Skip to content

Michigan · Nonprofit

OTSEGO COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING

OTSEGO COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING (Michigan) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $3,466,144 to it, the largest being NORTHEAST MICHIGAN COMMUNITY SERVICE AGENCY INC ($2,543,343). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$2.5M
Funders on record
5
Grants received
$3.5M
Net assets
$1.3M
3/5 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 36%
01What it does

What Otsego County Commission on Aging does

Mission

To enrich the lives of the senior population of otsego county, with an emphasis on providing meals and services, in order to maintain their independence.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Congregate and home delivered meals - over 52,000 meals were served to seniors in the otsego county area.

    $671,296 spent$71,342 earned by the program
    30% of program spending
  2. Homemaking, personal care, advocacy and other services - over 30,000 hours of services to hundreds of seniors in the otsego county area.

    $1,566,357 spent$65,222 earned by the program
    70% of program spending

The 2 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $2,237,653.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($1.7M) Expenses 100 ($1.7M) Net assets 100 ($729k)2018 Revenue 116 ($2.0M) Expenses 114 ($1.9M) Net assets 110 ($799k)2019 Revenue 118 ($2.1M) Expenses 121 ($2.1M) Net assets 109 ($794k)2020 Revenue 116 ($2.0M) Expenses 114 ($2.0M) Net assets 117 ($851k)2021 Revenue 142 ($2.5M) Expenses 105 ($1.8M) Net assets 210 ($1.5M)2022 Revenue 122 ($2.1M) Expenses 124 ($2.1M) Net assets 210 ($1.5M)2023 Revenue 123 ($2.1M) Expenses 134 ($2.3M) Net assets 191 ($1.4M)2024 Revenue 128 ($2.2M) Expenses 136 ($2.3M) Net assets 177 ($1.3M)2025 Revenue 143 ($2.5M) Expenses 143 ($2.5M) Net assets 183 ($1.3M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (143)Expenses (143)Net assets (183)

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2020 to 2021, from $1.2M to $4.4M (+268%).

$781k
$853k
$854k
$1.2M
$4.4M
$4.5M
$4.1M
$3.9M
$3.9M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 83% · 2018 85% · 2019 85% · 2020 24% · 2021 37% · 2022 22% · 2023 17% · 2024 16% · 2025 20%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$27k
’17
$71k
’18
−$5k
’19
$57k
’20
$680k
’21
−$281
’22
−$141k
’23
−$97k
’24
$40k
’25
6.4
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Dona Wishart

Executive director

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed11121111101010810
Joined·+1+0+0+2+2+0+0+2
No longer listed·01032020
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base narrowed from 3 funders to 1 funder, grant income fell $627k → $302k.

Funder
'17
'18
'19
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24*
'25*
total
funders
3
2
3
2
3
3
1
2
1

1 of 5 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 1% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of OTSEGO COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

OTSEGO COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING leans on a few funders — its largest provides 73% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund OTSEGO COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING.

73%
largest funder
100%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 57% · 2018 99% · 2019 59% · 2020 99% · 2021 99% · 2022 72% · 2023 100% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

100% of OTSEGO COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING's grant income comes from Michigan funders.

MI

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Michigan out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $20k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Organizations like OTSEGO COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Michigan

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

91% of spending goes to programs.

Program 91%Management 7%Fundraising 1%

Governance

7
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

99%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for OTSEGO COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds OTSEGO COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING?
OTSEGO COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING (Michigan) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $3,466,144 to it, the largest being NORTHEAST MICHIGAN COMMUNITY SERVICE AGENCY INC ($2,543,343). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does OTSEGO COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING have?
IRS filings report 5 organizations giving $3,466,144 in grants to OTSEGO COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING, 3 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of OTSEGO COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING?
NORTHEAST MICHIGAN COMMUNITY SERVICE AGENCY INC is the largest funder on record, with $2,543,343 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like OTSEGO COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Michigan. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Otsego County Commission on Aging →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 5 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing