Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Legett Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$13M
Granted FY2024still arriving
136
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$2.5M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.

Education$24MPhilanthropy$7.0MHealth$6.4MCommunity Improvement$3.5MAnimals$2.5MArts & Culture$2.1MPublic Benefit$1.6MHuman Services$1.5MOther$0
02FY2024 · 136 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k58 grants · $187k
  • $10k–50k58 grants · $1.1M
  • $50k–250k11 grants · $1.3M
  • $250k+9 grants · $9.9M
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$112M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF ABILENE$2,500,000
AMARILLO AREA FOUNDATION$2,100,000
WEST TEXAS REHABILITATION CENTER FOUNDATION$1,683,667
HARDIN-SIMMONS UNIVERSITY$1,000,000
M D ANDERSON CANCER CENTER$1,000,000
HENDRICK MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION$600,000
TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY$449,444
TEXAS TECH FOUNDATION$310,000
ABILENE RESTORATION MINISTRIES$250,000
ABILENE IMPROVEMENT CORPORATION$237,500
UNITED WAY OF ABILENE$185,000
THE GLOBAL ORPHAN PROJECT$150,000
BCFS HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES$150,000
ABILENE ARTS ALLIANCE$150,000
ANGELO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$125,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $738k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 76% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC: $1k → 8%FAITH CITY INC: $10k → 20%SOUTHEASTERN GUIDE DOGS INC: $15k → 10%LEARNING ALLY: $5k → 11%CANADIAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $10k → 11%FAITH CITY INC: $5k → 20%SOUTHEASTERN GUIDE DOGS INC: $10k → 10%LEARNING ALLY: $5k → 11%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $1k → 9%FAITH CITY INC: $3k → 20%LEARNING ALLY: $5k → 11%BCFS HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES: $150k → 16%LEARNING ALLY: $5k → 11%COMMUNIO FOUNDATION: $100k → 6%COMMUNIO FOUNDATION: $25k → 6%COMMUNIO FOUNDATION: $13k → 6%COMMUNIO FOUNDATION: $10k → 6%DELIVERFUND: $10k → 14%ALLIANCE FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN: $50k → 22%FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL: $5k → 14%FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL: $5k → 14%PINK CAP WARRIORS ON THE MOVE: $5k → 16%BEN RICHEY BOYS RANCH: $3k → 16%BEN RICHEY BOYS RANCH: $3k → 16%LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF THE NATIONAL CAPITAL AREA INC: $15k → 14%ALLIANCE FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN: $13k → 22%DISABILITY RESOURCES INC: $10k → 22%CHRISTIAN SERVICE CENTER OF ABILENE INC: $5k → 16%BCFS HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES: $100k → 16%DISABILITY RESOURCES INC: $2k → 22%ADVOCATES FOR CAMP ABLE: $90k → 16%ADVOCATES FOR CAMP ABLE: $50k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
IL
MI
NY
MA
IN
PA
NJ
CA
CO
KY
VA
MD
DE
AR
NC
DC
OK
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 18% of The Legett Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 96% of the giving stays in TX; read by stated purpose it is 85% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

The Legett Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.1% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$39M · 152 repeat orgs$8.5M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +24% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.

152 repeat relationships — 61 still active in FY2024, 91 since wound down; 65 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

152
116

Total granted

$39M
$5.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+16%

Still filing today

80%
73%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.3M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesHealthPublic BenefitCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2020–2024 · $8.5M · revenue +40%
  • TT
    TEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $2.7M · revenue +68%
  • AZ
    Abilene Zoological Society
    4× · 2021–2024 · $1.5M · revenue +18% · 38% of their budget

Funded once

  • WT
    WEST TEXAS A&M UNIV FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $910k · revenue -40%
  • TG
    THE GEORGE W BUSH FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $750k · revenue -15%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $600k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Progress Texas Institute

The Progress Texas Institute provides research and strategic communications on issues with the ultimate goal of increasing civic engagement.

Civil Rights
2
Texas Tribune Inc

The texas tribune promotes civic engagement and public education across the state by producing and sharing for free public data interactives, statewide events and intensive and daily reporting on texas public policy, politics and current…

Education
3
Texas a&M Research Foundation

To facilitate research and development within the texas a&m university system and selected other entities.

Education
4
Aclu Foundation of Texas Inc

The ACLU Foundation of Texas is the unyielding guardian and promoter of freedom, justice, equality and dignity of all people, particularly for those who are still fighting to secure the full exercise of their civil rights and liberties.…

Civil Rights
5
Uatx

Uatx is a nonprofit dedicated to building a liberal arts university committed to freedom of inquiry, freedom of conscience, and civil discourse. to maintain these principles, the university will be fiercely independent financially,…

Education
6
Glasstire

Glasstire is a website about visual art in Texas. Our mission is to expand the conversation about visual art in Texas.

Arts & Culture
7
Witte Museum

The witte museum inspires people to shape the future of texas through transformative and relevant experiences in nature, science and culture.

Arts & Culture
8
Center for Public Policy Priorities

At the Every Texan, we believe in a Texas that offers everyone the chance to compete and succeed in life. We envision a Texas where everyone is healthy, well educated, and financially secure. We want the best Texas, a proud state that sets…

Public Benefit
9
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
10
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
11
American Civil Liberties Union of Texas Inc

The ACLU of Texas works with communities, at the State Capitol, and in the courts to protect and advance civil rights and civil liberties for every Texan, no exceptions.

—
12
The Association of Former Students of Texas a&M University

To strengthen the association of former students, promote the interests and welfare of texas a&m university, perpetuate ties of affection and esteem formed in university or college days, and serve the student body.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Texas Public Policy Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Mobeetie Volunteer Fire Department Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Environmental Conservation …United Way AffiliatesAnimal Rescue and ShelterYouth Development ServicesCommunity Arts CentersOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Independent K-12 SchoolsSchool District FoundationsLocal History MuseumsVolunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Developmental Disabilities …Child Abuse Advocacy Servic…Domestic Violence ServicesSenior Support ServicesPregnancy Support ServicesHealth Access Advocacy and …Cancer Support ServicesWomen & Girls Leadership De…Military Veterans SupportPolicy Research and AdvocacyYouth Sports ProgramsEquine Therapy ProgramsCommunity College Foundatio…Public Library Operations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number26%2%<5yr16%7%5–10yr20%11%10–20yr16%24%20–35yr10%30%35–55yr13%26%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value26%1%<5yr16%5%5–10yr20%9%10–20yr16%9%20–35yr10%20%35–55yr13%58%55yr+

The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.8% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.8%2/246
the rest of the field
15%
20,232/136,558

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

228 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 228 of the 338 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

8
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
44
Early backer (in before they grew)
226/228
Grantees still filing
155/228
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY — $8,503,888 · EducationTEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITYTEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC — $2,691,500 · EducationTEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INCHARDIN-SIMMONS UNIVERSITY — $1,701,000 · EducationHARDIN-SIMMONS UNIVERSITYMCMURRY UNIVERSITY — $1,150,000 · EducationMCMURRY UNIVERSITYWEST TEXAS A&M UNIV FOUNDATION — $910,000 · EducationTHE GEORGE W BUSH FOUNDATION — $750,000 · Education+16 more — $1,886,000 · Education+16 moreM D ANDERSON CANCER CENTER — $2,001,000 · OtherM D ANDERSON CANCER CENTERABILENE CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY — $1,076,500 · OtherABILENE CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITYUNITED WAY OF ABILENE INC — $738,333 · OtherYMCA — $625,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $600,000 · OtherEPISCOPAL THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY OF THE SOUTHWEST — $600,000 · OtherCITY OF CLARENDON — $580,000 · OtherTEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER — $526,000 · OtherTexas Agricultural Land Trust — $1,400,000 · OtherTexas Agricultural Land Trust+116 more — $6,299,794 · Other+116 moreABILENE HERITAGE SQUARE INC — $5,000,000 · Arts & CultureABILENE HERIT…FRONTIER TEXAS INC — $385,167 · Arts & CultureFRONTIER TEXA…ABILENE ARTS ALLIANCE — $318,850 · Arts & CultureRemember the Alamo Foundation — $250,000 · Arts & Culture+19 more — $707,399 · Arts & Culture+19 moreCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF ABILENE — $3,980,133 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOU…AMARILLO AREA FOUNDATION INC — $2,150,000 · PhilanthropyAMARILLO AREA…+5 more — $165,850 · PhilanthropyABILENE IMPROVEMENT CORPORATION — $3,237,500 · Community Improvement+5 more — $122,920 · Community ImprovementWest Texas Rehabilitation Center Foundation — $1,683,667 · HealthHendrick Medical Center Foundation — $600,000 · HealthAbilene Restoration Ministries dba Nehemiah Abilene — $500,000 · HealthHEAL THE CITY FREE CLINIC — $350,000 · Health+8 more — $223,400 · HealthAbilene Zoological Society — $1,515,000 · AnimalsAll Kind Animal Initiative — $498,333 · AnimalsGROVER NELSON PARK ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION — $225,000 · AnimalsRescue the Animals Inc — $161,000 · Animals+1 more — $20,500 · Animals
Education$17,592,388Other$14,446,627Arts & Culture$6,661,416Philanthropy$6,295,983Community Improvement$3,360,420Health$3,357,067Animals$2,419,833

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY — $8,503,888 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetABILENE HERITAGE SQUARE INC — $5,000,000 over 4y, 43% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF ABILENE — $3,980,133 over 5y, 8.4% of budgetABILENE IMPROVEMENT CORPORATION — $3,237,500 over 2y, 19% of budgetTEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC — $2,691,500 over 4y, 4.2% of budgetAMARILLO AREA FOUNDATION INC — $2,150,000 over 2y, 8.0% of budgetHARDIN-SIMMONS UNIVERSITY — $1,701,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetWest Texas Rehabilitation Center Foundation — $1,683,667 over 1y, 13% of budgetAbilene Zoological Society — $1,515,000 over 4y, 38% of budgetTexas Agricultural Land Trust — $1,400,000 over 3y, 3.8% of budgetMCMURRY UNIVERSITY — $1,150,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetABILENE CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY — $1,076,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetWEST TEXAS A&M UNIV FOUNDATION — $910,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetTHE GEORGE W BUSH FOUNDATION — $750,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF ABILENE INC — $738,333 over 5y, 9.6% of budgetHendrick Medical Center Foundation — $600,000 over 1y, 9.1% of budgetAbilene Restoration Ministries dba Nehemiah Abilene — $500,000 over 2y, 18% of budgetANGELO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $500,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetAll Kind Animal Initiative — $498,333 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetFRONTIER TEXAS INC — $385,167 over 4y, 21% of budgetHEAL THE CITY FREE CLINIC — $350,000 over 4y, 4.1% of budgetABILENE ARTS ALLIANCE — $318,850 over 5y, 16% of budgetOPPORTUNITY SCHOOL INC — $301,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSchreiner University — $275,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS LONE STAR — $260,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetSouthern Methodist University — $250,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRemember the Alamo Foundation — $250,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetBCFS Health and Human Services — $250,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $250,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRanching Heritage Association — $227,667 over 3y, 6.9% of budgetGROVER NELSON PARK ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION — $225,000 over 1y, 22% of budgetRescue the Animals Inc — $161,000 over 5y, 22% of budgetABILENE PHILHARMONIC FOUNDATION — $150,689 over 3y, 13% of budgetCOMMUNIO FOUNDATION INC — $147,500 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetAdvocates for Camp Able Camp Able of Buffalo Gap — $140,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetWAYLAND BAPTIST UNIVERSITY — $125,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetABILENE YOUTH SPORTS AUTHORITY — $120,400 over 2y, 10% of budgetAMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH — $110,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH VOICE INC — $100,000 over 1y, 5.6% of budgetAbilene Chamber of Commerce Foundation — $77,000 over 2y, 52% of budgetPRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $76,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBIG COUNTRY COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES INC — $75,000 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetYoung America's Foundation — $70,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetYOUNG LIFE — $70,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSAINTS' ROOST MUSEUM — $65,000 over 3y, 33% of budgetMCLEAN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT — $65,000 over 5y, 13% of budgetGRACE MUSEUM INC — $63,000 over 4y, 1.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Kickapoo Springs Foun…Dian Graves Owen Foun…The Karakin FoundationCommunity Foundation …Shelton Family Founda…Barber FoundationGreathouse FoundationThe Robison Excelsior…Amarillo Area Foundat…The Massey Family Cha…M K Brown Foundation …Abilene Christian Uni…
Kickapoo Springs FoundationTX240.8× affinity118 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Kickapoo Springs Foundation · Dian Graves Owen Foundation · The Karakin Foundation · Community Foundation of Abilene · Shelton Family Foundation · Barber Foundation · Greathouse Foundation · The Robison Excelsior Foundation · Amarillo Area Foundation Inc · The Massey Family Charitable Trust · M K Brown Foundation Inc · Abilene Christian University

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Legett Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
  • Learning Ally Inc — 4% of income from government
  • Southeastern Guide Dogs Inc — 0% of income from government
  • The Johns Hopkins Hospital — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
33report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Legett Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Legett Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 338 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home