· Private foundation
The Chris and Melody Malachowsky Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k27 grants · $117k
- $10k–50k93 grants · $2.2M
- $50k–250k45 grants · $3.3M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NDN COLLECTIVE INC | $180,000 |
| SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK | $150,000 |
| CLEAN AIR TASK FORCE | $150,000 |
| EARTHJUSTICE | $150,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD | $115,000 |
| INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE | $100,000 |
| AMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND | $100,000 |
| ABODE | $100,000 |
| COMPUTER HISTORY MUSEUM | $100,000 |
| PALESTINE CHILDRENS RELIEF FUND | $100,000 |
| THE SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER | $100,000 |
| NATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS | $90,000 |
| BAY AREA COMMUNITY SERVICES INC | $75,000 |
| AMERICAN IMMIGRATION COUNCIL | $75,000 |
| CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC | $75,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 70% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against +1% for the ones you funded once.
156 repeat relationships — 127 still active in FY2024, 29 since wound down; 33 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.3M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CACLEAN AIR TASK FORCE INC4× · 2020–2024 · $521k · revenue +156%
EARTHJUSTICE6× · 2019–2024 · $516k · revenue +66%
GLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC3× · 2018–2023 · $495k · revenue +50%
Funded once
- CMChristian Ministry Allianceone grant, 2023 · $400k · revenue -36%
- AJAMERICAN JEWISH JOINT COMMISSIONone grant, 2023 · $250k
- AFAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOMone grant, 2023 · $250k · revenue -51%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.
To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.
Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…
Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…
American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…
Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.
The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…
Nacwa is the national voice of public clean water utilities, shaping water policy, convening a vibrant peer network, and empowering water leaders.
A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.
At the internet society foundation, we focus on funding initiatives that strengthen the internet in function and reach so that it can effectively serve all people. our work advances the vision of the internet society (isoc): the internet…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Policylink and the most unlike its peers is Henry E Huntington Library and Art Gallery. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.4% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
250 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 250 of the 281 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Silicon Valley Community Foundation ↗
- Who funds CLEAN AIR TASK FORCE INC ↗
- Who funds EARTHJUSTICE ↗
- Who funds GLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Christian Ministry Alliance ↗
- Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds COMPUTER HISTORY MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds NAMI National ↗
- Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR RESEARCH ON SCHIZOPHRENIA AND DEPRESSION ↗
- Who funds GREATER LOS ANGELES ZOOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds PETSMART CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗
- Who funds RAINFOREST TRUST ↗
- Who funds THE GREY MUZZLE ORGANIZATION ↗
- Who funds TREVOR PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds NDN COLLECTIVE INC ↗
- Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
- Who funds THE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA FIRE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds POLICYLINK ↗
- Who funds THE AOPA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE CONSERVATION FUND A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds The Ocean Foundation ↗
- Who funds WORLD RESOURCES INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds THE CORAL REEF ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds COVENANT HOUSE CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE INC ↗
- Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS AMERICA ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
- Who funds Bay Area Community Services Inc ↗
- Who funds MONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The San Francisco Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · East Bay Community Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Sunlight Giving · Marin Community Foundation · The California Wellness Foundation · Give Lively Foundation Inc · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · Tides Foundation · Impactassetsinc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Chris and Melody Malachowsky Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Harborcov Inc — 76% of income from government
- Mercy Corps — 47% of income from government
- Postpartum Support International — 43% of income from government
- Roxbury Stone House Inc — 29% of income from government
- International Institute of New England Inc — 24% of income from government
- Greater Boston Food Bank Inc — 22% of income from government
- City Year Inc — 11% of income from government
- Preeclampsia Foundation Inc — 9% of income from government
- Women's Lunch Place Inc — 8% of income from government
- American Academy of Arts & Sciences — 3% of income from government
- Family Promise Inc — 2% of income from government
- Sandy Hook Promise Foundation — 0% of income from government
- Guy Harvey Ocean Fund Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.