Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Weil Gotshal & Manges Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$2.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
90
Grants FY2024still arriving
16
States reached
$500k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.

Crime & Legal$4.4MHealth$4.4MEducation$2.6MPhilanthropy$1.0MCivil Rights$827kInternational$692kPublic Safety & Disaster$557kArts & Culture$449kOther$0
02FY2024 · 90 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k35 grants · $165k
  • $10k–50k48 grants · $802k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $205k
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.2M
$10,000
Median grant
16
States reached
$4.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WEILL CORNELL MEDICINE$500,000
LEGAL AID SOCIETY$482,250
WEILL CORNELL MEDICINE$250,000
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$55,000
CITY YEAR GREATER BOSTON$50,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$50,000
GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY$50,000
EQUAL JUSTICE WORKS$39,000
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF NEW YORK CITY$30,000
THE VANCE CENTER$27,500
INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT INC (IRAP)$27,500
CITY BAR JUSTICE CENTER$27,500
HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH$25,000
DUKE LAW SCHOOL$25,000
THE TEAK FELLOWSHIP$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $894k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GLEN DOHERTY MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC: $5k → 10%GLEN DOHERTY MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC: $5k → 10%AMERICAN INSTITUTE FOR STUTTERING: $10k → 17%GLEN DOHERTY MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC: $5k → 10%BOSTON HEALTH CARE FOR THE HOMELESS PROGRAM: $13k → 16%VOGEL ALCOVE: $10k → 14%VOGEL ALCOVE: $10k → 14%FAIR CHANCE: $5k → 14%DELIVERING GOOD: $18k → 17%GOOD PLUS FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 17%LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR OF WASHINGTON DC: $1k → 14%DELIVERING GOOD: $1k → 17%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $325k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $50k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $47k → 14%ASYLUM SEEKER ADVOCACY PROJECT: $8k → 17%START SMALL THINK BIG INC: $50k → 17%START SMALL THINK BIG INC: $25k → 17%START SMALL THINK BIG INC: $25k → 17%HETRICK-MARTIN INSTITUTE: $5k → 17%ASYLUM SEEKER ADVOCACY PROJECT: $5k → 17%HETRICK-MARTIN INSTITUTE: $5k → 17%HETRICK-MARTIN INSTITUTE: $3k → 17%NEW YORK POLICE AND FIRE WIDOWS' & CHILDREN'S BENEFIT FUND INC: $25k → 17%METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ON JEWISH POVERTY: $10k → 17%NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC: $25k → 17%NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC: $15k → 17%ASIAN AMERICAN FEDERATION: $1k → 17%INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT INC (IRAP): $28k → 17%START SMALL THINK BIG INC: $3k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $55k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $50k → 17%VISIONS SERVICES FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED: $1k → 17%INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM INC: $28k → 17%TANENBAUM CENTER FOR INTERRELIGIOUS UNDERSTANDING: $5k → 17%TANENBAUM CENTER FOR INTERRELIGIOUS UNDERSTANDING: $5k → 17%IRAQ AND AFGHANISTAN VETERANS OF AMERICA INC: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
WA
IL
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
IN
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
NE
VA
MD
DE
AZ
TN
NC
SC
DC
OK
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$12M · 120 repeat orgs$3.4M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +17% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.

120 repeat relationships — 22 still active in FY2024, 98 since wound down; 61 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

120
176

Total granted

$12M
$2.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+10%

Still filing today

90%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 46% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.3M went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthHuman ServicesInternationalCrime & LegalPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TL
    THE LEGAL AID SOCIETY
    5× · 2019–2023 · $1.9M · revenue +44%
  • UJ
    UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC
    4× · 2019–2024 · $553k · revenue +27%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    3× · 2020–2023 · $422k · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • NY
    NEW YORK WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL CENTER FUND INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $200k · revenue +182%
  • NW
    NATIONAL WOMEN'S LAW CENTER
    one grant, 2022 · $75k · revenue +6%
  • AF
    Advocates for Children of New Yorkgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $75k · revenue +27%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Law Institute

The institute's mission, as set out in its certificate of incorporation, is to promote the clarification and simplification of the law and its better adaptation to social needs, to secure the better administration of justice, and to…

Crime & Legal
2
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
3
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
4
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
5
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
6
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
7
Brooklyn Law School

To provide students with the knowledge, skills, ethical values needed for a career in law.

Education
8
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
9
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
10
American Civil Liberties Union Fund of the District of Columbia

Preservation of civil liberties through litigation and public education.

—
11
Twin Cities Diversity in Practice

To attract, recruit, advance, and retain attorneys of color in the twin cities through education and collaboration with member organizations.

Community Improvement
12
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Her Justice Inc and the most unlike its peers is Saks Fifth Avenue Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Pregnancy Support ServicesElementary Literacy TutoringCommunity Arts CentersLgbtq+ Community SupportYouth Sports ProgramsMilitary Veterans SupportYouth Development CentersEnvironmental Conservation …Local Food System Organizat…Community College Foundatio…Women & Girls Leadership De…Community FoundationsSchool Parent OrganizationsChristian Missionary Organi…Dance Arts OrganizationsCancer Support ServicesHealth Access Advocacy and …Independent K-12 SchoolsImmigrant Worker SupportAffordable Housing Developm…Youth Development ServicesSchool District FoundationsCommunity FoundationsFood Banks and PantriesUnited Way AffiliatesDomestic Violence ServicesJewish Community Organizati…Policy Research and Advocacy
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%2%<5yr14%5%5–10yr20%11%10–20yr19%27%20–35yr13%31%35–55yr16%25%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%1%<5yr14%2%5–10yr20%6%10–20yr19%17%20–35yr13%33%35–55yr16%42%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.4% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.4%1/276
the rest of the field
10%
11,858/120,484

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

272 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 272 of the 368 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
26
Early backer (in before they grew)
268/272
Grantees still filing
172/272
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WEILL CORNELL MEDICINE — $3,100,000 · OtherWEILL CORNELL MEDICINELEGAL AID SOCIETY — $482,250 · OtherLEGAL AID SOCIETY+101 more — $3,901,482 · Other+101 moreTHE LEGAL AID SOCIETY — $1,948,500 · Crime & LegalTHE LEGAL AID SOCIE…EQUAL JUSTICE WORKS — $119,000 · Crime & LegalPRO BONO NET INC — $90,000 · Crime & Legal+13 more — $521,000 · Crime & Legal+13 moreTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $1,029,418 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES …HER JUSTICE INC — $125,000 · EducationHER JUSTICE I…JUMPSTART FOR YOUNG CHILDREN INC — $75,000 · EducationSPONSORS FOR EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITY INC — $70,000 · Education+20 more — $533,000 · Education+20 moreUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC — $552,500 · PhilanthropyPENCIL INC — $106,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF NEW YORK CITY — $78,000 · PhilanthropySOCIAL VENTURE PARTNERS BOSTON INC — $75,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS INC — $45,000 · PhilanthropyST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC — $40,000 · Philanthropy+10 more — $214,258 · PhilanthropyAmerican Heart Association Inc — $352,745 · HealthNEW YORK WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL CENTER FUND INC — $200,000 · HealthNEW ENGLAND PARKINSONS RIDE — $75,000 · HealthTHE HONORABLE TINA BROZMAN FDTN INC — $65,000 · HealthChildren's Hospital Corporation — $50,000 · HealthCure Childhood Cancer Inc — $45,000 · Health+10 more — $159,500 · HealthAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $422,185 · Human ServicesTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC — $105,000 · Human ServicesSTART SMALL THINK BIG INC — $102,500 · Human ServicesSANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES INC — $70,000 · Human ServicesINTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT INC — $55,000 · Human ServicesNATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC — $40,000 · Human Services+8 more — $126,500 · Human ServicesAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC — $125,000 · Civil RightsTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC — $105,000 · Civil RightsEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE — $100,000 · Civil RightsAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE — $85,000 · Civil RightsTHE TAHIRIH JUSTICE CENTER — $50,000 · Civil RightsIMMIGRATION EQUALITY — $50,000 · Civil RightsNAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC — $50,000 · Civil RightsASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE - AAJC INC — $35,000 · Civil RightsMATTHEW SHEPARD FOUNDATION — $25,000 · Civil Rights+2 more — $27,500 · Civil Rights
Other$7,483,732Crime & Legal$2,678,500Education$1,832,418Philanthropy$1,110,758Health$947,245Human Services$921,185Civil Rights$652,500

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE LEGAL AID SOCIETY — $1,948,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $1,029,418 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC — $552,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $422,185 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $352,745 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLAWYERS ALLIANCE FOR NEW YORK — $230,000 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetNEW YORK WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL CENTER FUND INC — $200,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetCITY YEAR INC — $183,768 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF NEW YORK CITY INC — $178,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetNew York Lawyers for the Public Interest Inc — $175,000 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC — $125,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHER JUSTICE INC — $125,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE WORKS — $119,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $114,726 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPENCIL INC — $106,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC — $105,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC — $105,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSTART SMALL THINK BIG INC — $102,500 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetLawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law — $100,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY — $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE — $100,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPRO BONO NET INC — $90,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE — $85,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPILNET — $82,500 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetUNITED WAY OF NEW YORK CITY — $78,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFEDERAL BAR FOUNDATION — $77,500 over 4y, 4.3% of budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC — $77,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL WOMEN'S LAW CENTER — $75,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSOCIAL VENTURE PARTNERS BOSTON INC — $75,000 over 3y, 5.7% of budgetVOLUNTEERS OF LEGAL SERVICE INC — $75,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetNEW ENGLAND PARKINSONS RIDE — $75,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetYOUTH IMPROVING NON-PROFITS FOR CHILDREN — $75,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetJUMPSTART FOR YOUNG CHILDREN INC — $75,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAdvocates for Children of New York — $75,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetSANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES INC — $70,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSPONSORS FOR EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITY INC — $70,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HONORABLE TINA BROZMAN FDTN INC — $65,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetPRACTICING ATTORNEYS FOR LAW STUDENTS PROGRAM INC — $60,000 over 4y, 15% of budgetWILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC — $60,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT INC — $55,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $53,236 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetASSOCIATION OF THE BAR OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK FUND INC — $50,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation — $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE POSSE FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE TAHIRIH JUSTICE CENTER — $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetNEW ALTERNATIVES FOR CHILDREN INC — $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLEGAL MOMENTUM — $50,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetIMMIGRATION EQUALITY — $50,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Sidley Austin Fou…Quinn Emanuel Foundat…The Gibson Dunn & Cru…The Goldman Sachs Cha…United Way Miami IncWachtell Lipton Rosen…The Morrison & Foerst…The New York Communit…The Hyde and Watson F…The Ford FoundationKatten Muchin Rosenma…Perkins Coie Foundati…
The Sidley Austin FoundationIL84.3× affinity43 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Sidley Austin Foundation · Quinn Emanuel Foundation · The Gibson Dunn & Crutcher Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · United Way Miami Inc · Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz Foundation · The Morrison & Foerster Foundation · The New York Community Trust · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · The Ford Foundation · Katten Muchin Rosenman Foundation Inc · Perkins Coie Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Weil Gotshal & Manges Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 90%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Hias Inc — 88% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
  • America Scores New England Dba Boston Scores — 30% of income from government
  • Medstar Health Inc — 23% of income from government
  • United Way of Massachusetts Bay Inc — 23% of income from government
  • Boston Medical Center Corporation — 23% of income from government
  • Greater Boston Food Bank Inc — 22% of income from government
  • New Jersey Ballet Company Inc — 19% of income from government
  • Heading Home Inc — 17% of income from government
  • Delaware Community Foundation Inc — 13% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University — 12% of income from government
  • Tulsa Community Foundation — 11% of income from government
  • City Year Inc — 11% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation — 10% of income from government
  • Volunteer Lawyers for Justice in — 9% of income from government
  • Boston Health Care for the Homeless Program Inc — 8% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston College — 3% of income from government
  • Shatterproof a Nonprofit Corporation — 2% of income from government
  • Boys & Girls Clubs of Boston Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Sacred Heart University Incorporated — 1% of income from government
  • Americares Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Oxfam-America Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
9get no government money at all
54report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Weil Gotshal & Manges Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Weil Gotshal & Manges Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 368 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines