Skip to content

Washington · Nonprofit

Home Range Wildlife Research

Home Range Wildlife Research (Washington) receives grants from 9 organizations whose IRS filings report $548,930 to it, the largest being ALLEN FAMILY PHILANTHROPIES ($297,877). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$290k
Funders on record
9
Grants received
$549k
Net assets
$113k
4/9 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 44%
01What it does

What Home Range Wildlife Research does

Mission

MISSION: To advance wildlife conservation by conducting high-quality research, educating aspiring biologists, and engaging local communities. In the face of vast environmental and social changes, we are committed to wildlife conservation in rigorous field-based science and long-term connection to our landscape. We aim to build a diverse and inclusive community of people that are equipped to tackle our most pressing wildlife conservation challenges.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Lynx-Wildlife Project: We completed our 3rd year of the Lynx Wildlife Research, answering critical questions about how lynx navigate landscape transformed by climate-driven mega-wildfires. In 2024-2025, we collared and tracked 10 Lynx in Okanogan County, and collected important vegetation plots to better understand lynx habitat and movements in burned and unburned environments within the study area. We partnered with several Universities while supporting 2 graduate students, 2 university fellows, and 7 undergraduate interns, whose efforts are advancing our understanding of wildlife and burned landscapes.

    $208,787 spent
    73% of program spending
  2. Field Training Courses: In 2024-2025 we trained 62 aspiring biologists from across North America. Thanks to partnerships and grant funds, we provided subsidies and scholarships to 10 participants from LGBTQ+ and Indigenous communities.

    $45,253 spent$6,481 earned by the program
    16% of program spending
  3. Human-Bear Co-Existance Project: We collected data long walking transections on critical bear food resources and set remote wildlife cameras to document occupancy of black bears for the 3rd field season. We worked with 40 community scientist volunteers to help us collect field data and analyze over 10,000 photos of wildlife occupancy along these transects. Initial analyses show that presence of wildfire and serviceberry abundance are critical indicators for black bears habitat and use in the study area.

    $33,228 spent
    12% of program spending

The 3 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $287,268.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2023, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2023, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20232023 Revenue 100 ($330k) Expenses 100 ($286k) Net assets 100 ($45k)2024 Revenue 167 ($551k) Expenses 123 ($353k) Net assets 541 ($241k)2025 Revenue 88 ($290k) Expenses 146 ($417k) Net assets 255 ($113k)
202320242025
Revenue (88)Expenses (146)Net assets (255)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2023 to 2024, from $45k to $261k (+486%).

$45k
$261k
$122k
202320242025
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2023 0% · 2024 24%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

98% of Home Range Wildlife Research’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (86% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 7,042 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 3 reported years ran a deficit.

$43k
’23
$198k
’24
−$127k
’25
2.5
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

202320242025
Listed489
Joined·+7+3
No longer listed·32
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2022 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 4 funders, grant income rose $108k → $146k.

3 of 9 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 27% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of Home Range Wildlife Research’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

Home Range Wildlife Research leans on a few funders — its largest provides 54% of grant income and the top three 80%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

39% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund Home Range Wildlife Research.

54%
largest funder
80%
top three
~3
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2022 100% · 2023 65% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

91% of Home Range Wildlife Research's grant income comes from Washington funders.

WA
NY
TX

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’22
’23
Washington out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $145k arriving through sponsors registered in 3 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

Home Range Wildlife Research's funding base is broadening — from 1 funders to 4 as grant income climbed.

Operating margin−44% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve2.5mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)−6% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 3,693 animals nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Government funding Home Range Wildlife Research receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $14k on record.

Federal$14k
grants $14kcontracts $0
Top agencies
  • Department of the Interior$14k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like Home Range Wildlife Research

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Washington

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

69% of spending goes to programs.

Program 69%Management 24%Fundraising 7%

Governance

5
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy–Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Home Range Wildlife Research: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds Home Range Wildlife Research?
Home Range Wildlife Research (Washington) receives grants from 9 organizations whose IRS filings report $548,930 to it, the largest being ALLEN FAMILY PHILANTHROPIES ($297,877). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does Home Range Wildlife Research have?
IRS filings report 9 organizations giving $548,930 in grants to Home Range Wildlife Research, 4 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of Home Range Wildlife Research?
ALLEN FAMILY PHILANTHROPIES is the largest funder on record, with $297,877 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like Home Range Wildlife Research find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2023–2025), and the filings of 9 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing