Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Cba Fund

CBA FUND is a nonprofit corporation established under the laws of the district of columbia, formed and operated for the purpose of expanding the capicity of nonprofits that provide safe and affordable small dollar consumer loans and credit building products to low and moderate income individuals.

$223k
Granted FY2024still arriving
20
Grants FY2024still arriving
17
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.

Community Improvement$551kHuman Services$519kHousing & Shelter$343kEducation$75kCrime & Legal$56kYouth Development$50kArts & Culture$15kEnvironment$6k
02FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 20 grants below total $198,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $222,500 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $24,500 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k12 grants · $86k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $112k
$8,000
Median grant
17
States reached
$5.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY FIRST FUND$16,125
NORTHWEST ACCESS FUND$15,000
BETTERFI$15,000
COOK INLET LENDING CENTER INC$15,000
REDBUD FINANCIAL ALTERNATIVES$15,000
WISCONSIN NATIVE LOAN FUND$15,000
SOLITAS HOUSE$10,875
ONE PERCENT FOR AMERICA$10,000
KC UNIDOS FEDERAL CREDIT UNION$8,000
PEOPLE TRUST$8,000
NATIONAL ASIAN AMERICAN COALITION$8,000
FIRST COMMUNITY CAPITAL INC$8,000
CENTER FOR ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY$8,000
NACDC FINANCIAL SERVICES INC$8,000
THE FOUNTAIN FUND$8,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $537k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 71% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ONE PERCENT FOR AMERICA: $10k → 16%NATIONAL ASIAN AMERICAN COALITION: $8k → 7%HOMESTEAD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: $12k → 9%CENTER FOR ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY: $70k → 17%LAKE SUPERIOR COMMUNITY DEVT CORP: $6k → 14%CAP SERVICES INC: $12k → 10%BETTERFI: $15k → 21%NORTHWEST ACCESS FUND: $50k → 9%WORKING CREDIT NFP: $250k → 14%HOUSING OPTIONS & PLANNING ENT: $6k → 11%HEBREW FREE LOAN SOCIETY: $20k → 17%LAKE SUPERIOR COMMUNITY DEVT CORP: $6k → 14%CAP SERVICES INC: $8k → 10%NORTHWEST ACCESS FUND: $15k → 9%COMMUNITY CREDIT LAB: $50k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
WA
ID
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
IN
PA
NJ
RI
CA
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
AR
TN
NC
DC
HI
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

49%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$791k · 17 repeat orgs$824k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against +34% for the ones you funded once.

17 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
19

Total granted

$791k
$716k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+34%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 45% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $108k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Community ImprovementHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterEducationYouth DevelopmentCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE CAPITAL GOOD FUND
    4× · 2020–2024 · $99k · revenue +98%
  • IC
    IRCS CENTER FOR ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY INC
    3× · 2020–2024 · $98k · revenue +192%
  • CC
    COMMUNITY CAPITAL NEW YORK INC
    2× · 2020–2022 · $80k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • WC
    Working Credit NFPgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $250k · revenue +177% · 32% of their budget
  • CC
    COVENANT COMMUNITY CAPITAL CORPORATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue +25%
  • MA
    MISSION ASSET FUND
    one grant, 2020 · $60k · revenue -77%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Loan Fund of the Capital Region Inc

Community development financial institution that links socially concerned investors with community needs by making affordable housing, community and economic development loans to nonprofit orgs, small businesses and low/moderate income…

Housing & Shelter
2
First Community Capital Inc

First Community Capital, Inc. (FCCI) is a certified Community Development Financial Institution (CDFI) dedicated to expanding access to affordable capital and technical assistance for small businesses and individuals, with a focus on low-…

Employment
3
Community Enterprise Development Services

Community enterprise development services' mission is to support the american dream of financial self-sufficiency, by assisting refugees, immigrants, and those from underserved communities in metro denver who desire to own or strengthen…

Human Services
4
Fresno Community Development Financial Institution dba Access Plus Capital

Access plus capital is nonprofit small business lender and service provider with the mission to eliminate economic barriers to financial success through fair and equitable community investment.

Public Benefit
5
Cincinnati Development Fund

To strengthen underserved neighborhoods and improve lives through innovative financing.

Housing & Shelter
6
Chattanooga Neighborhood Enterprise

Mission: to create economically diverse neighborhoods filled with financially empowered citizens and housing for all.vision: all chattanoogans can afford a safe place in a strong neighborhood to call home. belief: we believe the future of…

Housing & Shelter
7
Newwest Community Capital Inc

A certified community development financial institution organized to increase access to capital for affordable housing and community facilities.

Community Improvement
8
Vermont Community Loan Fund

Investing in people and communities to create a just and thriving vermont

Housing & Shelter
9
Community Development Financial Institution - Tohono O'odham Nation

We assist in overall economic development and support new businesses and help to improve personal financial stability through our premier educational and loan services.

Community Improvement
10
Community Development Corporation of Utah

The community development corporation of utah (cdcu) helps our community thrive by empowering people on their path toward financial security, housing stability, and access to affordable homes.we achieve this by:1. increasing financial…

Housing & Shelter
11
National Community Investment Fund

NCIF invests capital and lends with institutions, that increase access to responsible financial products and services, catalyze projects that provide economic opportunities, and improve the quality of life in underserved communities…

Community Improvement
12
Small Business Empowerment Fund Cdfi

A community development financial institution or community development finance institution - abbreviated in both cases to CDFI - is a financial institution that provides credit and financial services to underserved markets and populations,…

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community First Fund and the most unlike its peers is Housing Options & Planning Enterprises Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyJewish Community Organizati…Environmental Conservation …Affordable Housing Construc…Community FoundationsPolicy Research and AdvocacyImmigrant Worker SupportAffordable Housing Developm…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 18 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%7%<5yr14%7%5–10yr19%42%10–20yr16%30%20–35yr13%9%35–55yr16%5%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%6%5–10yr19%54%10–20yr16%33%20–35yr13%3%35–55yr16%3%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/47
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,518

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

45 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 45 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
17
Early backer (in before they grew)
45/45
Grantees still filing
26/45
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Working Credit NFP — $250,000 · Human ServicesWorking Credit NFPIRCS CENTER FOR ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY INC — $98,000 · Human ServicesIRCS CENTER FOR ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY INCNORTHWEST ACCESS FUND — $65,000 · Human ServicesNORTHWEST ACCESS FUNDCOMMUNITY CREDIT LAB — $50,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY CREDIT LABHEBREW FREE LOAN SOCIETY INC — $20,000 · Human Services+8 more — $96,749 · Human Services+8 moreCOVENANT COMMUNITY CAPITAL CORPORATION — $100,000 · Community ImprovementCOVENANT COMMUNITY CAPITAL CORPORA…THE CAPITAL GOOD FUND — $98,786 · Community ImprovementTHE CAPITAL GOOD FUNDMISSION ASSET FUND — $60,000 · Community ImprovementMISSION ASSET FUNDLATINO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $45,000 · Community ImprovementLATINO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPOR…Nimiipuu Community Development Fund — $25,000 · Community ImprovementFIRST NATIONS COMMUNITY FINANCIAL — $25,000 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY FIRST CAPITAL CORP — $22,500 · Community ImprovementNACDC Financial Services Inc — $19,785 · Community ImprovementFresno Area Hispanic Foundation — $17,786 · Community ImprovementBUSINESS AND COMMUNITY LENDERS OF TEXAS — $17,786 · Community Improvement+5 more — $58,572 · Community Improvement+5 moreCOMMUNITY CAPITAL NEW YORK INC — $80,000 · Housing & ShelterCOMMUNITY CAPITAL NE…COMMUNITY FIRST FUND — $78,910 · Housing & ShelterCOMMUNITY FIRST FUNDJustine Petersen Housing And Reinvestment Corporation — $61,000 · Housing & ShelterJustine Petersen Hou…LOUISVILLE HOUSING OPPORTUNITY AND MICRO ENTERPRISE COMMUNITY — $25,000 · Housing & ShelterLOUISVILLE HOUSING O…SOLITAS HOUSE INC — $19,875 · Housing & ShelterSOLITAS HOUSE INCWISCONSIN NATIVE LOAN FUND INC — $15,000 · Housing & Shelter+2 more — $11,000 · Housing & ShelterCommon Wealth Associates Inc — $75,000 · EducationAFRICAN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SOLUTIONS — $7,250 · EducationTHE FOUNTAIN FUND — $55,786 · Crime & LegalPEOPLE TRUST — $30,786 · Youth DevelopmentLEGACY INSTITUTE FOR FINANCIAL EMPOWERMENT — $18,786 · Youth DevelopmentWESTSIDE HOUSING ORGANIZATION INC — $25,000 · OtherGUADALUPE CENTERS FEDERAL CREDIT UNION — $8,000 · OtherLENDING SOLUTIONS LLC — $5,500 · OtherMicrocare Community Development Solutions — $14,500 · OtherHUSTLE USA — $7,000 · OtherSOLAR & ENERGY LOAN FUND OF ST LUCIE COUNTY INC — $6,000 · Other
Human Services$579,749Community Improvement$490,215Housing & Shelter$290,785Education$82,250Crime & Legal$55,786Youth Development$49,572Other$66,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWorking Credit NFP — $250,000 over 1y, 32% of budgetCOVENANT COMMUNITY CAPITAL CORPORATION — $100,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetTHE CAPITAL GOOD FUND — $98,786 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetIRCS CENTER FOR ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY INC — $98,000 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY CAPITAL NEW YORK INC — $80,000 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetCOMMUNITY FIRST FUND — $78,910 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCommon Wealth Associates Inc — $75,000 over 2y, 5.0% of budgetNORTHWEST ACCESS FUND — $65,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetJustine Petersen Housing And Reinvestment Corporation — $61,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetMISSION ASSET FUND — $60,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FOUNTAIN FUND — $55,786 over 4y, 3.7% of budgetCOMMUNITY CREDIT LAB — $50,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetLATINO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $45,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPEOPLE TRUST — $30,786 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetNimiipuu Community Development Fund — $25,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetWESTSIDE HOUSING ORGANIZATION INC — $25,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetLOUISVILLE HOUSING OPPORTUNITY AND MICRO ENTERPRISE COMMUNITY — $25,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetFIRST NATIONS COMMUNITY FINANCIAL — $25,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetCOMMUNITY FIRST CAPITAL CORP — $22,500 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetHEBREW FREE LOAN SOCIETY INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSOLITAS HOUSE INC — $19,875 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetNACDC Financial Services Inc — $19,785 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCAP SERVICES INC — $19,285 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLEGACY INSTITUTE FOR FINANCIAL EMPOWERMENT — $18,786 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetFresno Area Hispanic Foundation — $17,786 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBUSINESS AND COMMUNITY LENDERS OF TEXAS — $17,786 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetBETTERFI — $15,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetWISCONSIN NATIVE LOAN FUND INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCOOK INLET LENDING CENTER — $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetREDBUD FINANCIAL ALTERNATIVES INC — $15,000 over 1y, 7.1% of budgetOPENING DOORS INC — $14,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMicrocare Community Development Solutions — $14,500 over 1y, 9.2% of budgetLAKE SUPERIOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $11,786 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetNORTH PHILADELPHIA FINANCIAL PARTNERSHIP NEIGHBORHOOD PROGRESS FUND — $11,786 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetUNION COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORP — $11,786 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetONE PERCENT FOR AMERICA INC — $10,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetPACIFIC COMMUNITY FUND FKA NATIONAL ASIAN AMERICAN COALITION — $8,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAFRICAN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SOLUTIONS — $7,250 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSOLAR & ENERGY LOAN FUND OF ST LUCIE COUNTY INC — $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOUSING OPTIONS & PLANNING ENTERPRISES INC — $5,893 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetJAMESTOWN SKLALLAM TRIBAL CAPITAL INC — $5,500 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetLAFAYETTE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVICES INC — $5,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNeighborWorks Housing Services of Pueblo Inc — $5,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Opportunity Finance N…Wells Fargo FoundationOweesta CorporationCredit Builders Allia…National Association …Citi FoundationNdn Collective IncTd Charitable Foundat…National Community Re…Truist Foundation IncTides FoundationImpactassetsinc
Opportunity Finance NetworkDC42.3× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Opportunity Finance Network · Wells Fargo Foundation · Oweesta Corporation · Credit Builders Alliance Inc · National Association for Latino Community Asset Builders · Citi Foundation · Ndn Collective Inc · Td Charitable Foundation · National Community Reinvestment Coalition Inc · Truist Foundation Inc · Tides Foundation · Impactassetsinc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Cba Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 47%
  • Solar & Energy Loan Fund of St Lucie County Inc — 100% of income from government
  • Union County Economic Development Corp — 47% of income from government
  • Solitas House Inc — 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Cba Fund?

Find your warmest path to Cba Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home