1,631,837). 8 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- Revenue FY2025
- $3.6M
- Funders on record
- 15
- Grants received
- $2.3M
- Net assets
- $6.7M
What Tundra Womens Coalition does
Mission
Tundra Women's Coalition provides safe, empowering services for families experiencing domestic or sexual violence. We seek to promote violence-free communities through culturally appropriate outreach programs, supportive services and violence prevention programs. TWC currently includes a 30-bed shelter, a 24-hr crisis line, administrative offices, a legal advocacy program, a community education program with a village outreach component, youth violence-prevention program called teens acting against violence, a children's program, Irniata Ikayrviat (children's advocacy center), an engaging men and boys program, a housing program with transitional houses, and a thrify store.
As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.
Programs
On its FY2024 return the organization reported starting a significant new program.
Tundra Women's Coalition began leasing a seven unit facility from Bethel Community Services Foundation to run the Tundra Youth Home project, which is transitional housing for youth age 18-24.
Its own explanation, from Schedule O of that return (Part III, line 2).
Council on Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault provides emergency shelter,counseling, crisis intervention, and community education and training for victims ofdomestic abuse and sexual assault.
$1,728,074 spent$156,991 earned by the program65% of program spendingOther Grants includes programs of the Tundra Womens Coalition that provide 24-hour crisis line support for victims of domestic violence and support advocacy and other supporting services to individuals and families in the YK Delta.
$429,223 spent16% of program spendingChild Advocacy Center (CAC) CAC program stresses a child-focused multidisciplinaryapproach to investigation, prosecution, and treatment of child abuse cases. CAC further strives to support healing for children and to hold offenders accountable. A CAC is a safe place where a child and their protective caregiver can visit to address a concern of serious abuse. At a CAC, they can receive wraparound services from a team of professionals; such as a child-friendly forensic interview, medical evaluation, safety planning by child protection, referrals to behavioral health and other services, investigation of the crime by law enforcement and prosecution, and support with navigating through the overall process.
$325,601 spent12% of program spendingTelehealth the Bethel Adult Sexual Assault Response Team (SART) is expandingaccess to SART exams through the use of TeleMedicine. Instead of having to go toBethel to go through the SART process, people will be able to receive services at their subregional clinic.
$93,207 spent4% of program spendingAHFC Homeless Assistance Program provides services for individuals and families inthe YK Delta at-risk of or experiencing homelessness through participation in the Alaska Homeless Management Information System (AKHMIS) or the Continuums of CaresCoordinated Entry System.
$70,247 spent3% of program spending
The 5 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $2,646,352.
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.
Balance sheet
Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2023 to 2024, from $6.9M to $6.4M (−8%).
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
Government-grant reliance: 2017 92% · 2018 90% · 2019 90% · 2020 88% · 2021 69% · 2022 88% · 2023 81% · 2024 91% · 2025 89%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 9 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Leadership and staff
The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.
Who funds it, year by year
2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 2 funders to 7 funders, grant income rose $92k → $106k.
4 of 15 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 14% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of Tundra Womens Coalition’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
Tundra Womens Coalition leans on a few funders — its largest provides 71% of grant income and the top three 85%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
89% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund Tundra Womens Coalition.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 54% · 2018 86% · 2019 90% · 2020 90% · 2021 43% · 2022 28% · 2023 48% — diversifying over time.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How long its funders stay
60% of Tundra Womens Coalition's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 53% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.
Where its funders are
94% of Tundra Womens Coalition's grant income comes from Alaska funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $323k arriving through sponsors registered in 3 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Government funding Tundra Womens Coalition receives
Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $8.9M on record.
- Department of Justice$7.9M
- Department of Housing and Urban Development$930k
- Denali Commission$55k
Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.
Organizations like Tundra Womens Coalition
Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Alaska
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
71% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
99%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Tundra Womens Coalition: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds Tundra Womens Coalition?
- Tundra Womens Coalition (Alaska) receives grants from 15 organizations whose IRS filings report $2,312,524 to it, the largest being BETHEL COMMUNITY SERVICES FOUNDATION ($1,631,837). 8 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does Tundra Womens Coalition have?
- IRS filings report 15 organizations giving $2,312,524 in grants to Tundra Womens Coalition, 8 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of Tundra Womens Coalition?
- BETHEL COMMUNITY SERVICES FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $1,631,837 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like Tundra Womens Coalition find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Alaska. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
Play a game about who funds Tundra Womens Coalition →
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 15 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing