Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Trinity Health - Michigan

We, trinity health-michigan and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.

$3.9M
Granted FY2025still arriving
58
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$593k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$13MEducation$2.7MHuman Services$2.4MHousing & Shelter$2.2MFood & Nutrition$1.5MCommunity Improvement$639kPublic Benefit$505kArts & Culture$399kOther$0
02FY2025 · 58 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 58 grants below total $3,514,539 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $3,911,034 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $396,495 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $43k
  • $10k–50k29 grants · $677k
  • $50k–250k19 grants · $1.2M
  • $250k+4 grants · $1.6M
$40,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$5.7B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WASHTENAW HEALTH PROJECT (WASHTENAW HEALTH PLAN)$593,286
SAY DETROIT FAMILY HEALTH CLINIC$400,000
OAKLAND LIVINGSTON HUMAN SERVI AGENCY$335,000
ST FRANCES CABRINI CLINIC$250,000
SHELTER ASSOCIATION OF WASHTENAW COUNTY TOTAL$118,828
MICHIGAN COMMUNITY HEALTH WORKER ALLIANCE$100,000
LIVINGSTON CNTY DEPT PUBLIC HEALTH$100,000
ANN ARBOR HANDS ON MUSEUM$86,876
CENTER FOR HEALTHCARE RESEARCH & TRANSFORMATION$70,000
WASHTENAW HOUSING ALLIANCE$70,000
LIVINGSTON ESSENTIAL TRANSPORTATION SERVICE$61,216
HOPE HOSPITALITY AND WARMING CENTER$60,000
YPSILANTI MEALS ON WHEELS$50,000
GROWING FORWARD TOGETHER$50,000
INTERFAITH HOSPITALITY NETWORK OF WASHTENAW COUNTY$50,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $4.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 66% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $55k → 10%HISPANIC CENTER OF WEST MICHIGAN: $73k → 9%ST FRANCES CABRINI CLINIC: $250k → 21%ST FRANCES CABRINI CLINIC: $250k → 21%ST FRANCES CABRINI CLINIC: $250k → 21%ST FRANCES CABRINI CLINIC: $250k → 21%ST FRANCES CABRINI CLINIC: $250k → 21%ST FRANCES CABRINI CLINIC: $250k → 21%HOPE NETWORK WEST MICHIGAN: $20k → 11%ST FRANCES CABRINI CLINIC: $250k → 21%TRINITY COMMUNITY SERVICES AND EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $73k → 21%GROWTH WORKS INC: $50k → 21%LIVINGSTON COUNTY CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $128k → 5%WOMENS CENTER OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $20k → 14%LIVINGSTON CO CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $20k → 5%LIVINGSTON COUNTY CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $20k → 5%YMCA GREATER GRAND RAPIDS: $37k → 11%LIVINGSTON CO CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $20k → 5%YMCA WEST CENTRAL MICHIGAN: $28k → 11%LIVINGSTON COUNTY CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $20k → 5%ST SUZANNE CODY ROUGE COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $17k → 21%DEO GRATIAS MINISTRIES DETROIT: $25k → 21%OAKLAND LIVINGSTON HUMAN SERVI AGENCY: $335k → 8%OAKLAND LIVINGSTON HUMAN SERVICE AGENCY: $230k → 8%OAKLAND LIVINGSTON HUMAN SERVICE AGENCY: $137k → 8%COMMUNITY FAMILY LIFE CENTERS: $50k → 14%OAKLAND LIVINGSTON HUMAN SERVICE AGENCY: $70k → 8%LORIS HANDS METRO DETROIT CHAPTER: $35k → 14%HOPE HOSPITALITY AND WARMING CENTER: $60k → 8%HOPE HOSPITALITY AND WARMING CENTER INC: $60k → 8%HOPE HOSPITALITY & WARMING CTR: $50k → 8%HOPE HOSPITALITY & WARMING CENTER: $50k → 8%HOPE HOSPITALITY AND WARMING CENTER: $50k → 8%HOPE HOSPITALITY AND WARMING CENTER INC: $50k → 8%HOPE HOSPITALITY & WARMING CTR: $50k → 8%WESTERN WASHTENAW AREA VALUE EXPRESS: $28k → 14%URBAN LEAGUE OF WEST MICHIGAN: $40k → 11%FAITH IN ACTION INC: $25k → 14%HISPANIC CENTER OF WESTERN MICHIGAN INC: $37k → 11%WAVE-WESTERN WASHTENAW AREA VALUE EXPRESS: $23k → 14%DEGAGE MINISTRIES: $34k → 11%FAITH IN ACTION INC: $17k → 14%HISPANIC CENTER OF WESTERN MICHIGAN INC: $20k → 11%YMCA WEST CENTRAL MICHIGAN: $20k → 11%SOS COMMUNITY SERVICES: $97k → 14%OZONE HOUSE INC: $50k → 14%GROWING FORWARD TOGETHER: $50k → 14%GROWING FORWARD TOGETHER: $50k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$21M · 96 repeat orgs$3.5M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.

96 repeat relationships — 41 still active in FY2025, 55 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

96
75

Total granted

$21M
$2.9M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+7%

Still filing today

81%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $627k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SD
    SAY DETROIT
    7× · 2019–2025 · $2.5M · revenue +41%
  • WH
    WASHTENAW HEALTH PLAN
    7× · 2018–2025 · $2.4M · revenue +326%
  • CC
    Covenant Community Care Inc
    4× · 2017–2021 · $1.4M · revenue +0%

Funded once

  • AH
    ADVANTAGE HEALTHSAINT MARY'S MEDICAL GROUP
    one grant, 2023 · $750k · revenue +22%
  • MF
    MIA-USA FUNDRAISING INC
    one grant, 2018 · $167k · revenue -3% · 64% of their budget
  • PH
    Packard Health Incgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $150k · revenue +30%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Area Agency On Aging of Western Michigan Inc

Through internal expertise, external partnerships, and advocacy, the area agency on aging of western michigan provides older adults, adults with disabilities, and their caregivers equitable access to services that promote independence and…

Human Services
2
Mid Michigan Community Action Agency Inc

Mid michigan community action guides local residents on the path to self-sufficiency through empowerment, education and community enrichment.

3
Michigan Chamber of Commerce

To promote conditions favorable to job creation and business success in michigan.

4
Michigan Assoc of Community Mental Health Boards

Assisting the community mental health boards of michigan in developing methods for mental health planning, care and treatment.

5
Center for Family Health

The mission of the Center for Family Health is opening the door to health care for all.

Health
6
Lincoln Behavioral Services

To provide comprehensive outpatient mental health services to over 5400 individuals and their families in a consumer driven person centered delivery system. Approximately 15% of our staff members are our clients who are involved in a…

Health
7
Midmichigan Health Services

To provide high quality community-oriented, patient-centered health services for all.

Health
8
Business Leaders for Michigan

Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…

9
Great Lakes Bay Health Centers

To provide high quality health care to individuals and community groups in Saginaw, Bay, and other nearby counties. Services are provided without regard to race, beliefs or ability to pay.

Health
10
Urban League of Detroit and Southeastern Michigan

To enable african americans and people in need to reach their full human potential

11
Michigan Center for Clinical Systems Improvement

The organization's mission is to support community-based, stakeholder driven training for care teams including physicians, care managers, care coordinators, medical assistants and behavioral health specialists; facilitate training and…

Health
12
Mymichigan Medical Center Midland

Creating healthy communities - together

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ywca West Central Michigan and the most unlike its peers is Dr Gary Burnstein Community Health Clinic. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyLabor Union Benefit FundsYouth Sports & Recreation P…Michigan Civic Infrastructu…Fraternal Service Organizat…Senior Residential CareDetroit Community Developme…Animal Rescue and CareK-12 School Support Organiz…Youth Sports ProgramsFamily Philanthropic Founda…Anti-Poverty Community Serv…Health Systems and NetworksSenior Residential Housing
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%0%<5yr15%10%5–10yr19%16%10–20yr17%27%20–35yr13%28%35–55yr13%20%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%0%<5yr15%5%5–10yr19%23%10–20yr17%43%20–35yr13%21%35–55yr13%8%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 2% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%3/185
the rest of the field
16%
3,556/22,374

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

148 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 148 of the 192 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
36
Early backer (in before they grew)
144/148
Grantees still filing
98/148
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WASHTENAW HEALTH PLAN — $2,443,286 · HealthWASHTENAW HEALTH PLANCovenant Community Care Inc — $1,400,000 · HealthCovenant Community Care IncTHE WELLNESS PLAN MEDICAL CENTERS — $1,110,049 · HealthTHE WELLNESS PLAN MEDICAL CENTERSADVANTAGE HEALTHSAINT MARY'S MEDICAL GROUP — $750,000 · HealthADVANTAGE HEALTHSAINT MARY'S MEDIC…CENTER FOR HEALTHCARE RESEARCH & TRANSFORMATION — $690,000 · HealthCENTER FOR HEALTHCARE RESEARCH & T…+18 more — $1,040,053 · Health+18 moreWashtenaw County Office of Community and Economic Developement — $861,099 · OtherWashtenaw County Office of Communit…MEL TROTTER MINISTRIES — $445,000 · OtherMEL TROTTER MINISTRIESCITY YEAR INC — $375,000 · OtherLIVINGSTON COUNTY TREASURER — $308,587 · Other+114 more — $5,651,873 · Other+114 moreTRINITY COMMUNITY SERVICES AND EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION — $1,822,381 · Human ServicesTRINITY COMMUNITY S…OAKLAND LIVINGSTON HUMAN SERVICE AGENCY — $771,873 · Human ServicesOAKLAND LIVINGSTON …HOPE HOSPITALITY AND WARMING CENTER INC — $370,000 · Human ServicesHOPE HOSPITALITY AN…LIVINGSTON COUNTY CATHOLIC CHARITIES — $208,221 · Human ServicesHISPANIC CENTER OF WESTERN MICHIGAN INC — $149,000 · Human Services+24 more — $1,015,885 · Human Services+24 moreSAY DETROIT — $2,500,000 · Housing & ShelterSAY DETROITAVALON NONPROFIT HOUSING CORPORATION — $495,000 · Housing & ShelterAVALON NONPROFIT …SHELTER ASSOCIATION OF WASHTENAW COUNTY — $311,576 · Housing & ShelterSHELTER ASSOCIATI…WASHTENAW HOUSING ALLIANCE — $277,500 · Housing & ShelterWASHTENAW HOUSING…+4 more — $170,000 · Housing & ShelterMERCY EDUCATION PROJECT — $375,395 · EducationDETROIT PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $80,825 · EducationWEST MICHIGAN CENTER FOR ARTS & TECHNOLOGY — $25,000 · EducationLPS EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $22,500 · EducationEASTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $20,256 · EducationUNITED STROKE ALLIANCE — $19,500 · Education+1 more — $10,000 · EducationFAIR FOOD NETWORK INC — $150,000 · Food & NutritionGLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN — $150,000 · Food & NutritionCOMMUNITY FOOD CLUBS — $120,000 · Food & NutritionEASTERN MARKET CORPORATION — $100,000 · Food & NutritionOUR KITCHEN TABLE — $25,000 · Food & NutritionMICHIGAN COMMUNITY HEALTH WORKER ALLIANCE — $300,000 · EmploymentDETROIT EMPLOYMENT SOLUTIONS CORPORATION — $50,000 · Employment
Health$7,433,388Other$7,641,559Human Services$4,337,360Housing & Shelter$3,754,076Education$553,476Food & Nutrition$545,000Employment$350,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSAY DETROIT — $2,500,000 over 7y, 14% of budgetWASHTENAW HEALTH PLAN — $2,443,286 over 7y, 20% of budgetTRINITY COMMUNITY SERVICES AND EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION — $1,822,381 over 8y, 22% of budgetCovenant Community Care Inc — $1,400,000 over 4y, 3.3% of budgetTHE WELLNESS PLAN MEDICAL CENTERS — $1,110,049 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetOAKLAND LIVINGSTON HUMAN SERVICE AGENCY — $771,873 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetADVANTAGE HEALTHSAINT MARY'S MEDICAL GROUP — $750,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCENTER FOR HEALTHCARE RESEARCH & TRANSFORMATION — $690,000 over 9y, 3.0% of budgetAVALON NONPROFIT HOUSING CORPORATION — $495,000 over 3y, 3.2% of budgetMEL TROTTER MINISTRIES — $445,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetMERCY EDUCATION PROJECT — $375,395 over 6y, 12% of budgetCITY YEAR INC — $375,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHOPE HOSPITALITY AND WARMING CENTER INC — $370,000 over 7y, 5.5% of budgetSHELTER ASSOCIATION OF WASHTENAW COUNTY — $311,576 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetMICHIGAN COMMUNITY HEALTH WORKER ALLIANCE — $300,000 over 3y, 6.5% of budgetWASHTENAW HOUSING ALLIANCE — $277,500 over 4y, 24% of budgetFOOD GATHERERS — $245,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetLIVINGSTON COUNTY CATHOLIC CHARITIES — $208,221 over 5y, 4.4% of budgetFreedom Road Transportation Authority — $200,000 over 5y, 25% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF WASHTENAW COUNTY INC — $197,498 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetMIA-USA FUNDRAISING INC — $167,000 over 1y, 64% of budgetTHE RIGHT PLACE INC — $162,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetYPSILANTI MEALS ON WHEELS — $150,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetFAIR FOOD NETWORK INC — $150,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetPackard Health Inc — $150,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetGLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN — $150,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHISPANIC CENTER OF WESTERN MICHIGAN INC — $149,000 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetSTUDENT ADVOCACY CENTER OF MICHIGAN INC — $140,000 over 3y, 5.1% of budgetGROWING HOPE INC — $140,000 over 7y, 2.8% of budgetHOPE MEDICAL CLINIC INC — $135,000 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetYWCA WEST CENTRAL MICHIGAN — $127,198 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOOD CLUBS — $120,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetHEART OF WEST MICHIGAN UNITED WAY — $116,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetUNITED WAY OF WASHTENAW COUNTY — $114,999 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetInterfaith Hospitality Network of Washtenaw County — $100,000 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF MICHIGAN — $100,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetEASTERN MARKET CORPORATION — $100,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetGROWING FORWARD TOGETHER — $100,000 over 2y, 10% of budgetMETRO SOLUTIONS INC — $99,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetSOS COMMUNITY SERVICES — $97,100 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetMICHIGAN PRISON DOULA INITIATIVE — $96,550 over 3y, 28% of budgetAFRICAN-AMERICAN HEALTH INSTITUTE — $95,000 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetLACASA — $89,758 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetGrand Rapids Area Chamber of Commerce — $88,500 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetSTOCKBRIDGE COMMUNITY OUTREACH ASSOCIATION — $87,500 over 2y, 43% of budgetANN ARBOR HANDS-ON MUSEUM — $86,876 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetDETROIT PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $80,825 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetCOMMON GROUND — $80,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SAY DETROIT
  • Who funds WASHTENAW HEALTH PLAN
  • Who funds TRINITY COMMUNITY SERVICES AND EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Covenant Community Care Inc
  • Who funds THE WELLNESS PLAN MEDICAL CENTERS
  • Who funds OAKLAND LIVINGSTON HUMAN SERVICE AGENCY
  • Who funds ADVANTAGE HEALTHSAINT MARY'S MEDICAL GROUP
  • Who funds CENTER FOR HEALTHCARE RESEARCH & TRANSFORMATION
  • Who funds AVALON NONPROFIT HOUSING CORPORATION
  • Who funds MEL TROTTER MINISTRIES
  • Who funds MERCY EDUCATION PROJECT
  • Who funds CITY YEAR INC
  • Who funds HOPE HOSPITALITY AND WARMING CENTER INC
  • Who funds SHELTER ASSOCIATION OF WASHTENAW COUNTY
  • Who funds MICHIGAN COMMUNITY HEALTH WORKER ALLIANCE
  • Who funds WASHTENAW HOUSING ALLIANCE
  • Who funds FOOD GATHERERS
  • Who funds LIVINGSTON COUNTY CATHOLIC CHARITIES
  • Who funds Freedom Road Transportation Authority
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF WASHTENAW COUNTY INC
  • Who funds MIA-USA FUNDRAISING INC
  • Who funds THE RIGHT PLACE INC
  • Who funds YPSILANTI MEALS ON WHEELS
  • Who funds FAIR FOOD NETWORK INC
  • Who funds Packard Health Inc
  • Who funds GLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN
  • Who funds HISPANIC CENTER OF WESTERN MICHIGAN INC
  • Who funds STUDENT ADVOCACY CENTER OF MICHIGAN INC
  • Who funds GROWING HOPE INC
  • Who funds HOPE MEDICAL CLINIC INC
  • Who funds YWCA WEST CENTRAL MICHIGAN
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOOD CLUBS
  • Who funds HEART OF WEST MICHIGAN UNITED WAY
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF WASHTENAW COUNTY

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for Southeast MichiganMI85.1× affinity58 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · Ann Arbor Area Community Foundation · United Way for Southeastern Michigan · Michigan Health Endowment Fund · Dte Energy Foundation · United Way of Washtenaw County · Harry a and Margaret D Towsley Foundation · Grand Rapids Community Foundation · Consumers Energy Foundation · Heart of West Michigan United Way · James a and Faith Knight Foundation · The Carls Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Trinity Health - Michigan funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 11%
  • City Year Inc11% of income from government
  • Lori's Hands Inc1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
57report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 192 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph