· Public charity
Michigan Health Endowment Fund
The mission of the MICHIGAN HEALTH ENDOWMENT FUND is to improve the health of michigan residents, with special emphasis on the health and wellness of children and seniors, while reducing the cost of health care.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k6 grants · $185k
- $50k–250k96 grants · $13M
- $250k+46 grants · $23M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MICHIGAN DEP OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES | $2,496,422 |
| THE REGENTS OF THE UNIV OF MICHIGAN | $1,800,433 |
| MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY | $1,522,928 |
| EASTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY | $874,601 |
| WELLWISE SERVICES AREA AGENCY ON AGING | $648,514 |
| INTER-TRIBAL COUNCIL OF MICHIGAN | $500,000 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY DETROIT | $500,000 |
| NATIONAL COUNCIL OF DEMENTIA MINDS | $500,000 |
| MICHIGAN PRIMARY CARE ASSOCIATION | $500,000 |
| DETROIT AREA AGENCY ON AGING | $500,000 |
| GROUNDWORK CENTER FOR RESILIENT COMM | $499,976 |
| COREWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION WEST MICHIGAN | $499,841 |
| NATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATION OF MICHIGAN | $499,802 |
| NORTHERN MICHIGAN HEALTH CONSORTIUM | $499,750 |
| HOSPICE CARE OF SOUTHWEST MICHIGAN DBA CENTRICA CARE NAVIGATORS | $495,142 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $33.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 63% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +45% since the first grant, against +26% for the ones you funded once.
208 repeat relationships — 74 still active in FY2024, 134 since wound down; 68 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HFHENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM8× · 2017–2024 · $6.0M · revenue +69%
MICHIGAN PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE6× · 2017–2022 · $5.3M · revenue +117%- MPMICHIGAN PRIMARY CARE ASSOCIATION5× · 2017–2024 · $2.4M · revenue +66%
Funded once
KIDS KICKING CANCER INCone grant, 2020 · $600k · revenue +7%- FMFamily Medical Center ofgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $550k · revenue +81%
- FOFRIENDS OF THE CHILDRENgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $500k · revenue +140%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide high quality community-oriented, patient-centered health services for all.
The mission of the Center for Family Health is opening the door to health care for all.
Creating healthy communities - together
To provide comprehensive outpatient mental health services to over 5400 individuals and their families in a consumer driven person centered delivery system. Approximately 15% of our staff members are our clients who are involved in a…
Creating healthy communities - together
Mclaren health care corporation, along with its subsidiaries, will be michigan's best value in healthcare as defined by quality outcomes and cost.
To encourage and support its members as professionals responsible for the delivery of patient-focused care.
Mclaren healthcare, through its subsidiaries, will be the best value in healthcare as defined by quality outcomes and cost.
Creating healthy communities - together
The michigan christian home dba beacon hill at eastgate, a not-for-profit corporation, provides housing and health services in a christian environment for older adults, thus enabling them to meet their ongoing physical, social and…
Creating healthy communities - together
To promote conditions favorable to job creation and business success in michigan.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Michigan Public Health Institute and the most unlike its peers is Luella Hannan Memorial Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.4% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
414 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 414 of the 489 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM ↗
- Who funds MICHIGAN PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds COREWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION WEST MICHIGAN ↗
- Who funds WILLIAM BEAUMONT HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds MICHIGAN PRIMARY CARE ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds INTER-TRIBAL COUNCIL OF MICHIGAN INC ↗
- Who funds MICHIGAN HEALTH IMPROVEMENT ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds PINE REST CHRISTIAN MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES ↗
- Who funds DETROIT AREA AGENCY ON AGING ↗
- Who funds TRINITY HEALTH - MICHIGAN ↗
- Who funds National Kidney Foundation of Michigan Inc ↗
- Who funds STARR COMMONWEALTH ↗
- Who funds GREATER FLINT HEALTH COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds Health Net of West Michigan ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds REGION 3B AREA AGENCY ON AGING ↗
- Who funds ALTARUM INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds MICHIGAN ELEMENTARY AND MIDDLE SCHOOL PRINCIPALS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds Food Bank Council of Michigan Inc ↗
- Who funds METRO SOLUTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds Hospice of Michigan Inc ↗
- Who funds Senior Resources of West Michigan ↗
- Who funds MICHIGAN HEALTH COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC HUMAN SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds MYMICHIGAN HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST SENIOR RESOURCES INC ↗
- Who funds UPPER PENINSULA HEALTH CARE SOLUTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds MHA KEYSTONE CENTER DBA MHA PATIENT SAFETY ORGANIZATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: United Way for Southeastern Michigan · Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · Dte Energy Foundation · The Carls Foundation · Children's Hospital of Michigan Foundation · Consumers Energy Foundation · Grand Rapids Community Foundation · Ethel and James Flinn Foundation · Trinity Health - Michigan · Ann Arbor Area Community Foundation · Heart of West Michigan United Way · Delta Dental Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Michigan Health Endowment Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Foodcorps Inc — 21% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.