· Community foundation
Community Foundation of Abilene
To empower people to make a lasting charitable impact on our community.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 281 grants below total $27,352,769 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $28,764,370 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,411,601 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k60 grants · $441k
- $10k–50k153 grants · $3.4M
- $50k–250k57 grants · $6.5M
- $250k+11 grants · $17M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ABILENE HERITAGE SQUARE | $8,166,390 |
| SOUTHERN METHODIST UNIVERSITY OFFICE OF DEVELOPMENT | $3,000,000 |
| ABILENE IMPROVEMENT CORPORATION | $1,067,500 |
| THE GRACE MUSEUM | $1,016,543 |
| PARAMOUNT THEATRE | $790,369 |
| ST JOHN'S EPISCOPAL SCHOOL | $778,581 |
| ALL KIND ANIMAL INITIATIVE | $618,185 |
| FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF ABILENE | $486,857 |
| ALBANY ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION | $436,000 |
| OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION | $400,000 |
| KENLEY SCHOOL | $281,943 |
| HOSPICE OF THE BIG COUNTRY | $247,858 |
| ABILENE YOUTH SPORTS AUTHORITY | $235,550 |
| BELTWAY MINISTRY CENTER | $224,720 |
| BCFS ABILENE TRANSITION CENTER | $216,750 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $5.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +24% since the first grant, against +3% for the ones you funded once.
352 repeat relationships — 215 still active in FY2025, 137 since wound down; 63 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.1M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
Southern Methodist University8× · 2017–2025 · $15M · revenue +57%- GMGRACE MUSEUM INC9× · 2017–2025 · $5.2M · revenue +5% · 45% of their budget
- HUHARDIN-SIMMONS UNIVERSITY9× · 2017–2025 · $4.1M · revenue +24%
Funded once
- VOVETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS OF THE UNITED STATES DEPT OF TEXASone grant, 2023 · $125k
- NCNOLAN COUNTYone grant, 2024 · $100k
- TTTEXAS TECH ALUMNI ASSOCIATIONone grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue -3%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The WTFB exists to collect, purchase, and distribute food to feed the hungry in 19 counties in West Texas in partnership with volunteers and community organizations and to educate these partners and the public at large about the real face…
To reach the texas capitol community for christ
To provide family services and to provide residential child care for dependent children where there is a need to assist children and families disrupted by problems.
Provides housing and spiritual development for Christians reintegrating into society upon exiting the criminal justice system.
Texas Christian Foundations mission is to mobilize resources by inspiring biblical generosity and educating Texans on ways their generosity can impact their community, Texas and the world.
Unbound North Texas exists to support survivors and resource the community to fight human trafficking through Survivor Advocacy, a 24/7 Drop-In Center, and Prevention and Awareness.
National Christian Foundation North Texas (NCFNT) was created to facilitate smarter Christian giving with sophisticated charitable techniques.
RAISE Texas advances equitable policies and programs that foster financial security and economic mobility for low- and moderate-income Texans. We equip, innovate and advocate to reduce disparities, remove barriers and build opportunities…
Care, hope, and support for all when illness threatens life.
Sharing jesus, healing hearts, transforming lives.
Our mission is to provide adults and families with an effective and comprehensive faith based solution to life-controlling drug and alcohol problems in order for them to become productive members of society. By applying biblical…
A local united christian organization and ministry dedicated to providing love, hope, respect and a new beginning for the homeless, offering a holistic care program that leads to true lasting healing.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bcfs Health and Human Services and the most unlike its peers is Kingdom Project 7 Billion. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.7% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
392 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 392 of the 604 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Southern Methodist University ↗
- Who funds ABILENE HERITAGE SQUARE INC ↗
- Who funds GRACE MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds HARDIN-SIMMONS UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Eleemosynary St Johns Episcopal School ↗
- Who funds The West Texas Rehabilitation Center ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF ABILENE INC ↗
- Who funds Kenley School Inc ↗
- Who funds ABILENE YOUTH SPORTS AUTHORITY ↗
- Who funds Historic Paramount Theatre Inc ↗
- Who funds Advocates for Camp Able Camp Able of Buffalo Gap ↗
- Who funds ALBANY ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ABILENE ARTS ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds National Center for Childrens Illustrated Literat ↗
- Who funds GROVER NELSON PARK ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Day Nursery of Abilene Inc ↗
- Who funds Texas Trails Council Inc ↗
- Who funds ABILENE IMPROVEMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds All Kind Animal Initiative ↗
- Who funds UNITED RESCUE ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds Abilene Boys Ranch Inc ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY FOUNDATION OF ABILENE ↗
- Who funds ABILENE LIBRARY CONSORTIUM ↗
- Who funds TEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds BIG COUNTRY COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES INC ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS LONE STAR ↗
- Who funds Meals on Wheels Plus Incorporated ↗
- Who funds Taylor County History Center ↗
- Who funds Food Bank of West Central Texas ↗
- Who funds Abilene Restoration Ministries dba Nehemiah Abilene ↗
- Who funds Abilene Education Foundation ↗
- Who funds Center for Contemporary Arts ↗
- Who funds MCMURRY UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Rescue the Animals Inc ↗
- Who funds Abilene Zoological Society ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Dian Graves Owen Foundation · Shelton Family Foundation · The Legett Foundation · Barber Foundation · Greathouse Foundation · Kickapoo Springs Foundation · The Karakin Foundation · Food Bank of West Central Texas · United Way of Abilene Inc · Abilene Christian University · The Robison Excelsior Foundation · The Massey Family Charitable Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Community Foundation of Abilene funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- United Way Suncoast Inc — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.