· Private foundation
Dte Energy Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k148 grants · $684k
- $10k–50k224 grants · $4.0M
- $50k–250k61 grants · $5.9M
- $250k+9 grants · $5.2M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DTE BEACON PARK FOUNDATION | $1,200,000 |
| CMNTY FOUNDATION FOR SOUTHEAST | $1,000,000 |
| UNITED WAY FOR SOUTHEASTERN | $875,000 |
| THE HEAT AND WARMTH FUND | $500,000 |
| DETROIT RIVERFRONT CONSERVANCY INC | $500,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $400,000 |
| YESHIVATH BETH YEHUDAH | $250,000 |
| DETROIT REGIONAL PARTNERSHIP FOUNDA | $250,000 |
| AMERICAN FORESTS | $250,000 |
| DETROIT EMPLOYMENT SOLUTIONS CORP | $225,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF THE LAKESHORE | $200,000 |
| DETROIT BELLE ISLE GRAND PRIX INC | $200,000 |
| DETROIT ECONOMIC GROWTH ASSOCIATION | $200,000 |
| DETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC | $200,000 |
| COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF ST CLAIR | $178,050 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $4.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 61% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.
655 repeat relationships — 297 still active in FY2024, 358 since wound down; 83 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.5M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
UNITED WAY FOR SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN7× · 2017–2023 · $8.8M · revenue +55%- DEDETROIT EMPLOYMENT SOLUTIONS CORPORATION7× · 2017–2024 · $5.2M · revenue +23%
DETROIT RIVERFRONT CONSERVANCY INC8× · 2017–2024 · $3.5M · revenue +643%
Funded once
- FIFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLEone grant, 2021 · $2.0M
- DEDETROIT EMPLOYMENT SOLUTIONS CORPORATION DESCone grant, 2019 · $805k
- HFHENRY FORD COLLEGE FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $600k · revenue +56% · 26% of their budget
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…
To promote conditions favorable to job creation and business success in michigan.
Promotion of activities to spur economic growth and revitalization in the city of detroit
The organization was founded by a group of concerned citizens, working in cooperation with the detroit city council, to shape food policy and to work for a more localized, more just, and environmentally friendly food system. the…
To apply the principles of workforce development to grow michigan's economy while improving the lives of michigan workers.
The organization's mission is to provide citizens of michigan with an understanding of how current policy initiatives will affect their well-being; promote the common good, economic growth and general welfare of the citizens of michigan;…
The right place is the economic development organization that drives current and long-term economic prosperity in west michigan.
Inspire awareness, appreciation and passion for michigan's history and stories, culture and environment through the arts.
To be a catalyst for economic and community progress within the great lakes bay region.
CEC works with diverse stakeholders across Detroit to develop critical resources and system-level solutions that address common challenges faced by Detroit families in accessing quality education.
1) to plan and conduct nonpartisan public education programs regarding free enterprise, productivity and basic economic issues affecting the state of michigan.2) to establish and operate a leadership institute designed to provide promising…
Our mission is conserving West Michigans ecologically critical land. We protect land by creating public nature preserves, providing support to communities and local governments in creating natural areas, and helping private landowners…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northwest Michigan Community Action and the most unlike its peers is Taylor Farmers Market. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
842 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 842 of the 1,285 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds DTE BEACON PARK FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR SOUTHEAST MICHIGAN ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY FOR SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN ↗
- Who funds DETROIT EMPLOYMENT SOLUTIONS CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds THE HEAT AND WARMTH FUND ↗
- Who funds DETROIT RIVERFRONT CONSERVANCY INC ↗
- Who funds DOWNTOWN DETROIT PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds DETROIT ECONOMIC GROWTH ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds FIRST IN MICHIGAN ↗
- Who funds RELEAF MICHIGAN INC ↗
- Who funds THE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF ST CLAIR COUNTY ↗
- Who funds DETROIT REGIONAL PARTNERSHIP FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
- Who funds MICHIGAN SCIENCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds CRANBROOK EDUCATIONAL COMMUNITY ↗
- Who funds FORGOTTEN HARVEST INC ↗
- Who funds CONNECT DETROIT ↗
- Who funds THE GREENING OF DETROIT ↗
- Who funds AUTISM ALLIANCE OF MICHIGAN ↗
- Who funds Habitat for Humanity of Michigan Inc ↗
- Who funds MUSEUM OF AFRICAN AMERICAN HISTORY ↗
- Who funds GLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN ↗
- Who funds DETROIT JAZZ FESTIVAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DETROIT PUBLIC MEDIA ↗
- Who funds ARAB COMMUNITY CENTER FOR ECONOMIC AND S ↗
- Who funds American Forests ↗
- Who funds LOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: United Way for Southeastern Michigan · Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · Consumers Energy Foundation · Comerica Charitable Foundation · Ford Philanthropy · The Skillman Foundation · The Ralph C Wilson Jr Foundation · Hudson-Webber Foundation · Michigan Health Endowment Fund · Harry a and Margaret D Towsley Foundation · McGregor Fund · The Fred & Barbara Erb Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Dte Energy Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- City Year Inc — 11% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Dte Energy Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Dte Energy Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.