Skip to content

Washington · Nonprofit

OLYMPIA ECOSYSTEMS

OLYMPIA ECOSYSTEMS (Washington) receives grants from 12 organizations whose IRS filings report $4,941,131 to it, the largest being ANGELA J BOWEN CONSERVANCY FOUNDATION ($4,344,161). 7 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$1.3M
Funders on record
12
Grants received
$4.9M
Net assets
$6.1M
7/12 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 98%
01What it does

What Olympia Ecosystems does

Mission

Olympia Ecosystems is established to protect, preserve and restore the diverse ecosystems in and around olympia, washington that include the freshwater, shoreline, tidal waters, grasslands and upland forests. In coordination with community members, local agencies, and other non- profit groups, we will work to ensure that these ecosystems remain vital in perpetuity.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Conservation: Olympia Ecosystems (oe) acquired two land properties in 2025. The total acquisition cost is $405,770, which is included in fixed assets on the balance sheet.

  2. Restoration: Olympia Ecosystems (oe) continued restoration at its largest preserve,the 428-acre deschutes river preserve. Oe smoothed a previously disturbed hillside and planted with native oaks and shrubs. Oe also continued treatment of over 80 acres of invasive thistle and blackberry and maintained over 10,000 native willow stakes and riparian trees to support wetland and salmon habitat. Finally, oe worked collaboratively with partners to plan additional riparian restoration actions and secure funding for future restoration of the area.

    $369,511 spent
    50% of program spending
  3. Restoration: simultaneous to the deschutes river preserve restoration, oe continued restoration at its other preserves: cooper crest, west bay woods, and green cove creek. In partnership with community members, volunteers and the washington conservation corps, oe removed hundreds of thousands of invasive plants across all three preserves. At west bay woods, oe improved nearly a mile of trail and converted an old parking lot into a stormwater pond surrounded by hundreds of native plants to slow down and filter water on its way to the puget sound. At cooper crest, oe designed ans installed an interpretive kiosk in partnership with a local artist and eagle scouts to educate the community on the history and ecology of the site.

    $369,510 spent
    50% of program spending

The 3 programs described on its FY2025 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $739,021.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2019, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2019, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20192019 Revenue 100 ($1.4M) Expenses 100 ($74k) Net assets 100 ($1.9M)2020 Revenue 23 ($311k) Expenses 258 ($190k) Net assets 106 ($2.0M)2021 Revenue 51 ($698k) Expenses 220 ($162k) Net assets 135 ($2.6M)2022 Revenue 200 ($2.8M) Expenses 475 ($350k) Net assets 262 ($5.0M)2023 Revenue 40 ($559k) Expenses 503 ($370k) Net assets 272 ($5.2M)2024 Revenue 56 ($780k) Expenses 545 ($401k) Net assets 292 ($5.5M)2025 Revenue 97 ($1.3M) Expenses 1048 ($771k) Net assets 322 ($6.1M)
2019202020212022202320242025
Revenue (97)Expenses (1048)Net assets (322)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2021 to 2022, from $2.6M to $5.0M (+95%).

$1.9M
$2.0M
$2.6M
$5.0M
$5.2M
$5.5M
$6.1M
2019202020212022202320242025
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2022 8% · 2024 14% · 2025 15%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

98% of OLYMPIA ECOSYSTEMS’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (88% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 2,293 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 0 of the last 7 reported years ran a deficit.

$1.3M
’19
$121k
’20
$537k
’21
$2.4M
’22
$188k
’23
$379k
’24
$567k
’25
11
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

2019202020212022202320242025
Listed7788889
Joined·+3+1+2+1+1+2
No longer listed·302111
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 3 funders to 5 funders, grant income rose $68k → $170k.

5 of 12 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 8% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of OLYMPIA ECOSYSTEMS’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

OLYMPIA ECOSYSTEMS leans on a few funders — its largest provides 88% of grant income and the top three 95%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

88%
largest funder
95%
top three
~1
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 74% · 2019 96% · 2020 83% · 2021 92% · 2022 99% · 2023 62% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

63% of OLYMPIA ECOSYSTEMS's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 58% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

99% of OLYMPIA ECOSYSTEMS's grant income comes from Washington funders.

WA
CT
CA
NC

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Washington out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $406k arriving through sponsors registered in 4 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

OLYMPIA ECOSYSTEMS runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 1,074 environment nonprofits its size.

Operating margin42% · top quartile
Months of reserve10.5mo · top quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)−1% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,074 environment nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025

Organizations like OLYMPIA ECOSYSTEMS

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Washington

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

96% of spending goes to programs.

Program 96%Management 4%Fundraising 0%

Governance

8
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy–Whistleblower policy–Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

62%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for OLYMPIA ECOSYSTEMS: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds OLYMPIA ECOSYSTEMS?
OLYMPIA ECOSYSTEMS (Washington) receives grants from 12 organizations whose IRS filings report $4,941,131 to it, the largest being ANGELA J BOWEN CONSERVANCY FOUNDATION ($4,344,161). 7 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does OLYMPIA ECOSYSTEMS have?
IRS filings report 12 organizations giving $4,941,131 in grants to OLYMPIA ECOSYSTEMS, 7 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of OLYMPIA ECOSYSTEMS?
ANGELA J BOWEN CONSERVANCY FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $4,344,161 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like OLYMPIA ECOSYSTEMS find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Olympia Ecosystems →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2019–2025), and the filings of 12 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing