Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Prosperity Now

PROSPERITY NOW inspires bold action and provides organizations with the tools, research, and resources needed to help people build prosperity so everyone can thrive.

$2.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$1.9M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.

Community Improvement$11MPhilanthropy$6.8MHuman Services$1.6MHousing & Shelter$913kEducation$312kEmployment$180kCivil Rights$143kPublic Benefit$61kOther$0
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $17k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $185k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.9M
$100,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$14M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PACIFIC COMMUNITY VENTURES$1,909,214
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF LATINO ASSET BUILDERS$100,000
LATINO BUSINESS ACTION NETWORK$85,000
AMERICAN LATINO VETERANS ASSOCIATION$17,238
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–23, $1.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 75% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%METROPOLITAN WILMINGTON URBAN LEAGUE: $5k → 10%FAMILY PROMISE IN ANOKA COUNTY: $65k → 7%COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY: $11k → 14%KOREATOWN YOUTH AND COMMUNITY CENTER: $120k → 14%TEXAS MUSLIM WOMEN'S FOUNDATION INC: $41k → 5%BAKERRIPLEY: $14k → 16%COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY OF SOUTHERN NEW MEXICO: $20k → 23%WATEREE COMMUNITY ACTIONS INC: $11k → 16%URBAN LEAGUE OF BROWARD COUNTY: $58k → 13%POLK PROSPERITY CAMPAIGN INC: $20k → 16%ALABAMA ASSET BUILDING COALITION: $15k → 16%CONNECTICUT ASSOCIATION FOR HUMAN SERVICES: $20k → 11%GRACE-MAR SERVICES INC: $15k → 10%FAMILY SERVICE OF THE PIEDMONT INC: $6k → 16%COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP ASSOCIATION: $20k → 6%NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION: $20k → 16%INDIANA YOUTH INSTITUTE: $20k → 16%SPRINGBOARD TO OPPORTUNITIES: $9k → 23%FAMILY PROMISE IN ANOKA COUNTY: $20k → 7%KOREATOWN YOUTH AND COMMUNITY CENTER: $20k → 14%DEPELCHIN CHILDREN'S CENTER: $12k → 16%CONNECTICUT ASSOCIATION FOR HUMAN SERVICES: $20k → 11%LATIN AMERICAN COALITION: $15k → 10%INDIANA YOUTH INSTITUTE: $17k → 16%SPRINGBOARD TO OPPORTUNITIES: $8k → 23%BON SECOURS COMMUNITY WORKS: $73k → 19%KOREATOWN YOUTH AND COMMUNITY CENTER: $15k → 14%INSPIRING TOMORROW'S LEADERS INC: $23k → 14%CONNECTICUT ASSOCIATION FOR HUMAN SERVICES: $10k → 11%SPRINGBOARD TO OPPORTUNITIES: $6k → 23%CASH CAMPAIGN OF MARYLAND: $11k → 19%KOREATOWN YOUTH AND COMMUNITY CENTER: $11k → 14%INSPIRING TOMORROW'S LEADERS INC: $13k → 14%HAITIAN NEIGHBORHOOD CTR SANT LA: $20k → 15%BRIDGING COMMUNITIES: $19k → 21%EL PROGRAMA HISPANO CATOLICO: $10k → 12%SPRINGBOARD TO OPPORTUNITIES: $7k → 23%CITY FIRST ENTERPRISES: $375k → 14%HAITIAN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER INC: $11k → 15%BRIDGING COMMUNITIES: $15k → 21%BYRD BARR PLACE: $5k → 9%FATHERS' SUPPORT CENTER STLOUIS: $15k → 21%CITY FIRST ENTERPRISES: $160k → 14%MINNEAPOLIS URBAN LEAGUE: $5k → 11%AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $173k → 11%THE SAFE SISTERS CIRCLE: $50k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
WA
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 100% of Prosperity Now’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 35% of the giving stays in DC; read by stated purpose it is 0% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Prosperity Nowlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

32%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.6M · 42 repeat orgs$9.9M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +51% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.

42 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2024, 42 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

42
127

Total granted

$4.6M
$7.9M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+20%

Still filing today

83%
91%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.0M went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesCommunity ImprovementHousing & ShelterEducationPhilanthropyPublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ME
    Metropolitan Economic Development Association
    3× · 2021–2023 · $1.3M · revenue +28%
  • KY
    KOREATOWN YOUTH AND COMMUNITY CENTER
    4× · 2020–2023 · $166k · revenue +111%
  • FP
    Family Promise in Anoka County
    2× · 2018–2019 · $85k · revenue +238%

Funded once

  • CF
    COMMON FUTURE
    one grant, 2021 · $2.0M · revenue -62%
  • ER
    ENTREPRENEUR READY INC
    one grant, 2022 · $1.9M
  • CF
    COMMUNITY FIRST FUND
    one grant, 2021 · $375k · revenue -11%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Washington Area Community Investment Fund Inc

The washington area community investment fund (wacif) is a nonprofit community loan fund focused on increasing equity and economic opportunity in the washington, dc area's underserved communities. wacif's mission is driven is driven by…

—
2
Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation

The neighborhood reinvestment corporation (d.b.a neighborworks america) is a congressionally chartered public non-profit corporation that creates opportunities for people to live in affordable homes, improve their lives, and strengthen…

—
3
United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey

United way's mission is to end intergenerational poverty in our region by harnessing, leveraging and strategically investing the collective power of donors, advocates and volunteers, to help individuals and families break the cycle of…

Philanthropy
4
Enterprise Community Investment Inc

All our efforts support our strategic goals to increase housing supply, advance racial equity and build resilience and upward mobility.the organization raises private capital through investment and by forming effective partnerships.…

Housing & Shelter
5
Employment Connection

Employment connection is a nonprofit st. louis community asset whose mission is "to assist individuals with limited opportunities to self sufficiency" including those recovering from substance abuse, the homeless, low-income individuals…

—
6
Community Development Corporation of Long Island Inc

Cdcli invests in the housing and economic aspirations of individuals and families by providing solutions that foster and maintain vibrant, equitable, and sustainable communities.

Community Improvement
7
Community Action Board

To partner with the community to eliminate poverty and create social change through advocacy and essential services.

Employment
8
The Louisville Urban League Inc

As an active partner, leader and catalyst, we will assist african americans, other minority groups and the disadvantaged attain social and economic equality and stability through direct services and advocacy.

Human Services
9
Coop Careers Inc

Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.

Education
10
Community Credit Lab

To support equitable access to economic opportunities for immigrants, refugees, low-income, marginalized, and underserved communities in king county and the united states.

Human Services
11
Chattanooga Neighborhood Enterprise

Mission: to create economically diverse neighborhoods filled with financially empowered citizens and housing for all.vision: all chattanoogans can afford a safe place in a strong neighborhood to call home. belief: we believe the future of…

Housing & Shelter
12
Inclusive Communities Project

Promote fair and affordable housing for low income families, free from the vestiges of segregation and discrimination.

Housing & Shelter

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of the Lowcountry and the most unlike its peers is San Juan College Retiree Health Trust. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyPolicy Research and AdvocacyWomen & Girls Leadership De…Military Veterans SupportCommunity FoundationsDomestic Violence ServicesYouth Development ServicesCommunity College Foundatio…Christian Missionary Organi…Immigrant Worker SupportCommunity FoundationsAffordable Housing Developm…United Way Affiliates
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%5%5–10yr19%17%10–20yr16%32%20–35yr13%22%35–55yr16%24%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%35%5–10yr19%5%10–20yr16%38%20–35yr13%11%35–55yr16%11%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%2/183
the rest of the field
13%
240,394/1,819,382

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

167 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 167 of the 183 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
33
Early backer (in before they grew)
164/167
Grantees still filing
109/167
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc — $5,991,647 · PhilanthropyAmalgamated Charitable Foundation I…HOPEWELL FUND — $315,000 · Philanthropy+20 more — $318,509 · PhilanthropyCOMMON FUTURE — $2,000,000 · Community ImprovementCOMMON FUTUREPACIFIC COMMUNITY VENTURES INC — $1,909,214 · Community ImprovementPACIFIC COMMUNITY VENTURES INCPROSPERITY NOW — $860,000 · Community ImprovementPROSPERITY NOW+24 more — $939,784 · Community Improvement+24 moreENTREPRENEUR READY INC — $1,900,000 · OtherENTREPRENEUR READY INCMetropolitan Economic Development Association — $1,255,657 · OtherMetropolitan Economic Deve…+58 more — $1,717,964 · Other+58 moreCITY FIRST ENTERPRISES INC — $535,000 · Human ServicesAFRICAN DEVELOPMENT CENTER — $173,125 · Human ServicesKOREATOWN YOUTH AND COMMUNITY CENTER — $166,150 · Human ServicesFamily Promise in Anoka County — $85,000 · Human ServicesBon Secours Baltimore Community Works Inc — $73,000 · Human ServicesUrban League of Broward County Inc — $58,000 · Human Services+27 more — $558,602 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY FIRST FUND — $375,000 · Housing & ShelterBBCDC INC — $375,000 · Housing & ShelterEAST LA COMMUNITY CORPORATION — $241,000 · Housing & ShelterBedford Stuyvesant Restoration Corporation — $62,500 · Housing & ShelterFOUNDATION COMMUNITIES INC — $56,000 · Housing & ShelterHOUSING ASSOCIATION OF NONPROFIT DEVELOPERS — $50,000 · Housing & ShelterMANNA INC — $49,500 · Housing & Shelter+15 more — $273,709 · Housing & ShelterVETERAN BUSINESS PROJECT INC — $333,218 · Public BenefitDALLAS LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION — $41,458 · Public BenefitGEORGIA WATCH — $29,500 · Public BenefitCenter on Budget and Policy Priorities — $25,000 · Public BenefitAMERICAN LATINO VETERANS ASSOCIATION — $17,238 · Public Benefit+1 more — $6,300 · Public BenefitCOLLEGIATE DIRECTIONS INC — $50,000 · EducationPROVIDENCE PROMISE — $31,257 · EducationAFRICAN AMERICAN LEADERSHIP FORUM — $28,125 · EducationNONPROFIT KNOWLEDGE WORKS INC — $25,000 · EducationBuild Wealth MN Inc — $21,125 · EducationGECU FOUNDATION — $20,000 · EducationNATIONAL MANUFACTURED HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATION INC — $19,000 · EducationOAKLAND PROMISE — $16,500 · EducationCOLLEGE DREAMS INC — $16,129 · EducationCOMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $11,000 · Education+3 more — $19,382 · Education
Philanthropy$6,625,156Community Improvement$5,708,998Other$4,873,621Human Services$1,648,877Housing & Shelter$1,482,709Public Benefit$452,714Education$257,518

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAmalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc — $5,991,647 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetCOMMON FUTURE — $2,000,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetPACIFIC COMMUNITY VENTURES INC — $1,909,214 over 1y, 15% of budgetMetropolitan Economic Development Association — $1,255,657 over 3y, 5.2% of budgetPROSPERITY NOW — $860,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetCITY FIRST ENTERPRISES INC — $535,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetCOMMUNITY FIRST FUND — $375,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetBBCDC INC — $375,000 over 1y, 9.1% of budgetVETERAN BUSINESS PROJECT INC — $333,218 over 1y, 94% of budgetHOPEWELL FUND — $315,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetEAST LA COMMUNITY CORPORATION — $241,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetAFRICAN DEVELOPMENT CENTER — $173,125 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetKOREATOWN YOUTH AND COMMUNITY CENTER — $166,150 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetAmpac Tri-State CDC Inc — $160,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetGREATER JAMAICA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $160,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR LATINO COMMUNITY ASSET BUILDERS — $100,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetWABASH COUNTY YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC — $97,452 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetFamily Promise in Anoka County — $85,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetLATINO BUSINESS ACTION NETWORK INC — $85,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF YELLOWSTONE VALLEY — $75,000 over 2y, 9.8% of budgetBon Secours Baltimore Community Works Inc — $73,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetNORTH LAWNDALE EMPLOYMENT NETWORK — $66,458 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetBedford Stuyvesant Restoration Corporation — $62,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetUrban League of Broward County Inc — $58,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetFOUNDATION COMMUNITIES INC — $56,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE MASSACHUSETTS ASSOCIATION FOR COMMUNITY ACTION INC — $55,150 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetHOMEWISE INC — $52,800 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCONNECTICUT ASSOCIATION FOR HUMAN SERVICES INC — $50,150 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetHOUSING ASSOCIATION OF NONPROFIT DEVELOPERS — $50,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetVERMONT-SLAUSON LDC INC — $50,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetMY SISTER'S PLACE INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMARSHALL HEIGHTS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT — $50,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetLIFT INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE URBAN INSTITUTE — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSafe Sisters Circle — $50,000 over 1y, 7.1% of budgetCOLLEGIATE DIRECTIONS INC — $50,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetLATINO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ENTERPRISE CENTER — $50,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetMANNA INC — $49,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetDALLAS LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION — $41,458 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetTEXAS MUSLIM WOMENS FOUNDATION INC — $41,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetHISPANIC UNITY OF FLORIDA INC — $41,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetUNITED WAY OF THE BAY AREA — $40,150 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetINVERSANT INC — $40,064 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetINDIANA YOUTH INSTITUTE INC — $36,500 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetSPANISH COALITION FOR HOUSING — $36,459 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetInspiring Tomorrows Leaders — $36,459 over 2y, 24% of budgetGREATER AUBURN GRESHAM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $36,458 over 2y, 0.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Wells Fargo FoundationCities for Financial …Target FoundationTruist Foundation IncCiti FoundationNational Community Re…Enterprise Community …The Kresge FoundationOpportunity Finance N…Annie E Casey Foundat…Capital One Foundatio…Pnc Foundation
Wells Fargo FoundationMN52.2× affinity37 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Wells Fargo Foundation · Cities for Financial Empowerment Fund Inc · Target Foundation · Truist Foundation Inc · Citi Foundation · National Community Reinvestment Coalition Inc · Enterprise Community Partners Inc · The Kresge Foundation · Opportunity Finance Network · Annie E Casey Foundation Inc · Capital One Foundation Inc · Pnc Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Prosperity Now funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 19%
  • Home Forward Development Enterprises Corporation — 100% of income from government
  • The Massachusetts Association for Community Action Inc — 97% of income from government
  • Urban League of Broward County Inc — 44% of income from government
  • Belair-Edison Neighborhoods Inc — 32% of income from government
  • Salem Interfaith Hospitality Network — 25% of income from government
  • College Dreams Inc — 23% of income from government
  • Portland Housing Center — 19% of income from government
  • El Programa Hispano Catolico — 13% of income from government
  • Cash Campaign of Maryland Inc — 11% of income from government
  • United Way of West Florida Inc — 3% of income from government
  • Bon Secours Baltimore Community Works Inc — 3% of income from government
  • Hispanic Unity of Florida Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Goodwill Industries of Tulsa Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
48report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 183 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines