Skip to content

Utah · Nonprofit

AND JUSTICE FOR ALL

AND JUSTICE FOR ALL (Utah) receives grants from 28 organizations whose IRS filings report $5,231,839 to it, the largest being FLORENCE J GILLMOR FOUNDATION ($2,450,000). 20 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2024
$5.5M
Funders on record
28
Grants received
$5.2M
Net assets
$6.4M
20/28 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 43%
01What it does

What And Justice for All does

Mission

Increase access to civil legal services for the disadvantaged in utah.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Programs

  1. And Justice for All's annual campaign raised funds and made grants to nonprofits providing civil legal assistance to disadvantaged utahns. The three largest recipients of grants in 2023 leveraged these funds to assist 26,958 individuals.

    $1,833,334 spentof which $1,828,881 as grants
    81% of program spending
  2. The james b. Lee justice center co-locates utah's primary non-profit providers of civil legal aid to simplify access for clients and achieve operating efficiencies through subsidized rents (currently below 40% of market rate for similar space); shared phone system, meeting space and trainings; and increased coordination.

    $370,872 spent$257,344 earned by the program
    16% of program spending
  3. The southern utah community legal center co-located the region's primary non-profit providers of civil legal aid to simplify access for clients and achieve operating efficiencies through shared space and by providing space for pro bono attorneys to meet disadvantaged clients.

    $49,725 spentof which $49,500 as grants
    2% of program spending

The 3 programs described on its FY2023 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $2,253,931.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($2.5M) Expenses 100 ($2.3M) Net assets 100 ($2.5M)2018 Revenue 74 ($1.9M) Expenses 82 ($1.9M) Net assets 98 ($2.4M)2019 Revenue 87 ($2.2M) Expenses 110 ($2.5M) Net assets 83 ($2.1M)2020 Revenue 79 ($2.0M) Expenses 86 ($2.0M) Net assets 87 ($2.2M)2021 Revenue 92 ($2.3M) Expenses 86 ($2.0M) Net assets 99 ($2.5M)2022 Revenue 220 ($5.5M) Expenses 94 ($2.2M) Net assets 232 ($5.8M)2023 Revenue 101 ($2.5M) Expenses 105 ($2.4M) Net assets 235 ($5.9M)2024 Revenue 221 ($5.5M) Expenses 217 ($5.0M) Net assets 256 ($6.4M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (221)Expenses (217)Net assets (256)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2020 to 2021, from $2.7M to $6.4M (+136%).

$2.9M
$2.7M
$2.8M
$2.7M
$6.4M
$9.2M
$8.3M
$7.0M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 32% · 2018 35% · 2024 18%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

42% of AND JUSTICE FOR ALL’s revenue is contributions — more earned-revenue than three-quarters of its peers (93% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 1,394 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$181k
’17
−$60k
’18
−$363k
’19
−$26k
’20
$309k
’21
$3.3M
’22
$85k
’23
$514k
’24
2.1
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Staci Duke

Executive director

As listed on its FY2024 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Listed99999999
Joined·+2+1+1+1+1+0+0
No longer listed·2111100
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 10 funders to 12 funders, grant income rose $158k → $396k.

8 of 28 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 13% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of AND JUSTICE FOR ALL’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

AND JUSTICE FOR ALL leans on a few funders — its largest provides 47% of grant income and the top three 76%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

45% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund AND JUSTICE FOR ALL.

47%
largest funder
76%
top three
~4
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 24% · 2018 60% · 2019 72% · 2020 47% · 2021 63% · 2022 61% · 2023 51% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

53% of AND JUSTICE FOR ALL's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 71% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

90% of AND JUSTICE FOR ALL's grant income comes from Utah funders.

ID
MN
WI
NY
MA
CA
UT
VA
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Utah out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $657k arriving through sponsors registered in 8 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

AND JUSTICE FOR ALL runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 1,337 crime & legal nonprofits its size.

Operating margin9% · above the median
Months of reserve2.1mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)12% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,337 crime & legal nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2024

Organizations like AND JUSTICE FOR ALL

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Utah

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

96% of spending goes to programs.

Program 96%Management 3%Fundraising 1%

Governance

8
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

85%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

UT

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for AND JUSTICE FOR ALL: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds AND JUSTICE FOR ALL?
AND JUSTICE FOR ALL (Utah) receives grants from 28 organizations whose IRS filings report $5,231,839 to it, the largest being FLORENCE J GILLMOR FOUNDATION ($2,450,000). 20 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does AND JUSTICE FOR ALL have?
IRS filings report 28 organizations giving $5,231,839 in grants to AND JUSTICE FOR ALL, 20 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of AND JUSTICE FOR ALL?
FLORENCE J GILLMOR FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $2,450,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like AND JUSTICE FOR ALL find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Utah. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 28 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing