Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Charlotte y Martin Foundation-Ima

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.3M
Granted FY2024still arriving
58
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$312k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.

Education$1.9MEnvironment$1.3MArts & Culture$903kYouth Development$512kCivil Rights$400kHuman Services$238kAnimals$173kCommunity Improvement$155kOther$0
02FY2024 · 58 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k51 grants · $878k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
  • $250k+1 grant · $312k
$15,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$21M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY$312,020
QIZHJEH VENA ALASKA QVA$100,000
PIEGAN INSTITUTE$45,000
INDIGENOUS CREATIVES COLLECTIVE$40,000
HOME RANGE WILDLIFE RESEARCH$35,000
RAINIER VALLEY CORP FISCAL SPONSOR$25,000
LIFE LEADERS INC$25,000
ARLEE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION$20,230
COCOON HOUSE$20,000
CTR COU TLINGIT HAIDA INDIAN TRIBES OF A$20,000
KLAMATH-SISKIYOU WILDLANDS$20,000
FREE VERSE WRITING PROJECT$20,000
SALISH SCHOOL OF SPOKANE$20,000
INDIGENOUS ROOTS & REPARATION FOUNDATION$20,000
HEARTS GATHERED$20,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $230k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 48% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%CENTER POLE: $10k → 23%LIFE LEADERS INC: $25k → 21%SAMOA PACIFIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $15k → 12%NORTHWEST AMERICAN INDIAN COALITION: $20k → 14%ADELANTE MUJERES: $15k → 8%TTAWAXT BIRTH JUSTICE CENTER: $15k → 17%ADELANTE MUJERES: $10k → 8%TTAWAXT BIRTH JUSTICE CENTER: $10k → 17%ADELANTE MUJERES: $10k → 8%TTAWAXT BIRTH JUSTICE CENTER: $10k → 17%BLACK PARENT INITIATIVE: $5k → 12%EL CENTRO DE LA RAZA: $20k → 9%REFUGEE WOMENS ALLIANCE: $15k → 9%REFUGEE WOMENS ALLIANCE: $15k → 9%UTOPIA SEATTLE: $20k → 9%REFUGEE WOMEN'S ALLIANCE: $10k → 9%CHIEF SEATTLE CLUB INC: $5k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
WA
ID
MT
MI
OR
CA
MO
AL
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

53%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.2M · 54 repeat orgs$2.9M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +44% since the first grant, against +25% for the ones you funded once.

54 repeat relationships — 24 still active in FY2024, 30 since wound down; 33 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

54
164

Total granted

$3.2M
$2.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+25%

Still filing today

87%
61%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $598k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentEducationHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2020–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +36%
  • Salish School of Spokane
    4× · 2020–2024 · $90k · revenue +29%
  • PI
    PIEGAN INSTITUTE
    4× · 2020–2024 · $80k · revenue +84%

Funded once

  • IC
    IDAHO CONSERVATION LEAGUE INC
    one grant, 2023 · $30k · revenue -25%
  • AP
    ASAIN PACIFIC AMERICAN NETWORK OF OREGON
    one grant, 2020 · $30k
  • PT
    Perseverance Theatre Incorporated
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue -17%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Oregon Websites and Watershed Project Inc

Develop educational network to communicate historical and scientific information empasizing natural and cultural resources to pacific northwest.

Environment
2
Coast Salish Youth Coalition

To cultivate the next generation of culturally engaged environmental stewards.

Environment
3
10000 Years Institute

10,000 Years Institute evaluates the ecological effects of human activities on natural environments, and promotes the maintenance and restoration of ecological integrity through the integration of reliable scientific information, sound…

Unclassified
4
Magic Canoe

Magic Canoe is a champion of a reimagined future that is driven by local-based bottom-up regenerative solutions for a more equitable and healthier bioregion that is Salmon Nation.

Environment
5
Wis Teq Neemit

Promote and educate the heritage of the Nez Perce Tribe.

Community Improvement
6
The Cultural ConservancySacred Land Foundation

We are a Native-led Indigenous rights organization. We are dedicated to our mission of protecting & revitalizing Indigenous cultures, empowering them in the direct application of their traditional knowledge & practices on their ancestral…

Arts & Culture
7
Wild Salmon Rivers

To conserve functioning salmon/steelhead eco-system at watershed levels, integrate angling activities with basic scientific research, collect raw data, monitor environmental functions, salmon/steelhead population dynamics, public…

Environment
8
Discover Your Northwest

Discover Your Northwest promotes the discovery of northwest public lands, enriches the experience of visitors and builds community stewardship of these special places today and for generations to come.

Recreation & Sports
9
Naa Kaani Native Program

The naa kaani native program strives to educate and empower native communities in the pacific norhtwest, with a focus on the salish sea territory. we support cultural events, advocate for tribal rights, and aim to improve lives and…

Community Improvement
10
Washington Indian Civil Rights Commission

Washington Indian Civil Rights Commission is led by and for Indigenous people, and envisions a just society in which we are treated with honor, fairness and respect. Our mission is to uphold our individual civil rights through education…

Human Services
11
Na'ah Illahee Fund

Naah Illahee Fund is an Indigenous-led organization rooted in the Northwest region of Turtle Island. Our mission is to catalyze the ongoing regeneration of Indigenous communities through participatory grantmaking, capacity building, and…

International
12
Confluence Environmental Center

Confluence Environmental Center's mission is to bring together streams of thought, action and people to make the environmental movement more robust, inclusive and effective.

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Native Conservancy and the most unlike its peers is Noble Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsPregnancy Support ServicesLocal History MuseumsDance Arts OrganizationsYouth Sports ProgramsLocal Food System Organizat…Orchestra and Ensemble Perf…Youth Development CentersElementary Literacy TutoringEquine Therapy ProgramsYouth Mentoring ProgramsCommunity College Foundatio…Domestic Violence ServicesCancer Support ServicesWomen & Girls Leadership De…Immigrant Worker SupportCommunity Arts CentersYouth Development ServicesEnvironmental Conservation …
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 19 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number21%10%<5yr14%18%5–10yr20%24%10–20yr18%30%20–35yr13%14%35–55yr15%4%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value21%7%<5yr14%12%5–10yr20%19%10–20yr18%20%20–35yr13%11%35–55yr15%31%55yr+

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 10% of your grantees by number, and just 7% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%5/199
the rest of the field
12%
4,744/38,769

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

183 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 183 of the 253 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
61
Early backer (in before they grew)
175/183
Grantees still filing
118/183
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY — $1,401,249 · EducationCORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITYSalish School of Spokane — $90,000 · EducationUrban American Indian Alaska Native Education Alli — $60,000 · Education+8 more — $154,275 · Education+8 morePIEGAN INSTITUTE — $80,000 · OtherINDIGENOUS CREATIVES COLLECTIVE — $75,000 · Other+92 more — $1,770,180 · Other+92 moreSoutheast Alaska Conservation Council Inc-SEACC — $50,000 · EnvironmentAhtna Intertribal Resource Commission — $50,000 · EnvironmentKLAMATH-SISKIYOU WILDLANDS CENTER — $45,000 · EnvironmentCRAG LAW CENTER — $45,000 · EnvironmentYAAK VALLEY FOREST COUNCIL — $40,000 · EnvironmentCLARK FORK COALITION — $40,000 · EnvironmentALASKA MARINE COMMUNITY COALITION — $35,000 · EnvironmentNimiipuu Ecosystems Restoration Inc — $35,000 · EnvironmentSPOKANE RIVERKEEPER — $33,000 · Environment+32 more — $596,800 · Environment+32 moreQIZHJEH VENA ALASKA — $100,000 · Arts & CultureQIZHJEH VE…Terrain Programs — $40,000 · Arts & CultureTerrain Pr…Perseverance Theatre Incorporated — $25,000 · Arts & CultureKEY TO CHANGE — $25,000 · Arts & CultureRed Eagle Soaring — $25,000 · Arts & CultureINDIGENOUS ROOTS & REPARATION FND — $20,000 · Arts & CultureKOAHNIC BROADCAST CORPORATION — $20,000 · Arts & CultureTULALIP FOUNDATION — $20,000 · Arts & CultureMIRACLE THEATRE GROUP — $20,000 · Arts & CultureQIZHJEH HERITAGE INSTITUTE — $20,000 · Arts & CultureMISSOULA WRITING COLLABORATIVE — $20,000 · Arts & CultureNATIVE ACTION NETWORK — $20,000 · Arts & CultureMAHCHIWMINAHNAHTIK CHIPPEWA AND CREE LANGUAGE REVITALIZATION — $20,000 · Arts & CultureFree Verse Project — $18,940 · Arts & Culture+10 more — $142,000 · Arts & Culture+10 moreRefugee Womens Alliance — $40,000 · Human ServicesTTAWAXT BIRTH JUSTICE CENTER — $35,000 · Human ServicesADELANTE MUJERES — $35,000 · Human ServicesLFE LEADERS INC — $25,000 · Human ServicesNORTH AMERICAN NATIVE RESEARCH AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 · Human ServicesSEVENTH GENERATION FUND FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES INC — $20,000 · Human ServicesEL CENTRO DE LA RAZA — $20,000 · Human ServicesNORTHWEST AMERICAN INDIAN COALITION INC — $20,000 · Human ServicesUNITED TERRITORIES OF PACIFIC ISLANDERS WASHINGTON-UTOPIA WA — $20,000 · Human ServicesSamoa Pacific Development Corporation — $15,000 · Human ServicesCenter Pole — $10,000 · Human ServicesThe Service Board — $32,500 · Youth DevelopmentSEE STORIES — $28,000 · Youth DevelopmentMENTORING URBAN STUDENTS & TEENS — $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentIDENTITY INC — $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentPEACEKEEPER SOCIETY — $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentVAMOS OUTDOORS PROJECT — $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG WOMEN EMPOWERED — $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE NORTHERN CHEYENNE NATION — $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentELEVATE OREGON — $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentPROJECT GIRL MENTORING PROGRAM — $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentPongo Publishing Inc — $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentEMERGING UNIDOS — $12,000 · Youth DevelopmentGEEKING OUT KIDS OF COLOR — $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentNATIVE MOVEMENT — $75,000 · Community ImprovementARLEE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $20,230 · Community ImprovementFIRST ALASKANS INSTITUTE — $20,000 · Community ImprovementOPAL — $15,000 · Community ImprovementELDERBERRY WISDOM FARM — $15,000 · Community ImprovementTECHNOLOGY ACCESS FOUNDATION — $10,000 · Community Improvement
Education$1,705,524Other$1,925,180Environment$969,800Arts & Culture$535,940Human Services$265,000Youth Development$242,500Community Improvement$155,230

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY — $1,401,249 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetQIZHJEH VENA ALASKA — $100,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetSalish School of Spokane — $90,000 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetPIEGAN INSTITUTE — $80,000 over 4y, 7.8% of budgetINDIGENOUS CREATIVES COLLECTIVE — $75,000 over 3y, 4.6% of budgetNATIVE MOVEMENT — $75,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetUrban American Indian Alaska Native Education Alli — $60,000 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetMONTANA TWO SPIRIT SOCIETY — $50,000 over 3y, 16% of budgetSoutheast Alaska Conservation Council Inc-SEACC — $50,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetAhtna Intertribal Resource Commission — $50,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetKLAMATH-SISKIYOU WILDLANDS CENTER — $45,000 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetCRAG LAW CENTER — $45,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetYAAK VALLEY FOREST COUNCIL — $40,000 over 3y, 4.9% of budgetWESTERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER — $40,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetHearts Gathered — $40,000 over 2y, 5.7% of budgetRefugee Womens Alliance — $40,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCLARK FORK COALITION — $40,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetTerrain Programs — $40,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetChief Joseph Foundation — $35,500 over 2y, 9.6% of budgetTTAWAXT BIRTH JUSTICE CENTER — $35,000 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetALASKA MARINE COMMUNITY COALITION — $35,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetINDIAN LAW RESOURCE CENTER — $35,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetHome Range Wildlife Research — $35,000 over 1y, 6.3% of budgetADELANTE MUJERES — $35,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSPOKANE RIVERKEEPER — $33,000 over 2y, 6.8% of budgetThe Service Board — $32,500 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetKACHEMAK HERITAGE LAND TRUST INC — $30,000 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetTRUSTEES FOR ALASKA — $30,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetTodos Juntos Inc — $30,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetFUTUREWISE — $30,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetBLUE MOUNTAINS BIODIVERSITY PROJECT — $30,000 over 3y, 6.7% of budgetWASHINGTON'S NATIONAL PARK FUND — $30,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetIDAHO CONSERVATION LEAGUE INC — $30,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSnake River Waterkeeper Inc — $28,000 over 2y, 4.9% of budgetSEE STORIES — $28,000 over 2y, 6.9% of budgetCASCADES CARNIVORE PROJECT — $27,000 over 2y, 16% of budgetLFE LEADERS INC — $25,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetPerseverance Theatre Incorporated — $25,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetNORTH AMERICAN NATIVE RESEARCH AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetElakha Alliance — $25,000 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetThe Alaska Community Foundation — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSEATTLE CHILDREN'S THEATRE ASSOCIATION — $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetKEY TO CHANGE — $25,000 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetRed Eagle Soaring — $25,000 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetPACIFIC RIVERS — $25,000 over 2y, 6.4% of budgetTAKSHANUK WATERSHED COUNCIL — $21,500 over 2y, 6.2% of budgetARLEE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $20,230 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetPUGET SOUND SAGE — $20,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Potlatch FundMeyer Memorial TrustInatai FoundationPatagoniaorgFirst Nations Develop…Seattle FoundationSchool's Out Washingt…Na'ah Illahee FundMarie Lamfrom Charita…The Collins FoundationThe Satterberg Founda…Artsfund
Potlatch FundWA60.4× affinity28 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Potlatch Fund · Meyer Memorial Trust · Inatai Foundation · Patagoniaorg · First Nations Development Institute · Seattle Foundation · School's Out Washington · Na'ah Illahee Fund · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · The Collins Foundation · The Satterberg Foundation Inc · Artsfund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Charlotte y Martin Foundation-Ima funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 90%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 22%
  • Siuslaw Watershed Council Inc — 100% of income from government
  • Klamath Bird Observatory — 100% of income from government
  • Marys River Watershed Council — 100% of income from government
  • Todos Juntos Inc — 64% of income from government
  • Elderberry Wisdom Farm — 56% of income from government
  • Black Parent Initiative — 45% of income from government
  • Emerging Unidos — 44% of income from government
  • Adelante Mujeres — 31% of income from government
  • Samoa Pacific Development Corporation — 28% of income from government
  • Elevate Oregon — 28% of income from government
  • College Dreams Inc — 23% of income from government
  • Ophelia's Place — 22% of income from government
  • Cascades Carnivore Project — 16% of income from government
  • Affiliated Tribes of Northwest Indians — 10% of income from government
  • Elakha Alliance — 10% of income from government
  • Oregon Natural Desert Association — 9% of income from government
  • Write Around Portland — 6% of income from government
  • Miracle Theatre Group — 6% of income from government
  • Hunters of Color — 4% of income from government
  • Bark — 2% of income from government
  • Oregon Natural Resources Council Fund Oregon Wild — 2% of income from government
  • Caldera — 1% of income from government
  • Western Rivers Conservancy — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
9get no government money at all
53report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
5rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Charlotte y Martin Foundation-Ima?

Find your warmest path to Charlotte y Martin Foundation-Ima through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 253 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home