· Private foundation
Rosenthal Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k6 grants · $32k
- $10k–50k31 grants · $563k
- $50k–250k14 grants · $1.3M
- $250k+4 grants · $1.1M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| VERSA-STYLE DANCE COMPANY | $300,000 |
| ANTI-RECIDIVISM COALITION | $300,000 |
| ENTERTAINMENT COMMUNITY FUND | $275,000 |
| ALEXANDRIA HOUSE | $250,000 |
| UPPER DARBY ARTS AND EDUCATION | $185,000 |
| ARDEN THEATER COMPANY | $165,000 |
| ALLIANCE FOR JUSTICE | $150,000 |
| LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC | $100,000 |
| FILM INDEPENDENT | $100,000 |
| TEMPLE ISRAEL HOLLYWOOD | $100,000 |
| HEART AND SOUL DESIGN COMMUNITY | $95,000 |
| INNER CITY ARTS | $75,000 |
| HOMEBOY INDUSTRIES | $60,000 |
| ALEX'S LEMONADE STAND | $50,000 |
| SWIPE OUT HUNGER | $50,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $3.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
126 repeat relationships — 49 still active in FY2024, 77 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $77k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AHALEXANDRIA HOUSE4× · 2021–2024 · $2.0M · revenue +12%
HOMEBOY INDUSTRIES8× · 2017–2024 · $2.0M · revenue +175%
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC4× · 2020–2023 · $1.6M · revenue +21%
Funded once
- SBSUNNYSIDE BAPTIST CHURCHone grant, 2022 · $346k · revenue +14% · 37% of their budget
- UDUPPER DARBY ARTS AND EDUCATION FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $250k · revenue ×99
- WRWomen's Reproductive Rights Assistance Projectone grant, 2022 · $250k · revenue -55%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To serve the public by producing world-class opera that preserves, promotes and advances the art form while embodying the diversity, spirit and artistic sensibility unique to los angeles. we envision an engaged and enlightened community in…
The Television Academy is dedicated to celebrating excellence, innovation and the advancement of the telecommunications arts and sciences through recognition, education and leadership, while fostering a diverse, inclusive and accessible…
Chamber's mission: design and advance opportunities and solutions for a thriving regional economy that are inclusive and globally competitive. 1) advocacy - be a bold advocate for business as a driver of a strong economy that enables…
Ca fwd drives action to identify solutions that can be taken to scale to meet the challenges the state is facing. the organization is driven by the belief that regional solutions across the state will help ensure economic, environmental,…
Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…
The L.A. Co-op Lab is a collective that builds capacity for worker ownership in Los Angeles as a pathway toward a more equitable and democratic economy.
The organization is a non-partisan, membership based speakers' forum that connects business leaders, community members, and engaged individuals with shared interest in local, national, and global affairs. it provides an open and accessible…
To invest in america's finest artists and illuminate the value of artists to society.
The first amendment coalition protects and promotes a free press, freedom of expression and the people's right to know. continued on schedule o.
To distribute public affairs and other educational information in order to create an electronic bridge between californians and their public officials, and, in the process educate a new generation of voting citizens and civic leaders who…
The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.
The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Women's Foundation of California and the most unlike its peers is Polos Pantry. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.8% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
234 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 234 of the 317 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ALEXANDRIA HOUSE ↗
- Who funds HOMEBOY INDUSTRIES ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds CITY YEAR INC ↗
- Who funds THE ACTORS' FUND OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds INNER-CITY ARTS ↗
- Who funds Versa-Style Dance Company ↗
- Who funds ARDEN THEATRE COMPANY ↗
- Who funds THE ANTI-RECIDIVISM COALITION ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE FOR JUSTICE ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds ALMA BACKYARD FARM ↗
- Who funds PARTNERSHIP FOR LOS ANGELES SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds FOOD FORWARD INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER THEATRE GROUP OF LOS ANGELES ↗
- Who funds WEST SIDE CENTER FOR COMMUNITY LIFE ↗
- Who funds JOHN F KENNEDY CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS ↗
- Who funds Arts for LA ↗
- Who funds SUNNYSIDE BAPTIST CHURCH ↗
- Who funds HOFSTRA UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds HEART OF LOS ANGELES YOUTH INC ↗
- Who funds A PLACE CALLED HOME ↗
- Who funds THE GILDER LEHRMAN INSTITUTE OF AMERICAN HISTORY ↗
- Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PUBLIC COUNSEL ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RADIO ↗
- Who funds GET LIT - WORDS IGNITE INC ↗
- Who funds ALEXS LEMONADE STAND FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FULCRUM ARTS ↗
- Who funds UPPER DARBY ARTS AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Women's Reproductive Rights Assistance Project ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER IN HOLLYWOOD ↗
- Who funds ACTOR'S GANG INC ↗
- Who funds HOPEWELL FUND ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY PARTNERS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · Liberty Hill Foundation · Weingart Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · The Rose Hills Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · The Rosalinde and Arthur Gilbert Foundation · Elbridge Stuart Foundation Dba Stuart Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Perenchio Foundation · The California Endowment
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Rosenthal Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- City Year Inc — 11% of income from government
- Casa Myrna Vazquez Inc — 5% of income from government
- Sharsheret Inc — 4% of income from government
- Upstream Usa Inc — 4% of income from government
- Sandy Hook Promise Foundation — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Rosenthal Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Rosenthal Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.