· Private foundation
Quinn Emanuel Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k25 grants · $130k
- $10k–50k50 grants · $1.0M
- $50k–250k17 grants · $1.2M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNITED WAY OF SAN ANTONIO & BEXAR COUNTY | $160,000 |
| KEATON'S CHILD CANCER ALLIANCE | $109,000 |
| NEW YORK LAWYERS FOR THE PUBLIC INTEREST | $100,752 |
| BORDER SOLIDARITY (SHELTERS FOR HOPE) | $88,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $87,500 |
| COMMUNITY LEGAL AID SOCIETY INC (CLASI) | $79,500 |
| SMART | $60,000 |
| THE DRAGONFLY HOME | $56,500 |
| MARINE CORPS SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION | $53,500 |
| LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION | $51,000 |
| BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE | $50,000 |
| BUSINESS COUNCIL FOR INTERNATIONAL UNDERSTANDING | $50,000 |
| REFORM ALLIANCE | $50,000 |
| LAMBDA LEGAL | $50,000 |
| LAWYER'S COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS UNDER LAW | $50,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $830k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 83% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +35% since the first grant, against +6% for the ones you funded once.
125 repeat relationships — 58 still active in FY2025, 67 since wound down; 34 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $781k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TLTHE LEGAL AID SOCIETY9× · 2017–2025 · $458k · revenue +66%
WILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC8× · 2017–2025 · $410k · revenue +206%- AGALZHEIMERS GREATER LOS ANGELES5× · 2017–2024 · $246k · revenue +28%
Funded once
- FUFordham Universityone grant, 2022 · $250k · revenue +15%
DIRECT RELIEFone grant, 2022 · $200k · revenue +8%- UOUniversity of Michigangraduatedone grant, 2021 · $179k · revenue +96% · 55% of their budget
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The institute's mission, as set out in its certificate of incorporation, is to promote the clarification and simplification of the law and its better adaptation to social needs, to secure the better administration of justice, and to…
The foundation, a subsidiary of new york university, fosters legal education and research at new york university's school of law by awarding scholarships, making grants for educational purposes related to law, and supporting programs of…
To provide students with the knowledge, skills, ethical values needed for a career in law.
The bar association of san francisco champions equal access to justice and promotes humanity, excellence, and diversity in the legal profession. we provide legal services to disadvantaged and underserved individuals in san francisco. we…
The american arbitration association ("aaa") is dedicated to effective, efficient and economical methods of dispute resolution through education, technology and solutions-oriented service.
Preservation of civil liberties through litigation and public education.
To attract, recruit, advance, and retain attorneys of color in the twin cities through education and collaboration with member organizations.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
The association of american law schools' mission is to uphold and advance excellence in legal education.
Ala is the catalyst for growth by providing: diverse educational experiences, engaged peer communities, strategic solutions, dynamic resources, and trusted networks.
The mission of new york law school is to provide its students with knowledge, skills and ethical values needed for a career in law.
Iaf's purpose is to conduct research and publicize findings concerning citizen's attitudes about economic options confronting america. iaf is devoted to fostering a robust and democratic debate about ideas that will shape our country's…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Her Justice Inc and the most unlike its peers is Bissell Pet Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.4% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
277 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 277 of the 393 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE LEGAL AID SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds WILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC ↗
- Who funds Fordham University ↗
- Who funds ALZHEIMERS GREATER LOS ANGELES ↗
- Who funds 826 National Inc ↗
- Who funds New York Lawyers for the Public Interest Inc ↗
- Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE WORKS ↗
- Who funds PRO BONO PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds DIRECT RELIEF ↗
- Who funds BET TZEDEK ↗
- Who funds SCHOOLS MENTORING AND RESOURCES TEAM INC (SMART) ↗
- Who funds MARINE CORPS SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds University of Michigan ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds THE HONORABLE TINA BROZMAN FDTN INC ↗
- Who funds BORDER SOLIDARITY ↗
- Who funds LEGAL SERVICES NYC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF SAN ANTONIO AND BEXAR COUNTY ↗
- Who funds THE HAROLD AND CAROLE PUMP FOUNDATION (FKA THE HAROLD PUMP FOUNDATION) ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN IMMIGRATION COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds Joan Marie Williams Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds American Brain Tumor Association ↗
- Who funds HER JUSTICE INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL CENTER FOR LAW AND ECONOMIC JUSTICE INC ↗
- Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CROSS RIVER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE BOOKS FOR KIDS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATED CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds COORDINATED ADVICE & REFERRAL PROGRAM FOR LEGAL SERVICES ↗
- Who funds NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Sidley Austin Foundation · United Way Miami Inc · The Gibson Dunn & Crutcher Foundation · Weil Gotshal & Manges Foundation Inc · Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Katten Muchin Rosenman Foundation Inc · Perkins Coie Foundation · The Morrison & Foerster Foundation · The Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati Foundation · The New York Community Trust · The Hyde and Watson Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Quinn Emanuel Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Vietnam Veterans Workshop Inc Dba New England Center and Home for Veterans — 66% of income from government
- Bridges from School to Work Inc — 33% of income from government
- The Broad Institute Inc — 19% of income from government
- Associated Catholic Charities Inc — 10% of income from government
- Volunteer Lawyers for Justice in — 9% of income from government
- Rutgers University Foundation — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Quinn Emanuel Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Quinn Emanuel Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.