· Public charity
Credit Builders Alliance Inc
Cba's mission is to help organizations move people from poverty to prosperity through credit building.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 21 grants below total $385,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $689,716 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $304,716 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k6 grants · $45k
- $10k–50k14 grants · $190k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $150k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| URBAN INSTITUTE | $150,000 |
| MARSHALL HEIGHTS COMMUNITY | $20,000 |
| PHIPPS NEIGHBORHOODS | $20,000 |
| PROJECT ACCESS | $20,000 |
| CARROLL GARDENTS ASSOCIATION | $15,000 |
| CONGRESO DE LATINOS UNIDOS INC | $15,000 |
| CENTRAL CITY NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERS | $15,000 |
| COMMUNITY FIRST FUND | $15,000 |
| EXODUS LENDING | $10,000 |
| CENTER FOR TRANSFORMING LIVES | $10,000 |
| GATEWAY COMMUNITY ACTION | $10,000 |
| DOWNSTREET HOUSING AND COMMUNITY | $10,000 |
| MILES COLLEGE | $10,000 |
| FRIENDSHIP HOUSE OF DELAWARE | $10,000 |
| LSS FINANCIAL COUNSELING | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $819k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
10 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 21 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $385k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CBCREDIT BUILDERS ALLIANCE INC3× · 2018–2020 · $295k · revenue +138%
- LILIFT INC2× · 2022–2023 · $40k · revenue +35%
- NPNEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIP HOUSING SERVICES INC2× · 2021–2022 · $30k · revenue +19%
Funded once
- SFSER-JOBS FOR PROGRESS OF THE TEXAS GULF COAST INCone grant, 2023 · $30k · revenue -85%
- AIARIVA INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +48%
- HHHarbor House of Central Florida Incone grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue +12%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The neighborhood reinvestment corporation (d.b.a neighborworks america) is a congressionally chartered public non-profit corporation that creates opportunities for people to live in affordable homes, improve their lives, and strengthen…
All our efforts support our strategic goals to increase housing supply, advance racial equity and build resilience and upward mobility.the organization raises private capital through investment and by forming effective partnerships.…
Mission: to create economically diverse neighborhoods filled with financially empowered citizens and housing for all.vision: all chattanoogans can afford a safe place in a strong neighborhood to call home. belief: we believe the future of…
Chn housing capital is a certified community development financial institution serving low-income individuals and distressed communities guided by the belief that homeownership should be within everyone's reach.
The washington area community investment fund (wacif) is a nonprofit community loan fund focused on increasing equity and economic opportunity in the washington, dc area's underserved communities. wacif's mission is driven is driven by…
Housing partnership development corporation functions to provide available low and moderate cost housing in the new york metro area through new housing production, preservation, rehabilitation, as well as the revitalization and…
Community capital is a nonprofit lender that has revitalized communities and transformed lives in the mid-hudson valley, bronx and fairfield county, ct for 36 years. our mission is to foster economic opportunity for underserved individuals…
To support equitable access to economic opportunities for immigrants, refugees, low-income, marginalized, and underserved communities in king county and the united states.
Helping people, changing lives, engaging the community to end poverty
Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…
Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.
Impact capital is a community development financial institution that makes strategic loans in organizations, tribal entities, and housing authorities to spur community development, including affordable housing, art and cultural centers,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Congreso De Latinos Unidos Inc and the most unlike its peers is Project Return Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
60 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 60 of the 67 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CBA FUND ↗
- Who funds CREDIT BUILDERS ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds THE URBAN INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds LIFT INC ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIP HOUSING SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds SER-JOBS FOR PROGRESS OF THE TEXAS GULF COAST INC ↗
- Who funds EAST BAY ASIAN LOCAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Columbus Housing Initiative Inc ↗
- Who funds ARIVA INC ↗
- Who funds MATRIX HUMAN SERVICES ↗
- Who funds MARSHALL HEIGHTS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ↗
- Who funds PHIPPS NEIGHBORHOODS INC ↗
- Who funds Project Access Inc ↗
- Who funds Harbor House of Central Florida Inc ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FIRST FUND ↗
- Who funds CARROLL GARDENS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL CITY NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds CONGRESO DE LATINOS UNIDOS INC ↗
- Who funds Iowa Legal Aid ↗
- Who funds URBAN LEAGUE OF ROCHESTER NY INC ↗
- Who funds The First 72 ↗
- Who funds Rocky Mountain Microfinance ↗
- Who funds PENQUIS CAP INC ↗
- Who funds INCLUSIVE ACTION FOR THE CITY ↗
- Who funds UNION COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORP ↗
- Who funds URBAN STRATEGIES INC ↗
- Who funds PROJECT RETURN INC ↗
- Who funds LATINO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds EXODUS FINANCIAL SERVICES ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR TRANSFORMING LIVES ↗
- Who funds DOWNSTREET HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INC ↗
- Who funds JUBILEE HOUSING INC ↗
- Who funds TRI-COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC ↗
- Who funds CAPITAL AREA ASSET BUILDING CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION FOR MICROENTERPRISE OPPORTUNITY ↗
- Who funds EAST RIVER DEVELOPMENT ALLIANCE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Wells Fargo Foundation · Td Charitable Foundation · Enterprise Community Partners Inc · Citi Foundation · National Association for Latino Community Asset Builders · Opportunity Finance Network · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation · Local Initiatives Support Corporation · Cba Fund · Truist Foundation Inc · Prosperity Now
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Credit Builders Alliance Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Hias Inc — 88% of income from government
- Union County Economic Development Corp — 47% of income from government
- Harbor House of Central Florida Inc — 24% of income from government
- Tri-County Community Action Agency Inc — 23% of income from government
- Downstreet Housing and Community Development Inc — 7% of income from government
- Urban Edge Housing Corporation — 2% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.