Skip to content

Washington, D.C. · Nonprofit

PRO BONO INSTITUTE

PRO BONO INSTITUTE (Washington, D.C.) receives grants from 18 organizations whose IRS filings report $924,759 to it, the largest being AMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC ($134,042). 8 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 60% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2024
$2.4M
Funders on record
18
Grants received
$925k
Net assets
$6.5M
8/18 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 8%
01What it does

What Pro Bono Institute does

Mission

Explore and identify new approaches to and resources for the provision of legal services to the poor, disadvantaged, and others unable to secure legal assistance to address critical legal problems.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Corporate pro bono - the corporate pro bono project is designed to substantially increase the amount of pro bono work performed by in-house counsel and to enhance the pro bono culture of in-house legal departments through technical assistance to the in-house community, targeted research and publications, online information and services, and outreach and educational programming. One of corporate pro bono's key features is its website, www.cpbo.org.

    $697,871 spent$3,000 earned by the program
    39% of program spending
  2. Law firm pro bono project - the law firm project was created to support and expand the pro bono public activities of large law firms. Funded by member law firms and sponsors, the project assists law firms in developing effective pro bono programs and in integrating those programs into the practice, philosophy and culture of the firms.

    $654,598 spent$231,279 earned by the program
    36% of program spending
  3. Conference - the Pro Bono Institute annual conference is the legal profession's premier global pro bono event and the only conference specifically tailored to the interests, needs, resources, and emerging and evolving issues faced by law firms and corporate in-house leaders involved in the direction, oversight, support, and administration of their pro bono programs. The annual conference provides an in-depth, timely, and practical orientation to leading practices and emerging issues, trends and innovations, cutting-edge developments in the fast-changing world of law firms and corporate in-house pro bono, and new and compelling pro bono opportunities in public interest law.

    $336,176 spent$168,905 earned by the program
    19% of program spending
  4. Public interest project and global pro bono project

    $119,688 spent
    7% of program spending

The 4 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $1,808,333.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($2.6M) Expenses 100 ($2.3M) Net assets 100 ($4.7M)2018 Revenue 106 ($2.7M) Expenses 106 ($2.5M) Net assets 106 ($5.0M)2019 Revenue 99 ($2.5M) Expenses 100 ($2.4M) Net assets 110 ($5.2M)2020 Revenue 78 ($2.0M) Expenses 82 ($1.9M) Net assets 119 ($5.6M)2021 Revenue 85 ($2.2M) Expenses 76 ($1.8M) Net assets 147 ($6.9M)2022 Revenue 96 ($2.5M) Expenses 92 ($2.2M) Net assets 123 ($5.8M)2023 Revenue 78 ($2.0M) Expenses 100 ($2.3M) Net assets 120 ($5.7M)2024 Revenue 93 ($2.4M) Expenses 93 ($2.2M) Net assets 138 ($6.5M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (93)Expenses (93)Net assets (138)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2020 to 2021, from $6.3M to $7.8M (+23%).

$5.9M
$6.0M
$6.1M
$6.3M
$7.8M
$6.6M
$6.9M
$7.4M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2021 10% · 2022 9%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

74% of PRO BONO INSTITUTE’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (93% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 1,392 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$215k
’17
$238k
’18
$184k
’19
$73k
’20
$397k
’21
$304k
’22
−$356k
’23
$194k
’24
1.3
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Eve Runyon

President & CEO

As listed on its FY2024 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Listed1414141414141514
Joined·+0+2+3+1+0+1+0
No longer listed·0231001
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 7 funders, grant income rose $22k → $99k.

8 of 18 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 60% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of PRO BONO INSTITUTE’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

PRO BONO INSTITUTE has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 14% of grant income, and it takes 4 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 4 funders to its left

84% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund PRO BONO INSTITUTE.

14%
largest funder
43%
top three
~10
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 58% · 2019 48% · 2020 47% · 2021 44% · 2022 23% · 2023 25% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

25% of PRO BONO INSTITUTE's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 44% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

60% of PRO BONO INSTITUTE's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $370k that is directly attributable, 65% of it comes from funders outside Washington, D.C., across 7 states.

WA
IL
NY
PA
CA
MO
DC

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’21
’22
’23
Washington, D.C. out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $554k arriving through sponsors registered in 8 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

PRO BONO INSTITUTE runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 1,337 crime & legal nonprofits its size.

Operating margin8% · above the median
Months of reserve1.3mo · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)−1% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,337 crime & legal nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2024

Organizations like PRO BONO INSTITUTE

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Washington, D.C.

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

83% of spending goes to programs.

Program 83%Management 14%Fundraising 3%

Governance

8
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

78%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

NY

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for PRO BONO INSTITUTE: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds PRO BONO INSTITUTE?
PRO BONO INSTITUTE (Washington, D.C.) receives grants from 18 organizations whose IRS filings report $924,759 to it, the largest being AMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC ($134,042). 8 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 60% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does PRO BONO INSTITUTE have?
IRS filings report 18 organizations giving $924,759 in grants to PRO BONO INSTITUTE, 8 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of PRO BONO INSTITUTE?
AMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC is the largest funder on record, with $134,042 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like PRO BONO INSTITUTE find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington, D.C.. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Pro Bono Institute →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 18 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing