· Public charity
Abilene Christian University
Acu is a national leader in christian higher education, and the mission is to educate students for christian service and leadership throughout the world.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 7 grants below total $391,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $90,086,180 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $89,695,180 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k5 grants · $91k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
- $250k+1 grant · $250k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FOCUS ON THE FAMILY | $250,000 |
| ABILENE YOUTH SPORTS AUTHORITY | $50,000 |
| WOODSEDGE COMMUNITY CHURCH | $26,000 |
| YOUTH VOICE | $25,000 |
| CHRISTIAN CAMPUS CENTER - UTA | $20,000 |
| LIVEBEYOND | $10,000 |
| EASTERN EUROPEAN MISSIONS | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $58k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
15 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $45k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NHNEW HORIZONS RANCH & CENTER INC3× · 2018–2024 · $30k · revenue +30%
- HFHOUSES FOR HEALING INC2× · 2020–2024 · $30k · revenue +334%
- TRTEXAS RAMP PROJECT2× · 2017–2018 · $16k · revenue +144%
Funded once
- AHABILENE HERITAGE SQUARE INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $35k · revenue +131%
- TPTEXAS PUBLIC POLICY FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue +137%
- MOMIGHTY OAKS FOUNDATIONone grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue -29%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provides housing and spiritual development for Christians reintegrating into society upon exiting the criminal justice system.
Christian coaching, counseling, assessment and consulting services to the communities of Tarrant County, Texas.
Our mission is to help the underemployed, through personal, career, academic and spiritual development, acquire the confidence and skills for gainful and long-term employment.
The mission of First Refuge Ministries is to share the Gospel of Jesus Christ by offering essential services to those in need within our community. Our belief is that every person has worth and value since they are created by God. Our goal…
To assist homeless families in securing stable housing
To assist people through life's struggles by spiritually guiding individuals by encouraging, offering biblical counseling and educating individuals with tools and skills to cope with life's difficult situations. it is the desire of the…
See Schedule OTDS fights for the end of mass incarceration and excessive punishment in Texas through direct representation, policy reform, and public education. TDS stands up for the dignity and humanity of people harmed by mass…
The family abuse center exists to eliminate domestic violence in central texas by sheltering victims of domestic violence and by preventing abuse from occurring through intervention and education.
To operate a 30 unit permanent and temporary housing facility known as Destiny Village for rental to low income individuals and families who are survivors of domestic violence and or sexual assault
Committed to supporting displaced single mothers in Fort Bend County by providing housing assistance and wraparound services.
Counseling Services offering hope, healing, and restoration to hurting people, marriages, and families using respected therapy practices and solid biblical principles.
Unbound North Texas exists to support survivors and resource the community to fight human trafficking through Survivor Advocacy, a 24/7 Drop-In Center, and Prevention and Awareness.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Texas Public Policy Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Mlb-Mlbpa Youth Development Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MOBILE MEDICAL DISASTER RELIEF INC ↗
- Who funds ABILENE YOUTH SPORTS AUTHORITY ↗
- Who funds ABILENE HERITAGE SQUARE INC ↗
- Who funds NEW HORIZONS RANCH & CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Reflective Life Ministries ↗
- Who funds HOUSES FOR HEALING INC ↗
- Who funds TEXAS PUBLIC POLICY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MIGHTY OAKS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds YOUTH VOICE INC ↗
- Who funds MLB-MLBPA Youth Development Foundation ↗
- Who funds Christian Campus Center at UTA Inc ↗
- Who funds Regional Crime Victim Crisis Center ↗
- Who funds TEXAS RAMP PROJECT ↗
- Who funds Abilene Hope Haven Inc ↗
- Who funds Cancer Services Network Inc ↗
- Who funds First Baptist Mission Action Inc ↗
- Who funds SAFE FAMILIES FOR CHILDREN ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds Pregnancy Resources of Abilene Inc ↗
- Who funds Abilene Restoration Ministries dba Nehemiah Abilene ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS LONE STAR ↗
- Who funds ABILENE PALM HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds SVG SPORTS BROADCASTING FUND ↗
- Who funds THE TSTC FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ARMS OF HOPE ↗
- Who funds UNITED RESCUE ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds Disability Resources Inc ↗
- Who funds BIG COUNTRY COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES INC ↗
- Who funds TEXOMA YOUTH CAMP INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Abilene · The Legett Foundation · Barber Foundation · Kickapoo Springs Foundation · Shelton Family Foundation · Dian Graves Owen Foundation · Greathouse Foundation · The Karakin Foundation · United Way of Abilene Inc · Food Bank of West Central Texas · American Electric Power Foundation · Directors Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Abilene Christian University funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.