Skip to content
Plinth

· Community foundation

Ann Arbor Area Community Foundation

The ANN ARBOR AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION enriches the quality of life in our region through its knowledgeable leadership, engaged grantmaking, and creative partnerships with donors to make philanthropic investments and build endowment.

$8.9M
Granted FY2024still arriving
204
Grants FY2024still arriving
15
States reached
$295k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$7.6MHuman Services$7.5MHealth$7.5MArts & Culture$5.6MPhilanthropy$4.0MYouth Development$4.0MAnimals$3.5MHousing & Shelter$3.4MOther$0
02FY2024 · 204 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 204 grants below total $8,110,711 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $8,940,782 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $830,071 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k34 grants · $239k
  • $10k–50k121 grants · $2.7M
  • $50k–250k47 grants · $4.6M
  • $250k+2 grants · $553k
$20,350
Median grant
15
States reached
$227M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN$295,026
HUMANE SOCIETY OF HURON VALLEY$258,126
WASHTENAW HOUSING ALLIANCE$243,760
PEACE NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER$226,819
UNITED WAY FOR SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN$198,759
FEONIX - MOBILITY RISING$180,000
COMMUNITY ACTION NETWORK$155,013
SHELTER ASSOCIATION OF WASHTENAW COUNTY$154,391
BERKSHIRE HUMANE SOCIETY$151,564
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$150,353
THE BOSTON FOUNDATION$150,000
ANN ARBOR ART ASSOCIATION DBA ANN ARBOR ART CENTER$137,554
THE TREELINE CONSERVANCY$137,066
FRIENDS IN DEED$122,448
JEWISH FEDERATION OF METROPOLITAN DETROIT$118,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $4.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 84% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%UPTOGETHER: $115k → 10%MILAN SENIORS FOR HEALTHY LIVING: $85k → 10%MILAN SENIORS FOR HEALTHY LIVING: $62k → 10%MILAN SENIORS FOR HEALTHY LIVING: $56k → 10%MILAN SENIORS FOR HEALTHY LIVING: $47k → 10%MILAN SENIORS FOR HEALTHY LIVING: $30k → 10%AREA AGENCY ON AGING 1-B: $157k → 8%AREA AGENCY ON AGING 1-B: $118k → 8%AREA AGENCY ON AGING: $37k → 8%AREA AGENCY ON AGING 1-B: $36k → 8%OZONE HOUSE INC: $65k → 14%OZONE HOUSE INC: $65k → 14%FEONIX - MOBILITY RISING: $180k → 14%MICHIGAN ABILITY PARTNERS: $94k → 14%MICHIGAN ABILITY PARTNERS: $71k → 14%THE WOMEN'S CENTER OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $69k → 14%MICHIGAN ABILITY PARTNERS: $57k → 14%MICHIGAN ABILITY PARTNERS: $49k → 14%THE WOMEN'S CENTER OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $38k → 14%LORI'S HANDS INC: $45k → 14%COMMUNITY FAMILY LIFE CENTERS: $36k → 14%TRADES PROGRAMS FOR YOUTH & ADULTS INC: $33k → 14%CHELSEA SENIOR CENTER: $163k → 14%CHELSEA SENIOR CENTER: $121k → 14%CHELSEA SENIOR CENTER: $35k → 14%NORTHFIELD HUMAN SERVICES: $50k → 14%OZONE HOUSE INC: $86k → 14%SOS COMMUNITY SERVICES: $81k → 14%SOS COMMUNITY SERVICES: $77k → 14%OZONE HOUSE INC: $69k → 14%SOS COMMUNITY SERVICES: $68k → 14%OZONE HOUSE: $62k → 14%YPSILANTI SENIOR CENTER: $60k → 14%OZONE HOUSE INC: $59k → 14%OZONE HOUSE: $57k → 14%SOS COMMUNITY SERVICES: $51k → 14%SOS COMMUNITY SERVICES: $32k → 14%PEACE NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER: $227k → 14%PEACE NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER: $150k → 14%PEACE NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER: $114k → 14%PEACE NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER: $101k → 14%PEACE NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER: $71k → 14%APPLE PLAYSCHOOLS: $61k → 14%ARBOR HOSPICE INC: $43k → 14%PEACE NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER: $40k → 14%ARBOR HOSPICE INC: $35k → 14%ARBOR HOSPICE: $32k → 14%ARBOR HOSPICE: $32k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
NH
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
IA
IN
OH
PA
CT
RI
CA
CO
VA
MD
AZ
NM
KS
TN
NC
DC
AL
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$45M · 231 repeat orgs$5.4M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +48% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.

231 repeat relationships — 155 still active in FY2024, 76 since wound down; 44 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

231
155

Total granted

$45M
$4.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
+21%

Still filing today

80%
70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $774k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthEnvironmentAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HS
    HUMANE SOCIETY OF HURON VALLEY
    7× · 2018–2024 · $1.9M · revenue +54%
  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF WASHTENAW COUNTY INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +311%
  • AA
    Ann Arbor Art Association
    7× · 2018–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • VC
    Veterans Connected
    one grant, 2022 · $1.0M · revenue +2%
  • BH
    BALTIMORE HOMECOMING INC
    one grant, 2021 · $290k · revenue +8% · 49% of their budget
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER RESEARCH INSTITUTEgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $200k · revenue +31%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Alumni Association of the University of Michigan

The Association is an independent worldwide organization that nurtures lifelong relationships with and among current and future Michigan alumni. As a committed partner of the University the Association offers programs of relevance and…

Education
2
Business Leaders for Michigan

Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…

3
Business Leaders for Michigan Foundation

Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…

Community Improvement
4
Michigan Enviromental Council

Informing and educating the public and decision makers about environmental issues.

Environment
5
The Northern Michigan University Foundation

The nmu foundation will establish and foster relationships to generate resources that benefit the strategic goals of northern michigan university.

Education
6
Michigan Chamber of Commerce

To promote conditions favorable to job creation and business success in michigan.

7
Michigan Pharmacists Association

To encourage and support its members as professionals responsible for the delivery of patient-focused care.

8
Michigan Legacy Art Park

Inspire awareness, appreciation and passion for michigan's history and stories, culture and environment through the arts.

Arts & Culture
9
Michigan Assoc of Community Mental Health Boards

Assisting the community mental health boards of michigan in developing methods for mental health planning, care and treatment.

10
Michigan Public Health Institute

The mission of mphi is to advance population health through public health innovation and collaboration, working to promote health and advance well-being for all.

Health
11
Mymichigan Medical Group

Creating healthy communities - together

Health
12
Mymichigan Health Foundation

The corporation is organized and shall be operated exclusively for charitable, educational and scientific purposes by conducting or supporting activites exclusively for the benefit of, to perform the functions of, or to carry out the…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Michigan Founders Fund and the most unlike its peers is Islamic Association of Ypsilanti Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyAffordable Housing Developm…Environmental Conservation …Women & Girls Leadership De…Health Access Advocacy and …Christian Youth CampsAnimal Rescue and ShelterLocal Food System Organizat…Policy Research and AdvocacyCancer Support ServicesAffordable Housing Construc…Youth Mentoring ProgramsElementary Literacy TutoringDevelopmental Disabilities …Addiction Recovery ServicesChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Equine Therapy ProgramsCommunity Food PantriesFaith-Based Social ServicesLocal History MuseumsChristian Missionary Organi…Independent K-12 SchoolsCommunity College Foundatio…Domestic Violence ServicesYmca Youth DevelopmentFood Banks and PantriesFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…United Way AffiliatesOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Pregnancy Support ServicesSenior Support ServicesJewish Community Organizati…Community Arts CentersCommunity FoundationsCommunity Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%7%<5yr13%11%5–10yr20%16%10–20yr15%20%20–35yr14%22%35–55yr18%24%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%1%<5yr13%8%5–10yr20%12%10–20yr15%20%20–35yr14%29%35–55yr18%30%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 2% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%8/425
the rest of the field
12%
6,503/53,431

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

340 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 340 of the 443 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

33
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
104
Early backer (in before they grew)
334/340
Grantees still filing
241/340
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN — $2,949,824 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGANJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF WASHTENAW COUNTY INC — $1,327,950 · OtherCANTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $1,083,301 · OtherUNITED WAY OF WASHTENAW COUNTY — $1,035,180 · OtherVeterans Connected — $1,025,000 · Other+105 more — $19,218,625 · Other+105 moreCOMMUNITY ACTION NETWORK — $772,713 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY AC…Peace Neighborhood Center — $715,617 · Human ServicesPeace Neighb…OZONE HOUSE INC — $463,349 · Human ServicesOZONE HOUSE …AgeWays Nonprofit Senior Services — $356,560 · Human ServicesAgeWays Nonp…MICHIGAN ABILITY PARTNERS — $334,171 · Human ServicesMICHIGAN ABI…CHELSEA SENIOR CENTER — $333,805 · Human ServicesCHELSEA SENI…MILAN SENIORS FOR HEALTHY LIVING — $329,576 · Human ServicesMILAN SENIOR…SOS COMMUNITY SERVICES — $326,660 · Human ServicesSOS COMMUNIT…FEONIX - MOBILITY RISING — $202,000 · Human ServicesTHE WOMEN'S CENTER OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN — $197,480 · Human Services+14 more — $1,121,930 · Human Services+14 morePackard Health Inc — $920,544 · HealthPackard He…CENTER FOR HEALTHCARE RESEARCH & TRANSFORMATION — $809,238 · HealthCENTER FOR…American Heart Association Inc — $366,425 · HealthAmerican H…MARSHFIELD CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC — $353,470 · HealthMARSHFIELD…PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MICHIGAN — $350,143 · HealthPLANNED PA…TRINITY HEALTH - MICHIGAN — $310,662 · HealthTRINITY HE…NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY — $239,425 · HealthUNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $200,000 · HealthGARRETT'S SPACE — $161,000 · Health+7 more — $790,069 · Health+7 moreAnn Arbor Art Association — $1,028,357 · Arts & CultureAnn Arbor …MICHIGAN THEATER FOUNDATION INC — $595,497 · Arts & CultureMICHIGAN T…ANN ARBOR HANDS-ON MUSEUM — $541,096 · Arts & CultureANN ARBOR …CULTURESOURCE — $466,411 · Arts & CultureCULTURESOU…UNIVERSITY MUSICAL SOCIETY — $403,213 · Arts & CultureUNIVERSITY…+14 more — $1,324,946 · Arts & Culture+14 moreHUMANE SOCIETY OF HURON VALLEY — $1,910,841 · AnimalsBERKSHIRE HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $956,948 · Animals+5 more — $280,000 · AnimalsWASHTENAW COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $553,172 · EducationEASTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $510,642 · EducationFoundations Preschool of Washtenaw County — $225,044 · EducationCLEARY UNIVERSITY — $151,993 · EducationANN ARBOR ACADEMY INC — $150,100 · EducationGREENHILLS SCHOOL — $140,752 · EducationFAMILY LEARNING INSTITUTE — $110,117 · EducationDAYCROFT INC — $99,242 · Education+9 more — $515,717 · EducationWASHTENAW HOUSING ALLIANCE — $858,860 · Housing & ShelterSHELTER ASSOCIATION OF WASHTENAW COUNTY — $611,828 · Housing & ShelterAVALON NONPROFIT HOUSING CORPORATION — $433,096 · Housing & ShelterHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF HURON VALLEY — $162,290 · Housing & ShelterANN ARBOR HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORP — $151,950 · Housing & ShelterGLACIER HILLS FOUNDATION — $116,100 · Housing & Shelter+1 more — $66,500 · Housing & Shelter
Other$26,639,880Human Services$5,153,861Health$4,500,976Arts & Culture$4,359,520Animals$3,147,789Education$2,456,779Housing & Shelter$2,400,624

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF HURON VALLEY — $1,910,841 over 7y, 4.6% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF WASHTENAW COUNTY INC — $1,327,950 over 7y, 8.6% of budgetCANTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $1,083,301 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetUNITED WAY OF WASHTENAW COUNTY — $1,035,180 over 7y, 18% of budgetAnn Arbor Art Association — $1,028,357 over 7y, 24% of budgetBERKSHIRE HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $956,948 over 7y, 9.8% of budgetPackard Health Inc — $920,544 over 6y, 3.4% of budgetWASHTENAW HOUSING ALLIANCE — $858,860 over 6y, 72% of budgetCatholic Social Services of Washtenaw County — $813,506 over 7y, 3.3% of budgetCENTER FOR HEALTHCARE RESEARCH & TRANSFORMATION — $809,238 over 5y, 4.8% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION NETWORK — $772,713 over 7y, 11% of budgetPeace Neighborhood Center — $715,617 over 7y, 7.7% of budgetDEXTER SENIOR CITIZENS INC — $636,696 over 6y, 50% of budgetSHELTER ASSOCIATION OF WASHTENAW COUNTY — $611,828 over 7y, 3.8% of budgetNonprofit Enterprise at Work Inc — $609,640 over 7y, 9.8% of budgetMICHIGAN THEATER FOUNDATION INC — $595,497 over 7y, 5.5% of budgetYPSILANTI MEALS ON WHEELS — $567,452 over 7y, 12% of budgetWASHTENAW COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $553,172 over 7y, 16% of budgetGIRLS GROUP — $546,804 over 7y, 9.2% of budgetANN ARBOR HANDS-ON MUSEUM — $541,096 over 7y, 5.4% of budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $530,285 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEASTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $510,642 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetNeutral Zone — $487,752 over 7y, 11% of budgetCULTURESOURCE — $466,411 over 6y, 17% of budgetOZONE HOUSE INC — $463,349 over 7y, 2.3% of budgetBoston Foundation Inc — $450,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAnn Arbor Young Men's Christian Association — $433,336 over 7y, 1.6% of budgetAVALON NONPROFIT HOUSING CORPORATION — $433,096 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetANN ARBOR CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING INC — $427,163 over 7y, 6.2% of budgetELE'S PLACE INC — $414,865 over 7y, 3.3% of budgetFOOD GATHERERS — $406,485 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetUNIVERSITY MUSICAL SOCIETY — $403,213 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetCATCHAFIRE FOUNDATION — $380,000 over 4y, 6.6% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $366,425 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SOUTHEAST MICHIGAN — $363,806 over 7y, 16% of budgetFriends In Deed — $357,696 over 7y, 15% of budgetAgeWays Nonprofit Senior Services — $356,560 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetMARSHFIELD CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC — $353,470 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MICHIGAN — $350,143 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetMICHIGAN ABILITY PARTNERS — $334,171 over 7y, 2.6% of budgetCHELSEA SENIOR CENTER — $333,805 over 4y, 28% of budgetMILAN SENIORS FOR HEALTHY LIVING — $329,576 over 7y, 16% of budgetSOS COMMUNITY SERVICES — $326,660 over 7y, 1.9% of budgetTRINITY HEALTH - MICHIGAN — $310,662 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetGROWING HOPE INC — $294,514 over 6y, 7.2% of budgetBALTIMORE HOMECOMING INC — $290,000 over 1y, 49% of budgetHURON RIVER WATERSHED COUNCIL — $275,748 over 7y, 3.8% of budgetA Brighter Way — $243,950 over 5y, 33% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF HURON VALLEY
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF WASHTENAW COUNTY INC
  • Who funds CANTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF WASHTENAW COUNTY
  • Who funds Ann Arbor Art Association
  • Who funds Veterans Connected
  • Who funds BERKSHIRE HUMANE SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds Packard Health Inc
  • Who funds WASHTENAW HOUSING ALLIANCE
  • Who funds Catholic Social Services of Washtenaw County
  • Who funds CENTER FOR HEALTHCARE RESEARCH & TRANSFORMATION
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION NETWORK
  • Who funds Peace Neighborhood Center
  • Who funds DEXTER SENIOR CITIZENS INC
  • Who funds SHELTER ASSOCIATION OF WASHTENAW COUNTY
  • Who funds Nonprofit Enterprise at Work Inc
  • Who funds MICHIGAN THEATER FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds YPSILANTI MEALS ON WHEELS
  • Who funds WASHTENAW COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds GIRLS GROUP
  • Who funds ANN ARBOR HANDS-ON MUSEUM
  • Who funds FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND
  • Who funds EASTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Neutral Zone
  • Who funds CULTURESOURCE
  • Who funds OZONE HOUSE INC
  • Who funds Boston Foundation Inc
  • Who funds Ann Arbor Young Men's Christian Association
  • Who funds AVALON NONPROFIT HOUSING CORPORATION
  • Who funds ANN ARBOR CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING INC
  • Who funds ELE'S PLACE INC
  • Who funds FOOD GATHERERS
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY MUSICAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds CATCHAFIRE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc
  • Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SOUTHEAST MICHIGAN

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Washtenaw CountyMI171.5× affinity87 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Washtenaw County · Harry a and Margaret D Towsley Foundation · Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · James a and Faith Knight Foundation · The Martin Family Foundation · Trinity Health - Michigan · United Way for Southeastern Michigan · Dte Energy Foundation · Michigan Health Endowment Fund · The Buhr Foundation · Duffy Foundation · Kiwanis Club of Ann Arbor Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ann Arbor Area Community Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 60%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • Finding Common Purpose Inc23% of income from government
  • Appalachian Mountain Club1% of income from government
  • Lori's Hands Inc1% of income from government
  • Boston Foundation Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
63report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 443 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph