Skip to content

Colorado · Nonprofit

A Christian Ministry in the National Parks

A Christian Ministry in the National Parks (Colorado) receives grants from 18 organizations whose IRS filings report $788,002 to it, the largest being CIOS ($320,000). 12 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$955k
Funders on record
18
Grants received
$788k
Net assets
$5.0M
12/18 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 24%
01What it does

What A Christian Ministry in the National Parks does

Mission

A Christian Ministry in the National Parks (ACMNP) embodies and extends the ministry of Jesus Christ through worship, witness, and the development of Christian leaders.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. ACMNP recruits, trains, and sends team members into US National Parks to lead worship services, build community through relational ministry, nurture park stewardship, and gain leadership skills while serving in an interdenominational ministry. The primary program is based around an entire summer or winter season which allows team members to work a full-time job within the community. Recruiting is focused on college and seminary campuses as well as online. Training is provided via two national training conferences in Denver and Chicago. Ongoing support for the seasonal teams is given through a Ministry Support Committee, which is a group of local residents who support and encourage team members. Additional support is provided through park visits from ACMNP national staff and other trained volunteers. This year, 145 team members served in 38 parks and were supported by 155 Ministry Support Committee volunteers.

    $546,126 spent
    64% of program spending
  2. ACMNP is committed to leadership development. Through an expanded application process, participants are selected for advanced leadership training, including a professional leadership assessment experience and opportunities for the practical application of leadership efforts at the national training conferences and in the parks. Pastoral leadership experience and leadership development is encouraged by providing scholarships ranging from $500 to $4,000 to qualified seminary students who serve as team members. This year, 9 individuals participated in the advanced leadership program. There were 14 total scholarships offered including 5 seminary scholarships, 9 for the advanced leadership program, and 4 who were selected for their exceptional service in season.

    $227,301 spentof which $25,000 as grants
    26% of program spending
  3. ACMNP organizes and leads short-term service-oriented trips to national parks for the purposes of experiencing park ministry, worship in parks, volunteer services and leadership development. This year, 141 individuals participated in these experiential service trips in 9 national park locations.

    $85,087 spent
    10% of program spending

The 3 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $858,514.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($714k) Expenses 100 ($807k) Net assets 100 ($3.4M)2018 Revenue 93 ($665k) Expenses 91 ($737k) Net assets 104 ($3.5M)2019 Revenue 110 ($783k) Expenses 96 ($779k) Net assets 103 ($3.5M)2020 Revenue 113 ($805k) Expenses 86 ($697k) Net assets 116 ($3.9M)2021 Revenue 97 ($689k) Expenses 89 ($716k) Net assets 142 ($4.8M)2022 Revenue 108 ($772k) Expenses 98 ($794k) Net assets 117 ($3.9M)2023 Revenue 121 ($866k) Expenses 125 ($1.0M) Net assets 121 ($4.1M)2024 Revenue 115 ($822k) Expenses 117 ($946k) Net assets 143 ($4.8M)2025 Revenue 134 ($955k) Expenses 134 ($1.1M) Net assets 150 ($5.0M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (134)Expenses (134)Net assets (150)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2020 to 2021, from $3.9M to $4.8M (+23%).

$3.4M
$3.6M
$3.5M
$3.9M
$4.8M
$4.0M
$4.1M
$4.9M
$5.2M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

76% of A Christian Ministry in the National Parks’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (100% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 15,288 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 7 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

−$93k
’17
−$72k
’18
$4k
’19
$108k
’20
−$28k
’21
−$23k
’22
−$145k
’23
−$124k
’24
−$124k
’25
2.0
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Board chair

Krista Henning-Ferkin

Chair

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed191718192020191917
Joined·+1+3+3+1+1+1+2+0
No longer listed·32201222
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 5 funders to 9 funders, grant income rose $37k → $207k.

8 of 18 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 30% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of A Christian Ministry in the National Parks’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

A Christian Ministry in the National Parks leans on a few funders — its largest provides 41% of grant income and the top three 70%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

30% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund A Christian Ministry in the National Parks.

41%
largest funder
70%
top three
~4
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 41% · 2018 54% · 2019 40% · 2020 58% · 2021 79% · 2022 55% · 2023 39% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

43% of A Christian Ministry in the National Parks's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 67% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

A Christian Ministry in the National Parks draws 95% of its grant income from funders outside Colorado, across 9 states in all.

IL
MI
NY
WY
CA
CO
AZ
GA
TX

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Colorado out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $237k arriving through sponsors registered in 8 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

A Christian Ministry in the National Parks's funding base is broadening — from 5 funders to 9 as grant income climbed.

Operating margin−13% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve2.0mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)4% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 7,334 religion nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Organizations like A Christian Ministry in the National Parks

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Colorado

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

80% of spending goes to programs.

Program 80%Management 11%Fundraising 9%

Governance

15
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

75%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

NV

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for A Christian Ministry in the National Parks: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds A Christian Ministry in the National Parks?
A Christian Ministry in the National Parks (Colorado) receives grants from 18 organizations whose IRS filings report $788,002 to it, the largest being CIOS ($320,000). 12 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does A Christian Ministry in the National Parks have?
IRS filings report 18 organizations giving $788,002 in grants to A Christian Ministry in the National Parks, 12 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of A Christian Ministry in the National Parks?
CIOS is the largest funder on record, with $320,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like A Christian Ministry in the National Parks find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Colorado. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds A Christian Ministry in the National Parks →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 18 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing