How much did JPMORGAN CHASE FOUNDATION grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 43% of JPMORGAN CHASE FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

mchenrybeaumontdetroit landvero beachjewish heritagegreater mercergirls sarasota

2019

girls northwestinternational filmdefendersyrian charstarkphiladelphia chamberdesert museum

2020

research internationalalsacst judejuvenile diabetesaffordable housingkomen curegilda'scross greater

2021

basilica shrinetallerclean energyafrican cdficdfi ceosharbourcornerstone christian

2022

pits patriotsoffice engagementagape mobilitymobility ethiopiawestgatequeen estherelementary pta

2023

fundacienmomhumane dallaspentwater harthart traildream dachshundeducation adoption

2024

mandir capitalflashnepalivalorgarrisonvedicgot

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 10323 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k9622 grants · $9.9M
$10k–50k198 grants · $3.5M
$50k–250k259 grants · $37M
$250k+244 grants · $152M

$550

Median grant

States reached

$1.2B

Total assets

Largest grants

THE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC$4,635,000
THE CHICAGO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$4,225,000
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FINANCE ASSOCIATION$2,592,589
AMALGAMATED CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC$2,210,000
LOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION$2,075,250
THE URBAN INSTITUTE$1,982,000
FAIR4ALL FINANCE LIMITED$1,912,221
GENERATION YOU EMPLOYED INC$1,836,264
GIVE2ASIA$1,835,090
SEATTLE FOUNDATION$1,800,000
COALITION FOR NONPROFIT HOUSING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT$1,750,000
ATLANTA NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP INC$1,750,000
ROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC$1,735,000
UNIDOSUS$1,500,000
THE NASHVILLE CHAMBER PUBLIC BENEFIT FOUNDATION$1,390,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $41.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15% — the area typically sits at 10%. 96% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$1.5B · 1500 repeat orgs$124M to everyone else

1500 repeat relationships — 732 still active in FY2024, 768 since wound down; 101 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

1500

399

Total granted

$1.5B

$96M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%

+78%

Still filing today

73%

46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28M went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Community ImprovementEducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterEmploymentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

THE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC
8× · 2017–2024 · $24M · revenue +243%
ENTERPRISE COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC
8× · 2017–2024 · $20M · revenue +153%
U
UNIDOSUS
8× · 2017–2024 · $14M · revenue +80%

Funded once

PU
PEOPLE UNITED FOR SUSTAINABLE HOUSING INCORPORATEDgraduated
one grant, 2022 · $2.1M · revenue +173% · 58% of their budget
TC
THE CAREERS AND ENTERPRISE COMPANY
one grant, 2021 · $1.9M
AF
ASSOCIATION FOR ENTERPRISE OPPORTUN ITY INC
one grant, 2017 · $1.3M

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Central Indiana Corporate

The central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is transforming our regional economy, bringing together the ceos of central indiana's largest and most civically engaged employers and university presidents to advance "big picture"…

Community Improvement

Coop Careers Inc

Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.

Education

United Food Bank

Uniting communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition

New York City Energy Efficiency

Delivering financing solutions and advancing markets for energy efficiency and clean energy.

Environment

Land Bank Twin Cities Inc

Land bank twin cities, inc. captures strategic real estate opportunities to benefit people with low to moderate incomes, prioritizing people of color and populations facing barriers.

Housing & Shelter

The Common Application Inc

The common application promotes access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process.

Education

Abilities Network Inc

To cultivate inclusive communities through relationships, innovation and high-quality services.

Health

Community Development

Cdcli invests in the housing and economic aspirations of individuals and families by providing solutions that foster and maintain vibrant, eguitable, and sustainable communities.

Community Improvement

Chief Executives for Corporate

Cecp's mission is to create a better world through business. cecp is a ceo-led coalition that believes that a company's social strategy how it engages with key stakeholders, including employees, communities, investors, and customers…

Philanthropy

Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Fighting hunger, improving lives, strengthening communities.

Food & Nutrition

Council for Court Excellence

Bring people together to research, educate, & advocate for a fair, equitable dc legal system.

—

Enterprise Community Investment Inc

Enterprise's mission is to make home and community places of pride, power and belonging, and platforms for resilience and upward mobility for all low and moderate income people.all our efforts support our strategic goals to increase…

Housing & Shelter

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Support Center for Nonprofit Management Inc and the most unlike its peers is International Tennis Hall of Fame. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.5% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.5%89/17,699

the rest of the field

11%

206,075/1,801,866

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

1375 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

165

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

499

Early backer (in before they grew)

1344/1375

Grantees still filing

1075/1375

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$788,881,854Community Improvement$280,485,950Education$151,096,216Housing & Shelter$107,620,420Philanthropy$99,038,633Human Services$81,501,901Employment$71,031,506

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a loosely connected circle, clustered around a few shared anchors.

Citi FoundationNY33.1× affinity112 shared granteesties to 4 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Citi Foundation · Sunshine Foundation · Siemer Family Foundation · Laffey-McHugh Foundation · Harry C Moores Foundation · Make-A-Wish Foundation of America · L Brands Foundation · Cme Group Community Foundation · Encova Foundation of Ohio · United Way of Delaware · Incyte Charitable Giving Foundation · Ayudar Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation JPMORGAN CHASE FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

9get no government money at all

3rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: REGIONAL COOPERATIVE ALLIANCE INC.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

4 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 660033581 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on REGIONAL COOPERATIVE ALLIANCE INC, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2023; revenue contracted over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 100% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Jpmorgan Chase Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Jpmorgan Chase Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

More from the funding graph

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

Strange bedfellows

the named clusters of US funding

The camps

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

By state

where grant money is based, and what stays home

State money flows

the interactive map of money crossing state lines