Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Potlatch Fund

Potlach fund's mission is to inspire and build upon the native tradition of giving and to expand philanthropy with tribal nations and native communities in the pacific northwest.

$1.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
70
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Arts & Culture$1.0MCommunity Improvement$535kEducation$500kCivil Rights$485kYouth Development$484kHuman Services$359kInternational$303kEnvironment$171kOther$0
02FY2024 · 70 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 70 grants below total $696,425 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,219,723 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $523,298 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k45 grants · $351k
  • $10k–50k24 grants · $246k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$8,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$5.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NA'AH ILLAHEE FUND$100,000
HUMMINGBIRD INDIGENOUS FAMILY SERVICES$15,625
INDIGENOUS PERFORMANCE PRODUCTIONS$10,000
SAUK-SUIATTLE INDIAN TRIBE$10,000
E-PEH-TES$10,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NORTH CHEYENNE NATI$10,000
MAKAH CULTURAL RESEARCH CENTER$10,000
INDIGENOUS IDAHO ALLIANCE$10,000
SILETZ REGALIA SHARING CLOSET$10,000
NORTHERN CHEYENNE LANGUAGE CONSORTIUM$10,000
CHIEF JOSEPH FOUNDATION$10,000
AANIIH AND NAKODA MONTESSORI$10,000
INDIGENOUS LEADERSHIP ACADEMY$10,000
CHICKADEE COMMUNITY SERVICES$10,000
SAGE INDIGENOUS LAW CENTER$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $348k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 24% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SALISH INSTITUTE: $10k → 18%CENTER POLE: $11k → 23%NORTHWEST AMERICAN INDIAN COALITION INC: $5k → 14%CENTER POLE: $10k → 13%SNQWEYLMISTN: $8k → 18%CENTER POLE: $10k → 23%CENTER POLE: $10k → 23%Center Pole: $5k → 23%Northwest Native Development Fund: $5k → 17%MOUNTAIN SHADOW ASSOCIATION: $8k → 23%TACOMA SEED: $8k → 9%Canoe Journey Herbalists: $8k → 9%NAWDIM: $63k → 9%Open Arms Perinatal Services: $19k → 9%MOTHER NATION: $10k → 9%OPEN ARMS PERINATAL SERVICES: $10k → 9%OPEN ARMS PERINATAL SERVICES: $8k → 9%OPEN ARMS PERINATAL SERVICES: $5k → 9%NATIVE FAMILY LEARNING LODGE: $16k → 9%OCEANIA NORTHWEST: $8k → 9%Chief Seattle Club: $19k → 9%CHIEF SEATTLE CLUB: $14k → 9%CHIEF SEATTLE CLUB: $10k → 9%CHIEF SEATTLE CLUB: $10k → 9%CHIEF SEATTLE CLUB: $8k → 9%MOTHER NATION: $20k → 9%CHIEF SEATTLE CLUB: $8k → 9%CHIEF SEATTLE CLUB: $8k → 9%Mother Nation: $11k → 9%MOTHER NATION: $5k → 9%CHIEF SEATTLE CLUB: $5k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 6% of Potlatch Fund’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 80% of the giving stays in WA; read by stated purpose it is 75% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Potlatch Fundlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.4M · 72 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +127% since the first grant, against +47% for the ones you funded once.

72 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2024, 52 since wound down; 40 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

72
63

Total granted

$3.4M
$815k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+127%
+47%

Still filing today

65%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 40% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $414k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementEnvironmentHealthEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NI
    Na'ah Illahee Fund
    7× · 2018–2024 · $346k · revenue +496%
  • NA
    NATIVE ACTION NETWORK
    6× · 2018–2023 · $247k · revenue ×31 · 29% of their budget
  • UI
    UNITED INDIANS OF ALL TRIBES FOUNDATION
    6× · 2017–2022 · $144k · revenue +176%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $40k
  • ST
    Steilacoom Tribal Museum Association
    one grant, 2021 · $40k
  • KI
    KIKIALLUS INDIAN NATION
    one grant, 2021 · $40k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Indigenous Women Rising Indigeous Women Rising
—
2
Native Healing Llc
Animals
3
Ratiwennahawi Inc

Fund Indigenous Nations Languate, Culture and Restoration Plans

Education
4
Seattle Indian Center
Human Services
5
American Indian Institute

The american indian institute's mission is to perpetuate the ancient wisdom and cultural heritage of north america's native people and to promote a greater understanding of that wisdom amoung all people.

Human Services
6
International Indigenous Fund for Development and Solidarity Batani
International
7
The Foundation for Indigenous Education Leadership Development
Education
8
Northwest Washington Indian Health Board

Federal grants and contracts were used to provide direct community and public health services within Native American communities in Northwest Washington

—
9
Lushootseed Research

Preservation of Lushootseed language and culture through research, publishing and presentation of oral history and traditions.

—
10
Womanshare Legacy

Womanshare Legacy is an educational, financial and cultural resource for women who may be facing challenges because of discrimination, lack of opportunities or scarcity of personal support. Womanshare Legacy works locally with women,…

Human Services
11
Blue Bird LifeWays

Blue Bird Lifeways nurtures the breath of life by fostering remembrance, reconnection, and reclamation of land, language, culture, and identity. Through this work, we address the intergenerational impacts of trauma while strengthening…

Arts & Culture
12
Painted Sky Inc
Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Native American Youth and Family Center and the most unlike its peers is Research and Development Services of America. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyPolicy Research and AdvocacyCommunity FoundationsAffordable Housing Developm…Pregnancy Support ServicesMilitary Veterans SupportLocal Food System Organizat…Youth Development CentersCommunity College Foundatio…Environmental Conservation …Youth Mentoring ProgramsEquine Therapy Programs
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 10 years old; the field is 16. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number21%19%<5yr14%30%5–10yr20%29%10–20yr18%15%20–35yr13%5%35–55yr15%3%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value21%10%<5yr14%18%5–10yr20%42%10–20yr18%20%20–35yr13%6%35–55yr15%4%55yr+

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 19% of your grantees by number, and just 10% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 7% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
7%
12/170
the rest of the field
12%
4,737/38,798

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

103 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 103 of the 175 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
48
Early backer (in before they grew)
94/103
Grantees still filing
63/103
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNITED INDIANS OF ALL TRIBES FOUNDATION — $144,230 · OtherUNITED INDIANS OF ALL TRIBES FOUNDATIONDUWAMISH TRIBAL SERVICES DBA DUWAMISH TRIBAL SERVICES INC — $140,730 · OtherDUWAMISH TRIBAL SERVICES DBA DUWAMISH TRIBAL SERVICES INCPORT GAMBLE S'KLALLAM TRIBE — $89,821 · Other+110 more — $2,176,570 · Other+110 moreNATIVE ACTION NETWORK — $246,730 · Arts & CultureNATIVE ACTION NETW…Red Eagle Soaring — $136,730 · Arts & CultureRed Eagle SoaringINCHELIUM LANGUAGE AND CULTURE ASSOCIATION — $45,500 · Arts & CultureINCHELIUM LANGUAGE…SPOKANE LANGUAGE HOUSE — $33,360 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM AT WARM SPRINGS — $32,500 · Arts & CultureCROW LANGUAGE CONSORTIUM INC — $31,179 · Arts & CultureTHE LANGUAGE CONSERVANCY INC — $27,133 · Arts & Culture+16 more — $204,520 · Arts & Culture+16 moreOPEN ARMS PERINATAL SERVICES — $103,230 · Human ServicesOPEN ARMS…CHIEF SEATTLE CLUB — $79,230 · Human ServicesCHIEF SEA…Center Pole — $46,250 · Human ServicesCenter Po…Mother Nation — $45,000 · Human ServicesMother Na…NATIVE FAMILY LEARNING LODGE — $15,625 · Human ServicesHilltop Urban Gardens — $15,000 · Human Services+8 more — $63,800 · Human Services+8 moreNa'ah Illahee Fund — $346,356 · InternationalUrban American Indian Alaska Native Education Alli — $107,230 · EducationSalish School of Spokane — $50,633 · EducationSteilacoom Tribal Museum Association — $40,000 · EducationINTERCULTURE FOUNDATION INC — $32,513 · EducationCHICKADEE COMMUNITY SERVICES — $18,000 · Education+1 more — $7,500 · EducationUNKITAWA — $60,758 · EnvironmentNimiipuu Ecosystems Restoration Inc — $23,625 · EnvironmentSALMON DEFENSE — $20,000 · EnvironmentKhimstonik — $18,000 · EnvironmentNIMIIPUU PROTECTING THE ENVIRONMENT — $15,000 · EnvironmentWHITESWAN ENVIRONMENTAL WE — $10,000 · EnvironmentRios to Rivers — $10,000 · EnvironmentTINY SEED PROJECT INC — $8,000 · EnvironmentCoast Salish Youth Coalition — $8,000 · EnvironmentNORTHWEST NATIVE CHAMBER — $25,000 · Community ImprovementCONFEDERATED LOWER CHINOOK TRIBES & BANDS — $20,000 · Community ImprovementPLENTY DOORS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $18,000 · Community ImprovementNimiipuu Community Development Fund — $15,633 · Community ImprovementUPPER SNAKE RIVER TRIBES FOUNDATION — $15,000 · Community ImprovementNACDC Financial Services Inc — $13,482 · Community ImprovementPACIFIC NORTHWEST TRIBAL LENDING FINANCIAL INSTITUTION — $10,000 · Community ImprovementWIS TEQ NEEMIT — $8,250 · Community ImprovementNAA KAANI NATIVE PROGRAM — $7,500 · Community Improvement
Other$2,551,351Arts & Culture$757,652Human Services$368,135International$346,356Education$255,876Environment$173,383Community Improvement$132,865

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNa'ah Illahee Fund — $346,356 over 7y, 4.3% of budgetNATIVE ACTION NETWORK — $246,730 over 6y, 29% of budgetUNITED INDIANS OF ALL TRIBES FOUNDATION — $144,230 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetDUWAMISH TRIBAL SERVICES DBA DUWAMISH TRIBAL SERVICES INC — $140,730 over 6y, 4.5% of budgetRed Eagle Soaring — $136,730 over 5y, 11% of budgetUrban American Indian Alaska Native Education Alli — $107,230 over 5y, 11% of budgetOPEN ARMS PERINATAL SERVICES — $103,230 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetNorthwest Justice Project — $81,230 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHIEF SEATTLE CLUB — $79,230 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetLHAQ'TEMISH FOUNDATION — $63,125 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetUNKITAWA — $60,758 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetPEACEKEEPER SOCIETY — $54,938 over 5y, 14% of budgetSalish School of Spokane — $50,633 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetCenter Pole — $46,250 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetINCHELIUM LANGUAGE AND CULTURE ASSOCIATION — $45,500 over 4y, 4.8% of budgetMother Nation — $45,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetLITTLE SHELL TRIBE OF CHIPPEWA INDI — $35,500 over 4y, 3.8% of budgetHearts Gathered — $35,000 over 3y, 5.0% of budgetInternational Traditional Games Soc — $34,682 over 4y, 14% of budgetChief Joseph Foundation — $34,475 over 4y, 19% of budgetNATIVE AMERICAN YOUTH AND FAMILY CENTER — $33,732 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSPOKANE LANGUAGE HOUSE — $33,360 over 4y, 15% of budgetINTERCULTURE FOUNDATION INC — $32,513 over 4y, 4.3% of budgetMUSEUM AT WARM SPRINGS — $32,500 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetCHILDREN OF THE SETTING SUN PRODUCT — $32,500 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetCROW LANGUAGE CONSORTIUM INC — $31,179 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetNATIVE YOUTH LEADERSHIP ALLIANCE — $30,000 over 2y, 21% of budgetSALTFIRE — $28,625 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetTHE LANGUAGE CONSERVANCY INC — $27,133 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetFAST BLACKFEET — $25,625 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetNORTHWEST NATIVE CHAMBER — $25,000 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE NORTHERN CHEYENNE NATION — $25,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetSQUAXIN ISLAND MUSEUM LIBRARY AND RESEARCH CENTER — $23,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetAmerican Legion Rocky Boy Veterans Post — $22,138 over 3y, 3.8% of budgetSALMON DEFENSE — $20,000 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetINDIGENOUS CREATIVES COLLECTIVE — $20,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetCONFEDERATED LOWER CHINOOK TRIBES & BANDS — $20,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetNATIONAL URBAN INDIAN FAMILY COALITION — $19,700 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetKhimstonik — $18,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetPLENTY DOORS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $18,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetSILETZ TRIBAL ARTS AND HERITAGE SOCIETY — $18,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetRESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES OF AMERICA — $17,500 over 2y, 27% of budgetMONTANA TWO SPIRIT SOCIETY — $17,133 over 2y, 10% of budgetMAKAH CULTURAL AND RESEARCH CENTER — $17,132 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetNimiipuu Community Development Fund — $15,633 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetHUMMINGBIRD INDIGENOUS FAMILY SERVICES — $15,625 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNATIVE FAMILY LEARNING LODGE — $15,625 over 1y, 8.3% of budgetOREGON COMMUNITY HEALTH WORKERS ASSOC — $15,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Na'ah Illahee Fund ↗
  • Who funds NATIVE ACTION NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds UNITED INDIANS OF ALL TRIBES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DUWAMISH TRIBAL SERVICES DBA DUWAMISH TRIBAL SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds Red Eagle Soaring ↗
  • Who funds Urban American Indian Alaska Native Education Alli ↗
  • Who funds OPEN ARMS PERINATAL SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds Northwest Justice Project ↗
  • Who funds CHIEF SEATTLE CLUB ↗
  • Who funds LHAQ'TEMISH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNKITAWA ↗
  • Who funds PEACEKEEPER SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Salish School of Spokane ↗
  • Who funds Center Pole ↗
  • Who funds INCHELIUM LANGUAGE AND CULTURE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Mother Nation ↗
  • Who funds Steilacoom Tribal Museum Association ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE SHELL TRIBE OF CHIPPEWA INDI ↗
  • Who funds Hearts Gathered ↗
  • Who funds International Traditional Games Soc ↗
  • Who funds Chief Joseph Foundation ↗
  • Who funds NATIVE AMERICAN YOUTH AND FAMILY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds INDIGENOUS IDAHO ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds SPOKANE LANGUAGE HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds INTERCULTURE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM AT WARM SPRINGS ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

First Nations Develop…Na'ah Illahee FundInatai FoundationCharlotte y Martin Fo…Philanthropy NorthwestSeeding JusticeSocial Justice Fund N…Seventh Generation Fu…Common Counsel Founda…Ndn Collective IncNorthwest Area Founda…Seattle Foundation
First Nations Development InstituteCO83× affinity48 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: First Nations Development Institute · Na'ah Illahee Fund · Inatai Foundation · Charlotte y Martin Foundation-Ima · Philanthropy Northwest · Seeding Justice · Social Justice Fund Northwest · Seventh Generation Fund for Indigenous Peoples Inc · Common Counsel Foundation · Ndn Collective Inc · Northwest Area Foundation · Seattle Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Potlatch Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 23%
  • Opera Theater Oregon — 100% of income from government
  • Oregon Community Health Workers Assoc — 45% of income from government
  • Native American Youth and Family Center — 23% of income from government
  • Red Lodge Transition Services — 12% of income from government
  • Affiliated Tribes of Northwest Indians — 10% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
28report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 175 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines