· Private foundation
Jpmorgan Chase Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k10300 grants · $11M
- $10k–50k233 grants · $4.2M
- $50k–250k289 grants · $42M
- $250k+254 grants · $135M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE CAREERS AND ENTERPRISE COMPANY LIMITED | $2,197,332 |
| ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP OF ALABAMA FOUNDATION | $2,000,000 |
| CODE FOR AMERICA LABS INC | $2,000,000 |
| THE CHICAGO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $1,750,000 |
| ENTERPRISE COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC | $1,675,000 |
| NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVICES OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY | $1,500,000 |
| COMMIT2DALLAS | $1,500,000 |
| RECLAIMING CHICAGO NFP | $1,375,000 |
| VIBRANT EMOTIONAL HEALTH | $1,368,000 |
| POSSIBILITY LABS | $1,359,160 |
| THE URBAN INSTITUTE | $1,300,000 |
| GIVE2ASIA | $1,180,911 |
| GREATER WASHINGTON PARTNERSHIP | $1,180,000 |
| CLIMATE JOBS NATIONAL RESOURCE CENTER INC | $1,145,000 |
| THE CAREERS AND ENTERPRISE COMPANY LIMITED | $1,108,046 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your US giving — 85% of grant dollars ($1.4B). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 15% that went abroad ($249M) is mapped below.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $53.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Beyond the US — 15% of all-years giving ($249M)
45 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +45% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.
1478 repeat relationships — 674 still active in FY2025, 804 since wound down; 91 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
LOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION9× · 2017–2025 · $28M · revenue +135%
THE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC9× · 2017–2025 · $24M · revenue +243%
ENTERPRISE COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC9× · 2017–2025 · $24M · revenue +153%
Funded once
- TCTHE CAREERS AND ENTERPRISE COMPANYone grant, 2021 · $1.9M
- MSMain Street Launchgraduatedone grant, 2024 · $1.2M · revenue +27%
- TSTHE SOCIETY FOR COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION LIMITEDone grant, 2020 · $1.0M
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is transforming our regional economy, bringing together the ceos of central indiana's largest and most civically engaged employers and university presidents to advance "big picture"…
Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.
Uniting communities to alleviate hunger.
Delivering financing solutions and advancing markets for energy efficiency and clean energy.
Land bank twin cities, inc. captures strategic real estate opportunities to benefit people with low to moderate incomes, prioritizing people of color and populations facing barriers.
The common application promotes access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process.
To cultivate inclusive communities through relationships, innovation and high-quality services.
Cdcli invests in the housing and economic aspirations of individuals and families by providing solutions that foster and maintain vibrant, eguitable, and sustainable communities.
Cecp's mission is to create a better world through business. cecp is a ceo-led coalition that believes that a company's social strategy how it engages with key stakeholders, including employees, communities, investors, and customers…
Fighting hunger, improving lives, strengthening communities.
Bring people together to research, educate, & advocate for a fair, equitable dc legal system.
Enterprise's mission is to make home and community places of pride, power and belonging, and platforms for resilience and upward mobility for all low and moderate income people.all our efforts support our strategic goals to increase…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Support Center for Nonprofit Management Inc and the most unlike its peers is International Tennis Hall of Fame. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.5% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
1474 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1474 of the 2,000 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds THE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds ENTERPRISE COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC ↗
- Who funds COUNCIL OF CHIEF STATE SCHOOL OFFICERS ↗
- Who funds UNIDOSUS ↗
- Who funds COMMIT2DALLAS ↗
- Who funds GIVE2ASIA ↗
- Who funds THE URBAN INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds The Resurrection Project ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR LATINO COMMUNITY ASSET BUILDERS ↗
- Who funds GREATER WASHINGTON PARTNERSHIP ↗
- Who funds Indianapolis Private Industry Council ↗
- Who funds PROSPERITY NOW ↗
- Who funds Coalition for Nonprofit Housing and ↗
- Who funds THE NASHVILLE CHAMBER PUBLIC BENEFIT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds EDVESTORS INC ↗
- Who funds LINCOLN INSTITUTE OF LAND POLICY ↗
- Who funds SEATTLE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SOLAR & ENERGY LOAN FUND OF ST LUCIE COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds JOBS FOR THE FUTURE INC ↗
- Who funds CAPITAL IMPACT PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds MISSION ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGENCY ↗
- Who funds TREC COMMUNITY INVESTORS ↗
- Who funds NEW VENTURE FUND ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY FOR SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN ↗
- Who funds NOLA BUSINESS ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds NEW PROFIT INC ↗
- Who funds Beloved Community Inc ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR ECONOMIC INCLUSION ↗
- Who funds Central Valley Community Foundation A Corporation ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL SKILLS COALITION ↗
- Who funds CINNAIRE LENDING CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds POLICYLINK ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL CAREER TECHNICAL EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a loosely connected circle, clustered around a few shared anchors.
Open a dossier: Siemer Family Foundation · Incyte Charitable Giving Foundation · Citi Foundation · Capital One Foundation Inc · Harry C Moores Foundation · L Brands Foundation · Laffey-McHugh Foundation · Sunshine Foundation · United Way of Delaware · Crestlea Foundation Inc · Milton and Hattie Kutz Foundation · Encova Foundation of Ohio
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Jpmorgan Chase Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Solar & Energy Loan Fund of St Lucie County Inc — 100% of income from government
- Youthbuild Global Inc — 69% of income from government
- Education Development Center Inc — 65% of income from government
- Worksystems Inc — 55% of income from government
- Mercy Corps — 47% of income from government
- Florida Community Loan Fund Inc — 31% of income from government
- United Way Miami Inc — 23% of income from government
- Boston Medical Center Corporation — 23% of income from government
- Enterprise Community Partners Inc — 22% of income from government
- Parity Baltimore Incorporated — 11% of income from government
- Jobs for the Future Inc — 11% of income from government
- The Housing Partnership Network Inc — 10% of income from government
- Rising Tide Capital Inc and Subsidiaries — 2% of income from government
- Compass Working Capital Inc — 1% of income from government
- Edvestors Inc — 1% of income from government
- CRAFT3 — 1% of income from government
- Boston Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Play a game based on Jpmorgan Chase’s filings →